

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Among the hundreds of billionaires and mega billionaires in the U.S., there are more than several enlightened people upset by our society's problems who could make big improvements.
The next step is breaking down a roadblock of sorts. A prominent, very rich businessman summed it up when he told me: "Ralph, we all know how to make a lot of money, but we don't have a clue as to what to do with it, including me." It is not as if these super-wealthy are contemplating their navels. Many give away lots of money but wonder if their giving is a stopgap. In contrast, others refrain from donating unless they can be assured that their philanthropic investments will likely deliver results.
It helps to distinguish between charity and justice - both noble causes worthy of donations. Charity ministers to the immediate, often desperate needs of vulnerable populations. Charities support soup kitchens and clinics, renovate or build educational buildings, add services for the elderly, provide medicines for the poor here and in developing countries, help local school systems under budget restraints, and quickly respond to tragedies with disaster relief here and abroad. All of these causes are worthwhile (when these services and donations reach the appropriate recipients).
Justice directly confronts the challenge of preventing people from ending up in vulnerable situations. What causes over 15 million children in the U.S. to go to bed hungry each night? Why don't we have universal public health care? Why aren't public colleges and universities tuition-free like high schools in the U.S. and most Western European countries? Why are our public works crumbling and creating unnecessary obstructions for disaster relief (reaching people stranded after hurricanes)?
Will charity ever begin to catch up with the consequences from corruption, self- preserving bureaucracies, man-made environmental damages, and governments indentured to avaricious special interests and concentrated corporate power? Not a chance.
Advocacy promoting justice seeks to prevent the causes of so much misery, institutional harm, poverty, and the loss of human life and potential. Repairing the wreckage of wars places huge demands on charity, and waging peace and negotiating arms control agreements places huge demands on justice.
Last fall, I proposed "Birth-Year Gifts to America," which the very wealthy could jumpstart with other Americans around the country. For example, people born in 1930, 1935, or 1937 would organize to support and endow a self-renewing nonprofit civic institution to improve the quality of life of future generations.
The steel magnate Andrew Carnegie's philanthropy created many organizations, including the Carnegie Institution for Science, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and the Carnegie Corporation of New York (a major foundation dedicated to advancing science). His most memorable gift was funding the establishment of over 2,500 free libraries in as many communities throughout the country. He insisted, however, that the localities provide the land to give themselves a stake. Talk about a legacy!
In my proposal, I suggested twenty-five enduring ideas that could be gifted to our country and cover many needed societal improvements. Birth years for people seventy to ninety years of age have thousands of people of means who, whether they are religious or not, really do not believe that they can take it with them.
You can view the entire list, which may stimulate your birth-year project nationally, regionally, or locally, that advocates for justice through systemic creations or improvements of institutions here. For a copy, write to PO Box 19367, Washington, D.C. 20036.
Bringing together the billionaires who want to get things moving for a weekend roundtable could kickstart a new approach to meaningful and creative philanthropy. We would be pleased to host such a serious historic deliberation to escalate informed wishes into action.
Most progressives express disbelief that the very wealthy would ever support fundamental changes that would shift the power from the hands of the few to the hands of the many and create a much more equitable and prosperous society. We could have a culture that focuses on preventing problems through justice and not just reacting to the disasters and inequality caused by such problems through charity. A cynical view ignores that having the backing of majority public opinion and the financial support of the wealthy can produce positive results. (I strove to detail this potential in my book "Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us!" - a work of realistic political fiction.)
Nearly a century ago, the brilliant philosopher/mathematician Alfred North Whitehead declared, "A great society is a society in which its men of business think greatly of their functions." Today, those heeding the vision of Senator Daniel Webster, who, before the Civil War, said: "Justice, Sir, is the great interest of man on Earth," will surprise their peers by moving from success to significance. They can begin this transition by connecting with advocates with decades-long experience seeking justice under dire conditions, with some success.
There are examples of the wealthy contributing to longstanding progressive improvements in society. Some wealthy philanthropists funded many activities focused on abolishing slavery and obtaining universal suffrage for women. A few rich families provided substantial financial backing for the Civil Rights Movement. In addition, numerous environmental groups today are reaping the benefits of wealthy supporters.
