The Short, Happy Iraq War of Howard Kurtz

As the world marks the sixth
anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, corporate media's most
prominent journalism critic is wondering if Barack Obama's Iraq policy
isn't being sufficiently scrutinized. As Washington Post media reporter Howard Kurtz asked recently on his CNN program (3/15/09):
"What about the previous president? I mean, he famously landed on that
aircraft carrier, declared 'Mission Accomplished,' and we're still
there. Could journalists be falling into the same trap of taking a
president's word about Iraq at face value?"

It's a good question to ask - but is Kurtz really the best person to
ask it? In the heady days of "post-war" Iraq, Howard Kurtz went out of
his way to criticize those journalists who didn't adopt Bush's
short-sighted optimism about the "success" of the invasion.

In a column he wrote on April 14, 2003,
Kurtz congratulated the press for its coverage of the just-concluded
Iraq War. The piece provides a useful guide to the conventional wisdom
that guides not just journalism, but also the profession's most
powerful internal critics.

Kurtz began, "It's been the best of times and the worst of times for
journalists." On the negative side, "The worst because they nearly got
submerged in a sea of second-guessing just days into the fighting."
After remarking that "unnamed critics, it turns out, are never in short
supply," he elaborated by citing some examples of apparently
too-pessimistic reporting:

*The Washington Post, March 27: "Despite the rapid
advance of Army and Marine forces across Iraq over the past week, some
senior U.S. military officers are now convinced that the war is likely
to last months and will require considerably more combat power than is
now on hand there and in Kuwait, senior defense officials said
yesterday."

*Los Angeles Times, March 28: "The stiff resistance
shown by Iraqi forces in the last week has forced administration
officials to consider the prospect of a longer, costlier war."

*The New York Times, April 1: "Long-simmering tensions
between Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Army commanders have
erupted in a series of complaints from officers on the Iraqi
battlefield that the Pentagon has not sent enough troops to wage the
war as they want to fight it."

So journalists who were the right track - raising questions
("second-guessing") about whether the war would last "months," or
noticing tensions between military commanders and Rumsfeld - were the
"worst," according to Kurtz. He also stuck up for Dick Cheney, writing:

On the other hand, Newsweek's "Conventional Wisdom
Watch" gave Cheney a down arrow: "Tells Meet the Press just before war,
'We will be greeted as liberators.' An arrogant blunder for the ages."
Or not.

The arrogant blunder here seems to be all Kurtz's.

Kurtz recalled other highlights from the media's performance:

No anchor-gab was needed when it came to the powerful
images produced by this short war. The American POWs cruelly displayed
by the Iraqis; the dazed face of the wounded Jessica Lynch during the
rescue that freed her; the sheer joy of Baghdad residents hacking away
at that Saddam statue. The footage sent the world a message more
compelling than a thousand op-ed pieces or a million propaganda
leaflets dropped from U.S. planes.

Of course, there was plenty of "anchor-gab" about the Jessica Lynch
"rescue" and the Saddam Hussein statue, which were indeed more
effective than leaflets dropped from planes--precisely because they
were celebrated by the press corps in wildly exaggerated accounts
rather than exposed as the propaganda stunts they were (London Times, 4/16/03; LA Times, 6/3/04).

There were other lessons to be learned, according to Kurtz, from the
other short war the U.S. had just finished: "Were parts of the media
too downbeat about the war's early setbacks? Sure. Trying to assess a
war after a week or two is a high-wire act, as journalists learned
after the infamous 'quagmire' pieces about Afghanistan." He elaborated:

Now comes the difficult part of the story - forming a
government, rebuilding a shattered country, fending off suicide attacks
- that lacks the obvious drama of toppling a brutal dictator. (Anyone
seen a television report from Kabul lately?) Once the embedded
reporters are liberated, it's all too easy to imagine the media
drifting off to other obsessions while the future of Iraq is hammered
out.

Kurtz was right about one thing, in retrospect: Corporate media did
eventually "drift off" from Iraq - hundreds of thousands of lives and
billions of dollars later. In the meantime, that forgotten Afghanistan
conflict is still underway, with more U.S. troops on the way.