SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Smelling a 'Rat,' Groups Tell Obama: Foil TransCanada and Ban KXL Outright
Request to suspend application makes it clear KXL has been defeated by the climate movement. Campaigners call on Obama to 'end this.'
Nov 03, 2015
Even as environmentalists celebrated the news that TransCanada asked the U.S. State Department to suspend its consideration of the Keystone XL pipeline, many of those same groups said they smelled a "rat," demanding that President Obama call the company's bluff and reject this $8 billion "climate disaster" once and for all.
On Monday, TransCanada Corporation sent a letter (pdf) to Secretary of State John Kerry requesting the department to suspend its review of the Presidential Permit application for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, citing ongoing litigation in Nebraska over the pipeline route.
Environmental groups, which for years have fought an impressive grassroots battle against the international project, said the request was an indication that the pipeline giant knew it would not win approval under the current administration. Thus, TransCanada is calling a "timeout," hoping to push the decision ahead to a time when the declining oil markets--and perhaps government leadership--are more in their favor.
"This is a desperate play by a company that knows it's on thin ice," states a petition launched by climate group 350.org. It continues: "By calling for a suspension, TransCanada is hoping to avoid the pre-election rejection by President Obama that many are predicting. They are playing for time, hoping that by leaving the project in limbo they can avoid losing outright--and that maybe a year from now all those pesky activists will have gone away."
"By calling for a suspension, TransCanada is hoping to avoid the pre-election rejection by President Obama that many are predicting. They are playing for time, hoping that by leaving the project in limbo they can avoid losing outright--and that maybe a year from now all those pesky activists will have gone away."
"Clearly TransCanada has lost and they recognize that," said 350.org founder Bill McKibben. "It's one of the great victories for this movement in decades." However, with the 2016 presidential election still up for grabs, McKibben noted that this move is clearly TransCanada "asking for extra time from the referees, and clearly hoping they'll get a new head official after the election."
He concluded that it's time for "the current umpire, President Obama," to reject this "climate disaster" once and for all and "go to Paris as the first world leader to stop a major project because of its effect on the climate."
The Keystone XL "pause" is but the latest indication that the tide is shifting away from these massive fossil fuel infrastructure projects--including new pipelines and Arctic oil exploration--whether as result of a changing energy market, the growing climate movement, or the too-big-to-ignore effects of a warming planet.
As Stephen Kretzmann, executive director of Oil Change International, noted, "TransCanada is just the latest rat to flee the sinking tar sands ship. Shell canceled its big tar sands project last week, and the whole sector is under stress from a combination of low oil prices and lack of market access. And when I say 'lack of market access' I mean 'a continental movement that is stopping all new tar sands pipelines and defending our land and the climate.'"
"Bottom line," Kretzmann added, "the Keystone XL pipeline has been defeated by the movement with an assist from the markets--it only remains for the President to reject the permit and call an end to this."
Friends of the Earth president Erich Pica said, "This is a victory for the farmers, Indigenous Peoples, and environmentalists that banded together to stand up to big oil."
Pica said that Obama "should deny TransCanada on two fronts: First he should deny TransCanada's request for a suspension and then he should deny them a Presidential permit. Killing the pipeline once and for all is the only fair thing Obama could do for the sake of the climate and the people along the route, whose lives would be impacted by this project."
The 350.org petition which urges Obama to heed the call for this two-fold rejection is already gaining traction. It proclaims: "It's time."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Even as environmentalists celebrated the news that TransCanada asked the U.S. State Department to suspend its consideration of the Keystone XL pipeline, many of those same groups said they smelled a "rat," demanding that President Obama call the company's bluff and reject this $8 billion "climate disaster" once and for all.
On Monday, TransCanada Corporation sent a letter (pdf) to Secretary of State John Kerry requesting the department to suspend its review of the Presidential Permit application for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, citing ongoing litigation in Nebraska over the pipeline route.
Environmental groups, which for years have fought an impressive grassroots battle against the international project, said the request was an indication that the pipeline giant knew it would not win approval under the current administration. Thus, TransCanada is calling a "timeout," hoping to push the decision ahead to a time when the declining oil markets--and perhaps government leadership--are more in their favor.
"This is a desperate play by a company that knows it's on thin ice," states a petition launched by climate group 350.org. It continues: "By calling for a suspension, TransCanada is hoping to avoid the pre-election rejection by President Obama that many are predicting. They are playing for time, hoping that by leaving the project in limbo they can avoid losing outright--and that maybe a year from now all those pesky activists will have gone away."
"By calling for a suspension, TransCanada is hoping to avoid the pre-election rejection by President Obama that many are predicting. They are playing for time, hoping that by leaving the project in limbo they can avoid losing outright--and that maybe a year from now all those pesky activists will have gone away."
