December, 29 2020, 11:00pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Josh Chetwynd, Communications Manager, 303-573-5558, jchetwynd@publicinterestnetwork.org
Looking Ahead: Environment America's 2021 Federal and State Priorities
Agenda includes ramping up renewable energy, prioritizing wildlife over waste and increasing protections for our wild spaces.
WASHINGTON
Environment America, a national nonpartisan network of state environmental groups, contributed to numerous environmental victories in 2020. The organization is looking ahead to spurring more environmental progress at the federal and state levels.
"We enter 2021 with hope for a brighter and healthier year," said Environment America's Acting President Wendy Wendlandt. "With a new presidential administration and state and local governments showing leadership, we are optimistic we can continue to slash emissions from our cars and trucks, transition more of our cities and states to 100 percent renewable energy, conserve our wild spaces, reduce plastic waste and ensure Americans have clean water."
Here is a roundup of some of the top issues and bills that Environment America and its 29 state organizations will be working on across the country this coming year:
Building on momentum toward a 100% Renewable Energy society
With seven states and more than 150 cities pledging to generate electricity from clean energy sources, we continue to move closer to powering our country with 100 percent renewable energy. To continue on that road at the federal level, Environment America will press for further extending solar and wind energy tax credits, expanding incentives for electric vehicles and energy efficiency, and creating new tax credits for energy storage projects.
In addition, our organization will be working for 100 percent clean energy bills in at least six states -- Florida, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Texas and Connecticut -- and supporting 100 percent renewable initiatives on at least 23 college campuses.
Along with that work, there will be a big push to improve existing renewable energy plans. Environment California is supporting policies to accelerate the state's transition to 100 percent clean energy, which currently has a 2045 deadline. Environment Missouri will be looking to increase Missouri's Renewable Energy Standard of 15 percent renewable energy by 2021 to 50 percent by 2035; and Environment Minnesota is also seeking an update to its Renewable Energy Standards. In Michigan, Environment Michigan is calling on its legislature to create a legal roadmap to get the state to its 100 percent renewable energy commitment by 2050, which Gov. Gretchen Whitmer announced in September.
Environment California has other ambitious clean energy plans, such as working to ensure that state legislators set a goal of 3 gigawatts of offshore wind energy by 2030 and 10 gigawatts by 2040, and advocating for state investments in long-duration renewable energy storage technologies. Other plans on our California agenda include increasing geothermal power; ramping up the number of solar panels paired with battery storage on K-12 public schools; and heightening the use of such important energy efficiency options as all-electric buildings.
On the defense side, Environment Texas will be fighting against efforts to impose a tax on energy sources other than natural gas and to discriminate against wind and solar as part of the state's economic development program. At the same time, the group will support, among other policies, adopting a solar consumer protection act to make it easier for Texans to go solar; commencing a study on expanding the state's renewable energy standard on electricity to 50 percent by 2030 and 100 percent by 2050; and investing in additional transmission lines to bring wind and solar power to cities.
Elsewhere, Environment Colorado will back The Healthier Homes Act of 2021, which would help utilities develop plans to replace gas and propane-powered appliances with high-efficiency versions and The Building Energy Performance Act of 2021, which would require most large commercial, multifamily and public buildings to benchmark energy use and reduce emissions. Environment Maryland will advocate for a school clean energy bill that ensures the state's public schools develop comprehensive school energy policies. In the Southeast, Environment Georgia will aim to get burdensome solar fees outlawed. And Environment Florida will, among other things, press for expanding community solar, increasing rooftop solar numbers, adding new energy storage capacity, ratcheting up energy efficiency and banning fracking statewide.
Addressing the plastic pollution crisis
Every day, people throw away tons of single-use cups, containers and other plastic "stuff." All of this waste not only trashes our parks and public spaces, but it also washes into our rivers, where it's harmful to wildlife and pollutes our drinking water. To change that cycle, state environmental groups across the country will advocate for legislation to make sure that containers we only use for moments don't pollute our planet for generations.
For example, Environment Colorado, Environment Florida, Environment Michigan, Environment Oregon, Environment Virginia and Environment Washington will all be working for statewide bans on polystyrene -- what many people refer to as Styrofoam. Environment Florida, along with such groups as Environment Missouri and Environment Texas, will also be working to ensure that state legislatures don't preempt local communities' efforts to address polystyrene foam pollution.
