SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
President Joe Biden speaks during a visit to the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. on February 10, 2021. (Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
'A $753,000,000,000 Defense Budget Is a Failure': Biden Pentagon Request Rebuked
"Spending $753 billion on weapons and war while our communities starve... is a national shame."
May 28, 2021
Progressive anti-war campaigners and lawmakers blasted President Joe Biden's call Friday for a $753 billion military budget for fiscal year 2022, a request that goes beyond the current $740 billion spending level approved under former President Donald Trump.
Biden's sprawling $6 trillion budget request--which has no binding force but serves as an indication of the administration's priorities and a starting point for Congress--includes $1.5 trillion to fund government departments, with $715 billion of that total carved out for the Pentagon, the only federal agency that has yet to pass an audit.
"The Pentagon cannot even pass an audit, why on earth would we throw another $13 billion at an agency filled with fraud, waste, and little to no oversight?"
--Reps. Barbara Lee and Mark Pocan
Other military spending in Biden's budget proposal includes billions of dollars for U.S. nuclear weapon modernization and an initiative purportedly aimed at "countering China's military build-up in Asia," a policy likely to heighten progressive fears of a new Cold War.
"Budgets are moral documents," Erica Fein, Win Without War's senior Washington director, said in a statement. "Spending $753 billion on weapons and war while our communities starve, while the climate crisis worsens, while a pandemic that has killed millions and affected countless more rages on, is a national shame. We call on Congress to reject this budget and the logic of ever-expanding Pentagon funding that produced it."
"It's time to get our priorities straight and finally prioritize people over the Pentagon," Fein added.
Marcy Winograd, coordinator of CodePink Congress, warned Friday that the president's "push for rearmament, including hundreds of new land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine mounted tactical nuclear weapons, comes amid concern the Biden administration's heated anti-China rhetoric and policies could plunge us into a nuclear war."
"There is no law of gravity, however, that compels President Biden or Congress to continue funding the drive for nuclear rearmament or global omnicide," Winograd added.
Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) were among the first Democratic lawmakers to speak out against Biden's proposed $753 billion military budget, which amounts to a 1.7% increase from the fiscal year 2021 figure.
In a joint statement, the Democratic lawmakers slammed the proposed $13 billion increase in military spending as "a failure that doesn't reflect our country's actual needs."
"In the last year, the biggest threat to our nation was a global pandemic and we were drastically unprepared for it. Now, we're proposing a defense spending increase that alone is 1.5 times larger than the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's entire $8.7 billion budget," Lee and Pocan said. "The Pentagon cannot even pass an audit, why on earth would we throw another $13 billion at an agency filled with fraud, waste, and little to no oversight?"
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the nearly 100-member Congressional Progressive Caucus, also spoke out against Biden's Pentagon proposal.
"While we enthusiastically support the significant increase in discretionary domestic investments included in the budget, progressives also believe it is essential to reduce the president's request for increased funding for an already-bloated $740 billion Pentagon budget," Jayapal said in a statement Friday.
"At a time when America's military budget is larger than those of the next ten countries combined," the Washington Democrat added, "we believe it is essential to identify and cut military waste, fraud, and abuse in the budgetary process."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Progressive anti-war campaigners and lawmakers blasted President Joe Biden's call Friday for a $753 billion military budget for fiscal year 2022, a request that goes beyond the current $740 billion spending level approved under former President Donald Trump.
Biden's sprawling $6 trillion budget request--which has no binding force but serves as an indication of the administration's priorities and a starting point for Congress--includes $1.5 trillion to fund government departments, with $715 billion of that total carved out for the Pentagon, the only federal agency that has yet to pass an audit.
"The Pentagon cannot even pass an audit, why on earth would we throw another $13 billion at an agency filled with fraud, waste, and little to no oversight?"
--Reps. Barbara Lee and Mark Pocan
Other military spending in Biden's budget proposal includes billions of dollars for U.S. nuclear weapon modernization and an initiative purportedly aimed at "countering China's military build-up in Asia," a policy likely to heighten progressive fears of a new Cold War.
"Budgets are moral documents," Erica Fein, Win Without War's senior Washington director, said in a statement. "Spending $753 billion on weapons and war while our communities starve, while the climate crisis worsens, while a pandemic that has killed millions and affected countless more rages on, is a national shame. We call on Congress to reject this budget and the logic of ever-expanding Pentagon funding that produced it."
"It's time to get our priorities straight and finally prioritize people over the Pentagon," Fein added.
