December, 29 2020, 11:00pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Josh Chetwynd, Communications Manager, 303-573-5558, jchetwynd@publicinterestnetwork.org
Looking Ahead: Environment America's 2021 Federal and State Priorities
Agenda includes ramping up renewable energy, prioritizing wildlife over waste and increasing protections for our wild spaces.
WASHINGTON
Environment America, a national nonpartisan network of state environmental groups, contributed to numerous environmental victories in 2020. The organization is looking ahead to spurring more environmental progress at the federal and state levels.
"We enter 2021 with hope for a brighter and healthier year," said Environment America's Acting President Wendy Wendlandt. "With a new presidential administration and state and local governments showing leadership, we are optimistic we can continue to slash emissions from our cars and trucks, transition more of our cities and states to 100 percent renewable energy, conserve our wild spaces, reduce plastic waste and ensure Americans have clean water."
Here is a roundup of some of the top issues and bills that Environment America and its 29 state organizations will be working on across the country this coming year:
Building on momentum toward a 100% Renewable Energy society
With seven states and more than 150 cities pledging to generate electricity from clean energy sources, we continue to move closer to powering our country with 100 percent renewable energy. To continue on that road at the federal level, Environment America will press for further extending solar and wind energy tax credits, expanding incentives for electric vehicles and energy efficiency, and creating new tax credits for energy storage projects.
In addition, our organization will be working for 100 percent clean energy bills in at least six states -- Florida, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Texas and Connecticut -- and supporting 100 percent renewable initiatives on at least 23 college campuses.
Along with that work, there will be a big push to improve existing renewable energy plans. Environment California is supporting policies to accelerate the state's transition to 100 percent clean energy, which currently has a 2045 deadline. Environment Missouri will be looking to increase Missouri's Renewable Energy Standard of 15 percent renewable energy by 2021 to 50 percent by 2035; and Environment Minnesota is also seeking an update to its Renewable Energy Standards. In Michigan, Environment Michigan is calling on its legislature to create a legal roadmap to get the state to its 100 percent renewable energy commitment by 2050, which Gov. Gretchen Whitmer announced in September.
Environment California has other ambitious clean energy plans, such as working to ensure that state legislators set a goal of 3 gigawatts of offshore wind energy by 2030 and 10 gigawatts by 2040, and advocating for state investments in long-duration renewable energy storage technologies. Other plans on our California agenda include increasing geothermal power; ramping up the number of solar panels paired with battery storage on K-12 public schools; and heightening the use of such important energy efficiency options as all-electric buildings.
On the defense side, Environment Texas will be fighting against efforts to impose a tax on energy sources other than natural gas and to discriminate against wind and solar as part of the state's economic development program. At the same time, the group will support, among other policies, adopting a solar consumer protection act to make it easier for Texans to go solar; commencing a study on expanding the state's renewable energy standard on electricity to 50 percent by 2030 and 100 percent by 2050; and investing in additional transmission lines to bring wind and solar power to cities.
Elsewhere, Environment Colorado will back The Healthier Homes Act of 2021, which would help utilities develop plans to replace gas and propane-powered appliances with high-efficiency versions and The Building Energy Performance Act of 2021, which would require most large commercial, multifamily and public buildings to benchmark energy use and reduce emissions. Environment Maryland will advocate for a school clean energy bill that ensures the state's public schools develop comprehensive school energy policies. In the Southeast, Environment Georgia will aim to get burdensome solar fees outlawed. And Environment Florida will, among other things, press for expanding community solar, increasing rooftop solar numbers, adding new energy storage capacity, ratcheting up energy efficiency and banning fracking statewide.
Addressing the plastic pollution crisis
Every day, people throw away tons of single-use cups, containers and other plastic "stuff." All of this waste not only trashes our parks and public spaces, but it also washes into our rivers, where it's harmful to wildlife and pollutes our drinking water. To change that cycle, state environmental groups across the country will advocate for legislation to make sure that containers we only use for moments don't pollute our planet for generations.
