SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Puerto Ricans gather in San Juan to celebrate the resignation of Gov. Ricardo Rossello. (Photo: Dennis M. Rivera Pichardo / AP)
The movement that forced Ricardo Rossello to step down as governor of Puerto Rico is one of the largest in the island's history. It unified people across the ideological and political spectrum toward a common purpose: ending the governor's corrupt regime. On Monday, hundreds of thousands of people gathered in San Juan to demand "Ricky Renuncia."
Traveling to her native Puerto Rico to witness what was unfolding, political activist and journalist Rosa Clemente told me in an interview that rumors had spread on Monday that Rossello was readying his resignation. But then, she said, "He doubled down again by giving a horrific interview on Fox News, and that made especially young people more angry and agitated and ready to stay in the streets." Rossello told Fox News' Shepard Smith that while he wouldn't seek re-election, he also would not resign on the same day that half a million of the island's people were demanding he step down.
Two days later, more news outlets began reporting that Rossello was expected to resign later in the day. Some claimed that he had recorded a farewell message. But as the hours wore on, nothing happened. At that point, the Puerto Rican Legislature threatened to begin impeachment proceedings against him unless he stepped down. Hours later, when the day was nearly over, Rossello finally conceded. He refused to step down immediately, offering instead to resign Aug. 2.
The thousands of protesters who had remained on the streets of San Juan erupted in cheers and lit fireworks.
How did Puerto Rico's mass movement mobilize and emerge victorious so rapidly? The protests, which have been going on for two weeks straight, are incredibly diverse, involving Puerto Ricans from all the municipalities, young and old, unionized and unemployed, white and black. Clemente said she considered Monday's march "historic" in the context of Puerto Rican resistance. "The six-lane highway we were on was packed as far as the eye could see," effectively shutting it down to traffic. Cruise ships were turned away, the majority of Puerto Rican-run businesses in San Juan were closed, and restaurants handed out free food and water in solidarity.
This mass uprising was triggered by the publication of nearly 900 pages of private chat messages between Rossello and his aides, discussing in disparaging terms the victims of hurricanes Maria and Irma, and making homophobic remarks about LGBTQ Puerto Ricans, including the wildly popular Ricky Martin. Among the chats--dubbed "Rickyleaks"-was a playful threat to shoot Carmen Yulin Cruz, mayor of San Juan. Puerto Rico's Center for Investigative Journalism (its Spanish acronym is CPI) obtained the chat messages and published them online, sparking outrage among the island's residents, who have struggled for years with a debt crisis, poverty, widespread corruption and nearly 3,000 hurricane-related deaths in 2017 that have yet to be properly acknowledged.
Puerto Ricans feel betrayed by their territorial government and forgotten by the federal government. It's no wonder they pledged to remain on the streets until Rossello left office.
Days before the chat messages were published, the FBI arrested two government officials in Rossello's administration on corruption charges involving the illegal awarding of federal contracts to allies and friends. In May, the FBI arrested three Puerto Rican officials on unrelated charges of corruption. A report by the CPI concluded that "the island is the target of a pillage of public funds perpetrated through the sale of influences, contracts and access to benefits in the government." In other words, the whole system Rossello presided over is corrupt, and Puerto Ricans now know the extent of it.
The night before Monday's protest, Clemente conducted an interview with Cruz, who told her, "The world has heard the outcry of the Puerto Rican people, and let me tell you, this is about a lot more than a chat. What the chats did is [unveil] the true face of the governor of Puerto Rico."
Julio Ricardo Varela, founder of the influential online media outlet LatinoRebels.com, told me in an interview last week that after the controversial chats were made public, Rossello "got rid of everyone else on the group chat and then said, 'Well, I'm staying.' And that's when the protests started happening." He warned, "If Ricardo Rossello continues to stay in office ... it's going to be the worst political damage in the history of Puerto Rico as a colony."
Meanwhile, Donald Trump predictably took political advantage of the unrest by tweeting his disgust with both Rossello--who recently threatened to punch Trump--and Cruz, who has been his fiercest Puerto Rican critic. He also claimed that "much of their leadership is corrupt, & robbing the U.S. Government blind!" While the first part of that statement is true, the second part is Trump's attempt to obscure the fact that Puerto Ricans have been the target of almost criminal neglect by the federal government. He claimed that "the United States Congress foolishly gave [Puerto Rico] 92 Billion Dollars for hurricane relief," a blatant lie that he has repeated many times.
