Embracing Sanders' Higher-Ed Call, Clinton Expands Debt-Free College Plan
Clinton's new proposals on college affordability are 'a result of the work of both campaigns'
Hillary Clinton's newly revised college affordability plan, unveiled Wednesday, clearly bears the stamp of Bernie Sanders and his youth-powered movement--so much so that the senator from Vermont publicly praised it as "very bold initiative" that will "revolutionize the funding of higher education in America."
With the addition of three new proposals, Clinton's higher education plan now calls for:
- the elimination of tuition at in-state colleges and universities for 83 percent of U.S. families;
- a three-month moratorium on the repayment of federal student loans in order to facilitate debt restructuring; and
- restoration of year-round Pell Grants, which would help students get funding for summer classes.
According to the Huffington Post, "Clinton's new proposals move her beyond previous statements that she would try to make college 'as debt-free as possible' and toward making 'debt-free college available to all.'"
While the plan stops short of Sanders' call for universal free tuition, the senator himself said Wednesday that it "combines some of the strongest ideas she fought for during the campaign with some of the principles that I fought for. The final product is a result of the work of both campaigns."
As such, observers were swift to credit Sanders and his supporters for catapulting this issue to the forefront of the campaign. "The persistence of the political coalition around Bernie Sanders has nudged Hillary Clinton toward a more progressive position on ensuring that working-class students can attend college debt-free," wrote columnist Isaiah Poole at the Campaign for America's Future blog.
Indeed, "Clinton's plan is a sign that his vision has triumphed," Libby Nelson declared at Vox:
Until very recently, the consensus in the Democratic Party was that students should pay for part of their own education, even if they needed loans to do so, because they'd reap the lifelong benefits of earning a college degree. The role of the federal government was to help them afford it, through grants to the poorest students and loans to everyone else.
Sanders upended that consensus. Instead of viewing a college degree as something that ultimately benefits individuals, and that the federal government should help to finance, he saw higher education as something that should be free and accessible to everyone -- just as K-12 education is today.
As public policy organization Demos noted in its response to the news, "If enacted, this plan would return the U.S. to a system where students could work their way through school again, and it represents a major shift back to the notion of higher education as a public good."
With Sanders still holding out on endorsing Clinton, the move has explicitly political motivations. The New York Times reports:
Mrs. Clinton's team is eager to attract the young supporters that flocked to Mr. Sanders in the nominating fight. A campaign aide noted that during a meeting last month with Mr. Sanders, the two discussed the merits of their plans to make college more affordable and the importance of featuring the issue prominently in the general election.
And as CNBC put it, the shift "points to a trend of the Democratic party adopting elements of the Vermont Senator's progressive platform, which attracted a groundswell of support."
As Common Dreams reported last week, the Democratic National Committee's draft 2016 platform includes other nods to Sanders, including calls for an end to the death penalty, a $15 minimum wage, the establishment of a postal banking system, broad marijuana law reform, and elimination of tax breaks for Big Oil.
On other issues, like trade and fracking, the party continues to snub progressives.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Hillary Clinton's newly revised college affordability plan, unveiled Wednesday, clearly bears the stamp of Bernie Sanders and his youth-powered movement--so much so that the senator from Vermont publicly praised it as "very bold initiative" that will "revolutionize the funding of higher education in America."
With the addition of three new proposals, Clinton's higher education plan now calls for:
- the elimination of tuition at in-state colleges and universities for 83 percent of U.S. families;
- a three-month moratorium on the repayment of federal student loans in order to facilitate debt restructuring; and
- restoration of year-round Pell Grants, which would help students get funding for summer classes.
According to the Huffington Post, "Clinton's new proposals move her beyond previous statements that she would try to make college 'as debt-free as possible' and toward making 'debt-free college available to all.'"
While the plan stops short of Sanders' call for universal free tuition, the senator himself said Wednesday that it "combines some of the strongest ideas she fought for during the campaign with some of the principles that I fought for. The final product is a result of the work of both campaigns."
As such, observers were swift to credit Sanders and his supporters for catapulting this issue to the forefront of the campaign. "The persistence of the political coalition around Bernie Sanders has nudged Hillary Clinton toward a more progressive position on ensuring that working-class students can attend college debt-free," wrote columnist Isaiah Poole at the Campaign for America's Future blog.
