Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) stand back to back in the House Chamber during a joint session of Congress on January 6, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
'Basically Trying to Overturn the Senate Election': McConnell Delaying Democratic Takeover in Effort to Preserve Filibuster
"McConnell is already abusing the filibuster to block the constitution of the new majority. Nuking the filibuster is the appropriate response."
In an early effort to keep the GOP in a position to cripple President Joe Biden's agenda, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is threatening to block a must-pass organizing resolution that establishes the rules for the new session and sets committee assignments if Democrats don't agree to hamstring themselves by promising to leave the 60-vote legislative filibuster in place.
Senate Democrats--who won narrow control of the chamber with a pair of runoff victories in Georgia earlier this month--have thus far refused to accept McConnell's demand, but the Kentucky Republican's stonewalling of the organizing resolution is already causing problems for the new Biden administration and delaying legislative work as the pandemic rages and mass layoffs continue nationwide.
"McConnell was fine with getting rid of the filibuster to a United States Supreme Court nominee for a lifetime appointment, but he's not okay getting rid of the filibuster for unemployment relief for families that are out of work because of Covid-19."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
"The longer the standoff over the organizing package persists, the weirder the Senate will become," Politico reported Thursday. "New senators have not been added to committees and the ratios have not changed, leaving the GOP in the majority on some panels. That's already complicating the ability of the Senate to confirm some of President Joe Biden's nominees."
In a floor speech Thursday, McConnell signaled that he does not intend to drop his demand any time soon, calling the legislative filibuster "a crucial part of the Senate."
Rejecting McConnell's "extraneous provisions," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is pushing for an organizing resolution that sets the same rules that governed the 50-50 Senate in 2001.
Given that the organizing resolution is itself subject to the filibuster, McConnell is effectively using the archaic 60-vote requirement--which progressives have taken to calling a "Jim Crow relic"--to protect it from future elimination by the new Democratic majority. Scrapping the filibuster would require just 51 votes, meaning Democrats would need the support of their entire Senate caucus and a tie-breaking vote from Vice President Kamala Harris.
"McConnell is threatening to filibuster the organizing resolution which allows Democrats to assume the committee chair positions," Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) tweeted Thursday. "It's an absolutely unprecedented, wacky, counterproductive request. We won the Senate. We get the gavels."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) told CNN Thursday that "Mitch McConnell was fine with getting rid of the filibuster to a United States Supreme Court nominee for a lifetime appointment, but he's not okay getting rid of the filibuster for unemployment relief for families that are out of work because of Covid-19."
"I've just had enough of Mitch McConnell," Warren added.
Progressives argued that the early stand-off over the filibuster is an illustrative example of why the 60-vote rule must be abolished if the Democratic majority hopes to pass coronavirus relief, climate legislation, democracy reform, and other key priorities.
"The solution is obvious," said Brian Beutler, editor-in-chief at Crooked Media. "McConnell is already abusing the filibuster to block the constitution of the new majority. Nuking the filibuster is the appropriate response... The alternative--cave to McConnell on this basic question of which party won the majority, and ratify his plan to set a 60-vote threshold for everything of consequence--would be a profound, irrevocable betrayal right off the bat."
"McConnell is basically trying to overturn the Senate election," Beutler tweeted.
In an appearance on MSNBC late Thursday, Heather McGhee of Color of Change said that "Democrats have the high ground" in the fight over the filibuster, which she called a "McConnell minority veto."
"[Democrats] represent 40 million more people than the Republicans do in the Senate," said McGhee. "Their agenda is wildly popular and the Republican Party barely has an agenda, and that which they do is barely even popular with the base of their own party."
"Democrats will say: you know, what if we are in the minority again?" McGhee continued. "The best thing you can do to not be in the minority again is to kill the minority veto and get things done for the American people that are popular. And then, people will send you back to Washington."
New York magazine's Eric Levitz argued Thursday that "for the moment, Senate Republicans have some leverage to drive a hard bargain on the power-sharing agreement: Until a new resolution is worked out, the GOP will retain its existing majorities on Senate committees."
