Leaked Draft of ACA Replacement Reveals Massive Cuts to Subsidies, Medicaid
Just as polls reveal Obamacare and Medicaid expansion are more popular than ever, GOP moves closer to slashing subsidies and raising taxpayer costs—adding fuel to brewing protests nationwide
A leaked draft of a House bill to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was published Friday by Politico, and it reveals that Republicans are moving towards slashing subsidies and ending the Medicaid expansion--moves that are vastly out of step with the opinions of the American public.
The draft (pdf) reveals that Republicans are hoping to "take down the foundation of Obamacare, including the unpopular individual mandate, subsidies based on people's income, and all of the law's taxes. It would significantly roll back Medicaid spending and give states money to create high risk pools for some people with pre-existing conditions. Some elements would be effective right away; others not until 2020," per Politico's Paul Demko.
The bill would also eradicate the Medicaid expansion that some states enacted when the ACA was first passed in 2010. This means that states that took advantage of federal funds to expand Medicaid would no longer have access to such funds.
Echoing state-level GOP attempts to withhold funds from Planned Parenthood, the law also appears to explicitly ban federal funding for the women's health organization, Business Insider notes: "Under the bill, no funding from the federal government given to the states could be given to any organization that 'provides abortions' except in the cases of rape, incest, or the life of the mother."
Moreover, the legislation would help private insurance companies profit even more than they already do, as it gives in to insurers' desires to force elderly people to pay more for healthcare. It would "charge older customers up to five times as much as their younger counterparts," Demko notes.
"The proposal also includes penalties for individuals who fail to maintain coverage continuously," writes Demko. "If their coverage lapses and they decide to re-enroll, they would have to pay a 30 percent boost in premiums for a year."
And instead of subsidies based on income to help low-income people afford costly premiums, the law would give tax credits based on age. A person under 30 would receive a tax credit of $2,000, while someone over 60 would receive double that amount. "A related document notes that HHS Secretary Tom Price wants the subsidies to be slightly less generous for most age groups," Demko reports.
The subsidies will be funded by capping "the tax exemption for employer sponsored insurance at the 90th percentile of current premiums," Demko notes, a plan similar to the proposed "Cadillac tax" pushed by President Barack Obama and opposed by unions and progressives nationwide.
Overall, the plan would cover fewer people than Obamacare--contrary to President Donald Trump's promises. "We're going to have insurance for everybody," Trump told the Washington Post just last month. "There was a philosophy in some circles that if you can't pay for it, you don't get it. That's not going to happen with us."
In fact, the draft demonstrates that the Republican party is woefully out of step with public opinion when it comes to healthcare. The disparity was particularly noticeable as it was released on the same day as polls that showed support for the ACA has never been higher.
A Kaiser Family Foundation poll discovered that a stunning 84 percent of respondents want to keep the Medicaid expansion, and a Pew Research Center poll also revealed majority approval for the ACA for the first time in the law's history. Earlier this week, a Politico poll also found support for the ACA growing.
The swelling support for the ACA has coincided with the looming fulfillment of the Republican Party's long-touted promise to repeal and replace the law.
The disparities between the GOP's plans and public sentiment, which has fueled tensions at Republican politicians' town halls across the country, could also add urgency to "Hands Off Our Healthcare" rallies in support of publicly-funded healthcare happening nationwide Saturday.
Interested in fighting back against the GOP plan to dismantle health care? Find a rally near you here.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A leaked draft of a House bill to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was published Friday by Politico, and it reveals that Republicans are moving towards slashing subsidies and ending the Medicaid expansion--moves that are vastly out of step with the opinions of the American public.
The draft (pdf) reveals that Republicans are hoping to "take down the foundation of Obamacare, including the unpopular individual mandate, subsidies based on people's income, and all of the law's taxes. It would significantly roll back Medicaid spending and give states money to create high risk pools for some people with pre-existing conditions. Some elements would be effective right away; others not until 2020," per Politico's Paul Demko.
The bill would also eradicate the Medicaid expansion that some states enacted when the ACA was first passed in 2010. This means that states that took advantage of federal funds to expand Medicaid would no longer have access to such funds.
Echoing state-level GOP attempts to withhold funds from Planned Parenthood, the law also appears to explicitly ban federal funding for the women's health organization, Business Insider notes: "Under the bill, no funding from the federal government given to the states could be given to any organization that 'provides abortions' except in the cases of rape, incest, or the life of the mother."
Moreover, the legislation would help private insurance companies profit even more than they already do, as it gives in to insurers' desires to force elderly people to pay more for healthcare. It would "charge older customers up to five times as much as their younger counterparts," Demko notes.
"The proposal also includes penalties for individuals who fail to maintain coverage continuously," writes Demko. "If their coverage lapses and they decide to re-enroll, they would have to pay a 30 percent boost in premiums for a year."
