Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz appeared on 60 Minutes Sunday night to promote his new memoir and tell the American public he is "seriously thinking" about running for president in 2020 as a "centrist independent." (Image: CBS/60 Minutes)
Jan 27, 2019
The announcement by Howard Schultz on Sunday that he is "seriously considering" a 2020 run for president was proof enough for some critics that the billionaire, former CEO of Starbucks, and self-described "independent centrist" is definitely not qualified for the position.
In messages on social media and an interview on 60 Minutes, Schultz announced his consideration while also championing a new memoir and launching a three-month book tour to promote it alongside his political ideas. Among those ideological positions is his belief that while it's possible and good to build a global business empire in order to provide people around the world with subjectively "delicious" and "overpriced" coffee it remains impossible, as he argued on 60 Minutes, to improve and expand Medicare so that every single American is covered.
"Every American deserves the right to have access to quality health care. But what the Democrats are proposing is something that is as false as the wall," said Schultz as he compared President Trump's xenophobic border wall to a single-payer system, which polls show 7 in 10 Americans now support, including 84 percent of Democrats and 52 percent of Republicans. "That is free health care for all," Schultz falsely claimed, "which the country cannot afford."
Contrary to Schultz's assertion, a study released in November showed that a Medicare for All system in the United States could save the country $5.1 trillion over ten years. Progressives did not let the former executives remark go by without comment.
\u201cHoward Schultz said \u201cwhat Democrats are proposing on healthcare is as false as the wall\u201d\n\nThat, alone, is disqualifying.\u201d— John Bisognano (@John Bisognano) 1548635688
\u201cAmericans can't afford Howard Schultz.\u201d— Fred (@Fred) 1548637114
Even Larry Sabato, the politically moderate director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics, was severly unimpressed. "If Howard Schultz were 'seriously thinking' about an independent run for president," Sabato quipped, "he would have abandoned the idea already. I've had undergrad students with a more compelling platform than Schultz offered tonight."
\u201cAgreed. Claim that he\u2019s thinking about this seriously is the first big whopper of the Schultz presidency.\u201d— Josh Marshall (@Josh Marshall) 1548652772
For Democrats, of course, the large concern surrounding an independent run by Schultz--a threat also seen in New York billionaire Michael Bloomberg--is how such a candidate would siphon off votes and give President Donald Trump that much better a shot at re-election.
Julian Castro, among the current 2020 Democratic candidates and the former housing secretary under President Obama, told CNN's Jake Tapper on "State of the Union" on Sunday that a run by Schultz "would provide Donald Trump with his best hope of getting re-elected."
And Tina Podlodowski, the Democratic Party Chair in Washington state, said in a statement: "I have two words for Howard Schultz on a potential run for president as an independent: Just. Don't."
Regardless of his intentions, RoseAnn DeMoro, a labor organizer and strong supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), indicated her belief that Schultz poses no serious threat to anyone in 2020.
\u201cThis will be an easy one to dismiss. He overcharges all of America for coffee... that\u2019s a nonstarter. #SundayMorning\u201d— RoseAnn DeMoro (@RoseAnn DeMoro) 1548602914
Matt Stoller, a fellow at the Open Markets Institute, also said there is nothing to worry about:
\u201cI don\u2019t know why anyone is afraid of Howard Schultz running. He\u2019s not addressing some unmet yearning among voters. He\u2019ll waste a bunch of money and it\u2019ll be funny.\u201d— Matt Stoller (@Matt Stoller) 1548683560
On the other hand:
\u201cIt's hard to look at this photo of Howard Schultz and think he's unfit to be president.\u201d— wilf (@wilf) 1548685418
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
bernie sanderscorporate powerelection 2020howard schultzinequalityjulian castromedicare for allroseann demorosingle-payer
The announcement by Howard Schultz on Sunday that he is "seriously considering" a 2020 run for president was proof enough for some critics that the billionaire, former CEO of Starbucks, and self-described "independent centrist" is definitely not qualified for the position.
In messages on social media and an interview on 60 Minutes, Schultz announced his consideration while also championing a new memoir and launching a three-month book tour to promote it alongside his political ideas. Among those ideological positions is his belief that while it's possible and good to build a global business empire in order to provide people around the world with subjectively "delicious" and "overpriced" coffee it remains impossible, as he argued on 60 Minutes, to improve and expand Medicare so that every single American is covered.
"Every American deserves the right to have access to quality health care. But what the Democrats are proposing is something that is as false as the wall," said Schultz as he compared President Trump's xenophobic border wall to a single-payer system, which polls show 7 in 10 Americans now support, including 84 percent of Democrats and 52 percent of Republicans. "That is free health care for all," Schultz falsely claimed, "which the country cannot afford."
Contrary to Schultz's assertion, a study released in November showed that a Medicare for All system in the United States could save the country $5.1 trillion over ten years. Progressives did not let the former executives remark go by without comment.
\u201cHoward Schultz said \u201cwhat Democrats are proposing on healthcare is as false as the wall\u201d\n\nThat, alone, is disqualifying.\u201d— John Bisognano (@John Bisognano) 1548635688
\u201cAmericans can't afford Howard Schultz.\u201d— Fred (@Fred) 1548637114
Even Larry Sabato, the politically moderate director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics, was severly unimpressed. "If Howard Schultz were 'seriously thinking' about an independent run for president," Sabato quipped, "he would have abandoned the idea already. I've had undergrad students with a more compelling platform than Schultz offered tonight."
