

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) speaks to reporters following the Senate Republican policy luncheon on March 10, 2020 in Washington, D.C
As Sen. Bernie Sanders and other progressives call for direct and uniform monthly payments to every person in the U.S. amid the Covid-19 crisis, Senate Republicans have reportedly put forth a plan designed to ensure that poor people most in need of financial support receive less money than those with higher incomes.
The Washington Post reported Thursday that while stimulus talks between the White House and Congress remain in flux, "one leading GOP plan would offer $1,200 to most taxpayers but only $600 to poor families who pay less in taxes."
"$2,000 checks every month to every household during the emergency, means test it by raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires."
--David Sirota, speechwriter for Sen. Bernie Sanders
"The benefit would begin phasing out for people with more than $75,000 in annual income," the Post reported. It is unclear how the phase-in would work, tweeted the Post's Jeff Stein.
"This is madness, and cruel," Annie Lowrey, staff writer for The Atlantic, said of the Republican proposal.
"Senate GOP on brand as always trying to screw poor people," added Andrew Grinberg of Clean Water Action.
To the dismay of progressives who support universal programs over mean-tested policies, both Democratic and Republican lawmakers have long supported so-called "trapezoid" programs that phase in benefits at the bottom of the income distribution and phase them out at higher incomes.
In a conference call on Wednesday, according to the Post, House Democratic leaders unanimously agreed that "any cash payments should be means-tested to exclude the wealthiest Americans, a sentiment the White House appears to share."
David Sirota, speechwriter for Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) presidential campaign, voiced his frustration with the bipartisan consensus in favor of means-testing over universal programs in a series of tweets on Thursday.
Instead of piling layers of complexity on the front end through means-testing, Sirota argued the federal government should send monthly checks to every household and then raise taxes on the wealthy to ensure a more progressive distribution of income.
"$2,000 checks every month to every household during the emergency, means test it by raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires," Sirota tweeted. "There--I just did the work of 500 Democratic lanyards in Washington who are trying to make good policy seem complex, even when it can be simple."
As Common Dreams reported, Sanders on Tuesday proposed a $2 trillion stimulus plan that would send $2,000 in monthly payments to every American--both children and adults and regardless of income--for the duration of the coronavirus crisis.
Senate Republicans' means-tested proposal comes as the Trump White House is rushing to assemble a $1 trillion fiscal stimulus package as the U.S. economy barrels toward a potentially devastating recession.
In addition to possible direct payments to U.S. households, the White House stimulus proposal is also expected to request tens of billions of dollars in bailout money to industries hit hard by the coronavirus crisis, including airlines, hotels, and casinos.
Politico reported late Wednesday that House Democrats are putting together their own stimulus plan as a "counter-offer."
"The House Democratic plan will incorporate proposals from several panels and is expected to include additional unemployment insurance payments, expanded Medicaid coverage, an airline rescue package, relief for homeowners and renters, support for small businesses, and additional food security measures," Politico noted.
As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has faced criticism from progressives for refusing to support direct cash payments without means-testing.
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) wrote in a series of tweets Thursday that while increased funding for means-tested programs like Medicaid is a laudable and necessary goal, "we must deliver universal funds now!"
"Means-testing inevitably creates more administrative costs, red tape, and the ability for bureaucrats to deny benefits," said Omar. "Universal programs ensure that every American has a stake in our policies--that's why programs like Social Security are so successful."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As Sen. Bernie Sanders and other progressives call for direct and uniform monthly payments to every person in the U.S. amid the Covid-19 crisis, Senate Republicans have reportedly put forth a plan designed to ensure that poor people most in need of financial support receive less money than those with higher incomes.
The Washington Post reported Thursday that while stimulus talks between the White House and Congress remain in flux, "one leading GOP plan would offer $1,200 to most taxpayers but only $600 to poor families who pay less in taxes."
"$2,000 checks every month to every household during the emergency, means test it by raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires."
--David Sirota, speechwriter for Sen. Bernie Sanders
"The benefit would begin phasing out for people with more than $75,000 in annual income," the Post reported. It is unclear how the phase-in would work, tweeted the Post's Jeff Stein.
"This is madness, and cruel," Annie Lowrey, staff writer for The Atlantic, said of the Republican proposal.
"Senate GOP on brand as always trying to screw poor people," added Andrew Grinberg of Clean Water Action.
To the dismay of progressives who support universal programs over mean-tested policies, both Democratic and Republican lawmakers have long supported so-called "trapezoid" programs that phase in benefits at the bottom of the income distribution and phase them out at higher incomes.
In a conference call on Wednesday, according to the Post, House Democratic leaders unanimously agreed that "any cash payments should be means-tested to exclude the wealthiest Americans, a sentiment the White House appears to share."
David Sirota, speechwriter for Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) presidential campaign, voiced his frustration with the bipartisan consensus in favor of means-testing over universal programs in a series of tweets on Thursday.
