Apr 06, 2020
As desperate workers, the unemployed, and small businesses struggle to obtain benefits authorized under the multi-trillion-dollar coronavirus stimulus package President Donald Trump signed into law late last month, the White House is reportedly considering an additional slate of aid measures that critics say would disproportionately favor the wealthy while providing little relief for those most in need.
"A capital gains tax cut would be smash-and-grab economics with no value to the economic and medical calamity facing us."
--Zach Carter, HuffPost
The Washington Post, citing two anonymous officials familiar with White House discussions, reported late Sunday that the Trump administration is weighing "a payroll-tax cut, a capital-gains tax cut, creating 50-year Treasury bonds to lock in low interest rates, and a waiver that would clear businesses of liability from employees who contract the coronavirus on the job."
Trump is also considering an infrastructure package, according to the Post, but the idea faces internal opposition from top advisers.
Slashing the capital gains tax, a move that would overwhelmingly reward rich investors, has long been an obsession of the Trump White House and congressional Republicans. Last year, as Common Dreamsreported, Trump floated the idea of bypassing Congress to index capital gains to inflation, but never acted amid warnings that such a unilateral change would be illegal.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimated in a 2018 analysis that 86% of the benefits of indexing capital gains to inflation would flow to the top 1%.
\u201cCapital gains tax cut. No detail. But (see above) they seem to like recycling bad ideas. \n\nSo take their last bad cap gains tax idea as an e.g. of the shape of distribution you can expect from a tax cut geared to people with cap gains. I.e., regressive.\n\nhttps://t.co/VZfWf4t0Mv\u201d— Chye-Ching Huang (@Chye-Ching Huang) 1586130890
"A capital gains tax cut would be smash-and-grab economics with no value to the economic and medical calamity facing us," tweetedHuffPost senior reporter Zach Carter.
Critics also took aim at the other proposals under consideration inside the Trump White House, including the waiver relieving businesses of liability for workers who get sick on the job.
"Won't somebody please think of the employers who want to coerce their employees into accepting life-threatening workplace conditions without facing legal liability," New York magazine's Eric Levitz tweeted sardonically.
Freelance journalist Jon Walker called the Trump administration's reported proposals "the worst possible set of ideas for dealing with a pandemic."
"We are beyond parody at this point," Walker wrote. "Making it easier for people to get sick at work. Rewarding people for going into work. Rewarding vulture capitalists profiting off a crisis."
"We are entering an economic downturn that could be worse than the Great Depression of the 1930s. In this unprecedented moment in modern American history, it is imperative that we respond in an unprecedented way."
--Sen. Bernie Sanders
White House deliberations over a fresh coronavirus aid package comes as the mammoth legislation Trump signed late last month is failing to get much-needed relief into the hands of people and small businesses, vindicating progressives' warnings that the package amounted to little more than a massive bailout for big corporations replete with goodies for the well-off.
On Friday, the Trump administration launched the $350 billion small business relief program authorized under the $4.5 trillion stimulus package. But the rollout was disastrous as small businesses struggled to apply for loans and some of the biggest banks in the country sat out the process entirely as the Treasury Department failed to provide adequate guidance.
"The estimate is there are 30 million small businesses out there," wrote David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect. "About 4.5% of all of them will have a chance to get relief. Half of small businesses haven't paid rent in April, which if I'm doing the math correctly is more than 4.5%. And millions of them will have no federal help, no customers, and really no hope."
Workers and the unemployed, meanwhile, have yet to receive the one-time $1,200 cash payments and expanded unemployment benefits to which they are now entitled under law.
As the Postreported late Sunday, "the law's provision to boost unemployment benefits has become tangled in dated and overwhelmed state bureaucracies, as an unprecedented avalanche of jobless Americans seeks aid."
"Millions of workers are filing for unemployment and businesses around the country are struggling to stay afloat," said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). "This crisis isn't going away soon. The rise in jobless claims makes it clear Congress must continue working on the next relief bill to get Americans the help they need."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, said Friday that Congress--which is officially on recess until April 20--must move urgently to enact the "boldest legislation in history" to combat the coronavirus pandemic and the resulting economic collapse.
"We are in the midst of a COVID-19 pandemic that could lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Americans and infect millions of others, and we are entering an economic downturn that could be worse than the Great Depression of the 1930s," said Sanders.
The Vermont senator proposed a number of relief measures, including $2,000 in monthly payments to every person in the U.S. for the duration of the crisis and immediate suspension of all rent and mortgage payments.
"In this unprecedented moment in modern American history," said Sanders, "it is imperative that we respond in an unprecedented way."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.