"Washington has literally shut its doors to anyone who wants to lobby for Puerto Rico or talk about the island's needs," Varelo noted. "The members of the Puerto Rican political class are accomplices to the colonial system that the American government has created."
Puerto Ricans feel betrayed by their territorial government and forgotten by the federal government. It's no wonder they pledged to remain on the streets until Rossello left office.
In Puerto Rico, massive grassroots pressure pushed the Legislature to threaten impeachment and force Rossello's hand. The same can--and should--happen here, at the federal level.
What comes next remains to be seen. Secretary of Justice Wanda Vazquez is next in line of succession. But even before Rossello resigned, Puerto Ricans were demanding an alternative to Vazquez, tweeting #WandaRenuncia and chanting the refrain in the streets. It appears that they will not settle for another figurehead in the top position of a regime that has proven itself to be deeply corrupt.
What's happened in Puerto Rico provides important lessons for all Americans fed up with our deeply corrupt, racist, misogynist and hateful commander in chief. A sustained mass movement that is committed to changing the system can bring about a revolution, if the circumstances are right. The movement in Puerto Rico succeeded on the same day that contentious, arguably disastrous, hearings on the Robert Mueller investigation were held in Washington, D.C., by lawmakers hoping to drum up public support for impeaching the president. In Puerto Rico, massive grassroots pressure pushed the Legislature to threaten impeachment and force Rossello's hand. The same can--and should--happen here, at the federal level.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
The movement that forced Ricardo Rossello to step down as governor of Puerto Rico is one of the largest in the island's history. It unified people across the ideological and political spectrum toward a common purpose: ending the governor's corrupt regime. On Monday, hundreds of thousands of people gathered in San Juan to demand "Ricky Renuncia."
Traveling to her native Puerto Rico to witness what was unfolding, political activist and journalist Rosa Clemente told me in an interview that rumors had spread on Monday that Rossello was readying his resignation. But then, she said, "He doubled down again by giving a horrific interview on Fox News, and that made especially young people more angry and agitated and ready to stay in the streets." Rossello told Fox News' Shepard Smith that while he wouldn't seek re-election, he also would not resign on the same day that half a million of the island's people were demanding he step down.
Two days later, more news outlets began reporting that Rossello was expected to resign later in the day. Some claimed that he had recorded a farewell message. But as the hours wore on, nothing happened. At that point, the Puerto Rican Legislature threatened to begin impeachment proceedings against him unless he stepped down. Hours later, when the day was nearly over, Rossello finally conceded. He refused to step down immediately, offering instead to resign Aug. 2.
The thousands of protesters who had remained on the streets of San Juan erupted in cheers and lit fireworks.
How did Puerto Rico's mass movement mobilize and emerge victorious so rapidly? The protests, which have been going on for two weeks straight, are incredibly diverse, involving Puerto Ricans from all the municipalities, young and old, unionized and unemployed, white and black. Clemente said she considered Monday's march "historic" in the context of Puerto Rican resistance. "The six-lane highway we were on was packed as far as the eye could see," effectively shutting it down to traffic. Cruise ships were turned away, the majority of Puerto Rican-run businesses in San Juan were closed, and restaurants handed out free food and water in solidarity.
This mass uprising was triggered by the publication of nearly 900 pages of private chat messages between Rossello and his aides, discussing in disparaging terms the victims of hurricanes Maria and Irma, and making homophobic remarks about LGBTQ Puerto Ricans, including the wildly popular Ricky Martin. Among the chats--dubbed "Rickyleaks"-was a playful threat to shoot Carmen Yulin Cruz, mayor of San Juan. Puerto Rico's Center for Investigative Journalism (its Spanish acronym is CPI) obtained the chat messages and published them online, sparking outrage among the island's residents, who have struggled for years with a debt crisis, poverty, widespread corruption and nearly 3,000 hurricane-related deaths in 2017 that have yet to be properly acknowledged.
Puerto Ricans feel betrayed by their territorial government and forgotten by the federal government. It's no wonder they pledged to remain on the streets until Rossello left office.
Days before the chat messages were published, the FBI arrested two government officials in Rossello's administration on corruption charges involving the illegal awarding of federal contracts to allies and friends. In May, the FBI arrested three Puerto Rican officials on unrelated charges of corruption. A report by the CPI concluded that "the island is the target of a pillage of public funds perpetrated through the sale of influences, contracts and access to benefits in the government." In other words, the whole system Rossello presided over is corrupt, and Puerto Ricans now know the extent of it.