Our groups will promote numerous other policies to reduce plastic foam and other forms of plastic pollution. For instance, Environment Virginia will work for a ban on intentional balloon releases, which can be one of the most dangerous types of litter for wildlife. Environment Georgia will advocate for bans on plastic bags and plastic foam in state facilities and grocery stores. Along with its battle against preemption, Environment Texas will also support a bill that creates a statewide debris management plan with emphasis on landfill diversion and environmental protection.
In the Pacific Northwest, both Environment Oregon and Environment Washington will support statewide policies that require producers to take responsibility for the plastic pollution they create. Environment Oregon will also seek a comprehensive foodware policy that shifts away from single-use products and toward reusables; and a statewide stop to permitting new or expanded "chemical recycling" facilities, which is a false solution to the plastics problem.
Similarly, Environment Maryland will call for companies that produce plastic to be responsible for its disposal costs. Its state agenda includes a plastic incineration ban; a statewide ban on plastic bags and legislation that requires hotels to stop providing single-use toiletry containers, bans plastic utensils and stirrers, and requires that straws be given upon request only.
Conserving public lands and wild spaces
When The Great American Outdoors Act was signed into law in August, it was a rare bright spot for 2020. While the federal statute, which permanently funds the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) with $900 million annually and provides $9.5 billion over five years to fix maintenance problems plaguing America's public lands, was a big win, it was only a start.
In 2021, Environment America will lobby at the national and state level for resolutions that call for the conservation of 30 percent of America's lands and water by 2030. It will also support the Roadless Area Conservation Act, which aims to keep our wild spaces wild. Safeguarding our waters from offshore oil drilling will continue to be a vital issue in states along the Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific coasts.
Protecting pollinators will also be a priority. Environment Texas will support a series of policies to aid bees. These include establishing a voluntary pollinator-friendly designation for solar farms; backing a bill that requires utilities to install native and pollinator-friendly plants after they dig along state highways; and banning the use of bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides along state highways and on other state property.
Preventing the use of neonicotinoids is also at the center of both Environment Oregon and Environment Missouri's efforts on this issue.
Finally state environmental groups will continue to advocate state park funding. For example, Environment Texas will support an effort to appropriate all of the state's sporting goods sales tax to state parks and historic sites.
Decarbonizing the transportation sector
Despite fewer cars on the road in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, transportation emissions continued to be the top contributor to global warming in the United States. Environment America and our national network will continue efforts to solve this problem in 2021.
When federal transportation spending authorization expires in September, Environment America will be supporting a reauthorization that prioritizes reducing greenhouse gases emissions and investing in electric vehicles. Among the federal bills that the group will support is the Driving America Forward Act, which renews and extends the electric vehicle tax credit.
California has long been a leader on the transportation front, and Environment California looks to ensure that continues in 2021. The group will press for increased electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure as part of an effort to reach a goal of 1 million charging stations by 2030. The group will also embrace efforts to double the amount of trips taken on public transit in the next 10 years and will back programs that help people replace fossil-fuel powered cars with EVs.
Building on California's announcement in September that, by 2035, it will stop the sale of gas-powered vehicles, Environment Washington is aiming to get its state to enact a similar ban on new fossil fuel-powered cars and trucks -- but, in this case, by 2030. In the short term, the Seattle-based group will also push for a clean fuel standard within the state.
In the Lone Star State, Environment Texas will fight for allocating all current Texas Emissions Reduction Plan funds to support clean air and for expanding funding for electric vehicle rebates. The affiliate will also back cities' rights to adopt local option taxes for transportation investments. In addition, the group will endorse one bill that allows state employees to telecommute and another that requires drivers to stop and yield the right-of-way to pedestrians. It will oppose a bill that assesses an annual $200 fee on electric vehicles and another that takes "rainy day" funds to build roads and other infrastructure for oil and gas development.
Other state plans include Environment Missouri's support for increasing Missouri's current 17-cent fuel tax to 30 cents per gallon. Environment Colorado will support a transportation funding bill that will emphasize reducing vehicle miles travelled and accelerate a transition to EVs. Environment New Jersey is supporting initiatives to rapidly expand electric vehicle charging infrastructure. It is also advocating for spending Volkswagen settlement funds and Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) money on electrification measures for public transit vehicles, charging stations and seaport electrification.
Cleaning up America's waterways and protecting our drinking water
Too many of America's waterways continue to be threatened by toxic chemicals and too many schools continue to have unacceptable levels of lead in their drinking water that threaten children's health.
