
Peace activists gathered outside the Internal Revenue Service offices in Manhattan on April 15, 2021 to protest against spending federal tax dollars on the Pentagon and U.S. wars. (Photo: Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Pentagon Projected to Hand $407 Billion to Private Military Contractors This Fiscal Year
"There are over 700 lobbyists representing for-profit military contractors in D.C., and this redistribution of wealth is why they're there."
President Joe Biden signed a record-shattering military budget earlier this week, and a new analysis published Thursday predicted that if recent contracting trends continue, the Pentagon will funnel $407 billion worth of public funds to private weapons makers this fiscal year--more than the federal government spent when sending $1,400 relief checks to most Americans in 2021.
Stephen Semler, co-founder of the Security Policy Reform Institute, found that "from fiscal year (FY) 2002 to FY2021, 55% of all Pentagon spending went to private sector military contractors."
"If the privatization of funds rate over the last 20 years holds," Semler noted, "it means [the] military industry will get about $407 billion from Biden's first military budget--$16 billion more than the $391 billion those $1,400 stimulus checks cost the government earlier this year."
The National Defense Authorization Act for FY2022 was passed with broad bipartisan support earlier this month in the House, where the margin was 363-70, and in the Senate, where the vote was 88-11. By signing the bill into law on Monday, Biden approved a record-high $778 billion military budget.
" Military spending involves a massive redistribution of wealth from the public to private sector."
Even though U.S. troops withdrew from Afghanistan in August, Republicans and Democrats awash in weapons industry cash refused to support popular amendments to reduce Pentagon spending.
In fact, lawmakers in the House and the Senate added $25 billion--which happens to be the amount of funding that progressive advocacy group Public Citizen says is necessary to ramp up vaccine manufacturing to inoculate the world against Covid-19--on top of the already gargantuan $753 billion military budget requested by Biden back in May.
Semler's calculations are based on the Pentagon's $740 billion "base" budget--that is, the money allocated strictly to the Defense Department and not the additional $38 billion worth of "nuclear funding from the Energy Department or funding from elsewhere, even though that stuff is rightly considered military spending, too," he pointed out.
Related Content

Since 9/11, US Has Spent $21 Trillion on Militarism at Home and Abroad
"Military spending involves a massive redistribution of wealth from the public to private sector," wrote Semler. "There are over 700 lobbyists representing for-profit military contractors in D.C., and this redistribution of wealth is why they're there."
In a Jacobin essay published Thursday, Semler argued that Biden is doubling down on the "New Cold War" framework embraced by former President Donald Trump, whose administration claimed that the best way for the U.S. to prevent an armed confrontation with China and Russia "is to be prepared to win one."
According to Semler:
The difference between Trump's arms race and Biden's was supposed to be that the latter would bring a commensurate rise in social outlays. Biden campaigned on spending $7 trillion over a decade--or $700 billion per year, on average--for civil infrastructure, transportation, climate, healthcare, education, and other social programs.
Once in office, Biden's plan was to beat the drum on China, triggering a rally 'round the flag effect that would convince Congress--conservatives included--to budget for both military and economic competition. As a Democratic congressional aide told Vox in the first months of the Biden presidency, "[t]he best way to enact a progressive agenda is to use China [as a] threat."
"The Biden administration has done its best to put that theory into action," Semler argued. "But Biden's Cold Warrior experiment has failed."
"While military spending is shooting up as expected--Biden's budget allocates nearly $40 billion more than the Trump administration, $170 billion more than Obama's last budget, and 5% more than he campaigned on--less than 8% of the funding Biden sought for his domestic agenda has come through," he continued.
"Adjusted on a per-year average," Semler added, "Biden has only delivered $55 billion of the $700 billion he promised for human and physical infrastructure for fiscal year 2022."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
President Joe Biden signed a record-shattering military budget earlier this week, and a new analysis published Thursday predicted that if recent contracting trends continue, the Pentagon will funnel $407 billion worth of public funds to private weapons makers this fiscal year--more than the federal government spent when sending $1,400 relief checks to most Americans in 2021.
Stephen Semler, co-founder of the Security Policy Reform Institute, found that "from fiscal year (FY) 2002 to FY2021, 55% of all Pentagon spending went to private sector military contractors."
