Sep 25, 2018
While Republican lawmakers have attempted to push through a vote on Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination amid multiple sexual assault allegations against him, none of the party's members have signed on to support a reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), which expires at the end of September.
Democratic legislators have joined women's rights and anti-domestic violence groups in calling for the law to be fully reauthorized and strengthened with proposals put forth in a version sponsored by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), while Republican leaders want VAWA to be extended only until December 7 as part of the House's stopgap spending bill.
\u201cDon\u2019t let this go unnoticed: the Violence Against Women Act, which helps survivors of domestic abuse and sexual assault, is set to expire at the end of September. Let\u2019s reauthorize this Act now.\u201d— Kamala Harris (@Kamala Harris) 1537846440
House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has not called for a vote on a full authorization of the the bill, despite calls to do so, including from 46 members of his own party, as well as Democratic leaders and more than 50 attorneys general.
\u201cOur efforts to combat violence against women should never waiver, should never be pushed to the margins, and should never be delayed or diminished by political gamesmanship or foot dragging. Congress must reauthorize VAWA. Our letter to Congress:\u201d— Attorney General Matt Platkin (@Attorney General Matt Platkin) 1537203095
"Republicans' decision to include only a short-term VAWA reauthorization in the must-pass minibus spending bill is nothing short of an abdication of our responsibilities to women in our country," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) wrote in a letter to Ryan.
Jackson Lee's bill includes a provision to make it easier for police to confiscate guns from domestic abusers, more funding for rape prevention programs, and eviction protections for victims living in public housing.
"We're really hoping Congress takes seriously the importance of reauthorizing it with some key enhancements that we're collectively asking for and a three-month extension does not get that work done," Terri Poore, policy director of the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, told the Washington Post.
VAWA has been reauthorized three times since the landmark legislation, which was the first federal law to combat domestic violence and has provided grants for victims' services and prevention programs, was first passed in 1994--always with bipartisan support. As of Tuesday, 163 Democratic members of the House and zero Republicans had signed on as co-sponsors of the bill.
"It's been really sad to me and I really hope before it is too late we will see members of Congress who have proclaimed support for survivors connect it to VAWA," Jess Davidson, executive director of End Rape on Campus, told the Post. "I think that allowing VAWA to be brought to the brink like this when our country is having such an important national conversation to me really shows that Congress is not as with survivors of sexual assaults as they claim to be."
On social media, a number of critics connected Republicans' insistence on confirming Kavanaugh regardless of at least two allegations against him, and the hostility the party has shown toward his accusers, with its refusal to fully reauthorize VAWA.
\u201cthe Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 passed the Senate 78-22.\n\nthe 6 highest ranking Rs on @senjudiciary voted against it:\n\u2013 Grassley\n\u2013 Hatch\n\u2013 Graham\n\u2013 Cornyn\n\u2013 Lee\n\u2013 Cruz\nhttps://t.co/X3Yc4n98r5\u201d— Jesse Lehrich (@Jesse Lehrich) 1537230577
\u201c#VAWA was created in aftermath of Anita Hill and "Year of the Woman." Now, as a record number of women run for office and Kavanaugh accused of sexual assault, Congress is not making its renewal a priority. https://t.co/1deglkdNKX\u201d— Colby Itkowitz (@Colby Itkowitz) 1537533773
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.