SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"We are spending way, way, way, way too much money on the Pentagon," tweeted the Congressional Progressive Caucus. (Photo: AP)
Pentagon spending is on track to grow significantly for the fifth consecutive year, but "very few in Congress are questioning" how the U.S. can afford it.
That's according to the Washington Post's Jeff Stein and Aaron Gregg, who reported Thursday that "the United States is expected to spend more on its military in 2020 than at any point since World War II, except for a handful of years at the height of the Iraq War."
"We are spending way, way, way, way too much money on the Pentagon."
--Congressional Progressive Caucus
In his 2020 budget request, Trump called for $750 billion in Pentagon spending. Democrats countered with a $733 billion offer, which would still represent a substantial increase over the Pentagon's 2019 budget.
Either number would bring U.S. military spending to "near-historic highs," according to the Post.
"Earlier this year, the Congressional Budget Office projected the United States would spend more than $7 trillion on defense over the next decade," the Post reported, "which is in line with both the White House's and House Democrats' budget plans."
As Stein noted on Twitter, only a few progressive lawmakers are asking how the United States can afford such spending--a question frequently raised about bold progressive policies.
Consumer advocacy group Public Citizen tweeted that the "establishment says we can't afford" Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, but apparently has "unlimited" funds for the military.
As Common Dreams reported, Democratic leaders such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and DCCC chair Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.) have both raised alarm about Medicare for All's supposedly high "price tag"--but neither have raised similar alarm about soaring military spending.
\u201cThings the establishment says we can\u2019t afford:\n\n-@RepJayapal & @SenSanders' Medicare for All legislation\n\n-@AOC's Green New Deal\n\n-A living wage for workers\n\n-Universal childcare\n\n-A Federal Jobs Guarantee\n\n-Tuition/Debt-free College\n\nThings the establishment has unlimited $ for:\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1555624930
Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) are among the few speaking out against bipartisan efforts to raise military spending.
In response to the Post's reporting, the CPC tweeted, "We are spending way, way, way, way too much money on the Pentagon."
As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, the CPC revolted against House Democratic leaders' Pentagon spending request and forced the party to cancel a vote on their sweeping 2020 budget measure.
Progressives demanded an increase in domestic social spending in line with the Pentagon's budget.
"We need to prioritize our communities, not our military spending," tweeted Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the CPC. "Progressives aren't backing down from this fight."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Pentagon spending is on track to grow significantly for the fifth consecutive year, but "very few in Congress are questioning" how the U.S. can afford it.
That's according to the Washington Post's Jeff Stein and Aaron Gregg, who reported Thursday that "the United States is expected to spend more on its military in 2020 than at any point since World War II, except for a handful of years at the height of the Iraq War."
"We are spending way, way, way, way too much money on the Pentagon."
--Congressional Progressive Caucus
In his 2020 budget request, Trump called for $750 billion in Pentagon spending. Democrats countered with a $733 billion offer, which would still represent a substantial increase over the Pentagon's 2019 budget.
Either number would bring U.S. military spending to "near-historic highs," according to the Post.
"Earlier this year, the Congressional Budget Office projected the United States would spend more than $7 trillion on defense over the next decade," the Post reported, "which is in line with both the White House's and House Democrats' budget plans."
As Stein noted on Twitter, only a few progressive lawmakers are asking how the United States can afford such spending--a question frequently raised about bold progressive policies.
Consumer advocacy group Public Citizen tweeted that the "establishment says we can't afford" Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, but apparently has "unlimited" funds for the military.
As Common Dreams reported, Democratic leaders such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and DCCC chair Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.) have both raised alarm about Medicare for All's supposedly high "price tag"--but neither have raised similar alarm about soaring military spending.
\u201cThings the establishment says we can\u2019t afford:\n\n-@RepJayapal & @SenSanders' Medicare for All legislation\n\n-@AOC's Green New Deal\n\n-A living wage for workers\n\n-Universal childcare\n\n-A Federal Jobs Guarantee\n\n-Tuition/Debt-free College\n\nThings the establishment has unlimited $ for:\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1555624930
Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) are among the few speaking out against bipartisan efforts to raise military spending.
In response to the Post's reporting, the CPC tweeted, "We are spending way, way, way, way too much money on the Pentagon."
As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, the CPC revolted against House Democratic leaders' Pentagon spending request and forced the party to cancel a vote on their sweeping 2020 budget measure.
Progressives demanded an increase in domestic social spending in line with the Pentagon's budget.
"We need to prioritize our communities, not our military spending," tweeted Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the CPC. "Progressives aren't backing down from this fight."
Pentagon spending is on track to grow significantly for the fifth consecutive year, but "very few in Congress are questioning" how the U.S. can afford it.
That's according to the Washington Post's Jeff Stein and Aaron Gregg, who reported Thursday that "the United States is expected to spend more on its military in 2020 than at any point since World War II, except for a handful of years at the height of the Iraq War."
"We are spending way, way, way, way too much money on the Pentagon."
--Congressional Progressive Caucus
In his 2020 budget request, Trump called for $750 billion in Pentagon spending. Democrats countered with a $733 billion offer, which would still represent a substantial increase over the Pentagon's 2019 budget.
Either number would bring U.S. military spending to "near-historic highs," according to the Post.
"Earlier this year, the Congressional Budget Office projected the United States would spend more than $7 trillion on defense over the next decade," the Post reported, "which is in line with both the White House's and House Democrats' budget plans."
As Stein noted on Twitter, only a few progressive lawmakers are asking how the United States can afford such spending--a question frequently raised about bold progressive policies.
Consumer advocacy group Public Citizen tweeted that the "establishment says we can't afford" Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, but apparently has "unlimited" funds for the military.
As Common Dreams reported, Democratic leaders such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and DCCC chair Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.) have both raised alarm about Medicare for All's supposedly high "price tag"--but neither have raised similar alarm about soaring military spending.
\u201cThings the establishment says we can\u2019t afford:\n\n-@RepJayapal & @SenSanders' Medicare for All legislation\n\n-@AOC's Green New Deal\n\n-A living wage for workers\n\n-Universal childcare\n\n-A Federal Jobs Guarantee\n\n-Tuition/Debt-free College\n\nThings the establishment has unlimited $ for:\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1555624930
Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) are among the few speaking out against bipartisan efforts to raise military spending.
In response to the Post's reporting, the CPC tweeted, "We are spending way, way, way, way too much money on the Pentagon."
As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, the CPC revolted against House Democratic leaders' Pentagon spending request and forced the party to cancel a vote on their sweeping 2020 budget measure.
Progressives demanded an increase in domestic social spending in line with the Pentagon's budget.
"We need to prioritize our communities, not our military spending," tweeted Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the CPC. "Progressives aren't backing down from this fight."