"But the GOP only has such leverage for as long as Democrats allow them to," Levitz added. "The Senate is governed by a dizzying mess of procedural precedents. But as a constitutional matter, Senate majorities are sovereign over the body's internal affairs. Chuck Schumer's caucus has the power to simply rewrite all of the Senate's rules on a party-line basis, whenever it wants. They are just reluctant to do so."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In an early effort to keep the GOP in a position to cripple President Joe Biden's agenda, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is threatening to block a must-pass organizing resolution that establishes the rules for the new session and sets committee assignments if Democrats don't agree to hamstring themselves by promising to leave the 60-vote legislative filibuster in place.
Senate Democrats--who won narrow control of the chamber with a pair of runoff victories in Georgia earlier this month--have thus far refused to accept McConnell's demand, but the Kentucky Republican's stonewalling of the organizing resolution is already causing problems for the new Biden administration and delaying legislative work as the pandemic rages and mass layoffs continue nationwide.
"McConnell was fine with getting rid of the filibuster to a United States Supreme Court nominee for a lifetime appointment, but he's not okay getting rid of the filibuster for unemployment relief for families that are out of work because of Covid-19."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
"The longer the standoff over the organizing package persists, the weirder the Senate will become," Politico reported Thursday. "New senators have not been added to committees and the ratios have not changed, leaving the GOP in the majority on some panels. That's already complicating the ability of the Senate to confirm some of President Joe Biden's nominees."
In a floor speech Thursday, McConnell signaled that he does not intend to drop his demand any time soon, calling the legislative filibuster "a crucial part of the Senate."
Rejecting McConnell's "extraneous provisions," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is pushing for an organizing resolution that sets the same rules that governed the 50-50 Senate in 2001.
Given that the organizing resolution is itself subject to the filibuster, McConnell is effectively using the archaic 60-vote requirement--which progressives have taken to calling a "Jim Crow relic"--to protect it from future elimination by the new Democratic majority. Scrapping the filibuster would require just 51 votes, meaning Democrats would need the support of their entire Senate caucus and a tie-breaking vote from Vice President Kamala Harris.
"McConnell is threatening to filibuster the organizing resolution which allows Democrats to assume the committee chair positions," Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) tweeted Thursday. "It's an absolutely unprecedented, wacky, counterproductive request. We won the Senate. We get the gavels."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) told CNN Thursday that "Mitch McConnell was fine with getting rid of the filibuster to a United States Supreme Court nominee for a lifetime appointment, but he's not okay getting rid of the filibuster for unemployment relief for families that are out of work because of Covid-19."
"I've just had enough of Mitch McConnell," Warren added.
Progressives argued that the early stand-off over the filibuster is an illustrative example of why the 60-vote rule must be abolished if the Democratic majority hopes to pass coronavirus relief, climate legislation, democracy reform, and other key priorities.
"The solution is obvious," said Brian Beutler, editor-in-chief at Crooked Media. "McConnell is already abusing the filibuster to block the constitution of the new majority. Nuking the filibuster is the appropriate response... The alternative--cave to McConnell on this basic question of which party won the majority, and ratify his plan to set a 60-vote threshold for everything of consequence--would be a profound, irrevocable betrayal right off the bat."
"McConnell is basically trying to overturn the Senate election," Beutler tweeted.
In an appearance on MSNBC late Thursday, Heather McGhee of Color of Change said that "Democrats have the high ground" in the fight over the filibuster, which she called a "McConnell minority veto."
"[Democrats] represent 40 million more people than the Republicans do in the Senate," said McGhee. "Their agenda is wildly popular and the Republican Party barely has an agenda, and that which they do is barely even popular with the base of their own party."
"Democrats will say: you know, what if we are in the minority again?" McGhee continued. "The best thing you can do to not be in the minority again is to kill the minority veto and get things done for the American people that are popular. And then, people will send you back to Washington."
New York magazine's Eric Levitz argued Thursday that "for the moment, Senate Republicans have some leverage to drive a hard bargain on the power-sharing agreement: Until a new resolution is worked out, the GOP will retain its existing majorities on Senate committees."
"But the GOP only has such leverage for as long as Democrats allow them to," Levitz added. "The Senate is governed by a dizzying mess of procedural precedents. But as a constitutional matter, Senate majorities are sovereign over the body's internal affairs. Chuck Schumer's caucus has the power to simply rewrite all of the Senate's rules on a party-line basis, whenever it wants. They are just reluctant to do so."
