Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) answers questions on the possibility of a government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on January 18, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Mar 28, 2018
Sparking fresh alarm that the GOP is preparing to take an axe to America's already inadequate safety net, Politico reported on Wednesday that House Republicans are planning to take up a "balanced budget amendment" when Congress returns from recess--news that comes just months after the GOP passed a tax bill that analysts say could add nearly $2 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.
"A balanced budget amendment is the GOP dream, because it means every tax cut for the rich will 'force' them to cut programs for the poor."
--Josh Mound"A balanced budget amendment is the GOP dream, because it means every tax cut for the rich will 'force' them to cut programs for the poor and middle-class," observed journalist and academic Josh Mound in response to news of the Republican plan, which coincides with reports that GOP is reportedly mulling yet another round of tax cuts later this year.
\u201cThere are two stories circulating in DC right now about the GOP's legislative plans. One of them is about how they want to do a "Round 2" of giant unpaid-for tax cuts. Another is how they want to vote on a "Balanced Budget" amendment.\n\nHmmmmm...\u201d— Michael Linden (@Michael Linden) 1522242868
As Politico notes, the desire to force a vote on a balanced budget amendment--which has been a right-wing goal for decades--is likely the result of Republicans wanting to "be able to say they voted to support balancing the federal budget" ahead of the 2018 midterm elections.
Since the beginning of the GOP's push to deliver massive tax cuts to the rich and major corporations disguised as relief for the working class, progressives have warned that key programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security are in Republican crosshairs.
Indivisible, an advocacy group that mobilized against the $1.5 trillion tax cut package, termed the GOP's long-term strategy the "tax two step": Explode the deficit by slashing taxes for the wealthy, then use the ballooning deficit to justify deep cuts to the safety net.
In the wake of Wednesday's reports, economists and other commentators argued that the Republicans' desire to gut programs that serve poor and middle class Americans--a goal that has formed the foundation of House Speaker Paul Ryan's (R-Wis.) policy agenda since he was elected--is likely at the center of the party's "balanced budget" push.
Bruce Bartlett--a historian who by his own admission helped create the GOP myth that tax cuts lead to economic growth--argued that Republicans are also demonstrating their eagerness to "deflect attention" from the fact that their tax bill will dramatically increase the deficit by expressing support for a balanced budget amendment that is unlikely to pass Congress.
\u201cThe GOP economic agenda:\n1. Increase deficits with tax cuts for rich people and corporations.\n\n2. Pass Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution.\n\n3. Watch Federal Courts cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid to enforce the balanced budget rule.\n\nhttps://t.co/2bdDyvxYu5\u201d— Harry Stein (@Harry Stein) 1522241374
\u201cLying, ultra-hypocritical Republicans to take up a balanced budget amendment to deflect attention from their massive $2 trillion increase in the deficit with their tax give-away to the wealthy. Their goal is to abolish all spending except for the military. https://t.co/YHMxLyMoa5\u201d— Bruce Bartlett (@Bruce Bartlett) 1522247778
In an analysis published earlier this month, Richard Kogan, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, argued that in addition to threatening programs like Social Security, a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution would be "economically dangerous."
"By requiring a balanced budget every year, no matter the state of the economy, such an amendment would raise serious risks of tipping weak economies into recession and making recessions longer and deeper, causing very large job losses," Kogan noted. "That's because the amendment would force policymakers to cut federal programs, raise taxes, or both when the economy is weak or already in recession--the exact opposite of what good economic policy would advise."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sparking fresh alarm that the GOP is preparing to take an axe to America's already inadequate safety net, Politico reported on Wednesday that House Republicans are planning to take up a "balanced budget amendment" when Congress returns from recess--news that comes just months after the GOP passed a tax bill that analysts say could add nearly $2 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.
"A balanced budget amendment is the GOP dream, because it means every tax cut for the rich will 'force' them to cut programs for the poor."
--Josh Mound"A balanced budget amendment is the GOP dream, because it means every tax cut for the rich will 'force' them to cut programs for the poor and middle-class," observed journalist and academic Josh Mound in response to news of the Republican plan, which coincides with reports that GOP is reportedly mulling yet another round of tax cuts later this year.
\u201cThere are two stories circulating in DC right now about the GOP's legislative plans. One of them is about how they want to do a "Round 2" of giant unpaid-for tax cuts. Another is how they want to vote on a "Balanced Budget" amendment.\n\nHmmmmm...\u201d— Michael Linden (@Michael Linden) 1522242868
As Politico notes, the desire to force a vote on a balanced budget amendment--which has been a right-wing goal for decades--is likely the result of Republicans wanting to "be able to say they voted to support balancing the federal budget" ahead of the 2018 midterm elections.
Since the beginning of the GOP's push to deliver massive tax cuts to the rich and major corporations disguised as relief for the working class, progressives have warned that key programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security are in Republican crosshairs.
Indivisible, an advocacy group that mobilized against the $1.5 trillion tax cut package, termed the GOP's long-term strategy the "tax two step": Explode the deficit by slashing taxes for the wealthy, then use the ballooning deficit to justify deep cuts to the safety net.