To that end, Environment America will urge Congress to increase water infrastructure funding to stop sewage overflows, make our waterways safe for swimming, and "Get the Lead Out" of our kid's school faucets and fountains via the Get the Lead Out Act, which would require replacing lead service lines within 10 years.
At the federal administrative level, the organization will work to repeal the Dirty Water Rule, a Trump administration regulation that deeply diminished protections for our streams and wetlands. Other necessary changes include: increasing limits on toxic pollution from power plants; strengthening the Lead and Copper Rule; curbing pollution from meat processing plants with updated permit standards; and barring direct discharges of the "forever chemicals" per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFS) into waterways while also phasing out these toxins where possible.
State groups in the Environment America network will also be leaning into many of these issues. Environment Florida will push for comprehensive water testing and full public access to all the data from those studies. The group is also calling for schools to immediately shut off taps where water contains more lead than one part per billion (ppb), which is the threshold recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, and install National Sanitation Foundation-certified filters on faucets or fountains used for drinking or cooking. Similarly, Environment Maryland is backing a bill that strengthens protections from lead in school drinking water and Environment Washington is calling for both testing and alerts when drinking water taps test above 1 ppb. Environment Washington is also backing the approval of $3 million for the state Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to replace or remediate lead fixtures.
Environment Michigan will have PFAS and PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) in its crosshairs. The group will press for thorough regulations that protect Michiganders from this whole class of chemicals. The group will also support strengthening Michigan's "polluter pays" laws, which should hold those accountable when a company has contaminated our water or soil with these compounds.
Environment Virginia, which has worked for years to prevent runoff into the Chesapeake Bay, will continue these efforts. In Florida, another iconic body of water -- the Suwannee River -- also remains under threat. To solve that and other water-related dangers in the state, Environment Florida is aiming to protect state waterways through limits on agricultural pollution from large factory farms; keep beaches and other waterways safe from sewage overflows and runoff pollution with new stormwater standards and adequate funding for green infrastructure; and promote water conservation through incentive programs and appliance standards. Environment Georgia will fight to protect Georgia's waterways from toxic coal ash pollution by requiring stricter rules for long-term coal ash storage.
Environment Texas' large clean water agenda includes supporting a nature-based infrastructure financing program to fully fund community projects, policies that get toxic lead out of school drinking water, and a drinking water standard that reduces exposure to PFAS.
With Environment America, you protect the places that all of us love and promote core environmental values, such as clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, and clean energy to power our lives. We're a national network of 29 state environmental groups with members and supporters in every state. Together, we focus on timely, targeted action that wins tangible improvements in the quality of our environment and our lives.
(303) 801-0581LATEST NEWS
Democratic Lawmakers Demand Probe Into DHS Warrantless Location Tracking
“Location data is extremely sensitive, and can reveal someone’s religion, their political views, medical conditions, addictions, and with whom they spend time."
Mar 03, 2026
Over 70 Democratic US lawmakers on Tuesday demanded a new investigation into warrantless purchases of Americans' location data by Department of Homeland Security agencies—including Immigration and Customs Enforcement—which critics say violate the Fourth Amendment prohibition of unwarranted search and seizure.
In a letter to DHS Inspector General Joseph Cuffari, 72 congressional Democrats led by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-NY) wrote, "Public contracting documents indicate that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) recently resumed buying Americans’ location data from a shady data broker" after the agency "ended a previous program to purchase Americans’ cellphone location data in 2023, following an investigation by your office and scrutiny from Congress."
"Location data is extremely sensitive, and can reveal someone’s religion, their political views, medical conditions, addictions, and with whom they spend time," the lawmakers' letter states. "It is for that reason that ordinarily, the government must obtain a warrant from a judge in order to demand such data from phone or technology companies."
While the Fourth Amendment generally prohibits the government from searching or obtaining Americans' private information without a warrant, federal agencies have circumvented the proscription by buying sensitive personal data from private brokers.
"Public reports indicate that ICE has resumed its location data purchases, even though DHS has yet to adopt all of the recommendations from your prior review," the lawmakers noted in their letter.
The letter continues:
ICE issued a no-bid contract to the surveillance company PenLink in 2025, which included licenses for its location tracking product, Webloc, according to press reports. Webloc was developed by the controversial surveillance company Cobwebs Technologies, which was combined with Nebraska-based PenLink as part of a $200 million private equity deal in 2023. Cobwebs gained notoriety when Meta banned the company in 2021, as part of a crackdown on surveillance mercenaries after detecting the company’s customers targeting activists, opposition politicians, and government officials in Hong Kong and Mexico.