And instead of subsidies based on income to help low-income people afford costly premiums, the law would give tax credits based on age. A person under 30 would receive a tax credit of $2,000, while someone over 60 would receive double that amount. "A related document notes that HHS Secretary Tom Price wants the subsidies to be slightly less generous for most age groups," Demko reports.
The subsidies will be funded by capping "the tax exemption for employer sponsored insurance at the 90th percentile of current premiums," Demko notes, a plan similar to the proposed "Cadillac tax" pushed by President Barack Obama and opposed by unions and progressives nationwide.
Overall, the plan would cover fewer people than Obamacare--contrary to President Donald Trump's promises. "We're going to have insurance for everybody," Trump told the Washington Post just last month. "There was a philosophy in some circles that if you can't pay for it, you don't get it. That's not going to happen with us."
In fact, the draft demonstrates that the Republican party is woefully out of step with public opinion when it comes to healthcare. The disparity was particularly noticeable as it was released on the same day as polls that showed support for the ACA has never been higher.
A Kaiser Family Foundation poll discovered that a stunning 84 percent of respondents want to keep the Medicaid expansion, and a Pew Research Center poll also revealed majority approval for the ACA for the first time in the law's history. Earlier this week, a Politico poll also found support for the ACA growing.
The swelling support for the ACA has coincided with the looming fulfillment of the Republican Party's long-touted promise to repeal and replace the law.
The disparities between the GOP's plans and public sentiment, which has fueled tensions at Republican politicians' town halls across the country, could also add urgency to "Hands Off Our Healthcare" rallies in support of publicly-funded healthcare happening nationwide Saturday.
Interested in fighting back against the GOP plan to dismantle health care? Find a rally near you here.
A leaked draft of a House bill to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was published Friday by Politico, and it reveals that Republicans are moving towards slashing subsidies and ending the Medicaid expansion--moves that are vastly out of step with the opinions of the American public.
The draft (pdf) reveals that Republicans are hoping to "take down the foundation of Obamacare, including the unpopular individual mandate, subsidies based on people's income, and all of the law's taxes. It would significantly roll back Medicaid spending and give states money to create high risk pools for some people with pre-existing conditions. Some elements would be effective right away; others not until 2020," per Politico's Paul Demko.
The bill would also eradicate the Medicaid expansion that some states enacted when the ACA was first passed in 2010. This means that states that took advantage of federal funds to expand Medicaid would no longer have access to such funds.
Echoing state-level GOP attempts to withhold funds from Planned Parenthood, the law also appears to explicitly ban federal funding for the women's health organization, Business Insider notes: "Under the bill, no funding from the federal government given to the states could be given to any organization that 'provides abortions' except in the cases of rape, incest, or the life of the mother."
Moreover, the legislation would help private insurance companies profit even more than they already do, as it gives in to insurers' desires to force elderly people to pay more for healthcare. It would "charge older customers up to five times as much as their younger counterparts," Demko notes.
"The proposal also includes penalties for individuals who fail to maintain coverage continuously," writes Demko. "If their coverage lapses and they decide to re-enroll, they would have to pay a 30 percent boost in premiums for a year."
And instead of subsidies based on income to help low-income people afford costly premiums, the law would give tax credits based on age. A person under 30 would receive a tax credit of $2,000, while someone over 60 would receive double that amount. "A related document notes that HHS Secretary Tom Price wants the subsidies to be slightly less generous for most age groups," Demko reports.
The subsidies will be funded by capping "the tax exemption for employer sponsored insurance at the 90th percentile of current premiums," Demko notes, a plan similar to the proposed "Cadillac tax" pushed by President Barack Obama and opposed by unions and progressives nationwide.
Overall, the plan would cover fewer people than Obamacare--contrary to President Donald Trump's promises. "We're going to have insurance for everybody," Trump told the Washington Post just last month. "There was a philosophy in some circles that if you can't pay for it, you don't get it. That's not going to happen with us."
In fact, the draft demonstrates that the Republican party is woefully out of step with public opinion when it comes to healthcare. The disparity was particularly noticeable as it was released on the same day as polls that showed support for the ACA has never been higher.
A Kaiser Family Foundation poll discovered that a stunning 84 percent of respondents want to keep the Medicaid expansion, and a Pew Research Center poll also revealed majority approval for the ACA for the first time in the law's history. Earlier this week, a Politico poll also found support for the ACA growing.
The swelling support for the ACA has coincided with the looming fulfillment of the Republican Party's long-touted promise to repeal and replace the law.
The disparities between the GOP's plans and public sentiment, which has fueled tensions at Republican politicians' town halls across the country, could also add urgency to "Hands Off Our Healthcare" rallies in support of publicly-funded healthcare happening nationwide Saturday.
Interested in fighting back against the GOP plan to dismantle health care? Find a rally near you here.