Instead of piling layers of complexity on the front end through means-testing, Sirota argued the federal government should send monthly checks to every household and then raise taxes on the wealthy to ensure a more progressive distribution of income.
"$2,000 checks every month to every household during the emergency, means test it by raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires," Sirota tweeted. "There--I just did the work of 500 Democratic lanyards in Washington who are trying to make good policy seem complex, even when it can be simple."
As Common Dreams reported, Sanders on Tuesday proposed a $2 trillion stimulus plan that would send $2,000 in monthly payments to every American--both children and adults and regardless of income--for the duration of the coronavirus crisis.
Senate Republicans' means-tested proposal comes as the Trump White House is rushing to assemble a $1 trillion fiscal stimulus package as the U.S. economy barrels toward a potentially devastating recession.
In addition to possible direct payments to U.S. households, the White House stimulus proposal is also expected to request tens of billions of dollars in bailout money to industries hit hard by the coronavirus crisis, including airlines, hotels, and casinos.
Politico reported late Wednesday that House Democrats are putting together their own stimulus plan as a "counter-offer."
"The House Democratic plan will incorporate proposals from several panels and is expected to include additional unemployment insurance payments, expanded Medicaid coverage, an airline rescue package, relief for homeowners and renters, support for small businesses, and additional food security measures," Politico noted.
As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has faced criticism from progressives for refusing to support direct cash payments without means-testing.
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) wrote in a series of tweets Thursday that while increased funding for means-tested programs like Medicaid is a laudable and necessary goal, "we must deliver universal funds now!"
"Means-testing inevitably creates more administrative costs, red tape, and the ability for bureaucrats to deny benefits," said Omar. "Universal programs ensure that every American has a stake in our policies--that's why programs like Social Security are so successful."
As Sen. Bernie Sanders and other progressives call for direct and uniform monthly payments to every person in the U.S. amid the Covid-19 crisis, Senate Republicans have reportedly put forth a plan designed to ensure that poor people most in need of financial support receive less money than those with higher incomes.
The Washington Post reported Thursday that while stimulus talks between the White House and Congress remain in flux, "one leading GOP plan would offer $1,200 to most taxpayers but only $600 to poor families who pay less in taxes."
"$2,000 checks every month to every household during the emergency, means test it by raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires."
--David Sirota, speechwriter for Sen. Bernie Sanders
"The benefit would begin phasing out for people with more than $75,000 in annual income," the Post reported. It is unclear how the phase-in would work, tweeted the Post's Jeff Stein.
"This is madness, and cruel," Annie Lowrey, staff writer for The Atlantic, said of the Republican proposal.
"Senate GOP on brand as always trying to screw poor people," added Andrew Grinberg of Clean Water Action.
To the dismay of progressives who support universal programs over mean-tested policies, both Democratic and Republican lawmakers have long supported so-called "trapezoid" programs that phase in benefits at the bottom of the income distribution and phase them out at higher incomes.
In a conference call on Wednesday, according to the Post, House Democratic leaders unanimously agreed that "any cash payments should be means-tested to exclude the wealthiest Americans, a sentiment the White House appears to share."
David Sirota, speechwriter for Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) presidential campaign, voiced his frustration with the bipartisan consensus in favor of means-testing over universal programs in a series of tweets on Thursday.
Instead of piling layers of complexity on the front end through means-testing, Sirota argued the federal government should send monthly checks to every household and then raise taxes on the wealthy to ensure a more progressive distribution of income.
"$2,000 checks every month to every household during the emergency, means test it by raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires," Sirota tweeted. "There--I just did the work of 500 Democratic lanyards in Washington who are trying to make good policy seem complex, even when it can be simple."
As Common Dreams reported, Sanders on Tuesday proposed a $2 trillion stimulus plan that would send $2,000 in monthly payments to every American--both children and adults and regardless of income--for the duration of the coronavirus crisis.
Senate Republicans' means-tested proposal comes as the Trump White House is rushing to assemble a $1 trillion fiscal stimulus package as the U.S. economy barrels toward a potentially devastating recession.
In addition to possible direct payments to U.S. households, the White House stimulus proposal is also expected to request tens of billions of dollars in bailout money to industries hit hard by the coronavirus crisis, including airlines, hotels, and casinos.
Politico reported late Wednesday that House Democrats are putting together their own stimulus plan as a "counter-offer."
"The House Democratic plan will incorporate proposals from several panels and is expected to include additional unemployment insurance payments, expanded Medicaid coverage, an airline rescue package, relief for homeowners and renters, support for small businesses, and additional food security measures," Politico noted.
As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has faced criticism from progressives for refusing to support direct cash payments without means-testing.
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) wrote in a series of tweets Thursday that while increased funding for means-tested programs like Medicaid is a laudable and necessary goal, "we must deliver universal funds now!"
"Means-testing inevitably creates more administrative costs, red tape, and the ability for bureaucrats to deny benefits," said Omar. "Universal programs ensure that every American has a stake in our policies--that's why programs like Social Security are so successful."