A federal judge on Monday delivered yet another defeat to President Donald Trump and his supporters in their ongoing efforts to overturn President-elect Joe Biden\u0026#039;s November electoral victory, which is expected to be certified by Congress in a joint session scheduled for Wednesday.\r\n\r\n\u0022Courts are not instruments through which parties engage in such gamesmanship or symbolic political gestures.\u0022\r\n—Judge James E. Boasberg \r\n\r\nThe lawsuit (pdf) was filed last month in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by the right-wing Wisconsin Voters Alliance. Other plaintiffs included GOP Wisconsin lawmakers as well as groups and voters from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—all of which Biden won.\r\n\r\nThe suit against Vice President Mike Pence in his official capacity as president of the Senate, both houses of Congress, the Electoral College, and leaders from the five states sought a \u0022constitutionally compliant process for state-by-state post-election certification of presidential votes and presidential electors.\u0022\r\n\r\nThe Trump allies argued that Pence and Congress shouldn\u0026#039;t be allowed to consider states\u0026#039; electoral votes \u0022unless their respective state legislatures have voted affirmatively in a post-election vote to certify presidential votes and their presidential electors for the current and future presidential elections.\u0022\r\n\r\nDistrict Court Judge James E. Boasberg wrote in his seven-page opinion (pdf) Monday that the suit was filed on behalf of plaintiffs without standing and, at least regarding some defendants, in the wrong court. He added, \u0022It would be risible were its target not so grave: the undermining of a democratic election for president of the United States.\u0022\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nJUDGE BOASBERG IS NOT AMUSED https://t.co/1By2nZr8qS\r\n— Leah Litman (@LeahLitman) January 4, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\n\u0022Even if the the court had subject-matter and personal jurisdiction, it still could not rule in plaintiffs\u0026#039; favor because their central contention is flat-out wrong,\u0022 explained judge, tearing apart the Trump allies\u0026#039; claims about Article II of the Constitution.\r\n\r\n\u0022Plaintiffs somehow interpret this straightforward passage to mean that state legislatures alone must certify presidential votes and presidential electors after each election, and that governors or other entities have no constitutionally permitted role,\u0022 the judge wrote, adding that this \u0022is not at all what Article II says.\u0022\r\n\r\nNoting that each of the five battleground states in question has passed constitutionally sound statutes \u0022directing how votes are to be certified and electors selected,\u0022 Boasberg concluded that \u0022plaintiffs\u0026#039; theory that all of these laws are unconstitutional and that the court should instead require state legislatures themselves to certify every presidential election lies somewhere between a willful misreading of the Constitution and fantasy.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022It is not a stretch to find a serious lack of good faith here,\u0022 wrote the judge. \u0022Yet even that may be letting plaintiffs off the hook too lightly. Their failure to make any effort to serve or formally notify any defendant—even after reminder by the court in its minute order—renders it difficult to believe that the suit is meant seriously.\u0022\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nThis opinion from Judge Boasberg is . https://t.co/bPfjdaAJCs\r\n— Rachel Barkow (@RachelBarkow) January 4, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\n\u0022Courts are not instruments through which parties engage in such gamesmanship or symbolic political gestures,\u0022 added Boasberg, threatening a possible referral to a committee that could sanction the Trump allies\u0026#039; counsel.\r\n\r\nThe judge was appointed to the district court in D.C. by former President Barack Obama. He was previously appointed by former President George W. Bush to serve as an associate judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.\r\n\r\nBoasberg\u0026#039;s decision comes after a federal appeals court on Saturday dismissed a suit by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) and other Republicans that sought to empower Pence to interfere in the Electoral College vote count and overturn Biden\u0026#039;s win.\r\n\r\nSen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) led another group of Republicans who announced Saturday that they will join Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.)—and more than 100 GOP House members—in contesting the presidential election results during the Wednesday session, which provoked accusations of \u0022sedition.\u0022\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nShameful. https://t.co/q9wnWu0vBh\r\n— Rashida Tlaib (@RashidaTlaib) January 4, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\nTrump, meanwhile, pressured Georgia\u0026#039;s GOP Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on Saturday to \u0022find\u0022 enough votes to overturn Biden\u0026#039;s win. Leaked audio of the hourlong call drew demands for a criminal probe of the president and others.\r\n\r\nContinued outrage over Trump\u0026#039;s attempted election interference in Georgia comes just a day before a pair of runoff races in the state will determine which party controls the Senate. With a Democratic majority in the House, the outcomes of those elections are expected to dramatically impact Biden\u0026#039;s ability to implement his agenda.