Indeed, "Clinton's plan is a sign that his vision has triumphed," Libby Nelson declared at Vox:
Until very recently, the consensus in the Democratic Party was that students should pay for part of their own education, even if they needed loans to do so, because they'd reap the lifelong benefits of earning a college degree. The role of the federal government was to help them afford it, through grants to the poorest students and loans to everyone else.
Sanders upended that consensus. Instead of viewing a college degree as something that ultimately benefits individuals, and that the federal government should help to finance, he saw higher education as something that should be free and accessible to everyone -- just as K-12 education is today.
As public policy organization Demos noted in its response to the news, "If enacted, this plan would return the U.S. to a system where students could work their way through school again, and it represents a major shift back to the notion of higher education as a public good."
With Sanders still holding out on endorsing Clinton, the move has explicitly political motivations. The New York Times reports:
Mrs. Clinton's team is eager to attract the young supporters that flocked to Mr. Sanders in the nominating fight. A campaign aide noted that during a meeting last month with Mr. Sanders, the two discussed the merits of their plans to make college more affordable and the importance of featuring the issue prominently in the general election.
And as CNBC put it, the shift "points to a trend of the Democratic party adopting elements of the Vermont Senator's progressive platform, which attracted a groundswell of support."
As Common Dreams reported last week, the Democratic National Committee's draft 2016 platform includes other nods to Sanders, including calls for an end to the death penalty, a $15 minimum wage, the establishment of a postal banking system, broad marijuana law reform, and elimination of tax breaks for Big Oil.
On other issues, like trade and fracking, the party continues to snub progressives.
Hillary Clinton's newly revised college affordability plan, unveiled Wednesday, clearly bears the stamp of Bernie Sanders and his youth-powered movement--so much so that the senator from Vermont publicly praised it as "very bold initiative" that will "revolutionize the funding of higher education in America."
With the addition of three new proposals, Clinton's higher education plan now calls for:
- the elimination of tuition at in-state colleges and universities for 83 percent of U.S. families;
- a three-month moratorium on the repayment of federal student loans in order to facilitate debt restructuring; and
- restoration of year-round Pell Grants, which would help students get funding for summer classes.
According to the Huffington Post, "Clinton's new proposals move her beyond previous statements that she would try to make college 'as debt-free as possible' and toward making 'debt-free college available to all.'"
While the plan stops short of Sanders' call for universal free tuition, the senator himself said Wednesday that it "combines some of the strongest ideas she fought for during the campaign with some of the principles that I fought for. The final product is a result of the work of both campaigns."
As such, observers were swift to credit Sanders and his supporters for catapulting this issue to the forefront of the campaign. "The persistence of the political coalition around Bernie Sanders has nudged Hillary Clinton toward a more progressive position on ensuring that working-class students can attend college debt-free," wrote columnist Isaiah Poole at the Campaign for America's Future blog.
Indeed, "Clinton's plan is a sign that his vision has triumphed," Libby Nelson declared at Vox:
Until very recently, the consensus in the Democratic Party was that students should pay for part of their own education, even if they needed loans to do so, because they'd reap the lifelong benefits of earning a college degree. The role of the federal government was to help them afford it, through grants to the poorest students and loans to everyone else.
Sanders upended that consensus. Instead of viewing a college degree as something that ultimately benefits individuals, and that the federal government should help to finance, he saw higher education as something that should be free and accessible to everyone -- just as K-12 education is today.
As public policy organization Demos noted in its response to the news, "If enacted, this plan would return the U.S. to a system where students could work their way through school again, and it represents a major shift back to the notion of higher education as a public good."
With Sanders still holding out on endorsing Clinton, the move has explicitly political motivations. The New York Times reports:
Mrs. Clinton's team is eager to attract the young supporters that flocked to Mr. Sanders in the nominating fight. A campaign aide noted that during a meeting last month with Mr. Sanders, the two discussed the merits of their plans to make college more affordable and the importance of featuring the issue prominently in the general election.
And as CNBC put it, the shift "points to a trend of the Democratic party adopting elements of the Vermont Senator's progressive platform, which attracted a groundswell of support."
As Common Dreams reported last week, the Democratic National Committee's draft 2016 platform includes other nods to Sanders, including calls for an end to the death penalty, a $15 minimum wage, the establishment of a postal banking system, broad marijuana law reform, and elimination of tax breaks for Big Oil.
On other issues, like trade and fracking, the party continues to snub progressives.