SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Republican Offers Familiar Cruelty With Rare Honesty: 'I Don't Support Livable Wage'
The gaffe, said one commentator, was "a potentially fatal mistake"
Jun 07, 2017
In a televised debate just two weeks ahead of the high-profile special election that will fill the vacant House seat in Georgia's Sixth Congressional District, Republican Karen Handel delivered her opponent what one commentator called a "gift-wrapped present" Tuesday night by declaring her opposition to a livable wage.
"I do not support a livable wage," she said, adding that this is "an example of the fundamental difference between a liberal and a conservative."
Offering an alternative vision, one that aligns closely with the aims of Congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump, Handel concluded that she does support "making sure that we have an economy that is robust with low taxes and less regulation."
"A gaffe like this in the final weeks of the race is a potentially fatal mistake." --Jeff SteinHandel's comments came in response to her Democratic rival Jon Ossoff, who said, "The minimum wage should be a living wage."
In recent weeks, opinion polls have tightened as Republicans consolidated support behind Handel and poured money into what has been called the "most expensive House race ever."
Ossoff, a documentary filmmaker, has garnered the support and enthusiasm of the national Democratic Party--which has also spent heavily--and activist groups looking to pick up a win in a deeply red state. The New York Times presented the race as "one in which the pressure is on the Democrats to show they can turn their anti-Trump energies into a victory."
In the first round of the special election, which took place in April, Ossoff missed winning an outright majority of the vote by a mere two percentage points. But, as Common Dreams reported, his performance defied expectations.
Now, the Times notes, Ossoff's crucial objective is "turning out his anti-Trump coalition in equal force a second time during summer vacation season."
Some viewed Tuesday's debate as a possible deciding factor.
"A gaffe like this in the final weeks of the race is a potentially fatal mistake," Vox's Jeff Stein said of Handel's comments on the minimum wage. "Polling suggests Handel doesn't have much room to lose. Ossoff is up by about 2 points in a recent poll--on pace to win a deeply conservative House district that has recently gone to Republicans by more than 20 points."
Polling also suggests that it is Ossoff, not Handel, who is on the right side of history when it comes to raising the minimum wage.
Stein noted:
Hiking the minimum wage is a very popular idea, with more than half of voters saying they support it in some polls. Republican orthodoxy is that minimum wage hikes will result in job losses. Though the evidence is mixed from economists, there's no doubt it remains a popular issue, particularly with an energized Democratic base.
Acknowledging this groundswell of support, top congressional Democrats last month joined Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in announcing their support for the Raise the Wage Act (pdf), legislation that, if enacted, would "raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2024 and would be indexed to the median wage growth thereafter."
"It is a radical concept for our Republican friends," Sanders said while introducting the bill, "but we believe in the United States of America...if you work 40 hours a week or 50 hours a week, you should not be living in poverty."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a televised debate just two weeks ahead of the high-profile special election that will fill the vacant House seat in Georgia's Sixth Congressional District, Republican Karen Handel delivered her opponent what one commentator called a "gift-wrapped present" Tuesday night by declaring her opposition to a livable wage.
"I do not support a livable wage," she said, adding that this is "an example of the fundamental difference between a liberal and a conservative."
Offering an alternative vision, one that aligns closely with the aims of Congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump, Handel concluded that she does support "making sure that we have an economy that is robust with low taxes and less regulation."
"A gaffe like this in the final weeks of the race is a potentially fatal mistake." --Jeff SteinHandel's comments came in response to her Democratic rival Jon Ossoff, who said, "The minimum wage should be a living wage."
In recent weeks, opinion polls have tightened as Republicans consolidated support behind Handel and poured money into what has been called the "most expensive House race ever."
Ossoff, a documentary filmmaker, has garnered the support and enthusiasm of the national Democratic Party--which has also spent heavily--and activist groups looking to pick up a win in a deeply red state. The New York Times presented the race as "one in which the pressure is on the Democrats to show they can turn their anti-Trump energies into a victory."