The night before Monday's protest, Clemente conducted an interview with Cruz, who told her, "The world has heard the outcry of the Puerto Rican people, and let me tell you, this is about a lot more than a chat. What the chats did is [unveil] the true face of the governor of Puerto Rico."
Julio Ricardo Varela, founder of the influential online media outlet LatinoRebels.com, told me in an interview last week that after the controversial chats were made public, Rossello "got rid of everyone else on the group chat and then said, 'Well, I'm staying.' And that's when the protests started happening." He warned, "If Ricardo Rossello continues to stay in office ... it's going to be the worst political damage in the history of Puerto Rico as a colony."
Meanwhile, Donald Trump predictably took political advantage of the unrest by tweeting his disgust with both Rossello--who recently threatened to punch Trump--and Cruz, who has been his fiercest Puerto Rican critic. He also claimed that "much of their leadership is corrupt, & robbing the U.S. Government blind!" While the first part of that statement is true, the second part is Trump's attempt to obscure the fact that Puerto Ricans have been the target of almost criminal neglect by the federal government. He claimed that "the United States Congress foolishly gave [Puerto Rico] 92 Billion Dollars for hurricane relief," a blatant lie that he has repeated many times.
"Washington has literally shut its doors to anyone who wants to lobby for Puerto Rico or talk about the island's needs," Varelo noted. "The members of the Puerto Rican political class are accomplices to the colonial system that the American government has created."
Puerto Ricans feel betrayed by their territorial government and forgotten by the federal government. It's no wonder they pledged to remain on the streets until Rossello left office.
In Puerto Rico, massive grassroots pressure pushed the Legislature to threaten impeachment and force Rossello's hand. The same can--and should--happen here, at the federal level.
What comes next remains to be seen. Secretary of Justice Wanda Vazquez is next in line of succession. But even before Rossello resigned, Puerto Ricans were demanding an alternative to Vazquez, tweeting #WandaRenuncia and chanting the refrain in the streets. It appears that they will not settle for another figurehead in the top position of a regime that has proven itself to be deeply corrupt.
What's happened in Puerto Rico provides important lessons for all Americans fed up with our deeply corrupt, racist, misogynist and hateful commander in chief. A sustained mass movement that is committed to changing the system can bring about a revolution, if the circumstances are right. The movement in Puerto Rico succeeded on the same day that contentious, arguably disastrous, hearings on the Robert Mueller investigation were held in Washington, D.C., by lawmakers hoping to drum up public support for impeaching the president. In Puerto Rico, massive grassroots pressure pushed the Legislature to threaten impeachment and force Rossello's hand. The same can--and should--happen here, at the federal level.
The movement that forced Ricardo Rossello to step down as governor of Puerto Rico is one of the largest in the island's history. It unified people across the ideological and political spectrum toward a common purpose: ending the governor's corrupt regime. On Monday, hundreds of thousands of people gathered in San Juan to demand "Ricky Renuncia."
Traveling to her native Puerto Rico to witness what was unfolding, political activist and journalist Rosa Clemente told me in an interview that rumors had spread on Monday that Rossello was readying his resignation. But then, she said, "He doubled down again by giving a horrific interview on Fox News, and that made especially young people more angry and agitated and ready to stay in the streets." Rossello told Fox News' Shepard Smith that while he wouldn't seek re-election, he also would not resign on the same day that half a million of the island's people were demanding he step down.
Two days later, more news outlets began reporting that Rossello was expected to resign later in the day. Some claimed that he had recorded a farewell message. But as the hours wore on, nothing happened. At that point, the Puerto Rican Legislature threatened to begin impeachment proceedings against him unless he stepped down. Hours later, when the day was nearly over, Rossello finally conceded. He refused to step down immediately, offering instead to resign Aug. 2.
The thousands of protesters who had remained on the streets of San Juan erupted in cheers and lit fireworks.
How did Puerto Rico's mass movement mobilize and emerge victorious so rapidly? The protests, which have been going on for two weeks straight, are incredibly diverse, involving Puerto Ricans from all the municipalities, young and old, unionized and unemployed, white and black. Clemente said she considered Monday's march "historic" in the context of Puerto Rican resistance. "The six-lane highway we were on was packed as far as the eye could see," effectively shutting it down to traffic. Cruise ships were turned away, the majority of Puerto Rican-run businesses in San Juan were closed, and restaurants handed out free food and water in solidarity.