\u201cAgreed. Claim that he\u2019s thinking about this seriously is the first big whopper of the Schultz presidency.\u201d— Josh Marshall (@Josh Marshall) 1548652772
For Democrats, of course, the large concern surrounding an independent run by Schultz--a threat also seen in New York billionaire Michael Bloomberg--is how such a candidate would siphon off votes and give President Donald Trump that much better a shot at re-election.
Julian Castro, among the current 2020 Democratic candidates and the former housing secretary under President Obama, told CNN's Jake Tapper on "State of the Union" on Sunday that a run by Schultz "would provide Donald Trump with his best hope of getting re-elected."
And Tina Podlodowski, the Democratic Party Chair in Washington state, said in a statement: "I have two words for Howard Schultz on a potential run for president as an independent: Just. Don't."
Regardless of his intentions, RoseAnn DeMoro, a labor organizer and strong supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), indicated her belief that Schultz poses no serious threat to anyone in 2020.
\u201cThis will be an easy one to dismiss. He overcharges all of America for coffee... that\u2019s a nonstarter. #SundayMorning\u201d— RoseAnn DeMoro (@RoseAnn DeMoro) 1548602914
Matt Stoller, a fellow at the Open Markets Institute, also said there is nothing to worry about:
\u201cI don\u2019t know why anyone is afraid of Howard Schultz running. He\u2019s not addressing some unmet yearning among voters. He\u2019ll waste a bunch of money and it\u2019ll be funny.\u201d— Matt Stoller (@Matt Stoller) 1548683560
On the other hand:
\u201cIt's hard to look at this photo of Howard Schultz and think he's unfit to be president.\u201d— wilf (@wilf) 1548685418
The announcement by Howard Schultz on Sunday that he is "seriously considering" a 2020 run for president was proof enough for some critics that the billionaire, former CEO of Starbucks, and self-described "independent centrist" is definitely not qualified for the position.
In messages on social media and an interview on 60 Minutes, Schultz announced his consideration while also championing a new memoir and launching a three-month book tour to promote it alongside his political ideas. Among those ideological positions is his belief that while it's possible and good to build a global business empire in order to provide people around the world with subjectively "delicious" and "overpriced" coffee it remains impossible, as he argued on 60 Minutes, to improve and expand Medicare so that every single American is covered.
"Every American deserves the right to have access to quality health care. But what the Democrats are proposing is something that is as false as the wall," said Schultz as he compared President Trump's xenophobic border wall to a single-payer system, which polls show 7 in 10 Americans now support, including 84 percent of Democrats and 52 percent of Republicans. "That is free health care for all," Schultz falsely claimed, "which the country cannot afford."
Contrary to Schultz's assertion, a study released in November showed that a Medicare for All system in the United States could save the country $5.1 trillion over ten years. Progressives did not let the former executives remark go by without comment.
\u201cHoward Schultz said \u201cwhat Democrats are proposing on healthcare is as false as the wall\u201d\n\nThat, alone, is disqualifying.\u201d— John Bisognano (@John Bisognano) 1548635688
\u201cAmericans can't afford Howard Schultz.\u201d— Fred (@Fred) 1548637114
Even Larry Sabato, the politically moderate director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics, was severly unimpressed. "If Howard Schultz were 'seriously thinking' about an independent run for president," Sabato quipped, "he would have abandoned the idea already. I've had undergrad students with a more compelling platform than Schultz offered tonight."
\u201cAgreed. Claim that he\u2019s thinking about this seriously is the first big whopper of the Schultz presidency.\u201d— Josh Marshall (@Josh Marshall) 1548652772
For Democrats, of course, the large concern surrounding an independent run by Schultz--a threat also seen in New York billionaire Michael Bloomberg--is how such a candidate would siphon off votes and give President Donald Trump that much better a shot at re-election.
Julian Castro, among the current 2020 Democratic candidates and the former housing secretary under President Obama, told CNN's Jake Tapper on "State of the Union" on Sunday that a run by Schultz "would provide Donald Trump with his best hope of getting re-elected."
And Tina Podlodowski, the Democratic Party Chair in Washington state, said in a statement: "I have two words for Howard Schultz on a potential run for president as an independent: Just. Don't."
Regardless of his intentions, RoseAnn DeMoro, a labor organizer and strong supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), indicated her belief that Schultz poses no serious threat to anyone in 2020.
\u201cThis will be an easy one to dismiss. He overcharges all of America for coffee... that\u2019s a nonstarter. #SundayMorning\u201d— RoseAnn DeMoro (@RoseAnn DeMoro) 1548602914
Matt Stoller, a fellow at the Open Markets Institute, also said there is nothing to worry about:
\u201cI don\u2019t know why anyone is afraid of Howard Schultz running. He\u2019s not addressing some unmet yearning among voters. He\u2019ll waste a bunch of money and it\u2019ll be funny.\u201d— Matt Stoller (@Matt Stoller) 1548683560
On the other hand:
\u201cIt's hard to look at this photo of Howard Schultz and think he's unfit to be president.\u201d— wilf (@wilf) 1548685418
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.