SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Black-Out in DC: Pay No Attention to Those Veterans Chained to the White House Fence
Dec 19, 2010
There
was a black-out and a white-out Thursday and Friday as over a hundred
US veterans opposed to US wars in Afghanistan and elsewhere around the
world, and their civilian supporters, chained and tied themselves to the
White House fence during an early snowstorm to say enough is enough.
Washington
Police arrested 135 of the protesters, in what is being called the
largest mass detention in recent years. Among those arrested were Ray
McGovern, a former CIA analyst who used to provide the president's daily
briefings, Daniel Ellsberg, who released the government's Pentagon
Papers during the Nixon administration, and Chris Hedges, former war
correspondent for the New York Times.
No major US news media reported on the demonstration or the arrests. It was blacked out of the New York Times, blacked out of the Philadelphia Inquirer, blacked out in the Los Angeles Times, blacked out of the Wall Street Journal, and even blacked out of the capital's local daily, the Washington Post.
Making
the media cover-up of the protest all the more outrageous was the fact
that most news media did report on Friday, the day after the protest,
the results of the latest poll of American attitudes towards the
Afghanistan War, an ABC/Washington Post Poll which found that 60% of
Americans now feel that war has "not been worth it." That's a big
increase from the 53% who said they opposed the war in July.
Clearly,
any honest journalist and editor would see a news link between such a
poll result and an anti-war protest at the White House led, for the
first time in recent memory, by a veterans organization, the group
Veterans for Peace, in which veterans of the nation's wars actually put
themselves on the line to be arrested to protest a current war.
Friday
was also the day that most news organizations were reporting on the
much touted, but also much over-rated Pentagon report on the "progress"
of the American war in Afghanistan--a report that claimed there was
progress, but which was immediately contradicted by a CIA report that
said the opposite. Again, any honest journalist and editor would see the
publication of such a report as an appropriate place to mention the
unusual opposition to the war by a group of veterans right outside the
president's office.
And
yet, the protest event was completely blacked out by the corporate news
media, even as the capital was whited-out by a fast-moving snowstorm
that brought traffic almost to a standstill.
If you wanted to know about this protest, you had to go to the internet and read the Huffington Post or to theSocialist Worker,
or to this publication (okay, we're a day late, but I was stuck in
traffic yesterday), or to Democracy Now! on the alternative airways.
My old employer, the Sydney Morning Herald in
Australia, showed how it's supposed to be done. In an article published
Friday about the latest ABC/Washington Post Poll, reporter Simon Mann,
after explaining that opposition to the war in the US was rising, then
wrote:
"The
publication of the review coincided with anti-war protests held across
the US, including one in Washington in which people chained themselves
to the White House fence, leading to about 100 arrests."
That's the way journalism is supposed to work.
Relevant information that puts the days news in some kind of useful context is supposed to be provided to the reader.
Clearly,
in the US the corporate media perform a different function. It's called
propaganda. And the handling of this dramatic protest by American
veterans against the nation's current war provides a dramatic
illustration of how far the news industry and the journalism profession
has fallen.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Dave Lindorff
Dave Lindorff is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. He is author of "Marketplace Medicine: The Rise of the For-Profit Hospital Chains" (BantamBooks, 1992), and "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006). He is the founding editor of ThisCantBeHappening.
There
was a black-out and a white-out Thursday and Friday as over a hundred
US veterans opposed to US wars in Afghanistan and elsewhere around the
world, and their civilian supporters, chained and tied themselves to the
White House fence during an early snowstorm to say enough is enough.
Washington
Police arrested 135 of the protesters, in what is being called the
largest mass detention in recent years. Among those arrested were Ray
McGovern, a former CIA analyst who used to provide the president's daily
briefings, Daniel Ellsberg, who released the government's Pentagon
Papers during the Nixon administration, and Chris Hedges, former war
correspondent for the New York Times.
No major US news media reported on the demonstration or the arrests. It was blacked out of the New York Times, blacked out of the Philadelphia Inquirer, blacked out in the Los Angeles Times, blacked out of the Wall Street Journal, and even blacked out of the capital's local daily, the Washington Post.
Making
the media cover-up of the protest all the more outrageous was the fact
that most news media did report on Friday, the day after the protest,
the results of the latest poll of American attitudes towards the
Afghanistan War, an ABC/Washington Post Poll which found that 60% of
Americans now feel that war has "not been worth it." That's a big
increase from the 53% who said they opposed the war in July.
Clearly,
any honest journalist and editor would see a news link between such a
poll result and an anti-war protest at the White House led, for the
first time in recent memory, by a veterans organization, the group
Veterans for Peace, in which veterans of the nation's wars actually put
themselves on the line to be arrested to protest a current war.