ICE is now stonewalling congressional oversight into its purchase of location data. Sen. Wyden’s office requested a briefing from ICE soon after this contract was revealed in the press, in October, which was scheduled in December, for February 10, 2026. One day before that briefing was to take place, ICE canceled it with no explanation and without any offer to reschedule.
"Given DHS’ failure to adopt a policy for the use of commercial data, coupled with ICE awarding a no-bid contract to a shady data broker that is likely violating federal law, we urge you to open another investigation into the purchase," the lawmakers wrote.
The letter asks:
- Whether ICE and other DHS components are purchasing illegally obtained location data about Americans;
- If so, why does DHS not have policies in place to prevent taxpayer dollars from going to contractors that have invaded Americans’ privacy in violation of federal law;
- How ICE and other DHS components have used location data and whether they have used it to investigate Americans for engaging in constitutionally protected activities, including protesting or monitoring ICE operations;
- Whether ICE and other DHS components are auditing employee access to commercial location data to identify likely patterns of abuse; and
- Why has DHS still not adopted a policy for the use of commercial location data, as you recommended in 2023?
As the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) recently explained, ICE has spent $5 million on Webloc and Tangles, another location and social media surveillance product made by PenLink.
According to EFF:
Webloc gathers the locations of millions of phones by gathering data from mobile data brokers and linking it together with other information about users. Tangles is a social media surveillance tool which combines web scraping with access to social media application programming interfaces. These tools are able to build a dossier on anyone who has a public social media account. Tangles is able to link together a person’s posting history, posts, and comments containing keywords, location history, tags, social graph, and photos with those of their friends and family. PenLink then sells this information to law enforcement, allowing law enforcement to avoid the need for a warrant. This means ICE can look up historic and current locations of many people all across the US without ever having to get a warrant.
There have been several attempts to solidify restrictions on government purchase of Americans' personal data in recent years, most notably the Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act (FANFSA), which failed to pass.
Last month, Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) introduced the Security and Freedom Enhancement Act, which would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act but is also intended to protect Americans from warrantless spying, including by closing the data broker loophole that lets law enforcement buy their way around the Fourth Amendment.
Also last month, Rep. Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) led 13 Democratic lawmakers who sent a separate letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem seeking answers about ICE's use of PenLink surveillance technology "designed to collect and analyze cellphone location data across entire neighborhoods."
"Mass surveillance of entire communities or city blocks raises serious questions about data privacy and potential violations of civil liberties," Brown wrote.
"Americans should be able to trust their government to uphold the Constitution and respect fundamental rights," she added. "Instead, DHS appears to be engaging in broad surveillance practices to monitor entire communities, violating Americans’ fundamental civil rights and civil liberties to punish dissent and advance the president's cruel and unconstitutional mass deportation agenda."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Competing Dem War Powers Resolution Would Give Trump a Monthlong Free Pass in Iran
"The American people are firmly against this war and will see straight through this ruse," said one campaigner.
Mar 03, 2026
As the House of Representatives faces mounting pressure to pass Congressmen Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie's war powers resolution to end the US-Israeli assault on Iran, six right-wing Democrats on Tuesday introduced a competing bill that would give President Donald Trump a green light to keep waging war in the Middle East for the next month.
Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) have been pushing for their H.Con.Res.38 since shortly before Trump bombed Iranian nuclear facilities last June. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Saturday attack has ramped up demands for Congress to pass that resolution, along with S.J.Res.59, introduced last year by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.).
Those resolutions, expected to receive votes this week, were already facing uphill battles in both Republican-controlled chambers, and all-but-certain vetoes if they ever made it to Trump, whose administration claims "Operation Epic Fury" is about preventing a nuclear-armed Iran, while critics around the world accuse him and Netanyahu of engaging in an illegal regime change war.
At least six US service members and hundreds of Iranians are now dead. Despite the rising death toll, the Democrats behind the new proposal—Reps. Jim Costa (Calif.), Henry Cuellar (Texas), Jared Golden (Maine), Josh Gottheimer (NJ), Greg Landsman (Ohio), and Jimmy Panetta (Calif.)—made clear that they oppose a swift end to the conflict.
