SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Obama Administration Response to Border Crisis: More Deportations
More border detention centers and additional judges for deportation hearings planned for humanitarian crisis
Jun 20, 2014
In response to mounting political pressure to address the crisis in U.S-Mexico border detention centers, the Obama Administration is putting plans into action to speed up deportations--a move critics slam as a "step backwards for immigration policy."
Efforts to achieve the faster deportations include accelerating immigration trials and opening additional detention centers, as well as increasing the use of tracking devices such as ankle bracelets to keep track of immigrants after they are released and awaiting trials for deportation, The New York Times reports.
"It's a real step backwards for immigration policy," Bob Libal, the executive director of Grassroots Leadership, which advocates for alternatives to detention, told the Huffington Post. "Detention should always be used as a last option ... the harm that comes from children from being detained is well-documented, and if we don't have to do this, we shouldn't be doing it."
The humanitarian crisis at the border has once again stirred up anti-immigrant sentiment at many levels. The union representing more than 16,000 border patrol agents wrote on its Twitter feed last weekend complaining of "Babysitting, Diaper Changing, Burrito Wrapping," although the tweet was removed after immigration advocates called it racist. An op-ed in the Guardian on Friday noted the role the Associated Press has played in dehumanizing the debate around the crisis by referring to the children as "detainees" rather than just children.
Yet public opinion is behind a long-term solution to immigration. A survey that came out June 12, conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute and the Brookings Institution, found that 62 percent of Americans favor giving undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship, while just 19 percent favor a policy of deportation.
Before the planned increase in deportations was reported, President Obama had called President Enrique Pena Nieto of Mexico on Thursday to discuss the best ways to "work in close cooperation with Mexico to develop concrete proposals to address the root causes of unlawful migration from Central America," according to a White House statement.
The likelihood of the White House actually targeting the "root causes" of immigration is highly improbable from the point of view of staunch critics of how the U.S. consistently tackles immigration problems. Founder and former president of the Economic Policy Institute Jeff Faux, told the Real News Network that "lost in this debate is the question of U.S. responsibility for the basic causes of this tragic immigration to the United States. Immigration politics in the U.S. focuses on the U.S., but the question of what to do with people who are arriving here misses the point of how they arrived and why they arrived. In this case 95 percent of the children are coming from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador."
The reporting by the Times came on World Refugee Day, which the president commemorated by saying that the United States "was built by people who fled oppression and war" and that "the refugees who arrive in the United States today continue this tradition, bringing fresh dreams and energy and renewing the qualities that help forge our national identity and make our country strong."
____________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
economic policy instituteel salvadorenrique pena nietohondurashuman rightsimmigrationjeff fauxrefugees
In response to mounting political pressure to address the crisis in U.S-Mexico border detention centers, the Obama Administration is putting plans into action to speed up deportations--a move critics slam as a "step backwards for immigration policy."
Efforts to achieve the faster deportations include accelerating immigration trials and opening additional detention centers, as well as increasing the use of tracking devices such as ankle bracelets to keep track of immigrants after they are released and awaiting trials for deportation, The New York Times reports.
"It's a real step backwards for immigration policy," Bob Libal, the executive director of Grassroots Leadership, which advocates for alternatives to detention, told the Huffington Post. "Detention should always be used as a last option ... the harm that comes from children from being detained is well-documented, and if we don't have to do this, we shouldn't be doing it."
The humanitarian crisis at the border has once again stirred up anti-immigrant sentiment at many levels. The union representing more than 16,000 border patrol agents wrote on its Twitter feed last weekend complaining of "Babysitting, Diaper Changing, Burrito Wrapping," although the tweet was removed after immigration advocates called it racist. An op-ed in the Guardian on Friday noted the role the Associated Press has played in dehumanizing the debate around the crisis by referring to the children as "detainees" rather than just children.
Yet public opinion is behind a long-term solution to immigration. A survey that came out June 12, conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute and the Brookings Institution, found that 62 percent of Americans favor giving undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship, while just 19 percent favor a policy of deportation.
Before the planned increase in deportations was reported, President Obama had called President Enrique Pena Nieto of Mexico on Thursday to discuss the best ways to "work in close cooperation with Mexico to develop concrete proposals to address the root causes of unlawful migration from Central America," according to a White House statement.
The likelihood of the White House actually targeting the "root causes" of immigration is highly improbable from the point of view of staunch critics of how the U.S. consistently tackles immigration problems. Founder and former president of the Economic Policy Institute Jeff Faux, told the Real News Network that "lost in this debate is the question of U.S. responsibility for the basic causes of this tragic immigration to the United States. Immigration politics in the U.S. focuses on the U.S., but the question of what to do with people who are arriving here misses the point of how they arrived and why they arrived. In this case 95 percent of the children are coming from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador."
The reporting by the Times came on World Refugee Day, which the president commemorated by saying that the United States "was built by people who fled oppression and war" and that "the refugees who arrive in the United States today continue this tradition, bringing fresh dreams and energy and renewing the qualities that help forge our national identity and make our country strong."
____________________________
In response to mounting political pressure to address the crisis in U.S-Mexico border detention centers, the Obama Administration is putting plans into action to speed up deportations--a move critics slam as a "step backwards for immigration policy."
Efforts to achieve the faster deportations include accelerating immigration trials and opening additional detention centers, as well as increasing the use of tracking devices such as ankle bracelets to keep track of immigrants after they are released and awaiting trials for deportation, The New York Times reports.
"It's a real step backwards for immigration policy," Bob Libal, the executive director of Grassroots Leadership, which advocates for alternatives to detention, told the Huffington Post. "Detention should always be used as a last option ... the harm that comes from children from being detained is well-documented, and if we don't have to do this, we shouldn't be doing it."
The humanitarian crisis at the border has once again stirred up anti-immigrant sentiment at many levels. The union representing more than 16,000 border patrol agents wrote on its Twitter feed last weekend complaining of "Babysitting, Diaper Changing, Burrito Wrapping," although the tweet was removed after immigration advocates called it racist. An op-ed in the Guardian on Friday noted the role the Associated Press has played in dehumanizing the debate around the crisis by referring to the children as "detainees" rather than just children.
Yet public opinion is behind a long-term solution to immigration. A survey that came out June 12, conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute and the Brookings Institution, found that 62 percent of Americans favor giving undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship, while just 19 percent favor a policy of deportation.
Before the planned increase in deportations was reported, President Obama had called President Enrique Pena Nieto of Mexico on Thursday to discuss the best ways to "work in close cooperation with Mexico to develop concrete proposals to address the root causes of unlawful migration from Central America," according to a White House statement.
The likelihood of the White House actually targeting the "root causes" of immigration is highly improbable from the point of view of staunch critics of how the U.S. consistently tackles immigration problems. Founder and former president of the Economic Policy Institute Jeff Faux, told the Real News Network that "lost in this debate is the question of U.S. responsibility for the basic causes of this tragic immigration to the United States. Immigration politics in the U.S. focuses on the U.S., but the question of what to do with people who are arriving here misses the point of how they arrived and why they arrived. In this case 95 percent of the children are coming from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador."
The reporting by the Times came on World Refugee Day, which the president commemorated by saying that the United States "was built by people who fled oppression and war" and that "the refugees who arrive in the United States today continue this tradition, bringing fresh dreams and energy and renewing the qualities that help forge our national identity and make our country strong."
____________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.