"Clearly TransCanada has lost and they recognize that," said 350.org founder Bill McKibben. "It's one of the great victories for this movement in decades." However, with the 2016 presidential election still up for grabs, McKibben noted that this move is clearly TransCanada "asking for extra time from the referees, and clearly hoping they'll get a new head official after the election."
He concluded that it's time for "the current umpire, President Obama," to reject this "climate disaster" once and for all and "go to Paris as the first world leader to stop a major project because of its effect on the climate."
The Keystone XL "pause" is but the latest indication that the tide is shifting away from these massive fossil fuel infrastructure projects--including new pipelines and Arctic oil exploration--whether as result of a changing energy market, the growing climate movement, or the too-big-to-ignore effects of a warming planet.
As Stephen Kretzmann, executive director of Oil Change International, noted, "TransCanada is just the latest rat to flee the sinking tar sands ship. Shell canceled its big tar sands project last week, and the whole sector is under stress from a combination of low oil prices and lack of market access. And when I say 'lack of market access' I mean 'a continental movement that is stopping all new tar sands pipelines and defending our land and the climate.'"
"Bottom line," Kretzmann added, "the Keystone XL pipeline has been defeated by the movement with an assist from the markets--it only remains for the President to reject the permit and call an end to this."
Friends of the Earth president Erich Pica said, "This is a victory for the farmers, Indigenous Peoples, and environmentalists that banded together to stand up to big oil."
Pica said that Obama "should deny TransCanada on two fronts: First he should deny TransCanada's request for a suspension and then he should deny them a Presidential permit. Killing the pipeline once and for all is the only fair thing Obama could do for the sake of the climate and the people along the route, whose lives would be impacted by this project."
The 350.org petition which urges Obama to heed the call for this two-fold rejection is already gaining traction. It proclaims: "It's time."
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Even as environmentalists celebrated the news that TransCanada asked the U.S. State Department to suspend its consideration of the Keystone XL pipeline, many of those same groups said they smelled a "rat," demanding that President Obama call the company's bluff and reject this $8 billion "climate disaster" once and for all.
On Monday, TransCanada Corporation sent a letter (pdf) to Secretary of State John Kerry requesting the department to suspend its review of the Presidential Permit application for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, citing ongoing litigation in Nebraska over the pipeline route.
Environmental groups, which for years have fought an impressive grassroots battle against the international project, said the request was an indication that the pipeline giant knew it would not win approval under the current administration. Thus, TransCanada is calling a "timeout," hoping to push the decision ahead to a time when the declining oil markets--and perhaps government leadership--are more in their favor.
"This is a desperate play by a company that knows it's on thin ice," states a petition launched by climate group 350.org. It continues: "By calling for a suspension, TransCanada is hoping to avoid the pre-election rejection by President Obama that many are predicting. They are playing for time, hoping that by leaving the project in limbo they can avoid losing outright--and that maybe a year from now all those pesky activists will have gone away."
"By calling for a suspension, TransCanada is hoping to avoid the pre-election rejection by President Obama that many are predicting. They are playing for time, hoping that by leaving the project in limbo they can avoid losing outright--and that maybe a year from now all those pesky activists will have gone away."
"Clearly TransCanada has lost and they recognize that," said 350.org founder Bill McKibben. "It's one of the great victories for this movement in decades." However, with the 2016 presidential election still up for grabs, McKibben noted that this move is clearly TransCanada "asking for extra time from the referees, and clearly hoping they'll get a new head official after the election."
He concluded that it's time for "the current umpire, President Obama," to reject this "climate disaster" once and for all and "go to Paris as the first world leader to stop a major project because of its effect on the climate."
The Keystone XL "pause" is but the latest indication that the tide is shifting away from these massive fossil fuel infrastructure projects--including new pipelines and Arctic oil exploration--whether as result of a changing energy market, the growing climate movement, or the too-big-to-ignore effects of a warming planet.
As Stephen Kretzmann, executive director of Oil Change International, noted, "TransCanada is just the latest rat to flee the sinking tar sands ship. Shell canceled its big tar sands project last week, and the whole sector is under stress from a combination of low oil prices and lack of market access. And when I say 'lack of market access' I mean 'a continental movement that is stopping all new tar sands pipelines and defending our land and the climate.'"
"Bottom line," Kretzmann added, "the Keystone XL pipeline has been defeated by the movement with an assist from the markets--it only remains for the President to reject the permit and call an end to this."
Friends of the Earth president Erich Pica said, "This is a victory for the farmers, Indigenous Peoples, and environmentalists that banded together to stand up to big oil."
Pica said that Obama "should deny TransCanada on two fronts: First he should deny TransCanada's request for a suspension and then he should deny them a Presidential permit. Killing the pipeline once and for all is the only fair thing Obama could do for the sake of the climate and the people along the route, whose lives would be impacted by this project."
The 350.org petition which urges Obama to heed the call for this two-fold rejection is already gaining traction. It proclaims: "It's time."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.