In the first round of the special election, which took place in April, Ossoff missed winning an outright majority of the vote by a mere two percentage points. But, as Common Dreams reported, his performance defied expectations.
Now, the Times notes, Ossoff's crucial objective is "turning out his anti-Trump coalition in equal force a second time during summer vacation season."
Some viewed Tuesday's debate as a possible deciding factor.
"A gaffe like this in the final weeks of the race is a potentially fatal mistake," Vox's Jeff Stein said of Handel's comments on the minimum wage. "Polling suggests Handel doesn't have much room to lose. Ossoff is up by about 2 points in a recent poll--on pace to win a deeply conservative House district that has recently gone to Republicans by more than 20 points."
Polling also suggests that it is Ossoff, not Handel, who is on the right side of history when it comes to raising the minimum wage.
Stein noted:
Hiking the minimum wage is a very popular idea, with more than half of voters saying they support it in some polls. Republican orthodoxy is that minimum wage hikes will result in job losses. Though the evidence is mixed from economists, there's no doubt it remains a popular issue, particularly with an energized Democratic base.
Acknowledging this groundswell of support, top congressional Democrats last month joined Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in announcing their support for the Raise the Wage Act (pdf), legislation that, if enacted, would "raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2024 and would be indexed to the median wage growth thereafter."
"It is a radical concept for our Republican friends," Sanders said while introducting the bill, "but we believe in the United States of America...if you work 40 hours a week or 50 hours a week, you should not be living in poverty."
In a televised debate just two weeks ahead of the high-profile special election that will fill the vacant House seat in Georgia's Sixth Congressional District, Republican Karen Handel delivered her opponent what one commentator called a "gift-wrapped present" Tuesday night by declaring her opposition to a livable wage.
"I do not support a livable wage," she said, adding that this is "an example of the fundamental difference between a liberal and a conservative."
Offering an alternative vision, one that aligns closely with the aims of Congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump, Handel concluded that she does support "making sure that we have an economy that is robust with low taxes and less regulation."
"A gaffe like this in the final weeks of the race is a potentially fatal mistake." --Jeff SteinHandel's comments came in response to her Democratic rival Jon Ossoff, who said, "The minimum wage should be a living wage."
In recent weeks, opinion polls have tightened as Republicans consolidated support behind Handel and poured money into what has been called the "most expensive House race ever."
Ossoff, a documentary filmmaker, has garnered the support and enthusiasm of the national Democratic Party--which has also spent heavily--and activist groups looking to pick up a win in a deeply red state. The New York Times presented the race as "one in which the pressure is on the Democrats to show they can turn their anti-Trump energies into a victory."
In the first round of the special election, which took place in April, Ossoff missed winning an outright majority of the vote by a mere two percentage points. But, as Common Dreams reported, his performance defied expectations.
Now, the Times notes, Ossoff's crucial objective is "turning out his anti-Trump coalition in equal force a second time during summer vacation season."
Some viewed Tuesday's debate as a possible deciding factor.
"A gaffe like this in the final weeks of the race is a potentially fatal mistake," Vox's Jeff Stein said of Handel's comments on the minimum wage. "Polling suggests Handel doesn't have much room to lose. Ossoff is up by about 2 points in a recent poll--on pace to win a deeply conservative House district that has recently gone to Republicans by more than 20 points."
Polling also suggests that it is Ossoff, not Handel, who is on the right side of history when it comes to raising the minimum wage.
Stein noted:
Hiking the minimum wage is a very popular idea, with more than half of voters saying they support it in some polls. Republican orthodoxy is that minimum wage hikes will result in job losses. Though the evidence is mixed from economists, there's no doubt it remains a popular issue, particularly with an energized Democratic base.
Acknowledging this groundswell of support, top congressional Democrats last month joined Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in announcing their support for the Raise the Wage Act (pdf), legislation that, if enacted, would "raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2024 and would be indexed to the median wage growth thereafter."
"It is a radical concept for our Republican friends," Sanders said while introducting the bill, "but we believe in the United States of America...if you work 40 hours a week or 50 hours a week, you should not be living in poverty."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.