For example, Environment Colorado, Environment Florida, Environment Michigan, Environment Oregon, Environment Virginia and Environment Washington will all be working for statewide bans on polystyrene -- what many people refer to as Styrofoam. Environment Florida, along with such groups as Environment Missouri and Environment Texas, will also be working to ensure that state legislatures don't preempt local communities' efforts to address polystyrene foam pollution.
Our groups will promote numerous other policies to reduce plastic foam and other forms of plastic pollution. For instance, Environment Virginia will work for a ban on intentional balloon releases, which can be one of the most dangerous types of litter for wildlife. Environment Georgia will advocate for bans on plastic bags and plastic foam in state facilities and grocery stores. Along with its battle against preemption, Environment Texas will also support a bill that creates a statewide debris management plan with emphasis on landfill diversion and environmental protection.
In the Pacific Northwest, both Environment Oregon and Environment Washington will support statewide policies that require producers to take responsibility for the plastic pollution they create. Environment Oregon will also seek a comprehensive foodware policy that shifts away from single-use products and toward reusables; and a statewide stop to permitting new or expanded "chemical recycling" facilities, which is a false solution to the plastics problem.
Similarly, Environment Maryland will call for companies that produce plastic to be responsible for its disposal costs. Its state agenda includes a plastic incineration ban; a statewide ban on plastic bags and legislation that requires hotels to stop providing single-use toiletry containers, bans plastic utensils and stirrers, and requires that straws be given upon request only.
Conserving public lands and wild spaces
When The Great American Outdoors Act was signed into law in August, it was a rare bright spot for 2020. While the federal statute, which permanently funds the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) with $900 million annually and provides $9.5 billion over five years to fix maintenance problems plaguing America's public lands, was a big win, it was only a start.
In 2021, Environment America will lobby at the national and state level for resolutions that call for the conservation of 30 percent of America's lands and water by 2030. It will also support the Roadless Area Conservation Act, which aims to keep our wild spaces wild. Safeguarding our waters from offshore oil drilling will continue to be a vital issue in states along the Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific coasts.
Protecting pollinators will also be a priority. Environment Texas will support a series of policies to aid bees. These include establishing a voluntary pollinator-friendly designation for solar farms; backing a bill that requires utilities to install native and pollinator-friendly plants after they dig along state highways; and banning the use of bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides along state highways and on other state property.
Preventing the use of neonicotinoids is also at the center of both Environment Oregon and Environment Missouri's efforts on this issue.
Finally state environmental groups will continue to advocate state park funding. For example, Environment Texas will support an effort to appropriate all of the state's sporting goods sales tax to state parks and historic sites.
Decarbonizing the transportation sector
Despite fewer cars on the road in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, transportation emissions continued to be the top contributor to global warming in the United States. Environment America and our national network will continue efforts to solve this problem in 2021.
When federal transportation spending authorization expires in September, Environment America will be supporting a reauthorization that prioritizes reducing greenhouse gases emissions and investing in electric vehicles. Among the federal bills that the group will support is the Driving America Forward Act, which renews and extends the electric vehicle tax credit.
California has long been a leader on the transportation front, and Environment California looks to ensure that continues in 2021. The group will press for increased electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure as part of an effort to reach a goal of 1 million charging stations by 2030. The group will also embrace efforts to double the amount of trips taken on public transit in the next 10 years and will back programs that help people replace fossil-fuel powered cars with EVs.
Building on California's announcement in September that, by 2035, it will stop the sale of gas-powered vehicles, Environment Washington is aiming to get its state to enact a similar ban on new fossil fuel-powered cars and trucks -- but, in this case, by 2030. In the short term, the Seattle-based group will also push for a clean fuel standard within the state.
In the Lone Star State, Environment Texas will fight for allocating all current Texas Emissions Reduction Plan funds to support clean air and for expanding funding for electric vehicle rebates. The affiliate will also back cities' rights to adopt local option taxes for transportation investments. In addition, the group will endorse one bill that allows state employees to telecommute and another that requires drivers to stop and yield the right-of-way to pedestrians. It will oppose a bill that assesses an annual $200 fee on electric vehicles and another that takes "rainy day" funds to build roads and other infrastructure for oil and gas development.
