(Photo by Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)
Sep 03, 2021
Reproductive rights advocates this week have strived to spread information about self-managed medication abortions following the U.S. Supreme Court decision that allowed an extreme forced-birth law to go into effect in Texas--but Republicans in the state are now poised to ensure non-surgical abortions are harder for patients to obtain.
"I'm really tired of every single session, having to come here and debate one more obstacle to a woman having a right to choose what happens to her own body and her own destiny."
--Texas State Rep. Donna Howard
Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to sign Senate Bill 4, which would bar healthcare providers from administering the two pills needed for medication abortions after seven weeks of pregnancy. Currently, medication abortions are legal in the state until 10 weeks of pregnancy.
The bill also prohibits the two pills--misoprostol and mifepristone--from being sent via mail in Texas. According toThe 19th, those who are found to "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly" violate the law could face up to two years in jail and fines of up to $10,000. Medical providers who dispense the medication could also face disciplinary action.
Critics say the ban, like S.B. 8--which bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy--is meant to make it virtually impossible for most women in Texas to obtain care.
"Six weeks, seven weeks... both of them are set to stop access to abortion before most know that they're pregnant," Jennifer Driver, senior director of reproductive rights for the State Innovation Exchange (SiX), told The 19th.
The bill is currently on Abbott's desk after the state House of Representatives passed it in a vote of 82-41 on Tuesday. Earlier this week, the governor tweeted, "Texas will always defend the right to life," suggesting he is likely to sign S.B. 4.
The bill is awaiting Abbott's signature as rights advocates look to medication abortion as a last resort for many women in Texas--even if S.B. 4 goes into effect.
The Republicans who pushed the medication abortion ban through the legislature have claimed there are increased complications for patients who use the pills after seven weeks of pregnancy, but according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, fewer than 1% of patients experience adverse effects after having a medication abortion.
About 60% of people who have abortions by the tenth week of pregnancy choose medication abortions, the Guttmacher Institute reported in 2019.
"I'm really tired of every single session, having to come here and debate one more obstacle to a woman having a right to choose what happens to her own body and her own destiny," state Rep. Donna Howard, a Democrat who represents Austin, said Monday during the legislative debate over S.B. 4.
With Republican lawmakers across the country now eyeing legislation like Texas' six-week ban and medication abortion bans likely to follow, public health researcher Dr. Daniel Grossman said the medical community must "envision something better" for patients who are facing restrictions on care.
\u201cThis moment is pivotal for us. We can drastically shift the way people access abortion, on their own terms. The truth is, that's how it used to be. Indigenous people & other communities used to have herbs at the ready for abortions.\n\nWe can envision something better. Let's do it.\u201d— Dr. Daniel Grossman (@Dr. Daniel Grossman) 1630598235
"Advance provision of medication abortion pills empowers people with the capacity for pregnancy to determine on their own when they need the pills and how to use them using protocols clinics are already using," said Grossman, director of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health. "We can drastically shift the way people access abortion, on their own terms."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
healthcarereproductive rightsrepublican partyrights & justicetexasus supreme courtwomenabortion pillsabortion rightsgreg abbottmifepristone
Reproductive rights advocates this week have strived to spread information about self-managed medication abortions following the U.S. Supreme Court decision that allowed an extreme forced-birth law to go into effect in Texas--but Republicans in the state are now poised to ensure non-surgical abortions are harder for patients to obtain.
"I'm really tired of every single session, having to come here and debate one more obstacle to a woman having a right to choose what happens to her own body and her own destiny."
--Texas State Rep. Donna Howard
Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to sign Senate Bill 4, which would bar healthcare providers from administering the two pills needed for medication abortions after seven weeks of pregnancy. Currently, medication abortions are legal in the state until 10 weeks of pregnancy.
The bill also prohibits the two pills--misoprostol and mifepristone--from being sent via mail in Texas. According toThe 19th, those who are found to "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly" violate the law could face up to two years in jail and fines of up to $10,000. Medical providers who dispense the medication could also face disciplinary action.
Critics say the ban, like S.B. 8--which bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy--is meant to make it virtually impossible for most women in Texas to obtain care.
"Six weeks, seven weeks... both of them are set to stop access to abortion before most know that they're pregnant," Jennifer Driver, senior director of reproductive rights for the State Innovation Exchange (SiX), told The 19th.
The bill is currently on Abbott's desk after the state House of Representatives passed it in a vote of 82-41 on Tuesday. Earlier this week, the governor tweeted, "Texas will always defend the right to life," suggesting he is likely to sign S.B. 4.