This mass uprising was triggered by the publication of nearly 900 pages of private chat messages between Rossello and his aides, discussing in disparaging terms the victims of hurricanes Maria and Irma, and making homophobic remarks about LGBTQ Puerto Ricans, including the wildly popular Ricky Martin. Among the chats--dubbed "Rickyleaks"-was a playful threat to shoot Carmen Yulin Cruz, mayor of San Juan. Puerto Rico's Center for Investigative Journalism (its Spanish acronym is CPI) obtained the chat messages and published them online, sparking outrage among the island's residents, who have struggled for years with a debt crisis, poverty, widespread corruption and nearly 3,000 hurricane-related deaths in 2017 that have yet to be properly acknowledged.
Puerto Ricans feel betrayed by their territorial government and forgotten by the federal government. It's no wonder they pledged to remain on the streets until Rossello left office.
Days before the chat messages were published, the FBI arrested two government officials in Rossello's administration on corruption charges involving the illegal awarding of federal contracts to allies and friends. In May, the FBI arrested three Puerto Rican officials on unrelated charges of corruption. A report by the CPI concluded that "the island is the target of a pillage of public funds perpetrated through the sale of influences, contracts and access to benefits in the government." In other words, the whole system Rossello presided over is corrupt, and Puerto Ricans now know the extent of it.
The night before Monday's protest, Clemente conducted an interview with Cruz, who told her, "The world has heard the outcry of the Puerto Rican people, and let me tell you, this is about a lot more than a chat. What the chats did is [unveil] the true face of the governor of Puerto Rico."
Julio Ricardo Varela, founder of the influential online media outlet LatinoRebels.com, told me in an interview last week that after the controversial chats were made public, Rossello "got rid of everyone else on the group chat and then said, 'Well, I'm staying.' And that's when the protests started happening." He warned, "If Ricardo Rossello continues to stay in office ... it's going to be the worst political damage in the history of Puerto Rico as a colony."
Meanwhile, Donald Trump predictably took political advantage of the unrest by tweeting his disgust with both Rossello--who recently threatened to punch Trump--and Cruz, who has been his fiercest Puerto Rican critic. He also claimed that "much of their leadership is corrupt, & robbing the U.S. Government blind!" While the first part of that statement is true, the second part is Trump's attempt to obscure the fact that Puerto Ricans have been the target of almost criminal neglect by the federal government. He claimed that "the United States Congress foolishly gave [Puerto Rico] 92 Billion Dollars for hurricane relief," a blatant lie that he has repeated many times.
"Washington has literally shut its doors to anyone who wants to lobby for Puerto Rico or talk about the island's needs," Varelo noted. "The members of the Puerto Rican political class are accomplices to the colonial system that the American government has created."
Puerto Ricans feel betrayed by their territorial government and forgotten by the federal government. It's no wonder they pledged to remain on the streets until Rossello left office.
In Puerto Rico, massive grassroots pressure pushed the Legislature to threaten impeachment and force Rossello's hand. The same can--and should--happen here, at the federal level.
What comes next remains to be seen. Secretary of Justice Wanda Vazquez is next in line of succession. But even before Rossello resigned, Puerto Ricans were demanding an alternative to Vazquez, tweeting #WandaRenuncia and chanting the refrain in the streets. It appears that they will not settle for another figurehead in the top position of a regime that has proven itself to be deeply corrupt.
What's happened in Puerto Rico provides important lessons for all Americans fed up with our deeply corrupt, racist, misogynist and hateful commander in chief. A sustained mass movement that is committed to changing the system can bring about a revolution, if the circumstances are right. The movement in Puerto Rico succeeded on the same day that contentious, arguably disastrous, hearings on the Robert Mueller investigation were held in Washington, D.C., by lawmakers hoping to drum up public support for impeaching the president. In Puerto Rico, massive grassroots pressure pushed the Legislature to threaten impeachment and force Rossello's hand. The same can--and should--happen here, at the federal level.
"Bureau of Labor Statistics data is what determines the annual cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits," said Rep. John Larson. "It should alarm everyone when a yes-man determined to end Social Security is installed in this position."
U.S. President Donald Trump's pick to replace the top labor statistics official he fired earlier this month has called Social Security a "Ponzi scheme" that needs to be "sunset," comments that critics said further disqualify the nominee for the key government role.
During a December 2024 radio interview, Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni said it is a "mathematical fiction" that Social Security "can go on forever" and called for "some kind of transition program where unfortunately you'll need a generation of people who pay Social Security taxes, but never actually receive any of those benefits."