Friday
was also the day that most news organizations were reporting on the
much touted, but also much over-rated Pentagon report on the "progress"
of the American war in Afghanistan--a report that claimed there was
progress, but which was immediately contradicted by a CIA report that
said the opposite. Again, any honest journalist and editor would see the
publication of such a report as an appropriate place to mention the
unusual opposition to the war by a group of veterans right outside the
president's office.
And
yet, the protest event was completely blacked out by the corporate news
media, even as the capital was whited-out by a fast-moving snowstorm
that brought traffic almost to a standstill.
If you wanted to know about this protest, you had to go to the internet and read the Huffington Post or to theSocialist Worker,
or to this publication (okay, we're a day late, but I was stuck in
traffic yesterday), or to Democracy Now! on the alternative airways.
My old employer, the Sydney Morning Herald in
Australia, showed how it's supposed to be done. In an article published
Friday about the latest ABC/Washington Post Poll, reporter Simon Mann,
after explaining that opposition to the war in the US was rising, then
wrote:
"The
publication of the review coincided with anti-war protests held across
the US, including one in Washington in which people chained themselves
to the White House fence, leading to about 100 arrests."
That's the way journalism is supposed to work.
Relevant information that puts the days news in some kind of useful context is supposed to be provided to the reader.
Clearly,
in the US the corporate media perform a different function. It's called
propaganda. And the handling of this dramatic protest by American
veterans against the nation's current war provides a dramatic
illustration of how far the news industry and the journalism profession
has fallen.
Dave Lindorff
Dave Lindorff is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. He is author of "Marketplace Medicine: The Rise of the For-Profit Hospital Chains" (BantamBooks, 1992), and "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006). He is the founding editor of ThisCantBeHappening.
There
was a black-out and a white-out Thursday and Friday as over a hundred
US veterans opposed to US wars in Afghanistan and elsewhere around the
world, and their civilian supporters, chained and tied themselves to the
White House fence during an early snowstorm to say enough is enough.
Washington
Police arrested 135 of the protesters, in what is being called the
largest mass detention in recent years. Among those arrested were Ray
McGovern, a former CIA analyst who used to provide the president's daily
briefings, Daniel Ellsberg, who released the government's Pentagon
Papers during the Nixon administration, and Chris Hedges, former war
correspondent for the New York Times.
No major US news media reported on the demonstration or the arrests. It was blacked out of the New York Times, blacked out of the Philadelphia Inquirer, blacked out in the Los Angeles Times, blacked out of the Wall Street Journal, and even blacked out of the capital's local daily, the Washington Post.
Making
the media cover-up of the protest all the more outrageous was the fact
that most news media did report on Friday, the day after the protest,
the results of the latest poll of American attitudes towards the
Afghanistan War, an ABC/Washington Post Poll which found that 60% of
Americans now feel that war has "not been worth it." That's a big
increase from the 53% who said they opposed the war in July.
Clearly,
any honest journalist and editor would see a news link between such a
poll result and an anti-war protest at the White House led, for the
first time in recent memory, by a veterans organization, the group
Veterans for Peace, in which veterans of the nation's wars actually put
themselves on the line to be arrested to protest a current war.
Friday
was also the day that most news organizations were reporting on the
much touted, but also much over-rated Pentagon report on the "progress"
of the American war in Afghanistan--a report that claimed there was
progress, but which was immediately contradicted by a CIA report that
said the opposite. Again, any honest journalist and editor would see the
publication of such a report as an appropriate place to mention the
unusual opposition to the war by a group of veterans right outside the
president's office.
And
yet, the protest event was completely blacked out by the corporate news
media, even as the capital was whited-out by a fast-moving snowstorm
that brought traffic almost to a standstill.
If you wanted to know about this protest, you had to go to the internet and read the Huffington Post or to theSocialist Worker,
or to this publication (okay, we're a day late, but I was stuck in
traffic yesterday), or to Democracy Now! on the alternative airways.
My old employer, the Sydney Morning Herald in
Australia, showed how it's supposed to be done. In an article published
Friday about the latest ABC/Washington Post Poll, reporter Simon Mann,
after explaining that opposition to the war in the US was rising, then
wrote:
"The
publication of the review coincided with anti-war protests held across
the US, including one in Washington in which people chained themselves
to the White House fence, leading to about 100 arrests."
That's the way journalism is supposed to work.
Relevant information that puts the days news in some kind of useful context is supposed to be provided to the reader.
Clearly,
in the US the corporate media perform a different function. It's called
propaganda. And the handling of this dramatic protest by American
veterans against the nation's current war provides a dramatic
illustration of how far the news industry and the journalism profession
has fallen.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.