"There is a concern that the Khanna-Massie war powers resolution currently requires the immediate withdrawal of US forces, even while Iran is actively targeting American troops, assets, embassies, and our allies across the region," they said in a statement. "It is vital that we allow for a safe transition, that protects our service members, embassies, and allies, not a potentially precarious withdrawal."
While proposing a 30-day window for ending the conflict—absent an authorization for the use of military force or a formal declaration of war from Congress—the six Democrats also said that "an open-ended commitment by the administration and the recent implication from the secretary of defense that ground troops may be engaged are both unacceptable."
Politico called the new measure "a sign of how some Democrats are struggling to reconcile their opposition to the Trump administration's military action with a desire to appear hawkish on national security—even in a largely symbolic capacity."
The outlet also noted that when asked about the latest proposal during a Tuesday news conference, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) said that "our focus is on the resolution that will be on the floor this week."
"We'll continue to make the strongest possible case," Jeffries added. "There is going to be very strong Democratic support for the war powers resolution across the ideological spectrum."
Cavan Kharrazian, a senior policy adviser at the grassroots group Demand Progress, was far more critical, declaring that "of course Democrats who raced to applaud Trump's illegal war in Iran, and in one case was pardoned by him, would draft a pro-war war powers resolution meant to sabotage the real war powers resolution receiving a vote this week."
"This Trojan horse resolution attempts to give Trump a free pass to continue waging an unauthorized war in Iran for a whole month—exactly the amount of time that Trump has said he expects the war to last," he warned. "The American people are firmly against this war and will see straight through this ruse."
"Representatives need to ignore this bad-faith distraction," Kharrazian argued, "and vote for the bipartisan Khanna-Massie resolution that will actually stop this illegal war and bring our troops home."
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘These Guys Can’t Help Themselves’: Cruz Pushes $200 Billion Capital Gains Tax Cut Without OK From Congress
Republican senators said they were seeking to end an "unfair inflation tax on everyday Americans." But nearly all the benefits of their proposal would go to the wealthiest 1%.
Mar 03, 2026
Two leading Republicans are pushing for the Trump administration to issue another $200 billion tax cut, primarily to the wealthiest Americans, without congressional approval.
The Washington Post reported Tuesday that Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Tim Scott (R-SC) sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urging him to use executive authority to lower the federal tax on capital gains—the profits from selling stocks, bonds, real estate, and other investments.
The senators have proposed that capital gains taxes should be “indexed for inflation." As the Post explained:
The plan pushed by Cruz and Scott has been sought by conservatives for many years. Under current law, an investor who bought $100 worth of stock in 1990 and sold it today for $300 would currently owe capital gains taxes on the full $200 in profit. But the $100 investment in 1990 would be worth roughly $230 in today’s dollars after accounting for inflation. Under the Cruz-Scott proposal, the investor would only owe taxes on that $70, rather than the full $200.
The senators called on Bessent to "eliminate" this "unfair inflation tax on everyday Americans."
According to Federal Reserve data from 2025, the richest 1% of Americans owned about half of all stocks, while the poorest 50% owned only 1%.
Republicans' so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which enacted massive cuts to social programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) last summer, is already estimated to funnel more than $1 trillion to the top 1% of earners over the next 10 years, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
It is unclear whether Bessent would even have the power to change how gains are taxed without an act of Congress, or if Bessent has any interest in doing so. But the vast majority of the benefits from Cruz and Scott's proposal, if enacted, would likely go to the rich as well.
When the Trump administration first considered indexing capital gains taxes to inflation back in 2018, the Penn Wharton Budget Model projected that 63% of the benefits would flow to the richest 0.1%—those making tens of millions per year—while 86% would go to the top 1%.
Those in the bottom 90% of earners would see just over 2% of the overall benefits, with those in the bottom half receiving basically nothing.
According to the Post, the senators view lowering capital gains taxes as part of a GOP bid to "improve its economic approval rating with voters ahead of the 2026 midterm elections," in which the party is expected to take a walloping, according to current polls.
Voters have not responded kindly to previous bills that handed lavish tax breaks to the rich. At the time of its passage, the OBBBA was one of the least popular pieces of legislation in modern history, with several polls showing nearly a 2-to-1 disapproval rating.
But Cruz and Scott are pushing for this policy change despite the public revulsion and the fact that the Department of Justice has previously ruled that the Treasury Department can't make policy without Congress' approval.
"Ted Cruz is asking the Treasury Department to break the law to give another round of tax breaks to the ultrarich," remarked Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee. "These guys can't help themselves."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


