SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Thanks to Sanders, Democratic Party Just Debated Merits of Capitalism
Presidential hopefuls broke usual parameters of discourse when they debated capitalism versus socialism Tuesday night
Oct 14, 2015
Breaking the usual parameters of election season discourse, Democratic presidential hopefuls Tuesday night debated the merits of capitalism on the national stage--a development that many attribute to the candidacy of self-described socialist U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders and rising inequality and discontent.
When CNN's Anderson Cooper asked Sanders whether he considers himself a capitalist, the Vermont Senator replied: "Do I consider myself part of the casino capitalist process by which so few have so much and so many have so little, by which Wall Street's greed and recklessness wrecked this economy? No, I don't."
"I believe in a society where all people do well," he continued, "not just a handful of billionaires."
Cooper then asked the panel: "Is there anybody else on the stage who is not a capitalist?"
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded with a vague defense of the capitalist system.
"Let me follow up on that, Anderson," Clinton said. "When I think about capitalism, I think about all the small businesses that were started because we have the opportunity and the freedom in our country for people to do that and make a good living for themselves and their families. I don't think we should confuse what we have to do every so often in America, which is save capitalism from itself."
While direct criticism of capitalism in mainstream politics is not unheard of in U.S. history, it is unusual for modern times.
"From the late 1970s to fairly recently, this was certainly outside the norm as a combination of Cold War politics and Reaganomics and other dynamics made it taboo to criticize capitalism, especially on the national stage of presidential politics," Marjorie Wood, senior economic policy associate at the Institute for Policy Studies and managing editor of Inequality.org, told Common Dreams.
"But if you go back further, this kind of debate isn't all that unusual in America," Wood added. "In fact, debating the merits of capitalism was completely the norm during the first Gilded Age of extreme inequality and abuses of the democratic system. But still, it was a remarkable moment last night that reflects the new moment of inequality we find ourselves in."
During the debate, Sanders also defined what he means when he calls himself a democratic socialist: "And what democratic socialism is about is saying that it is immoral and wrong that the top one-tenth of one percent in this country own almost 90 percent--almost--own almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent. That it is wrong, today, in a rigged economy, that 57 percent of all new income is going to the top one percent."
Some critics of capitalism who do not share Sanders' specific political vision argue that openly discussing alternative systems is valuable.
"Even if it's not the definition of socialism that I'd prefer, in this country, with its history, it still feels significant," wrote labor reporter Sarah Jaffe in the wake of Tuesday night's debate.
Meanwhile, there are signs that among younger people and communities of color in the U.S., capitalism is falling out of favor.
A Pew Research Center poll from 2011 found that a plurality of young people (49-43 percent) have a positive view of socialism and a negative view of capitalism (47-46 percent). For African Americans, these numbers were more dramatic, with a majority (55-36 percent) holding a positive view of socialism and a negative view of capitalism (51-41 percent).
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
pew research centerelection 2016hillary clintoninequalitygilded agewall street greedbernie sanderssocialismcapitalism
Breaking the usual parameters of election season discourse, Democratic presidential hopefuls Tuesday night debated the merits of capitalism on the national stage--a development that many attribute to the candidacy of self-described socialist U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders and rising inequality and discontent.
When CNN's Anderson Cooper asked Sanders whether he considers himself a capitalist, the Vermont Senator replied: "Do I consider myself part of the casino capitalist process by which so few have so much and so many have so little, by which Wall Street's greed and recklessness wrecked this economy? No, I don't."
"I believe in a society where all people do well," he continued, "not just a handful of billionaires."
Cooper then asked the panel: "Is there anybody else on the stage who is not a capitalist?"
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded with a vague defense of the capitalist system.
"Let me follow up on that, Anderson," Clinton said. "When I think about capitalism, I think about all the small businesses that were started because we have the opportunity and the freedom in our country for people to do that and make a good living for themselves and their families. I don't think we should confuse what we have to do every so often in America, which is save capitalism from itself."
While direct criticism of capitalism in mainstream politics is not unheard of in U.S. history, it is unusual for modern times.
