SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
As Rule 41 Quietly Passes, Trump to Inherit Expanded Hacking Powers
Changes to rule allow FBI agents to remotely hack into computers that are outside of the judicial district where warrant was issued
Dec 01, 2016
Changes to a rule that expand government hacking powers quietly went into effect at midnight on Thursday, after senators failed to halt their implementation.
The amendments (pdf) to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure now allow intelligence agents to get warrants to hack into computers that are outside of the judicial district where the warrant was issued, if the target is using anonymity or encryption software like virtual private networks (VPNs), Tor browsing, or other protection tools.
Under previous rules, FBI agents were required to get warrants from federal magistrate judges in the districts in which the computers were located--which meant targets who used privacy software were more secure against government spying. There are more than 500 federal magistrate judges around the U.S.
"So," the digital rights group Fight for the Future said this week, "if the FBI wants to hack you but they don't have evidence that passes muster with your local federal judge, they will be able to take their case to a more lenient (or more naive) judge located anywhere in the country."
The new provisions are particularly troubling in light of the incoming presidential administration. As Common Dreams has previously noted, President Barack Obama spent much of his time in office expanding and building upon controversial policies that saw civil liberties eroded on many fronts--and now all that unchallenged power will be in President-elect Donald Trump's hands.
Republican Senate leaders on Wednesday denied requests by three lawmakers, including Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), to pass or vote on measures that would block or delay the rule to give time for congressional analysis.
"By sitting here and doing nothing, the Senate has given consent to this expansion of government hacking and surveillance," Wyden said Wednesday. "Law-abiding Americans are going to ask 'what were you guys thinking?' when the FBI starts hacking victims of a botnet hack. Or when a mass hack goes awry and breaks their device, or an entire hospital system and puts lives at risk."
National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden tweeted, "Without a debate or any new law, the rights of every American--and basic privacy of people around the world--have been narrowed."
In one example, under Rule 41's new provisions, FBI agents could remotely access any device that was used in the major botnet attack earlier this year that caused outages throughout the web, even if the owner was not involved in the scheme but simply a victim.
As the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) warned in June, the process for updating the rules was intended to deal with procedural issues, but earlier this year a committee known as the Judicial Conference quietly approved the changes that expanded federal hacking capabilities.
"The government is attempting to use a process designed for procedural changes to expand its investigatory powers," EFF activism director Rainey Reitman said at the time. "Make no mistake: these changes to Rule 41 will result in a dramatic increase in government hacking."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
barack obamabig brothercivil libertiesedward snowdenelectronic frontier foundationfbifight for the futurensaprivacytechnologytrumpismus senate
Changes to a rule that expand government hacking powers quietly went into effect at midnight on Thursday, after senators failed to halt their implementation.
The amendments (pdf) to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure now allow intelligence agents to get warrants to hack into computers that are outside of the judicial district where the warrant was issued, if the target is using anonymity or encryption software like virtual private networks (VPNs), Tor browsing, or other protection tools.
Under previous rules, FBI agents were required to get warrants from federal magistrate judges in the districts in which the computers were located--which meant targets who used privacy software were more secure against government spying. There are more than 500 federal magistrate judges around the U.S.
"So," the digital rights group Fight for the Future said this week, "if the FBI wants to hack you but they don't have evidence that passes muster with your local federal judge, they will be able to take their case to a more lenient (or more naive) judge located anywhere in the country."
The new provisions are particularly troubling in light of the incoming presidential administration. As Common Dreams has previously noted, President Barack Obama spent much of his time in office expanding and building upon controversial policies that saw civil liberties eroded on many fronts--and now all that unchallenged power will be in President-elect Donald Trump's hands.
Republican Senate leaders on Wednesday denied requests by three lawmakers, including Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), to pass or vote on measures that would block or delay the rule to give time for congressional analysis.
"By sitting here and doing nothing, the Senate has given consent to this expansion of government hacking and surveillance," Wyden said Wednesday. "Law-abiding Americans are going to ask 'what were you guys thinking?' when the FBI starts hacking victims of a botnet hack. Or when a mass hack goes awry and breaks their device, or an entire hospital system and puts lives at risk."
National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden tweeted, "Without a debate or any new law, the rights of every American--and basic privacy of people around the world--have been narrowed."
In one example, under Rule 41's new provisions, FBI agents could remotely access any device that was used in the major botnet attack earlier this year that caused outages throughout the web, even if the owner was not involved in the scheme but simply a victim.
As the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) warned in June, the process for updating the rules was intended to deal with procedural issues, but earlier this year a committee known as the Judicial Conference quietly approved the changes that expanded federal hacking capabilities.
"The government is attempting to use a process designed for procedural changes to expand its investigatory powers," EFF activism director Rainey Reitman said at the time. "Make no mistake: these changes to Rule 41 will result in a dramatic increase in government hacking."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Changes to a rule that expand government hacking powers quietly went into effect at midnight on Thursday, after senators failed to halt their implementation.
The amendments (pdf) to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure now allow intelligence agents to get warrants to hack into computers that are outside of the judicial district where the warrant was issued, if the target is using anonymity or encryption software like virtual private networks (VPNs), Tor browsing, or other protection tools.
Under previous rules, FBI agents were required to get warrants from federal magistrate judges in the districts in which the computers were located--which meant targets who used privacy software were more secure against government spying. There are more than 500 federal magistrate judges around the U.S.
"So," the digital rights group Fight for the Future said this week, "if the FBI wants to hack you but they don't have evidence that passes muster with your local federal judge, they will be able to take their case to a more lenient (or more naive) judge located anywhere in the country."
The new provisions are particularly troubling in light of the incoming presidential administration. As Common Dreams has previously noted, President Barack Obama spent much of his time in office expanding and building upon controversial policies that saw civil liberties eroded on many fronts--and now all that unchallenged power will be in President-elect Donald Trump's hands.
Republican Senate leaders on Wednesday denied requests by three lawmakers, including Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), to pass or vote on measures that would block or delay the rule to give time for congressional analysis.
"By sitting here and doing nothing, the Senate has given consent to this expansion of government hacking and surveillance," Wyden said Wednesday. "Law-abiding Americans are going to ask 'what were you guys thinking?' when the FBI starts hacking victims of a botnet hack. Or when a mass hack goes awry and breaks their device, or an entire hospital system and puts lives at risk."
National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden tweeted, "Without a debate or any new law, the rights of every American--and basic privacy of people around the world--have been narrowed."
In one example, under Rule 41's new provisions, FBI agents could remotely access any device that was used in the major botnet attack earlier this year that caused outages throughout the web, even if the owner was not involved in the scheme but simply a victim.
As the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) warned in June, the process for updating the rules was intended to deal with procedural issues, but earlier this year a committee known as the Judicial Conference quietly approved the changes that expanded federal hacking capabilities.
"The government is attempting to use a process designed for procedural changes to expand its investigatory powers," EFF activism director Rainey Reitman said at the time. "Make no mistake: these changes to Rule 41 will result in a dramatic increase in government hacking."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.