April, 07 2020, 12:00am EDT

80 Members of Congress and 200+ Organizations Demand Federal Action On Water
Letters demand next coronavirus stimulus package includes $47.5 billion in water funding and a national moratorium on water shutoffs.
WASHINGTON
Today, Representative Brenda Lawrence released a letter signed by 80 Members of Congress urging Congressional leaders to prioritize $47.5 billion in water funding as part of Phase 4 of the COVID-19 stimulus package. Food & Water Action released a sister letter echoing her demands signed by 233 environmental, social justice, labor, and religious organizations from across the country representing millions of Americans.
Read the Congressional letter here and the organizational letter here.
The letters include three major requests. First, the next federal coronavirus stimulus package must contain $12.5 billion in immediate assistance to cover the cost of nationwide low-income water billing assistance, service restorations, shutoff moratoriums, and household water bill debt forgiveness. Second, all states, localities, and utilities receiving those funds must be required to stop all water shutoffs and to restore service to previously disconnected customers.
Finally, Congress must pass the Water Affordability, Transparency, Equity and Reliability Act (HR 1417, S 611) to allocate $35 billion in annual federal funding for public clean water and drinking water providers to improve our water infrastructure, make service more affordable, stimulate the economy and create up to nearly 1 million jobs across the country.
"Handwashing is our first line of defense against the spread of COVID-19," said Representative Brenda L. Lawrence (MI-14). "Until every single person, family and community in this country is guaranteed access to safe, clean, affordable running water, this crisis will severely worsen. In the city of Detroit, even prior to the pandemic, over 140,000 households had been disconnected from their water service since 2014; that is simply unacceptable. That's why I, and so many of my colleagues in Congress, am urging Congressional Leadership to finally invest in fixing our long-neglected water system. We must act now and provide Americans with access to safe, clean running water during this pandemic, and hopefully long thereafter."
Congress members from 33 states have joined Rep. Lawrence in her call for Congressional leaders to make water a priority in the next aid package. According to data from Food & Water Action, only three-fifths of the country are currently protected from water shutoffs for nonpayment. Even less of the country is covered by state or local measures to restore water service or to forgive water billing debt. In 2016, one in every 20 households experienced a water shutoff.
"Water affordability is a deepening national crisis, especially as we face the pandemic's economic fallout and record-high job losses," said Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director of Food & Water Action. "No one should have to make tradeoffs between paying for water or housing, groceries or medicine. With immediate assistance and long-term federal investment, we can ensure safe water for all, rebuild our crumbling infrastructure and create up to 1 million jobs to give our economy a much-needed boost."
As the coronavirus pandemic continues to compound water access across the country, communities of color, low-income communities, rural communities, and indigenous communities will be the most vulnerable to water shutoffs or unaffordable water service rates.
"The global health crisis - COVID-19 - highlights the ongoing danger to public health caused by depriving access to the basic human need for clean water. We know that washing our hands and proper sanitation is always a primary method in preventing communicable illness," said Monica Lewis-Patrick, President and CEO We The People of Detroit. "So even after the Coronavirus pandemic has passed, our local and national leaders must ensure that all American citizens have access to clean, safe and affordable water for all of our safety."
According to the Clean Water Council, every $1 billion in water infrastructure investment creates an estimated 20,003 to 26,669 jobs and can have far-reaching economic benefits, tripling in size with total demand for goods and services reaching an estimated $2.87 to $3.46 billion.
These demands are supported in a letter from nearly 50 national organizations, including American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO; American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO; Center for Biological Diversity; Food & Water Action; Human Rights Watch; Local Progress; the NAACP; NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.; National Drinking Water Alliance; Rural Community Assistance Partnership; Sierra Club; Sisters of Charity Federation; and others, as well as local and statewide organizations from 30 states.
"We need our Congressional leaders to fully fund our water systems now," said Ricarra Jones, Political Director for 1199 SEIU Maryland/DC. "Working families across our country should not be facing water shutoffs because failed leadership has been staving off providing additional funding for water infrastructure."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has indicated support for water assistance in the next stimulus package but has suggested that infrastructure funding may be pushed to the Phase 5 response package. Today's letters showcase overwhelming support from Congress members and organizations across the country for prioritizing water action.
Food & Water Watch mobilizes regular people to build political power to move bold and uncompromised solutions to the most pressing food, water, and climate problems of our time. We work to protect people's health, communities, and democracy from the growing destructive power of the most powerful economic interests.
(202) 683-2500LATEST NEWS
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Memo Shows Pam Bondi Wants List of 'Domestic Terrorism' Groups Who Express 'Anti-American Sentiment'
"Millions of Americans like you and I could be the target," warned journalist Ken Klippenstein of the new memo.
Dec 07, 2025
A leaked memo written by US Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Department of Justice to compile a list of potential "domestic terrorism" organizations that espouse "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment."
The memo, which was obtained by journalist Ken Klippenstein, expands upon National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), a directive signed by President Donald Trump in late September that demanded a "national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts."
The new Bondi memo instructs law enforcement agencies to refer "suspected" domestic terrorism cases to the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which will then undertake an "exhaustive investigation contemplated by NSPM-7" that will incorporate "a focused strategy to root out all culpable participants—including organizers and funders—in all domestic terrorism activities."
The memo identifies the "domestic terrorism threat" as organizations that use "violence or the threat of violence" to advance political goals such as "opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality."
Commenting on the significance of the memo, Klippenstein criticized mainstream media organizations for largely ignoring the implications of NSPM-7, which was drafted and signed in the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"For months, major media outlets have largely blown off the story of NSPM-7, thinking it was all just Trump bluster and too crazy to be serious," he wrote. "But a memo like this one shows you that the administration is absolutely taking this seriously—even if the media are not—and is actively working to operationalize NSPM-7."
Klippenstein also warned that NSPM-7 appeared to be the start of a new "war on terrorism," but "only this time, millions of Americans like you and I could be the target."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