Now, with more wealthy individuals and families than ever,fundingh charity and justice has become more feasible.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Among the hundreds of billionaires and mega billionaires in the U.S., there are more than several enlightened people upset by our society's problems who could make big improvements.
The next step is breaking down a roadblock of sorts. A prominent, very rich businessman summed it up when he told me: "Ralph, we all know how to make a lot of money, but we don't have a clue as to what to do with it, including me." It is not as if these super-wealthy are contemplating their navels. Many give away lots of money but wonder if their giving is a stopgap. In contrast, others refrain from donating unless they can be assured that their philanthropic investments will likely deliver results.
It helps to distinguish between charity and justice - both noble causes worthy of donations. Charity ministers to the immediate, often desperate needs of vulnerable populations. Charities support soup kitchens and clinics, renovate or build educational buildings, add services for the elderly, provide medicines for the poor here and in developing countries, help local school systems under budget restraints, and quickly respond to tragedies with disaster relief here and abroad. All of these causes are worthwhile (when these services and donations reach the appropriate recipients).
Justice directly confronts the challenge of preventing people from ending up in vulnerable situations. What causes over 15 million children in the U.S. to go to bed hungry each night? Why don't we have universal public health care? Why aren't public colleges and universities tuition-free like high schools in the U.S. and most Western European countries? Why are our public works crumbling and creating unnecessary obstructions for disaster relief (reaching people stranded after hurricanes)?
Will charity ever begin to catch up with the consequences from corruption, self- preserving bureaucracies, man-made environmental damages, and governments indentured to avaricious special interests and concentrated corporate power? Not a chance.
Advocacy promoting justice seeks to prevent the causes of so much misery, institutional harm, poverty, and the loss of human life and potential. Repairing the wreckage of wars places huge demands on charity, and waging peace and negotiating arms control agreements places huge demands on justice.
Last fall, I proposed "Birth-Year Gifts to America," which the very wealthy could jumpstart with other Americans around the country. For example, people born in 1930, 1935, or 1937 would organize to support and endow a self-renewing nonprofit civic institution to improve the quality of life of future generations.
The steel magnate Andrew Carnegie's philanthropy created many organizations, including the Carnegie Institution for Science, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and the Carnegie Corporation of New York (a major foundation dedicated to advancing science). His most memorable gift was funding the establishment of over 2,500 free libraries in as many communities throughout the country. He insisted, however, that the localities provide the land to give themselves a stake. Talk about a legacy!
In my proposal, I suggested twenty-five enduring ideas that could be gifted to our country and cover many needed societal improvements. Birth years for people seventy to ninety years of age have thousands of people of means who, whether they are religious or not, really do not believe that they can take it with them.
You can view the entire list, which may stimulate your birth-year project nationally, regionally, or locally, that advocates for justice through systemic creations or improvements of institutions here. For a copy, write to PO Box 19367, Washington, D.C. 20036.
Bringing together the billionaires who want to get things moving for a weekend roundtable could kickstart a new approach to meaningful and creative philanthropy. We would be pleased to host such a serious historic deliberation to escalate informed wishes into action.
Most progressives express disbelief that the very wealthy would ever support fundamental changes that would shift the power from the hands of the few to the hands of the many and create a much more equitable and prosperous society. We could have a culture that focuses on preventing problems through justice and not just reacting to the disasters and inequality caused by such problems through charity. A cynical view ignores that having the backing of majority public opinion and the financial support of the wealthy can produce positive results. (I strove to detail this potential in my book "Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us!" - a work of realistic political fiction.)
Nearly a century ago, the brilliant philosopher/mathematician Alfred North Whitehead declared, "A great society is a society in which its men of business think greatly of their functions." Today, those heeding the vision of Senator Daniel Webster, who, before the Civil War, said: "Justice, Sir, is the great interest of man on Earth," will surprise their peers by moving from success to significance. They can begin this transition by connecting with advocates with decades-long experience seeking justice under dire conditions, with some success.
There are examples of the wealthy contributing to longstanding progressive improvements in society. Some wealthy philanthropists funded many activities focused on abolishing slavery and obtaining universal suffrage for women. A few rich families provided substantial financial backing for the Civil Rights Movement. In addition, numerous environmental groups today are reaping the benefits of wealthy supporters.
Now, with more wealthy individuals and families than ever,fundingh charity and justice has become more feasible.