Marcy Winograd, coordinator of CodePink Congress, warned Friday that the president's "push for rearmament, including hundreds of new land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine mounted tactical nuclear weapons, comes amid concern the Biden administration's heated anti-China rhetoric and policies could plunge us into a nuclear war."
"There is no law of gravity, however, that compels President Biden or Congress to continue funding the drive for nuclear rearmament or global omnicide," Winograd added.
Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) were among the first Democratic lawmakers to speak out against Biden's proposed $753 billion military budget, which amounts to a 1.7% increase from the fiscal year 2021 figure.
In a joint statement, the Democratic lawmakers slammed the proposed $13 billion increase in military spending as "a failure that doesn't reflect our country's actual needs."
"In the last year, the biggest threat to our nation was a global pandemic and we were drastically unprepared for it. Now, we're proposing a defense spending increase that alone is 1.5 times larger than the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's entire $8.7 billion budget," Lee and Pocan said. "The Pentagon cannot even pass an audit, why on earth would we throw another $13 billion at an agency filled with fraud, waste, and little to no oversight?"
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the nearly 100-member Congressional Progressive Caucus, also spoke out against Biden's Pentagon proposal.
"While we enthusiastically support the significant increase in discretionary domestic investments included in the budget, progressives also believe it is essential to reduce the president's request for increased funding for an already-bloated $740 billion Pentagon budget," Jayapal said in a statement Friday.
"At a time when America's military budget is larger than those of the next ten countries combined," the Washington Democrat added, "we believe it is essential to identify and cut military waste, fraud, and abuse in the budgetary process."
From Your Site Articles
Progressive anti-war campaigners and lawmakers blasted President Joe Biden's call Friday for a $753 billion military budget for fiscal year 2022, a request that goes beyond the current $740 billion spending level approved under former President Donald Trump.
Biden's sprawling $6 trillion budget request--which has no binding force but serves as an indication of the administration's priorities and a starting point for Congress--includes $1.5 trillion to fund government departments, with $715 billion of that total carved out for the Pentagon, the only federal agency that has yet to pass an audit.
"The Pentagon cannot even pass an audit, why on earth would we throw another $13 billion at an agency filled with fraud, waste, and little to no oversight?"
--Reps. Barbara Lee and Mark Pocan
Other military spending in Biden's budget proposal includes billions of dollars for U.S. nuclear weapon modernization and an initiative purportedly aimed at "countering China's military build-up in Asia," a policy likely to heighten progressive fears of a new Cold War.
"Budgets are moral documents," Erica Fein, Win Without War's senior Washington director, said in a statement. "Spending $753 billion on weapons and war while our communities starve, while the climate crisis worsens, while a pandemic that has killed millions and affected countless more rages on, is a national shame. We call on Congress to reject this budget and the logic of ever-expanding Pentagon funding that produced it."
"It's time to get our priorities straight and finally prioritize people over the Pentagon," Fein added.
Marcy Winograd, coordinator of CodePink Congress, warned Friday that the president's "push for rearmament, including hundreds of new land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine mounted tactical nuclear weapons, comes amid concern the Biden administration's heated anti-China rhetoric and policies could plunge us into a nuclear war."
"There is no law of gravity, however, that compels President Biden or Congress to continue funding the drive for nuclear rearmament or global omnicide," Winograd added.
Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) were among the first Democratic lawmakers to speak out against Biden's proposed $753 billion military budget, which amounts to a 1.7% increase from the fiscal year 2021 figure.
In a joint statement, the Democratic lawmakers slammed the proposed $13 billion increase in military spending as "a failure that doesn't reflect our country's actual needs."
"In the last year, the biggest threat to our nation was a global pandemic and we were drastically unprepared for it. Now, we're proposing a defense spending increase that alone is 1.5 times larger than the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's entire $8.7 billion budget," Lee and Pocan said. "The Pentagon cannot even pass an audit, why on earth would we throw another $13 billion at an agency filled with fraud, waste, and little to no oversight?"
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the nearly 100-member Congressional Progressive Caucus, also spoke out against Biden's Pentagon proposal.
"While we enthusiastically support the significant increase in discretionary domestic investments included in the budget, progressives also believe it is essential to reduce the president's request for increased funding for an already-bloated $740 billion Pentagon budget," Jayapal said in a statement Friday.
"At a time when America's military budget is larger than those of the next ten countries combined," the Washington Democrat added, "we believe it is essential to identify and cut military waste, fraud, and abuse in the budgetary process."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.