Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

For Immediate Release

Contact

Kirsten Stade kstade@peer.org; Peter Jenkins pjenkins@peer.org

Press Release

Suit to Bar E-Bikes from Park Trails Gets Greenlight Claims Challenging Legality of NPS E-Bikes Approval Will Be Heard

WASHINGTON -

A lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s approval of electronic bicycles (“e-bikes”) anywhere in the National Park System where traditional human-pedaled bicycles are allowed has survived dismissal and will now be heard in full, according to a federal court ruling posted today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).  The suit, in essence, would bar e-bikes from park backcountry where motorized transport is otherwise forbidden. 
 
In summary orders issued back in August 2019, the Trump Interior Department, followed the next day by the National Park Service, directed that e-bikes would be allowed on park trails wherever traditional bicycles are allowed. The NPS order was issued by an official who was illegally serving as “acting” Director and had no legal power to issue such an edict.  PEER and a coalition of groups filed suit to strike down this illegal order.
 
Scrambling to cure this defect, the Park Service moved to codify this e-bikes policy by adopting a new e-bike regulation, which “Final Rule” was signed on November 2, 2020, in the waning days of the Trump term.  After the regulation was adopted, the government moved to dismiss the PEER suit, which had since been amended to also challenge the new regulation. 
 
In an order dated March 30, 2021, U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras ruled that PEER’s challenges to both the original order and the Final Rule could go forward. Judge Contreras found a key Park Service argument to be “nonsensical”; further, that the original NPS approval order appeared to be “’bootstrapped’ and used as a false justification for a continuing NEPA [National Environmental Policy Act] violation in the Final Rule.” 
 
“The unanswered question is why would the Biden administration defend this ill-conceived Trump/Bernhardt initiative?” asked PEER Senior Counsel Peter Jenkins, noting that some 380 park units allowed e-bikes under the earlier illegal order. “This blanket e-bikes approval is the epitome of the worst way to make natural resource policy.”
 
The PEER case is based upon a number of claims, all of which the Judge approved.  A central issue is that the NPS has never conducted an environmental review under NEPA of on-the-ground impacts, such the risks of high-speed e-bikes to visitors and wildlife, spooking horses on mixed-use trails, and degrading the quality of the backcountry experience.  NPS has refused to conduct the type of detailed environmental review required despite ample opportunity to do so.
 
The court also will hear the claim that the policy resulted from illegal lobbying by an industry-backed “E-bike Partner and Agency Group,” which disbanded after PEER revealed its existence. 
 
PEER represents five environmental groups, including Wilderness Watch and the Marin Conservation League, and three impacted individuals in its suit.
 
“This new national e-bikes policy was hatched by industry lobbyists, not by national park professionals,” added Jenkins, noting that NPS has not had a Senate-confirmed Director for more than five years.  “After the court’s strong ruling we will be happy to continue to litigate if necessary, but we are open to discussing next steps forward with the new Park Service leadership when they take office.”

###

PEER logo

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) is a national alliance of local state and federal resource professionals. PEER's environmental work is solely directed by the needs of its members. As a consequence, we have the distinct honor of serving resource professionals who daily cast profiles in courage in cubicles across the country.

Citing Donziger Case, Dems Raise Alarm About Use of Private Prosecutors in Federal Court

Private prosecutions of criminal contempt charges, said a pair of senators, "are highly unusual and can raise concerning questions of fundamental fairness in our criminal justice system."

Jessica Corbett ·


'About Damn Time': DOJ Says Treasury Department Must Give Trump's Tax Returns to Congress

"This case is now bigger even than Donald Trump's crimes. Neither the courts, nor the machinery of our government, exist to bodyguard a corrupt private citizen from transparency."

Jake Johnson ·


'Just Say That the Election Was Corrupt,' Trump Told DOJ in December

"It was a failed coup. Call it what it was. It didn't work! But they sure as hell tried."

Kenny Stancil ·


Digital Rights Groups Hail Record €746 Million Amazon Data Privacy Fine

La Quadrature du Net, whose complaint led to the Luxembourg fine, called the penalty a "first step," but said that "we need to remain vigilant" in the face of Amazon's ongoing violations.

Brett Wilkins ·


Science Museum Just Killed Its 'Own Reputation,' Says Greta Thunberg After Docs Reveal Gag Clause With Shell

"It essentially creates a 'chilling effect,' where museum staff must refrain from speaking openly about the reality of Shell's activities."

Andrea Germanos ·