"From the late 1970s to fairly recently, this was certainly outside the norm as a combination of Cold War politics and Reaganomics and other dynamics made it taboo to criticize capitalism, especially on the national stage of presidential politics," Marjorie Wood, senior economic policy associate at the Institute for Policy Studies and managing editor of Inequality.org, told Common Dreams.
"But if you go back further, this kind of debate isn't all that unusual in America," Wood added. "In fact, debating the merits of capitalism was completely the norm during the first Gilded Age of extreme inequality and abuses of the democratic system. But still, it was a remarkable moment last night that reflects the new moment of inequality we find ourselves in."
During the debate, Sanders also defined what he means when he calls himself a democratic socialist: "And what democratic socialism is about is saying that it is immoral and wrong that the top one-tenth of one percent in this country own almost 90 percent--almost--own almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent. That it is wrong, today, in a rigged economy, that 57 percent of all new income is going to the top one percent."
Some critics of capitalism who do not share Sanders' specific political vision argue that openly discussing alternative systems is valuable.
"Even if it's not the definition of socialism that I'd prefer, in this country, with its history, it still feels significant," wrote labor reporter Sarah Jaffe in the wake of Tuesday night's debate.
Meanwhile, there are signs that among younger people and communities of color in the U.S., capitalism is falling out of favor.
A Pew Research Center poll from 2011 found that a plurality of young people (49-43 percent) have a positive view of socialism and a negative view of capitalism (47-46 percent). For African Americans, these numbers were more dramatic, with a majority (55-36 percent) holding a positive view of socialism and a negative view of capitalism (51-41 percent).
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Breaking the usual parameters of election season discourse, Democratic presidential hopefuls Tuesday night debated the merits of capitalism on the national stage--a development that many attribute to the candidacy of self-described socialist U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders and rising inequality and discontent.
When CNN's Anderson Cooper asked Sanders whether he considers himself a capitalist, the Vermont Senator replied: "Do I consider myself part of the casino capitalist process by which so few have so much and so many have so little, by which Wall Street's greed and recklessness wrecked this economy? No, I don't."
"I believe in a society where all people do well," he continued, "not just a handful of billionaires."
Cooper then asked the panel: "Is there anybody else on the stage who is not a capitalist?"
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded with a vague defense of the capitalist system.
"Let me follow up on that, Anderson," Clinton said. "When I think about capitalism, I think about all the small businesses that were started because we have the opportunity and the freedom in our country for people to do that and make a good living for themselves and their families. I don't think we should confuse what we have to do every so often in America, which is save capitalism from itself."
While direct criticism of capitalism in mainstream politics is not unheard of in U.S. history, it is unusual for modern times.
"From the late 1970s to fairly recently, this was certainly outside the norm as a combination of Cold War politics and Reaganomics and other dynamics made it taboo to criticize capitalism, especially on the national stage of presidential politics," Marjorie Wood, senior economic policy associate at the Institute for Policy Studies and managing editor of Inequality.org, told Common Dreams.
"But if you go back further, this kind of debate isn't all that unusual in America," Wood added. "In fact, debating the merits of capitalism was completely the norm during the first Gilded Age of extreme inequality and abuses of the democratic system. But still, it was a remarkable moment last night that reflects the new moment of inequality we find ourselves in."
During the debate, Sanders also defined what he means when he calls himself a democratic socialist: "And what democratic socialism is about is saying that it is immoral and wrong that the top one-tenth of one percent in this country own almost 90 percent--almost--own almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent. That it is wrong, today, in a rigged economy, that 57 percent of all new income is going to the top one percent."
Some critics of capitalism who do not share Sanders' specific political vision argue that openly discussing alternative systems is valuable.
"Even if it's not the definition of socialism that I'd prefer, in this country, with its history, it still feels significant," wrote labor reporter Sarah Jaffe in the wake of Tuesday night's debate.
Meanwhile, there are signs that among younger people and communities of color in the U.S., capitalism is falling out of favor.
A Pew Research Center poll from 2011 found that a plurality of young people (49-43 percent) have a positive view of socialism and a negative view of capitalism (47-46 percent). For African Americans, these numbers were more dramatic, with a majority (55-36 percent) holding a positive view of socialism and a negative view of capitalism (51-41 percent).
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.