The bill is awaiting Abbott's signature as rights advocates look to medication abortion as a last resort for many women in Texas--even if S.B. 4 goes into effect.
The Republicans who pushed the medication abortion ban through the legislature have claimed there are increased complications for patients who use the pills after seven weeks of pregnancy, but according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, fewer than 1% of patients experience adverse effects after having a medication abortion.
About 60% of people who have abortions by the tenth week of pregnancy choose medication abortions, the Guttmacher Institute reported in 2019.
"I'm really tired of every single session, having to come here and debate one more obstacle to a woman having a right to choose what happens to her own body and her own destiny," state Rep. Donna Howard, a Democrat who represents Austin, said Monday during the legislative debate over S.B. 4.
With Republican lawmakers across the country now eyeing legislation like Texas' six-week ban and medication abortion bans likely to follow, public health researcher Dr. Daniel Grossman said the medical community must "envision something better" for patients who are facing restrictions on care.
\u201cThis moment is pivotal for us. We can drastically shift the way people access abortion, on their own terms. The truth is, that's how it used to be. Indigenous people & other communities used to have herbs at the ready for abortions.\n\nWe can envision something better. Let's do it.\u201d— Dr. Daniel Grossman (@Dr. Daniel Grossman) 1630598235
"Advance provision of medication abortion pills empowers people with the capacity for pregnancy to determine on their own when they need the pills and how to use them using protocols clinics are already using," said Grossman, director of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health. "We can drastically shift the way people access abortion, on their own terms."
Reproductive rights advocates this week have strived to spread information about self-managed medication abortions following the U.S. Supreme Court decision that allowed an extreme forced-birth law to go into effect in Texas--but Republicans in the state are now poised to ensure non-surgical abortions are harder for patients to obtain.
"I'm really tired of every single session, having to come here and debate one more obstacle to a woman having a right to choose what happens to her own body and her own destiny."
--Texas State Rep. Donna Howard
Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to sign Senate Bill 4, which would bar healthcare providers from administering the two pills needed for medication abortions after seven weeks of pregnancy. Currently, medication abortions are legal in the state until 10 weeks of pregnancy.
The bill also prohibits the two pills--misoprostol and mifepristone--from being sent via mail in Texas. According toThe 19th, those who are found to "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly" violate the law could face up to two years in jail and fines of up to $10,000. Medical providers who dispense the medication could also face disciplinary action.
Critics say the ban, like S.B. 8--which bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy--is meant to make it virtually impossible for most women in Texas to obtain care.
"Six weeks, seven weeks... both of them are set to stop access to abortion before most know that they're pregnant," Jennifer Driver, senior director of reproductive rights for the State Innovation Exchange (SiX), told The 19th.
The bill is currently on Abbott's desk after the state House of Representatives passed it in a vote of 82-41 on Tuesday. Earlier this week, the governor tweeted, "Texas will always defend the right to life," suggesting he is likely to sign S.B. 4.
The bill is awaiting Abbott's signature as rights advocates look to medication abortion as a last resort for many women in Texas--even if S.B. 4 goes into effect.
The Republicans who pushed the medication abortion ban through the legislature have claimed there are increased complications for patients who use the pills after seven weeks of pregnancy, but according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, fewer than 1% of patients experience adverse effects after having a medication abortion.
About 60% of people who have abortions by the tenth week of pregnancy choose medication abortions, the Guttmacher Institute reported in 2019.
"I'm really tired of every single session, having to come here and debate one more obstacle to a woman having a right to choose what happens to her own body and her own destiny," state Rep. Donna Howard, a Democrat who represents Austin, said Monday during the legislative debate over S.B. 4.
With Republican lawmakers across the country now eyeing legislation like Texas' six-week ban and medication abortion bans likely to follow, public health researcher Dr. Daniel Grossman said the medical community must "envision something better" for patients who are facing restrictions on care.
\u201cThis moment is pivotal for us. We can drastically shift the way people access abortion, on their own terms. The truth is, that's how it used to be. Indigenous people & other communities used to have herbs at the ready for abortions.\n\nWe can envision something better. Let's do it.\u201d— Dr. Daniel Grossman (@Dr. Daniel Grossman) 1630598235
"Advance provision of medication abortion pills empowers people with the capacity for pregnancy to determine on their own when they need the pills and how to use them using protocols clinics are already using," said Grossman, director of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health. "We can drastically shift the way people access abortion, on their own terms."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.