Other state plans include Environment Missouri's support for increasing Missouri's current 17-cent fuel tax to 30 cents per gallon. Environment Colorado will support a transportation funding bill that will emphasize reducing vehicle miles travelled and accelerate a transition to EVs. Environment New Jersey is supporting initiatives to rapidly expand electric vehicle charging infrastructure. It is also advocating for spending Volkswagen settlement funds and Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) money on electrification measures for public transit vehicles, charging stations and seaport electrification.
Cleaning up America's waterways and protecting our drinking water
Too many of America's waterways continue to be threatened by toxic chemicals and too many schools continue to have unacceptable levels of lead in their drinking water that threaten children's health.
To that end, Environment America will urge Congress to increase water infrastructure funding to stop sewage overflows, make our waterways safe for swimming, and "Get the Lead Out" of our kid's school faucets and fountains via the Get the Lead Out Act, which would require replacing lead service lines within 10 years.
At the federal administrative level, the organization will work to repeal the Dirty Water Rule, a Trump administration regulation that deeply diminished protections for our streams and wetlands. Other necessary changes include: increasing limits on toxic pollution from power plants; strengthening the Lead and Copper Rule; curbing pollution from meat processing plants with updated permit standards; and barring direct discharges of the "forever chemicals" per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFS) into waterways while also phasing out these toxins where possible.
State groups in the Environment America network will also be leaning into many of these issues. Environment Florida will push for comprehensive water testing and full public access to all the data from those studies. The group is also calling for schools to immediately shut off taps where water contains more lead than one part per billion (ppb), which is the threshold recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, and install National Sanitation Foundation-certified filters on faucets or fountains used for drinking or cooking. Similarly, Environment Maryland is backing a bill that strengthens protections from lead in school drinking water and Environment Washington is calling for both testing and alerts when drinking water taps test above 1 ppb. Environment Washington is also backing the approval of $3 million for the state Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to replace or remediate lead fixtures.
Environment Michigan will have PFAS and PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) in its crosshairs. The group will press for thorough regulations that protect Michiganders from this whole class of chemicals. The group will also support strengthening Michigan's "polluter pays" laws, which should hold those accountable when a company has contaminated our water or soil with these compounds.
Environment Virginia, which has worked for years to prevent runoff into the Chesapeake Bay, will continue these efforts. In Florida, another iconic body of water -- the Suwannee River -- also remains under threat. To solve that and other water-related dangers in the state, Environment Florida is aiming to protect state waterways through limits on agricultural pollution from large factory farms; keep beaches and other waterways safe from sewage overflows and runoff pollution with new stormwater standards and adequate funding for green infrastructure; and promote water conservation through incentive programs and appliance standards. Environment Georgia will fight to protect Georgia's waterways from toxic coal ash pollution by requiring stricter rules for long-term coal ash storage.
Environment Texas' large clean water agenda includes supporting a nature-based infrastructure financing program to fully fund community projects, policies that get toxic lead out of school drinking water, and a drinking water standard that reduces exposure to PFAS.
With Environment America, you protect the places that all of us love and promote core environmental values, such as clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, and clean energy to power our lives. We're a national network of 29 state environmental groups with members and supporters in every state. Together, we focus on timely, targeted action that wins tangible improvements in the quality of our environment and our lives.
(303) 801-0581LATEST NEWS
Trump Tariffs Have Cost Average US Family Nearly $1,200 So Far
"The president’s tax on American families is simply making things more expensive.”
Dec 11, 2025
As President Donald Trump persistently claims the economy is working for Americans, Democrats in the US House and Senate on Thursday released an analysis that puts a number to the recent polling that's found many Americans feel squeezed by higher prices: $1,200.
That's how much the average household in the US has paid in tariff costs over the past 10 months, according to the Joint Economic Committee—and costs are expected to continue climbing.
The Democrats, including Ranking Member Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM), and Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.), analyzed official US Treasury Department data on the amount of tariff revenue collected since the beginning of Trump's second term as he's imposed tariffs across the European Union and on dozens of other countries—some as high as 50%.