In an early effort to keep the GOP in a position to cripple President Joe Biden's agenda, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is threatening to block a must-pass organizing resolution that establishes the rules for the new session and sets committee assignments if Democrats don't agree to hamstring themselves by promising to leave the 60-vote legislative filibuster in place.
Senate Democrats--who won narrow control of the chamber with a pair of runoff victories in Georgia earlier this month--have thus far refused to accept McConnell's demand, but the Kentucky Republican's stonewalling of the organizing resolution is already causing problems for the new Biden administration and delaying legislative work as the pandemic rages and mass layoffs continue nationwide.
"McConnell was fine with getting rid of the filibuster to a United States Supreme Court nominee for a lifetime appointment, but he's not okay getting rid of the filibuster for unemployment relief for families that are out of work because of Covid-19."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
"The longer the standoff over the organizing package persists, the weirder the Senate will become," Politico reported Thursday. "New senators have not been added to committees and the ratios have not changed, leaving the GOP in the majority on some panels. That's already complicating the ability of the Senate to confirm some of President Joe Biden's nominees."
In a floor speech Thursday, McConnell signaled that he does not intend to drop his demand any time soon, calling the legislative filibuster "a crucial part of the Senate."
Rejecting McConnell's "extraneous provisions," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is pushing for an organizing resolution that sets the same rules that governed the 50-50 Senate in 2001.
Given that the organizing resolution is itself subject to the filibuster, McConnell is effectively using the archaic 60-vote requirement--which progressives have taken to calling a "Jim Crow relic"--to protect it from future elimination by the new Democratic majority. Scrapping the filibuster would require just 51 votes, meaning Democrats would need the support of their entire Senate caucus and a tie-breaking vote from Vice President Kamala Harris.
"McConnell is threatening to filibuster the organizing resolution which allows Democrats to assume the committee chair positions," Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) tweeted Thursday. "It's an absolutely unprecedented, wacky, counterproductive request. We won the Senate. We get the gavels."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) told CNN Thursday that "Mitch McConnell was fine with getting rid of the filibuster to a United States Supreme Court nominee for a lifetime appointment, but he's not okay getting rid of the filibuster for unemployment relief for families that are out of work because of Covid-19."
"I've just had enough of Mitch McConnell," Warren added.
Progressives argued that the early stand-off over the filibuster is an illustrative example of why the 60-vote rule must be abolished if the Democratic majority hopes to pass coronavirus relief, climate legislation, democracy reform, and other key priorities.
"The solution is obvious," said Brian Beutler, editor-in-chief at Crooked Media. "McConnell is already abusing the filibuster to block the constitution of the new majority. Nuking the filibuster is the appropriate response... The alternative--cave to McConnell on this basic question of which party won the majority, and ratify his plan to set a 60-vote threshold for everything of consequence--would be a profound, irrevocable betrayal right off the bat."
"McConnell is basically trying to overturn the Senate election," Beutler tweeted.
In an appearance on MSNBC late Thursday, Heather McGhee of Color of Change said that "Democrats have the high ground" in the fight over the filibuster, which she called a "McConnell minority veto."
"[Democrats] represent 40 million more people than the Republicans do in the Senate," said McGhee. "Their agenda is wildly popular and the Republican Party barely has an agenda, and that which they do is barely even popular with the base of their own party."
"Democrats will say: you know, what if we are in the minority again?" McGhee continued. "The best thing you can do to not be in the minority again is to kill the minority veto and get things done for the American people that are popular. And then, people will send you back to Washington."
New York magazine's Eric Levitz argued Thursday that "for the moment, Senate Republicans have some leverage to drive a hard bargain on the power-sharing agreement: Until a new resolution is worked out, the GOP will retain its existing majorities on Senate committees."
"But the GOP only has such leverage for as long as Democrats allow them to," Levitz added. "The Senate is governed by a dizzying mess of procedural precedents. But as a constitutional matter, Senate majorities are sovereign over the body's internal affairs. Chuck Schumer's caucus has the power to simply rewrite all of the Senate's rules on a party-line basis, whenever it wants. They are just reluctant to do so."