

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

A beekeeper shows dead bees at a protest against the manufacture of harmful chemicals by agrochemical companies on April 26, 2019 in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. (Photo: Oliver Berg/dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images)
After waiting nearly five years for the Environmental Protection Agency to respond to a petition calling for the closing of a regulatory loophole which has proven deadly for honey bee colonies--spelling disaster for farmers' crops, food security, and biodiversity--two advocacy groups are suing the agency and demanding officials take immediate action to end the use of harmful pesticides known as neonics.
Joined by Pesticide Action Network (PAN) North America, the Center for Food Safety (CFS) filed the lawsuit saying the petition it sent to the EPA in April 2017 regarding the continued use of neonics, or neonicotinoids, provided "the legal blueprint to solve this problem and the legal impetus to do it."
" Science has shown that coating seeds with pesticides is not only ineffective, but can cause real harm to pollinators, workers, and farmers."
"While EPA fiddles, grave harm to bees and other pollinators continues," George Kimbrell, CFS legal director and counsel in the case, said Tuesday. "That delay must end."
Neonicotinoids have been linked to "devastating environmental effects," the groups said, including mass die-offs of bees and harms to pollinators' health, but the EPA has allowed agricultural companies to coat seeds with the pesticides without requiring adherence to registration requirements under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
"To continue this unlawful exemption would be severely detrimental," wrote the CFS in its petition in 2017.
Studies have showed neonicotinoids are linked to paralysis and death in bees, as they affect the central nervous system of the insects. The pesticides can also impair navigation and cognitive ability, leading to injuries in bee colonies.
New research published last month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences showed that one-time exposure to one of the neonicotinoids targeted in the 2017 petition, imidacloprid, can take bees multiple generations to recover from--affecting reproductive ability and resulting in a decrease in bee populations.
Despite numerous studies showing the harm done by neonicotinoids, more than 150 million acres of U.S. farmland are covered each year with crops grown from corn, soybean, and sunflower seeds that are coated in the pesticides, which permeate tissues in leaves, pollen, nectar, and other parts of plants.
More than 80% of neonicotinoids that coat seeds can also contaminate the air, soil, and waterways surrounding crops, according to CFS and PAN North America.
"Science has shown that coating seeds with pesticides is not only ineffective, but can cause real harm to pollinators, workers, and farmers," said Margaret Reeves, a senior scientist at PAN North America. "The vast majority of acres planted in crops such as corn, soybean, and cotton are planted with pesticide-treated seeds, yet farmers know less about pesticides applied to their seeds than pesticides applied in other ways. EPA must regulate this use and mitigate this danger."
Related Content

In their new lawsuit, the groups charged that the EPA is violating the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to respond to the 2017 rulemaking petition.
"EPA cannot unlawfully withhold or unreasonably delay a petition response," said the groups. "Nearly five years after plaintiffs first lodged the 2017 petition, EPA has still failed to respond. Irreparable environmental harm has continued unanalyzed and unabated in the interim. Plaintiffs' interests are continuing to be harmed by EPA's inaction and lack of oversight regarding coated seeds."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
After waiting nearly five years for the Environmental Protection Agency to respond to a petition calling for the closing of a regulatory loophole which has proven deadly for honey bee colonies--spelling disaster for farmers' crops, food security, and biodiversity--two advocacy groups are suing the agency and demanding officials take immediate action to end the use of harmful pesticides known as neonics.
Joined by Pesticide Action Network (PAN) North America, the Center for Food Safety (CFS) filed the lawsuit saying the petition it sent to the EPA in April 2017 regarding the continued use of neonics, or neonicotinoids, provided "the legal blueprint to solve this problem and the legal impetus to do it."
" Science has shown that coating seeds with pesticides is not only ineffective, but can cause real harm to pollinators, workers, and farmers."
"While EPA fiddles, grave harm to bees and other pollinators continues," George Kimbrell, CFS legal director and counsel in the case, said Tuesday. "That delay must end."
Neonicotinoids have been linked to "devastating environmental effects," the groups said, including mass die-offs of bees and harms to pollinators' health, but the EPA has allowed agricultural companies to coat seeds with the pesticides without requiring adherence to registration requirements under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
"To continue this unlawful exemption would be severely detrimental," wrote the CFS in its petition in 2017.
Studies have showed neonicotinoids are linked to paralysis and death in bees, as they affect the central nervous system of the insects. The pesticides can also impair navigation and cognitive ability, leading to injuries in bee colonies.
New research published last month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences showed that one-time exposure to one of the neonicotinoids targeted in the 2017 petition, imidacloprid, can take bees multiple generations to recover from--affecting reproductive ability and resulting in a decrease in bee populations.
Despite numerous studies showing the harm done by neonicotinoids, more than 150 million acres of U.S. farmland are covered each year with crops grown from corn, soybean, and sunflower seeds that are coated in the pesticides, which permeate tissues in leaves, pollen, nectar, and other parts of plants.
More than 80% of neonicotinoids that coat seeds can also contaminate the air, soil, and waterways surrounding crops, according to CFS and PAN North America.
"Science has shown that coating seeds with pesticides is not only ineffective, but can cause real harm to pollinators, workers, and farmers," said Margaret Reeves, a senior scientist at PAN North America. "The vast majority of acres planted in crops such as corn, soybean, and cotton are planted with pesticide-treated seeds, yet farmers know less about pesticides applied to their seeds than pesticides applied in other ways. EPA must regulate this use and mitigate this danger."
Related Content