Among the hundreds of billionaires and mega billionaires in the U.S., there are more than several enlightened people upset by our society's problems who could make big improvements.
The next step is breaking down a roadblock of sorts. A prominent, very rich businessman summed it up when he told me: "Ralph, we all know how to make a lot of money, but we don't have a clue as to what to do with it, including me." It is not as if these super-wealthy are contemplating their navels. Many give away lots of money but wonder if their giving is a stopgap. In contrast, others refrain from donating unless they can be assured that their philanthropic investments will likely deliver results.
It helps to distinguish between charity and justice - both noble causes worthy of donations. Charity ministers to the immediate, often desperate needs of vulnerable populations. Charities support soup kitchens and clinics, renovate or build educational buildings, add services for the elderly, provide medicines for the poor here and in developing countries, help local school systems under budget restraints, and quickly respond to tragedies with disaster relief here and abroad. All of these causes are worthwhile (when these services and donations reach the appropriate recipients).
Justice directly confronts the challenge of preventing people from ending up in vulnerable situations. What causes over 15 million children in the U.S. to go to bed hungry each night? Why don't we have universal public health care? Why aren't public colleges and universities tuition-free like high schools in the U.S. and most Western European countries? Why are our public works crumbling and creating unnecessary obstructions for disaster relief (reaching people stranded after hurricanes)?
Will charity ever begin to catch up with the consequences from corruption, self- preserving bureaucracies, man-made environmental damages, and governments indentured to avaricious special interests and concentrated corporate power? Not a chance.
Advocacy promoting justice seeks to prevent the causes of so much misery, institutional harm, poverty, and the loss of human life and potential. Repairing the wreckage of wars places huge demands on charity, and waging peace and negotiating arms control agreements places huge demands on justice.
Last fall, I proposed "Birth-Year Gifts to America," which the very wealthy could jumpstart with other Americans around the country. For example, people born in 1930, 1935, or 1937 would organize to support and endow a self-renewing nonprofit civic institution to improve the quality of life of future generations.
The steel magnate Andrew Carnegie's philanthropy created many organizations, including the Carnegie Institution for Science, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and the Carnegie Corporation of New York (a major foundation dedicated to advancing science). His most memorable gift was funding the establishment of over 2,500 free libraries in as many communities throughout the country. He insisted, however, that the localities provide the land to give themselves a stake. Talk about a legacy!
In my proposal, I suggested twenty-five enduring ideas that could be gifted to our country and cover many needed societal improvements. Birth years for people seventy to ninety years of age have thousands of people of means who, whether they are religious or not, really do not believe that they can take it with them.
You can view the entire list, which may stimulate your birth-year project nationally, regionally, or locally, that advocates for justice through systemic creations or improvements of institutions here. For a copy, write to PO Box 19367, Washington, D.C. 20036.
Bringing together the billionaires who want to get things moving for a weekend roundtable could kickstart a new approach to meaningful and creative philanthropy. We would be pleased to host such a serious historic deliberation to escalate informed wishes into action.
Most progressives express disbelief that the very wealthy would ever support fundamental changes that would shift the power from the hands of the few to the hands of the many and create a much more equitable and prosperous society. We could have a culture that focuses on preventing problems through justice and not just reacting to the disasters and inequality caused by such problems through charity. A cynical view ignores that having the backing of majority public opinion and the financial support of the wealthy can produce positive results. (I strove to detail this potential in my book "Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us!" - a work of realistic political fiction.)
Nearly a century ago, the brilliant philosopher/mathematician Alfred North Whitehead declared, "A great society is a society in which its men of business think greatly of their functions." Today, those heeding the vision of Senator Daniel Webster, who, before the Civil War, said: "Justice, Sir, is the great interest of man on Earth," will surprise their peers by moving from success to significance. They can begin this transition by connecting with advocates with decades-long experience seeking justice under dire conditions, with some success.
There are examples of the wealthy contributing to longstanding progressive improvements in society. Some wealthy philanthropists funded many activities focused on abolishing slavery and obtaining universal suffrage for women. A few rich families provided substantial financial backing for the Civil Rights Movement. In addition, numerous environmental groups today are reaping the benefits of wealthy supporters.
Now, with more wealthy individuals and families than ever,fundingh charity and justice has become more feasible.