In the wake of Wednesday's reports, economists and other commentators argued that the Republicans' desire to gut programs that serve poor and middle class Americans--a goal that has formed the foundation of House Speaker Paul Ryan's (R-Wis.) policy agenda since he was elected--is likely at the center of the party's "balanced budget" push.
Bruce Bartlett--a historian who by his own admission helped create the GOP myth that tax cuts lead to economic growth--argued that Republicans are also demonstrating their eagerness to "deflect attention" from the fact that their tax bill will dramatically increase the deficit by expressing support for a balanced budget amendment that is unlikely to pass Congress.
\u201cThe GOP economic agenda:\n1. Increase deficits with tax cuts for rich people and corporations.\n\n2. Pass Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution.\n\n3. Watch Federal Courts cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid to enforce the balanced budget rule.\n\nhttps://t.co/2bdDyvxYu5\u201d— Harry Stein (@Harry Stein) 1522241374
\u201cLying, ultra-hypocritical Republicans to take up a balanced budget amendment to deflect attention from their massive $2 trillion increase in the deficit with their tax give-away to the wealthy. Their goal is to abolish all spending except for the military. https://t.co/YHMxLyMoa5\u201d— Bruce Bartlett (@Bruce Bartlett) 1522247778
In an analysis published earlier this month, Richard Kogan, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, argued that in addition to threatening programs like Social Security, a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution would be "economically dangerous."
"By requiring a balanced budget every year, no matter the state of the economy, such an amendment would raise serious risks of tipping weak economies into recession and making recessions longer and deeper, causing very large job losses," Kogan noted. "That's because the amendment would force policymakers to cut federal programs, raise taxes, or both when the economy is weak or already in recession--the exact opposite of what good economic policy would advise."
Sparking fresh alarm that the GOP is preparing to take an axe to America's already inadequate safety net, Politico reported on Wednesday that House Republicans are planning to take up a "balanced budget amendment" when Congress returns from recess--news that comes just months after the GOP passed a tax bill that analysts say could add nearly $2 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.
"A balanced budget amendment is the GOP dream, because it means every tax cut for the rich will 'force' them to cut programs for the poor."
--Josh Mound"A balanced budget amendment is the GOP dream, because it means every tax cut for the rich will 'force' them to cut programs for the poor and middle-class," observed journalist and academic Josh Mound in response to news of the Republican plan, which coincides with reports that GOP is reportedly mulling yet another round of tax cuts later this year.
\u201cThere are two stories circulating in DC right now about the GOP's legislative plans. One of them is about how they want to do a "Round 2" of giant unpaid-for tax cuts. Another is how they want to vote on a "Balanced Budget" amendment.\n\nHmmmmm...\u201d— Michael Linden (@Michael Linden) 1522242868
As Politico notes, the desire to force a vote on a balanced budget amendment--which has been a right-wing goal for decades--is likely the result of Republicans wanting to "be able to say they voted to support balancing the federal budget" ahead of the 2018 midterm elections.
Since the beginning of the GOP's push to deliver massive tax cuts to the rich and major corporations disguised as relief for the working class, progressives have warned that key programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security are in Republican crosshairs.
Indivisible, an advocacy group that mobilized against the $1.5 trillion tax cut package, termed the GOP's long-term strategy the "tax two step": Explode the deficit by slashing taxes for the wealthy, then use the ballooning deficit to justify deep cuts to the safety net.
In the wake of Wednesday's reports, economists and other commentators argued that the Republicans' desire to gut programs that serve poor and middle class Americans--a goal that has formed the foundation of House Speaker Paul Ryan's (R-Wis.) policy agenda since he was elected--is likely at the center of the party's "balanced budget" push.
Bruce Bartlett--a historian who by his own admission helped create the GOP myth that tax cuts lead to economic growth--argued that Republicans are also demonstrating their eagerness to "deflect attention" from the fact that their tax bill will dramatically increase the deficit by expressing support for a balanced budget amendment that is unlikely to pass Congress.
\u201cThe GOP economic agenda:\n1. Increase deficits with tax cuts for rich people and corporations.\n\n2. Pass Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution.\n\n3. Watch Federal Courts cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid to enforce the balanced budget rule.\n\nhttps://t.co/2bdDyvxYu5\u201d— Harry Stein (@Harry Stein) 1522241374
\u201cLying, ultra-hypocritical Republicans to take up a balanced budget amendment to deflect attention from their massive $2 trillion increase in the deficit with their tax give-away to the wealthy. Their goal is to abolish all spending except for the military. https://t.co/YHMxLyMoa5\u201d— Bruce Bartlett (@Bruce Bartlett) 1522247778
In an analysis published earlier this month, Richard Kogan, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, argued that in addition to threatening programs like Social Security, a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution would be "economically dangerous."
"By requiring a balanced budget every year, no matter the state of the economy, such an amendment would raise serious risks of tipping weak economies into recession and making recessions longer and deeper, causing very large job losses," Kogan noted. "That's because the amendment would force policymakers to cut federal programs, raise taxes, or both when the economy is weak or already in recession--the exact opposite of what good economic policy would advise."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.