President Donald Trump stops to speak to reporters as he prepared to board Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House on January 19, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Pete Marovich/Getty Images)
Jan 05, 2020
Democratic lawmakers, anti-war advocates, and legal experts rebuked President Donald Trump after he announced on Twitter that he would be using the social media platform as the medium by which he would inform Congress of hypothetical, future military strikes against Iran.
"The Constitution doesn't allow presidents to declare war over social media," tweeted Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Caif.).
\u201cNo. The Constitution doesn't allow presidents to declare war over social media.\n\nThis is why it's so important to pass @BernieSanders' and my bill to block all federal funding for war with Iran until Congress votes.\u201d— Ro Khanna (@Ro Khanna) 1578273685
Khanna, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in the Senate, introduced a bill Friday to block funding for the president's effort to continue the conflict with Iran which exploded on January 2 when Trump ordered a drone strike in Baghdad which killed Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani.
"Congress must reassert its constitutional responsibility over war," said Sanders. "The Senate and House must vote to immediately defund unauthorized military action against Iran."
Trump announced Sunday that he would be making wartime declarations to Capitol Hill through Twitter.
"These Media Posts will serve as notification to the United States Congress that should Iran strike any U.S. person or target, the United States will quickly & fully strike back, & perhaps in a disproportionate manner," the president tweeted. "Such legal notice is not required, but is given nevertheless!"
Rep. Justin Amash (I-Mich.), who left the Republican Party last year over the president's conduct, referred Trump to the constitutional limits of the presidency's powers.
"Such legal notice was provided in 1789 but is given here again nevertheless," tweeted Amash.
\u201cThis Constitution of the United States of America will serve as notification to the president that should he order nondefensive strikes without congressional approval, he will be in violation of the law. Such legal notice was provided in 1789 but is given here again nevertheless.\u201d— Justin Amash (@Justin Amash) 1578289737
The House Foreign Affairs Committee also hit back against the president Sunday afternoon.
"This Media Post will serve as a reminder that war powers reside in the Congress under the United States Constitution," the committee's official account tweeted. "And that you should read the War Powers Act. And that you're not a dictator."
Yale Law School professor Oona Hathaway pointed out that Trump's declaration "threatens to break several laws" by not notifying Congress in a correct way, refusing to consult with lawmakers before taking military action, and claiming there is no requirement for notification.
"That any of this has to be said suggests just how insane this situation has become," said Hathaway.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Democratic lawmakers, anti-war advocates, and legal experts rebuked President Donald Trump after he announced on Twitter that he would be using the social media platform as the medium by which he would inform Congress of hypothetical, future military strikes against Iran.
"The Constitution doesn't allow presidents to declare war over social media," tweeted Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Caif.).
\u201cNo. The Constitution doesn't allow presidents to declare war over social media.\n\nThis is why it's so important to pass @BernieSanders' and my bill to block all federal funding for war with Iran until Congress votes.\u201d— Ro Khanna (@Ro Khanna) 1578273685
Khanna, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in the Senate, introduced a bill Friday to block funding for the president's effort to continue the conflict with Iran which exploded on January 2 when Trump ordered a drone strike in Baghdad which killed Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani.
"Congress must reassert its constitutional responsibility over war," said Sanders. "The Senate and House must vote to immediately defund unauthorized military action against Iran."
Trump announced Sunday that he would be making wartime declarations to Capitol Hill through Twitter.
"These Media Posts will serve as notification to the United States Congress that should Iran strike any U.S. person or target, the United States will quickly & fully strike back, & perhaps in a disproportionate manner," the president tweeted. "Such legal notice is not required, but is given nevertheless!"
Rep. Justin Amash (I-Mich.), who left the Republican Party last year over the president's conduct, referred Trump to the constitutional limits of the presidency's powers.
"Such legal notice was provided in 1789 but is given here again nevertheless," tweeted Amash.
\u201cThis Constitution of the United States of America will serve as notification to the president that should he order nondefensive strikes without congressional approval, he will be in violation of the law. Such legal notice was provided in 1789 but is given here again nevertheless.\u201d— Justin Amash (@Justin Amash) 1578289737
The House Foreign Affairs Committee also hit back against the president Sunday afternoon.
"This Media Post will serve as a reminder that war powers reside in the Congress under the United States Constitution," the committee's official account tweeted. "And that you should read the War Powers Act. And that you're not a dictator."
Yale Law School professor Oona Hathaway pointed out that Trump's declaration "threatens to break several laws" by not notifying Congress in a correct way, refusing to consult with lawmakers before taking military action, and claiming there is no requirement for notification.
"That any of this has to be said suggests just how insane this situation has become," said Hathaway.
Democratic lawmakers, anti-war advocates, and legal experts rebuked President Donald Trump after he announced on Twitter that he would be using the social media platform as the medium by which he would inform Congress of hypothetical, future military strikes against Iran.
"The Constitution doesn't allow presidents to declare war over social media," tweeted Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Caif.).
\u201cNo. The Constitution doesn't allow presidents to declare war over social media.\n\nThis is why it's so important to pass @BernieSanders' and my bill to block all federal funding for war with Iran until Congress votes.\u201d— Ro Khanna (@Ro Khanna) 1578273685
Khanna, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in the Senate, introduced a bill Friday to block funding for the president's effort to continue the conflict with Iran which exploded on January 2 when Trump ordered a drone strike in Baghdad which killed Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani.
"Congress must reassert its constitutional responsibility over war," said Sanders. "The Senate and House must vote to immediately defund unauthorized military action against Iran."
Trump announced Sunday that he would be making wartime declarations to Capitol Hill through Twitter.
"These Media Posts will serve as notification to the United States Congress that should Iran strike any U.S. person or target, the United States will quickly & fully strike back, & perhaps in a disproportionate manner," the president tweeted. "Such legal notice is not required, but is given nevertheless!"
Rep. Justin Amash (I-Mich.), who left the Republican Party last year over the president's conduct, referred Trump to the constitutional limits of the presidency's powers.
"Such legal notice was provided in 1789 but is given here again nevertheless," tweeted Amash.
\u201cThis Constitution of the United States of America will serve as notification to the president that should he order nondefensive strikes without congressional approval, he will be in violation of the law. Such legal notice was provided in 1789 but is given here again nevertheless.\u201d— Justin Amash (@Justin Amash) 1578289737
The House Foreign Affairs Committee also hit back against the president Sunday afternoon.
"This Media Post will serve as a reminder that war powers reside in the Congress under the United States Constitution," the committee's official account tweeted. "And that you should read the War Powers Act. And that you're not a dictator."
Yale Law School professor Oona Hathaway pointed out that Trump's declaration "threatens to break several laws" by not notifying Congress in a correct way, refusing to consult with lawmakers before taking military action, and claiming there is no requirement for notification.
"That any of this has to be said suggests just how insane this situation has become," said Hathaway.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.