The White House has insisted the tariffs on imports will "pry open foreign markets" and force exporters overseas to pay more, resulting in lower prices for US consumers.
But the JEC combined the Treasury data with independent estimates of the percent of each tariff dollar that is paid by consumers, as companies pass along their higher import prices to them.
At first, US families were paying an average of less than $60 in tariff costs when Trump began the trade war in February and March.
But that amount shot up to more than $80 per family in April when he expanded the tariffs, and monthly costs have steadily increased since then.
In November, a total of $24.04 billion was paid by consumers in tariff costs—or $181.29 per family.
“While President Trump promised that he would lower costs, this report shows that his tariffs have done nothing but drive prices even higher for families."
From February-November, families have paid an average of $1,197.50 each, according to the JEC analysis.
“While President Trump promised that he would lower costs, this report shows that his tariffs have done nothing but drive prices even higher for families,” said Hassan.
If costs remain as high as they were over the next 12 months, families are projected to pay $2,100 per year as a result of Trump's tariffs.
The analysis comes a week after Republicans on a House Ways and Means subcommittee attempted to avoid the topic of tariffs—which have a 61% disapproval rating among the public, according to Pew Research—at a hearing on global competitiveness for workers and businesses.
"Rep. Jimmy Gomez [D-Calif.] read several quotes from [former Rep. Kevin] Brady [R-Texas] during his time in Congress stating that tariffs are taxes that impede economic growth. Brady, who chaired the Ways and Means Committee and drafted Trump’s first tax law in 2017 (and now works as a lobbyist), had no desire to discuss those quotes or the topic of tariffs," wrote Steve Warmhoff, federal policy director at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. "Nor did Republicans address the point made by the Democrats’ witness, Kimberly Clausing, when she explained that Trump’s tariffs are the biggest tax increase on Americans (measured as a share of the economy) since 1982."
Clausing estimated that the tariffs will amount "to an annual tax increase of about $1,700 for an average household" if they stay at current levels, while Trump's decision to lower tariffs on goods such as meat, vegetables, fruits, and coffee last month amounted to just $35 in annual savings per household.
The JEC has also recently released analyses of annual household electricity costs under Trump, which were projected to go up by $100 for the average family despite the president's campaign pledge that "your energy bill within 12 months will be cut in half."
Last month the panel found that the average household is spending approximately $700 more per month on essentials like food, shelter, and energy since Trump took office.
“At a time when both parties should be working together to lower costs," said Hassan on Thursday, "the president’s tax on American families is simply making things more expensive.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Tlaib Rips Lawmakers Who 'Drool at the Opportunity to Fund War' While Opposing Healthcare for All
"They’re gutting healthcare and food assistance to pay for bombs and weapons. It’s a sick vicious cycle," said Rep. Rashida Tlaib.
Dec 11, 2025
"Imagine if our government funded our communities like they fund war."
That was Rep. Rashida Tlaib's (D-Mich.) response to the House's bipartisan passage Wednesday of legislation that authorizes nearly $901 billion in military spending for the coming fiscal year, as tens of millions of Americans face soaring health insurance premiums and struggle to afford basic necessities amid the nation's worsening cost-of-living crisis.
Tlaib, who voted against the military policy bill, had harsh words for her colleagues who "drool at the opportunity to fund war and genocide, but when it comes to universal healthcare, affordable housing, and food assistance, they suddenly argue that we simply can’t afford it."
"Congress just authorized nearly a trillion dollars for death and destruction but cut a trillion dollars from Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act," said Tlaib, referring to the budget reconciliation package that Republicans and President Donald Trump enacted over the summer.
"They’re gutting healthcare and food assistance to pay for bombs and weapons. It’s a sick vicious cycle," Tlaib continued. "Another record-breaking military budget is impossible to justify when Americans are sleeping on the streets, unable to afford groceries to feed their children, and racking up massive amounts of medical debt just for getting sick."
House passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) came as Republicans in both chambers of Congress pushed healthcare proposals that would not extend enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits that are set to expire at the end of the year, resulting in massive premium hikes for millions.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that a Senate Democratic plan to extend the ACA subsidies for three years would cost around $85 billion—a fraction of the military spending that House lawmakers just authorized.
The NDAA, which is expected to clear the Senate next week, approves $8 billion more in military spending than the Trump White House asked for in its annual budget request.
According to the National Priorities Project, that $8 billion "would be more than enough" to restore federal nutrition assistance to the millions expected to lose it due to expanded work requirements included in the Trump-GOP budget law.
"Our priorities are disgustingly misplaced," Tlaib said Wednesday.
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘Don't Give the Pentagon $1 Trillion,’ Critics Say as House Passes Record US Military Spending Bill
"From ending the nursing shortage to insuring uninsured children, preventing evictions, and replacing lead pipes, every dollar the Pentagon wastes is a dollar that isn't helping Americans get by," said one group.
Dec 10, 2025
US House lawmakers on Wednesday approved a $900.6 billion military spending bill, prompting critics to highlight ways in which taxpayer funds could be better spent on programs of social uplift instead of perpetual wars.
The lower chamber voted 312-112 in favor of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2026, which will fund what President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans call a "peace through strength" national security policy. The proposal now heads for a vote in the Senate, where it is also expected to pass.
Combined with $156 billion in supplemental funding included in the One Big Beautiful Bill signed in July by Trump, the NDAA would push military spending this fiscal year to over $1 trillion—a new record in absolute terms and a relative level unseen since World War II.
The House is about to vote on authorizing $901 billion in military spending, on top of the $156 billion included in the Big Beautiful Bill.70% of global military spending already comes from the US and its major allies.www.stephensemler.com/p/congress-s...
[image or embed]
— Stephen Semler (@stephensemler.bsky.social) December 10, 2025 at 1:16 PM
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) led opposition to the bill on Capitol Hill, focusing on what lawmakers called misplaced national priorities, as well as Trump's abuse of emergency powers to deploy National Guard troops in Democratic-controlled cities under pretext of fighting crime and unauthorized immigration.
Others sounded the alarm over the Trump administration's apparent march toward a war on Venezuela—which has never attacked the US or any other country in its nearly 200-year history but is rich in oil and is ruled by socialists offering an alternative to American-style capitalism.
"I will always support giving service members what they need to stay safe but that does not mean rubber-stamping bloated budgets or enabling unchecked executive war powers," CPC Deputy Chair Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said on social media, explaining her vote against legislation that "pours billions into weapons systems the Pentagon itself has said it does not need."
"It increases funding for defense contractors who profit from global instability and it advances a vision of national security rooted in militarization instead of diplomacy, human rights, or community well-being," Omar continued.
"At a time when families in Minnesota’s 5th District are struggling with rising costs, when our schools and social services remain underfunded, and when the Pentagon continues to evade a clean audit year after year, Congress should be investing in people," she added.
The Congressional Equality Caucus decried the NDAA's inclusion of a provision banning transgender women from full participation in sports programs at US military academies:
The NDAA should invest in our military, not target minority communities for exclusion.While we're grateful that most anti-LGBTQI+ provisions were removed, the GOP kept one anti-trans provision in the final bill—and that's one too many.We're committed to repealing it.
[image or embed]
— Congressional Equality Caucus (@equality.house.gov) December 10, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Advocacy groups also denounced the legislation, with the Institute for Policy Studies' National Priorities Project (NPP) noting that "from ending the nursing shortage to insuring uninsured children, preventing evictions, and replacing lead pipes, every dollar the Pentagon wastes is a dollar that isn't helping Americans get by."
"The last thing Congress should do is deliver $1 trillion into the hands of [Defense] Secretary Pete Hegseth," NPP program director Lindsay Koshgarian said in a statement Wednesday. "Under Secretary Hegseth's leadership, the Pentagon has killed unidentified boaters in the Caribbean, sent the National Guard to occupy peaceful US cities, and driven a destructive and divisive anti-diversity agenda in the military."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