"If the privatization of funds rate over the last 20 years holds," Semler noted, "it means [the] military industry will get about $407 billion from Biden's first military budget--$16 billion more than the $391 billion those $1,400 stimulus checks cost the government earlier this year."
The National Defense Authorization Act for FY2022 was passed with broad bipartisan support earlier this month in the House, where the margin was 363-70, and in the Senate, where the vote was 88-11. By signing the bill into law on Monday, Biden approved a record-high $778 billion military budget.
" Military spending involves a massive redistribution of wealth from the public to private sector."
Even though U.S. troops withdrew from Afghanistan in August, Republicans and Democrats awash in weapons industry cash refused to support popular amendments to reduce Pentagon spending.
In fact, lawmakers in the House and the Senate added $25 billion--which happens to be the amount of funding that progressive advocacy group Public Citizen says is necessary to ramp up vaccine manufacturing to inoculate the world against Covid-19--on top of the already gargantuan $753 billion military budget requested by Biden back in May.
Semler's calculations are based on the Pentagon's $740 billion "base" budget--that is, the money allocated strictly to the Defense Department and not the additional $38 billion worth of "nuclear funding from the Energy Department or funding from elsewhere, even though that stuff is rightly considered military spending, too," he pointed out.
Related Content

Since 9/11, US Has Spent $21 Trillion on Militarism at Home and Abroad
"Military spending involves a massive redistribution of wealth from the public to private sector," wrote Semler. "There are over 700 lobbyists representing for-profit military contractors in D.C., and this redistribution of wealth is why they're there."
In a Jacobin essay published Thursday, Semler argued that Biden is doubling down on the "New Cold War" framework embraced by former President Donald Trump, whose administration claimed that the best way for the U.S. to prevent an armed confrontation with China and Russia "is to be prepared to win one."
According to Semler:
The difference between Trump's arms race and Biden's was supposed to be that the latter would bring a commensurate rise in social outlays. Biden campaigned on spending $7 trillion over a decade--or $700 billion per year, on average--for civil infrastructure, transportation, climate, healthcare, education, and other social programs.
Once in office, Biden's plan was to beat the drum on China, triggering a rally 'round the flag effect that would convince Congress--conservatives included--to budget for both military and economic competition. As a Democratic congressional aide told Vox in the first months of the Biden presidency, "[t]he best way to enact a progressive agenda is to use China [as a] threat."
"The Biden administration has done its best to put that theory into action," Semler argued. "But Biden's Cold Warrior experiment has failed."
"While military spending is shooting up as expected--Biden's budget allocates nearly $40 billion more than the Trump administration, $170 billion more than Obama's last budget, and 5% more than he campaigned on--less than 8% of the funding Biden sought for his domestic agenda has come through," he continued.
"Adjusted on a per-year average," Semler added, "Biden has only delivered $55 billion of the $700 billion he promised for human and physical infrastructure for fiscal year 2022."
- Since 9/11, US Has Spent $21 Trillion on Militarism at Home and Abroad ›
- Opinion | US Military's 2023 Budget Boost Is 3,200 Times Larger Than NLRB's Increase | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Ludicrous Levels of Pentagon Spending Make Us Less Safe—Not More | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Insanity Continues as Pentagon Spending Moves Ever Closer to $1 Trillion | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Girding for Wars of The With an Endless Arms Race | Common Dreams ›
- Average US Taxpayer Spent $1,087 on Pentagon Contractors in 2022 ›
- Opinion | 2023 Military Budget Far Exceeds NLRB Funding for Workers | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | US Spending on Weapons and War Remains Higher Than 144 Other Nations Combined | Common Dreams ›
- 'An Arsenal of Profiteering': Military Contractors Have Gotten Over Half of Pentagon Spending Since 2020 | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Is the Pentagon Spending Taxpayer Money on Alien Tech? | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Why Does the Pentagon Seem to Be Spending More for Less? | Common Dreams ›
President Joe Biden signed a record-shattering military budget earlier this week, and a new analysis published Thursday predicted that if recent contracting trends continue, the Pentagon will funnel $407 billion worth of public funds to private weapons makers this fiscal year--more than the federal government spent when sending $1,400 relief checks to most Americans in 2021.