"That's the price to pay for unwinding a Ponzi scheme that was foisted on the American people by the Democrats in the 1930s," Antoni continued. "You're not going to be able to sustain a Ponzi scheme like Social Security. Eventually, you need to sunset the program."
Trump's choice for the Commissioner of the Bureau Labor Statistics called Social Security a "Ponzi scheme" in an interview:
" What you need to do is have some kind of transition program where unfortunately you'll need a generation of people who pay Social Security taxes, but… pic.twitter.com/MXL7k1C644
— More Perfect Union (@MorePerfectUS) August 12, 2025
Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.), one of Social Security's most vocal defenders in Congress, said Antoni's position on the program matters because "Bureau of Labor Statistics data is what determines the annual cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits."
"It should alarm everyone when a yes-man determined to end Social Security is installed in this position," Larson said in a statement. "I call on every Senate Republican to stand with Democrats and reject this extreme nominee—before our seniors are denied the benefits they earned through a lifetime of hard work."
Trump announced Antoni's nomination to serve as the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) less than two weeks after the president fired the agency's former head, Erika McEntarfer, following the release of abysmal jobs figures. The firing sparked concerns that future BLS data will be manipulated to suit Trump's political interests.
Antoni was a contributor to the far-right Project 2025 agenda that the Trump administration appears to have drawn from repeatedly this year, and his position on Social Security echoes that of far-right billionaire Elon Musk, who has also falsely characterized the program as a Ponzi scheme.
During his time in the Trump administration, Musk spearheaded an assault on the Social Security Administration that continues in the present, causing widespread chaos at the agency and increasing wait times for beneficiaries.
"President Trump fired the commissioner of Labor Statistics to cover up a weak jobs report—and now he is replacing her with a Project 2025 lackey who wants to shut down Social Security," said Larson. "E.J. Antoni agrees with Elon Musk that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme and said that middle-class seniors would be better off if it was eliminated."
"This sends a chilling message that the U.S. is willing to overlook some abuses, signaling that people experiencing human rights violations may be left to fend for themselves," said one Amnesty campaigner.
After leaked drafts exposed the Trump administration's plans to downplay human rights abuses in some allied countries, including Israel, the U.S. Department of State released the final edition of an annual report on Tuesday, sparking fresh condemnation.
"Breaking with precedent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not provide a written introduction to the report nor did he make remarks about it," CNN reported. Still, Amanda Klasing, Amnesty International USA's national director of government relations and advocacy, called him out by name in a Tuesday statement.
"With the release of the U.S. State Department's human rights report, it is clear that the Trump administration has engaged in a very selective documentation of human rights abuses in certain countries," Klasing said. "In addition to eliminating entire sections for certain countries—for example discrimination against LGBTQ+ people—there are also arbitrary omissions within existing sections of the report based on the country."
Klasing explained that "we have criticized past reports when warranted, but have never seen reports quite like this. Never before have the reports gone this far in prioritizing an administration's political agenda over a consistent and truthful accounting of human rights violations around the world—softening criticism in some countries while ignoring violations in others. The State Department has said in relation to the reports less is more. However, for the victims and human rights defenders who rely on these reports to shine light on abuses and violations, less is just less."
"Secretary Rubio knows full well from his time in the Senate how vital these reports are in informing policy decisions and shaping diplomatic conversations, yet he has made the dangerous and short-sighted decision to put out a truncated version that doesn't tell the whole story of human rights violations," she continued. "This sends a chilling message that the U.S. is willing to overlook some abuses, signaling that people experiencing human rights violations may be left to fend for themselves."
"Failing to adequately report on human rights violations further damages the credibility of the U.S. on human rights issues," she added. "It's shameful that the Trump administration and Secretary Rubio are putting politics above human lives."
The overarching report—which includes over 100 individual country reports—covers 2024, the last full calendar year of the Biden administration. The appendix says that in March, the report was "streamlined for better utility and accessibility in the field and by partners, and to be more responsive to the underlying legislative mandate and aligned to the administration's executive orders."
As CNN detailed:
The latest report was stripped of many of the specific sections included in past reports, including reporting on alleged abuses based on sexual orientation, violence toward women, corruption in government, systemic racial or ethnic violence, or denial of a fair public trial. Some country reports, including for Afghanistan, do address human rights abuses against women.
"We were asked to edit down the human rights reports to the bare minimum of what was statutorily required," said Michael Honigstein, the former director of African Affairs at the State Department's Bureau of Human Rights, Democracy, and Labor. He and his office helped compile the initial reports.