In their new lawsuit, the groups charged that the EPA is violating the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to respond to the 2017 rulemaking petition.
"EPA cannot unlawfully withhold or unreasonably delay a petition response," said the groups. "Nearly five years after plaintiffs first lodged the 2017 petition, EPA has still failed to respond. Irreparable environmental harm has continued unanalyzed and unabated in the interim. Plaintiffs' interests are continuing to be harmed by EPA's inaction and lack of oversight regarding coated seeds."
After waiting nearly five years for the Environmental Protection Agency to respond to a petition calling for the closing of a regulatory loophole which has proven deadly for honey bee colonies--spelling disaster for farmers' crops, food security, and biodiversity--two advocacy groups are suing the agency and demanding officials take immediate action to end the use of harmful pesticides known as neonics.
Joined by Pesticide Action Network (PAN) North America, the Center for Food Safety (CFS) filed the lawsuit saying the petition it sent to the EPA in April 2017 regarding the continued use of neonics, or neonicotinoids, provided "the legal blueprint to solve this problem and the legal impetus to do it."
" Science has shown that coating seeds with pesticides is not only ineffective, but can cause real harm to pollinators, workers, and farmers."
"While EPA fiddles, grave harm to bees and other pollinators continues," George Kimbrell, CFS legal director and counsel in the case, said Tuesday. "That delay must end."
Neonicotinoids have been linked to "devastating environmental effects," the groups said, including mass die-offs of bees and harms to pollinators' health, but the EPA has allowed agricultural companies to coat seeds with the pesticides without requiring adherence to registration requirements under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
"To continue this unlawful exemption would be severely detrimental," wrote the CFS in its petition in 2017.
Studies have showed neonicotinoids are linked to paralysis and death in bees, as they affect the central nervous system of the insects. The pesticides can also impair navigation and cognitive ability, leading to injuries in bee colonies.
New research published last month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences showed that one-time exposure to one of the neonicotinoids targeted in the 2017 petition, imidacloprid, can take bees multiple generations to recover from--affecting reproductive ability and resulting in a decrease in bee populations.
Despite numerous studies showing the harm done by neonicotinoids, more than 150 million acres of U.S. farmland are covered each year with crops grown from corn, soybean, and sunflower seeds that are coated in the pesticides, which permeate tissues in leaves, pollen, nectar, and other parts of plants.
More than 80% of neonicotinoids that coat seeds can also contaminate the air, soil, and waterways surrounding crops, according to CFS and PAN North America.
"Science has shown that coating seeds with pesticides is not only ineffective, but can cause real harm to pollinators, workers, and farmers," said Margaret Reeves, a senior scientist at PAN North America. "The vast majority of acres planted in crops such as corn, soybean, and cotton are planted with pesticide-treated seeds, yet farmers know less about pesticides applied to their seeds than pesticides applied in other ways. EPA must regulate this use and mitigate this danger."
Related Content

In their new lawsuit, the groups charged that the EPA is violating the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to respond to the 2017 rulemaking petition.
"EPA cannot unlawfully withhold or unreasonably delay a petition response," said the groups. "Nearly five years after plaintiffs first lodged the 2017 petition, EPA has still failed to respond. Irreparable environmental harm has continued unanalyzed and unabated in the interim. Plaintiffs' interests are continuing to be harmed by EPA's inaction and lack of oversight regarding coated seeds."