Saudi journalist, Global Opinions columnist for the Washington Post, and former editor-in-chief of Al-Arab News Channel Jamal Khashoggi offers remarks during POMED's "Mohammed bin Salman's Saudi Arabia: A Deeper Look." (Photo: POMED/Flickr/cc)
While President Continues to Play Dumb on Murder, 2016 Reporting Shows Saudis Only Blacklisted Khashoggi After Journalist Criticized... Trump
"So the Saudis murdered a journalist they previously banned for speaking badly about Trump, and now Trump refuses to condemn them for it."
As a columnist for the Washington Post, Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi frequently criticized his home country's government--denouncing the country's treatment of women and most recently, in his final column published Wednesday, calling on Saudi officials to embrace press freedom.
But as critics accuse President Donald Trump of conspiring with the Saudis to cover up Khashoggi's suspected murder, one journalist on Wednesday highlighted an article published in the Independent, weeks after Trump was elected in November of 2016--noting that Khashoggi's criticism of the Saudis wasn't the only thing that led the government to ban his work from appearing in his home country.
While the move was likely fueled by his outspoken criticism of the monarchy and its policies, the journalist was only blacklisted from working in the kingdom after criticizing Trump.
Los Angeles Times columnist Virginia Heffernan posted about her realization late Wednesday after coming across the Independent article.
Soon after, a Saudi government source was quoted by the Middle East Eye as saying, "The author Jamal Khashoggi does not represent the government of Saudi Arabia or its positions at any level, and...his opinions only represent his personal views, not that of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia."
By early December, Saudi authorities had banned Khashoggi "from writing in newspapers, appearing on TV, and attending conferences" in the kingdom, leading the author to a self-imposed exile.
To several political observers on Twitter, the revelation that the Saudis had so directly come to the defense of Trump gave new meaning to the fact that the president is now attempting to shield Saudi Arabia from the international outrage that's exploded in the 16 days since Khashoggi disappeared after entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul--especially following reports that U.S. intelligence agencies had known of a Saudi plan to detain Khashoggi.
Mounting evidence has pointed to a murder by a "hit team" with links to MBS, but the Trump administration has criticized those accusing the Saudis of involvement, with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo telling reporters, "We ought to give them a few more days" to complete their own investigation and issuing a reminder that the Saudis "are an important strategic alliance of the U.S. and we need to be mindful of that as well."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
As a columnist for the Washington Post, Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi frequently criticized his home country's government--denouncing the country's treatment of women and most recently, in his final column published Wednesday, calling on Saudi officials to embrace press freedom.
But as critics accuse President Donald Trump of conspiring with the Saudis to cover up Khashoggi's suspected murder, one journalist on Wednesday highlighted an article published in the Independent, weeks after Trump was elected in November of 2016--noting that Khashoggi's criticism of the Saudis wasn't the only thing that led the government to ban his work from appearing in his home country.
While the move was likely fueled by his outspoken criticism of the monarchy and its policies, the journalist was only blacklisted from working in the kingdom after criticizing Trump.
Los Angeles Times columnist Virginia Heffernan posted about her realization late Wednesday after coming across the Independent article.
Soon after, a Saudi government source was quoted by the Middle East Eye as saying, "The author Jamal Khashoggi does not represent the government of Saudi Arabia or its positions at any level, and...his opinions only represent his personal views, not that of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia."
By early December, Saudi authorities had banned Khashoggi "from writing in newspapers, appearing on TV, and attending conferences" in the kingdom, leading the author to a self-imposed exile.
To several political observers on Twitter, the revelation that the Saudis had so directly come to the defense of Trump gave new meaning to the fact that the president is now attempting to shield Saudi Arabia from the international outrage that's exploded in the 16 days since Khashoggi disappeared after entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul--especially following reports that U.S. intelligence agencies had known of a Saudi plan to detain Khashoggi.
Mounting evidence has pointed to a murder by a "hit team" with links to MBS, but the Trump administration has criticized those accusing the Saudis of involvement, with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo telling reporters, "We ought to give them a few more days" to complete their own investigation and issuing a reminder that the Saudis "are an important strategic alliance of the U.S. and we need to be mindful of that as well."
As a columnist for the Washington Post, Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi frequently criticized his home country's government--denouncing the country's treatment of women and most recently, in his final column published Wednesday, calling on Saudi officials to embrace press freedom.
But as critics accuse President Donald Trump of conspiring with the Saudis to cover up Khashoggi's suspected murder, one journalist on Wednesday highlighted an article published in the Independent, weeks after Trump was elected in November of 2016--noting that Khashoggi's criticism of the Saudis wasn't the only thing that led the government to ban his work from appearing in his home country.
While the move was likely fueled by his outspoken criticism of the monarchy and its policies, the journalist was only blacklisted from working in the kingdom after criticizing Trump.
Los Angeles Times columnist Virginia Heffernan posted about her realization late Wednesday after coming across the Independent article.
Soon after, a Saudi government source was quoted by the Middle East Eye as saying, "The author Jamal Khashoggi does not represent the government of Saudi Arabia or its positions at any level, and...his opinions only represent his personal views, not that of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia."
By early December, Saudi authorities had banned Khashoggi "from writing in newspapers, appearing on TV, and attending conferences" in the kingdom, leading the author to a self-imposed exile.
To several political observers on Twitter, the revelation that the Saudis had so directly come to the defense of Trump gave new meaning to the fact that the president is now attempting to shield Saudi Arabia from the international outrage that's exploded in the 16 days since Khashoggi disappeared after entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul--especially following reports that U.S. intelligence agencies had known of a Saudi plan to detain Khashoggi.
Mounting evidence has pointed to a murder by a "hit team" with links to MBS, but the Trump administration has criticized those accusing the Saudis of involvement, with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo telling reporters, "We ought to give them a few more days" to complete their own investigation and issuing a reminder that the Saudis "are an important strategic alliance of the U.S. and we need to be mindful of that as well."