

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Detainees are transferred from buses operated by the GEO Group to a plane chartered by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at King County International Airport on April 15, 2025 in Seattle, Washington.
A U.S. Department of Justice lawyer told a federal judge that there are no plans for such flights on Friday or Saturday while still asserting the administration's "right to remove people" as early as this weekend.
The ACLU on Friday sought emergency action from the U.S. Supreme Court to protect Venezuelan men in immigration custody at risk of swiftly being deported under President Donald Trump's proclamation invoking an 18th-century wartime law.
The high court should "preserve the status quo for individuals challenging their removal under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas," according to the legal group. "Members of the proposed class are in imminent and ongoing jeopardy of being removed from the United States without notice or an opportunity to be heard, in direct contravention of this court's order," which came after Trump used the 1798 law to send Venezuelans to a mega-prison in El Salvador last month.
The administration sent two planeloads of alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua to the Salvadoran Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), despite Washington, D.C.-based District Court Judge James Boasberg blocking deportations under the AEA. The Supreme Court lifted that block earlier this month, but also said people targeted for deportation should first receive notices—though no timeline was mandated—and be able to challenge their removal in court.
Exciting times (derogatory)
[image or embed]
— Joshua J. Friedman (@joshuajfriedman.com) April 18, 2025 at 5:53 PM
The ACLU's Friday filing followed Venezuelan migrants at Bluebonnet Detention Facility in Anson, Texas receiving removal notices. The petition—which goes to Justice Samuel Alito—states that "many individuals have already been loaded on to buses, presumably headed to the airport," and cites reporting that the administration was preparing for an imminent military deportation flight.
"Because of this ongoing and imminent risk of removal to a prison in El Salvador, applicants are simultaneously seeking relief through a renewed application for a temporary restraining order in the district court in the District of Columbia and an application for a stay of removal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit," the filing noted.
Boasberg, the district court judge, called an emergency hearing on Friday evening. Politico's Josh Gerstein reported that U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney Drew Ensign told him that there would be no AEA deportation flights on Friday night, and people he spoke with were not aware of any scheduled for Saturday.
According to Camilo Montoya-Galvez at CBS News, Boasberg also took issue with the notice that immigration officials gave to the targeted migrants, a photo of which the reporter shared on social media.
Montoya-Galvez later reported that after a recess, the DOJ lawyer clarified to Boasberg that while he has been informed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that there are no plans for AEA deportations on Saturday, they "reserve the right to remove people tomorrow."
Earlier this week, Boasberg concluded that the Trump administration's decisions related to migrants sent to CECOT in March "demonstrate a willful disregard for [his] order, sufficient for the court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the government in criminal contempt."
On Friday evening, a panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. issued an administrative stay, halting the district court judge's plan for contempt proceedings.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The ACLU on Friday sought emergency action from the U.S. Supreme Court to protect Venezuelan men in immigration custody at risk of swiftly being deported under President Donald Trump's proclamation invoking an 18th-century wartime law.
The high court should "preserve the status quo for individuals challenging their removal under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas," according to the legal group. "Members of the proposed class are in imminent and ongoing jeopardy of being removed from the United States without notice or an opportunity to be heard, in direct contravention of this court's order," which came after Trump used the 1798 law to send Venezuelans to a mega-prison in El Salvador last month.
The administration sent two planeloads of alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua to the Salvadoran Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), despite Washington, D.C.-based District Court Judge James Boasberg blocking deportations under the AEA. The Supreme Court lifted that block earlier this month, but also said people targeted for deportation should first receive notices—though no timeline was mandated—and be able to challenge their removal in court.
Exciting times (derogatory)
[image or embed]
— Joshua J. Friedman (@joshuajfriedman.com) April 18, 2025 at 5:53 PM
The ACLU's Friday filing followed Venezuelan migrants at Bluebonnet Detention Facility in Anson, Texas receiving removal notices. The petition—which goes to Justice Samuel Alito—states that "many individuals have already been loaded on to buses, presumably headed to the airport," and cites reporting that the administration was preparing for an imminent military deportation flight.
"Because of this ongoing and imminent risk of removal to a prison in El Salvador, applicants are simultaneously seeking relief through a renewed application for a temporary restraining order in the district court in the District of Columbia and an application for a stay of removal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit," the filing noted.
Boasberg, the district court judge, called an emergency hearing on Friday evening. Politico's Josh Gerstein reported that U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney Drew Ensign told him that there would be no AEA deportation flights on Friday night, and people he spoke with were not aware of any scheduled for Saturday.
According to Camilo Montoya-Galvez at CBS News, Boasberg also took issue with the notice that immigration officials gave to the targeted migrants, a photo of which the reporter shared on social media.
Montoya-Galvez later reported that after a recess, the DOJ lawyer clarified to Boasberg that while he has been informed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that there are no plans for AEA deportations on Saturday, they "reserve the right to remove people tomorrow."
Earlier this week, Boasberg concluded that the Trump administration's decisions related to migrants sent to CECOT in March "demonstrate a willful disregard for [his] order, sufficient for the court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the government in criminal contempt."
On Friday evening, a panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. issued an administrative stay, halting the district court judge's plan for contempt proceedings.
The ACLU on Friday sought emergency action from the U.S. Supreme Court to protect Venezuelan men in immigration custody at risk of swiftly being deported under President Donald Trump's proclamation invoking an 18th-century wartime law.
The high court should "preserve the status quo for individuals challenging their removal under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas," according to the legal group. "Members of the proposed class are in imminent and ongoing jeopardy of being removed from the United States without notice or an opportunity to be heard, in direct contravention of this court's order," which came after Trump used the 1798 law to send Venezuelans to a mega-prison in El Salvador last month.
The administration sent two planeloads of alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua to the Salvadoran Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), despite Washington, D.C.-based District Court Judge James Boasberg blocking deportations under the AEA. The Supreme Court lifted that block earlier this month, but also said people targeted for deportation should first receive notices—though no timeline was mandated—and be able to challenge their removal in court.
Exciting times (derogatory)
[image or embed]
— Joshua J. Friedman (@joshuajfriedman.com) April 18, 2025 at 5:53 PM
The ACLU's Friday filing followed Venezuelan migrants at Bluebonnet Detention Facility in Anson, Texas receiving removal notices. The petition—which goes to Justice Samuel Alito—states that "many individuals have already been loaded on to buses, presumably headed to the airport," and cites reporting that the administration was preparing for an imminent military deportation flight.
"Because of this ongoing and imminent risk of removal to a prison in El Salvador, applicants are simultaneously seeking relief through a renewed application for a temporary restraining order in the district court in the District of Columbia and an application for a stay of removal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit," the filing noted.
Boasberg, the district court judge, called an emergency hearing on Friday evening. Politico's Josh Gerstein reported that U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney Drew Ensign told him that there would be no AEA deportation flights on Friday night, and people he spoke with were not aware of any scheduled for Saturday.
According to Camilo Montoya-Galvez at CBS News, Boasberg also took issue with the notice that immigration officials gave to the targeted migrants, a photo of which the reporter shared on social media.
Montoya-Galvez later reported that after a recess, the DOJ lawyer clarified to Boasberg that while he has been informed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that there are no plans for AEA deportations on Saturday, they "reserve the right to remove people tomorrow."
Earlier this week, Boasberg concluded that the Trump administration's decisions related to migrants sent to CECOT in March "demonstrate a willful disregard for [his] order, sufficient for the court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the government in criminal contempt."
On Friday evening, a panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. issued an administrative stay, halting the district court judge's plan for contempt proceedings.