Over the past week, since the draft country reports leaked to the press, the Trump administration has come under fire for its portrayals of El Salvador, Israel, and Russia.
The report on Israel—and the illegally occupied Palestinian territories, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank—is just nine pages. The brevity even drew the attention of Israeli media. The Times of Israel highlighted that it "is much shorter than last year's edition compiled under the Biden administration and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza."
Since the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Israeli forces have slaughtered over 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to local officials—though experts warn the true toll is likely far higher. As Israel has restricted humanitarian aid in recent months, over 200 people have starved to death, including 103 children.
The U.S. report on Israel does not mention the genocide case that Israel faces at the International Court of Justice over the assault on Gaza, or the International Criminal Court arrest warrants issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The section on war crimes and genocide only says that "terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah continue to engage in the
indiscriminate targeting of Israeli civilians in violation of the law of armed conflict."
As the world mourns the killing of six more Palestinian media professionals in Gaza this week—which prompted calls for the United Nations Security Council to convene an emergency meeting—the report's section on press freedom is also short and makes no mention of the hundreds of journalists killed in Israel's annihilation of the strip:
The law generally provided for freedom of expression, including for members of the press and other media, and the government generally respected this right for most Israelis. NGOs and journalists reported authorities restricted press coverage and limited certain forms of expression, especially in the context of criticism against the war or sympathy for Palestinians in Gaza.
Noting that "the human rights reports have been among the U.S. government's most-read documents," DAWN senior adviser and 32-year State Department official Charles Blaha said the "significant omissions" in this year's report on Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank render it "functionally useless for Congress and the public as nothing more than a pro-Israel document."
Like Klasing at Amnesty, Sarah Leah Whitson, DAWN's executive director, specifically called out the U.S. secretary of state.
"Secretary Rubio has revamped the State Department reports for one principal purpose: to whitewash Israeli crimes, including its horrific genocide and starvation in Gaza. The report shockingly includes not a word about the overwhelming evidence of genocide, mass starvation, and the deliberate bombardment of civilians in Gaza," she said. "Rubio has defied the letter and intent of U.S. laws requiring the State Department to report truthfully and comprehensively about every country's human rights abuses, instead offering up anodyne cover for his murderous friends in Tel Aviv."
The Tuesday release came after a coalition of LGBTQ+ and human rights organizations on Monday filed a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department over its refusal to release the congressionally mandated report.
This article has been updated with comment from DAWN.
"We will not sit idly by while political leaders manipulate voting maps to entrench their power and subvert our democracy," said the head of Common Cause.
As Republicans try to rig congressional maps in several states and Democrats threaten retaliatory measures, a pro-democracy watchdog on Tuesday unveiled new fairness standards underscoring that "independent redistricting commissions remain the gold standard for ending partisan gerrymandering."
Common Cause will hold an online media briefing Wednesday at noon Eastern time "to walk reporters though the six pieces of criteria the organization will use to evaluate any proposed maps."
The Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group said that "it will closely evaluate, but not automatically condemn, countermeasures" to Republican gerrymandering efforts—especially mid-decade redistricting not based on decennial censuses.
Amid the gerrymandering wars, we just launched 6 fairness criteria to hold all actors to the same principled standard: people first—not parties. Read our criteria here: www.commoncause.org/resources/po...
[image or embed]
— Common Cause (@commoncause.org) August 12, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Common Cause's six fairness criteria for mid-decade redistricting are:
"We will not sit idly by while political leaders manipulate voting maps to entrench their power and subvert our democracy," Common Cause president and CEO Virginia Kase Solomón said in a statement. "But neither will we call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian tactics that undermine fair representation."
"We have established a fairness criteria that we will use to evaluate all countermeasures so we can respond to the most urgent threats to fair representation while holding all actors to the same principled standard: people—not parties—first," she added.
Common Cause's fairness criteria come amid the ongoing standoff between Republicans trying to gerrymander Texas' congressional map and Democratic lawmakers who fled the state in a bid to stymie a vote on the measure. Texas state senators on Tuesday approved the proposed map despite a walkout by most of their Democratic colleagues.
Leaders of several Democrat-controlled states, most notably California, have threatened retaliatory redistricting.
"This moment is about more than responding to a single threat—it's about building the movement for lasting reform," Kase Solomón asserted. "This is not an isolated political tactic; it is part of a broader march toward authoritarianism, dismantling people-powered democracy, and stripping away the people's ability to have a political voice and say in how they are governed."