Stephen Semler, co-founder of the Security Policy Reform Institute, found that "from fiscal year (FY) 2002 to FY2021, 55% of all Pentagon spending went to private sector military contractors."
"If the privatization of funds rate over the last 20 years holds," Semler noted, "it means [the] military industry will get about $407 billion from Biden's first military budget--$16 billion more than the $391 billion those $1,400 stimulus checks cost the government earlier this year."
The National Defense Authorization Act for FY2022 was passed with broad bipartisan support earlier this month in the House, where the margin was 363-70, and in the Senate, where the vote was 88-11. By signing the bill into law on Monday, Biden approved a record-high $778 billion military budget.
" Military spending involves a massive redistribution of wealth from the public to private sector."
Even though U.S. troops withdrew from Afghanistan in August, Republicans and Democrats awash in weapons industry cash refused to support popular amendments to reduce Pentagon spending.
In fact, lawmakers in the House and the Senate added $25 billion--which happens to be the amount of funding that progressive advocacy group Public Citizen says is necessary to ramp up vaccine manufacturing to inoculate the world against Covid-19--on top of the already gargantuan $753 billion military budget requested by Biden back in May.
Semler's calculations are based on the Pentagon's $740 billion "base" budget--that is, the money allocated strictly to the Defense Department and not the additional $38 billion worth of "nuclear funding from the Energy Department or funding from elsewhere, even though that stuff is rightly considered military spending, too," he pointed out.
Related Content

Since 9/11, US Has Spent $21 Trillion on Militarism at Home and Abroad
"Military spending involves a massive redistribution of wealth from the public to private sector," wrote Semler. "There are over 700 lobbyists representing for-profit military contractors in D.C., and this redistribution of wealth is why they're there."
In a Jacobin essay published Thursday, Semler argued that Biden is doubling down on the "New Cold War" framework embraced by former President Donald Trump, whose administration claimed that the best way for the U.S. to prevent an armed confrontation with China and Russia "is to be prepared to win one."
According to Semler:
The difference between Trump's arms race and Biden's was supposed to be that the latter would bring a commensurate rise in social outlays. Biden campaigned on spending $7 trillion over a decade--or $700 billion per year, on average--for civil infrastructure, transportation, climate, healthcare, education, and other social programs.
Once in office, Biden's plan was to beat the drum on China, triggering a rally 'round the flag effect that would convince Congress--conservatives included--to budget for both military and economic competition. As a Democratic congressional aide told Vox in the first months of the Biden presidency, "[t]he best way to enact a progressive agenda is to use China [as a] threat."
"The Biden administration has done its best to put that theory into action," Semler argued. "But Biden's Cold Warrior experiment has failed."
"While military spending is shooting up as expected--Biden's budget allocates nearly $40 billion more than the Trump administration, $170 billion more than Obama's last budget, and 5% more than he campaigned on--less than 8% of the funding Biden sought for his domestic agenda has come through," he continued.
"Adjusted on a per-year average," Semler added, "Biden has only delivered $55 billion of the $700 billion he promised for human and physical infrastructure for fiscal year 2022."
- Since 9/11, US Has Spent $21 Trillion on Militarism at Home and Abroad ›
- Opinion | US Military's 2023 Budget Boost Is 3,200 Times Larger Than NLRB's Increase | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Ludicrous Levels of Pentagon Spending Make Us Less Safe—Not More | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Insanity Continues as Pentagon Spending Moves Ever Closer to $1 Trillion | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Girding for Wars of The With an Endless Arms Race | Common Dreams ›
- Average US Taxpayer Spent $1,087 on Pentagon Contractors in 2022 ›
- Opinion | 2023 Military Budget Far Exceeds NLRB Funding for Workers | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | US Spending on Weapons and War Remains Higher Than 144 Other Nations Combined | Common Dreams ›
- 'An Arsenal of Profiteering': Military Contractors Have Gotten Over Half of Pentagon Spending Since 2020 | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Is the Pentagon Spending Taxpayer Money on Alien Tech? | Common Dreams ›
- Opinion | Why Does the Pentagon Seem to Be Spending More for Less? | Common Dreams ›

