Obama's Approval of Arctic Oil Drilling is a Bitter Betrayal
The news came swift and sudden, though not unexpected: The Obama administration had approved Shell's permits to drill for oil in the Arctic this summer.
The news came swift and sudden, though not unexpected: The Obama administration had approved Shell's permits to drill for oil in the Arctic this summer.
It came like a punch in the gut. How could he?
Not only will this put Arctic wildlife directly in harm's way of oil spill but it will push us deeper in the very climate crisis that President Obama has vowed time and again to finally address.
More than 1 million people had urged the president to keep oil drilling out of the Arctic. Just last weekend, thousands of people around the world took to the streets and their local waterways to say "Shell No" to drilling in the far north. (I even called on him prove his climate change rhetoric by denying Shell's Arctic oil drilling permits this week in an open letter on Huffington Post.)
Obama didn't just defy environmentalists around the world who have been calling for the Arctic to be kept off-limits to offshore drilling, he betrayed his own stated values and cast a dark shadow across the United States' role as a world leader in transitioning the planet to the clean energy future it desperately needs.
By allowing Big Oil to drill into the largest untapped oil reserve on the planet, located in a harsh environment where a major oil spill is both likely and impossible to clean up, Obama has set a depressing and destructive example going into this fall's climate change talks in Paris.
Yes, he claims to recognize and be working to address the "urgent and growing threat of a changing climate," but his actions keep saying, "Drill baby drill!" At least the Republicans are somewhat honest about their intentions to suck up and burn every drop of oil they can, but Obama claims other values and goals.
That's why this is such a bitter betrayal.
And it isn't just about climate change. The Department of the Interior has already acknowledged there's a 75 percent change of a major oil spill with this project, and that it will injure wildlife even without a spill. We only have to look at the delayed and deficient federal response to the recent oil spill near Santa Barbara to doubt the emergency response standards of the federal government, which regularly allows oil companies to self-regulate.
Former Vice President Al Gore, in an interview with the Guardian last week, offered a rare criticism of Obama for even considering the Shell project and allowing it to get this far, calling the idea "insane." Beyond the undeniable climate change impacts, Gore emphasized the likelihood of a devastating oil spill, like BP's 2010 disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.
"I think the Deepwater Horizon spill was warning enough. The conditions are so hostile for human activity there. I think it's a mistake to drill for oil in the Arctic. I think that ought to be banned," Gore said.
So do I, and so do leading environmentalists and climate scientists around the world. Obama's decision to allow this project to move forward is a painful blow, but it's one that will only increase my resolve to fight Big Oil with every means at our disposal.
This week, Obama made it clear that he's not the ally we'd hoped he was in this fight, but there's an army of us who will continue this struggle long after he's gone.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The news came swift and sudden, though not unexpected: The Obama administration had approved Shell's permits to drill for oil in the Arctic this summer.
It came like a punch in the gut. How could he?
Not only will this put Arctic wildlife directly in harm's way of oil spill but it will push us deeper in the very climate crisis that President Obama has vowed time and again to finally address.
More than 1 million people had urged the president to keep oil drilling out of the Arctic. Just last weekend, thousands of people around the world took to the streets and their local waterways to say "Shell No" to drilling in the far north. (I even called on him prove his climate change rhetoric by denying Shell's Arctic oil drilling permits this week in an open letter on Huffington Post.)
Obama didn't just defy environmentalists around the world who have been calling for the Arctic to be kept off-limits to offshore drilling, he betrayed his own stated values and cast a dark shadow across the United States' role as a world leader in transitioning the planet to the clean energy future it desperately needs.
By allowing Big Oil to drill into the largest untapped oil reserve on the planet, located in a harsh environment where a major oil spill is both likely and impossible to clean up, Obama has set a depressing and destructive example going into this fall's climate change talks in Paris.
Yes, he claims to recognize and be working to address the "urgent and growing threat of a changing climate," but his actions keep saying, "Drill baby drill!" At least the Republicans are somewhat honest about their intentions to suck up and burn every drop of oil they can, but Obama claims other values and goals.
That's why this is such a bitter betrayal.
And it isn't just about climate change. The Department of the Interior has already acknowledged there's a 75 percent change of a major oil spill with this project, and that it will injure wildlife even without a spill. We only have to look at the delayed and deficient federal response to the recent oil spill near Santa Barbara to doubt the emergency response standards of the federal government, which regularly allows oil companies to self-regulate.
Former Vice President Al Gore, in an interview with the Guardian last week, offered a rare criticism of Obama for even considering the Shell project and allowing it to get this far, calling the idea "insane." Beyond the undeniable climate change impacts, Gore emphasized the likelihood of a devastating oil spill, like BP's 2010 disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.
"I think the Deepwater Horizon spill was warning enough. The conditions are so hostile for human activity there. I think it's a mistake to drill for oil in the Arctic. I think that ought to be banned," Gore said.
So do I, and so do leading environmentalists and climate scientists around the world. Obama's decision to allow this project to move forward is a painful blow, but it's one that will only increase my resolve to fight Big Oil with every means at our disposal.
This week, Obama made it clear that he's not the ally we'd hoped he was in this fight, but there's an army of us who will continue this struggle long after he's gone.
The news came swift and sudden, though not unexpected: The Obama administration had approved Shell's permits to drill for oil in the Arctic this summer.
It came like a punch in the gut. How could he?
Not only will this put Arctic wildlife directly in harm's way of oil spill but it will push us deeper in the very climate crisis that President Obama has vowed time and again to finally address.
More than 1 million people had urged the president to keep oil drilling out of the Arctic. Just last weekend, thousands of people around the world took to the streets and their local waterways to say "Shell No" to drilling in the far north. (I even called on him prove his climate change rhetoric by denying Shell's Arctic oil drilling permits this week in an open letter on Huffington Post.)
Obama didn't just defy environmentalists around the world who have been calling for the Arctic to be kept off-limits to offshore drilling, he betrayed his own stated values and cast a dark shadow across the United States' role as a world leader in transitioning the planet to the clean energy future it desperately needs.
By allowing Big Oil to drill into the largest untapped oil reserve on the planet, located in a harsh environment where a major oil spill is both likely and impossible to clean up, Obama has set a depressing and destructive example going into this fall's climate change talks in Paris.
Yes, he claims to recognize and be working to address the "urgent and growing threat of a changing climate," but his actions keep saying, "Drill baby drill!" At least the Republicans are somewhat honest about their intentions to suck up and burn every drop of oil they can, but Obama claims other values and goals.
That's why this is such a bitter betrayal.
And it isn't just about climate change. The Department of the Interior has already acknowledged there's a 75 percent change of a major oil spill with this project, and that it will injure wildlife even without a spill. We only have to look at the delayed and deficient federal response to the recent oil spill near Santa Barbara to doubt the emergency response standards of the federal government, which regularly allows oil companies to self-regulate.
Former Vice President Al Gore, in an interview with the Guardian last week, offered a rare criticism of Obama for even considering the Shell project and allowing it to get this far, calling the idea "insane." Beyond the undeniable climate change impacts, Gore emphasized the likelihood of a devastating oil spill, like BP's 2010 disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.
"I think the Deepwater Horizon spill was warning enough. The conditions are so hostile for human activity there. I think it's a mistake to drill for oil in the Arctic. I think that ought to be banned," Gore said.
So do I, and so do leading environmentalists and climate scientists around the world. Obama's decision to allow this project to move forward is a painful blow, but it's one that will only increase my resolve to fight Big Oil with every means at our disposal.
This week, Obama made it clear that he's not the ally we'd hoped he was in this fight, but there's an army of us who will continue this struggle long after he's gone.