September, 18 2015, 02:45pm EDT
Former McDonald's Franchisee to Bloomberg: 'I wanted to get the hell out'
Here's the latest update in the Fight for $15 and union rights:
With 62% of New Yorkers backing $15/hour, Gov. Cuomo pledges 'full campaign to pass $15'
WASHINGTON
Here's the latest update in the Fight for $15 and union rights:
With 62% of New Yorkers backing $15/hour, Gov. Cuomo pledges 'full campaign to pass $15'
Sixty-two percent of New York voters want a $15 minimum wage statewide, according to a poll released today by Quinnipiac University. The poll comes as Governor Cuomo pledged to kick off "a full campaign to pass $15," stating Thursday, "I'm saying that we need to raise the minimum wage because we have low-wage workers who can't make it in this city on $18,000-a-year. It's math. It's third-grade math."
"McRevolt: The Frustrating Life of the McDonald's Franchisee - Not lovin' it"
McDonald's workers aren't the only ones feeling squeezed by the Golden Arches. Bloomberg reports that McDonald's franchisees are now speaking out against the abusive practices they face from the company, detailing how Al Jarvis, a McDonald's franchise owner of nearly 50 years, was forced to sell his store after years of menu changes and new demands from the company ultimately hurt his business. Jarvis told Bloomberg that he hit a point where his dealings with management were so problematic, he "wanted to get the hell out."
Fight for $15 leaders to welcome Pope at the White House
Fast-food, child care, and home care workers will represent the Fight for $15 when they join SEIU President Mary Kay Henry and President Obama at the White House to welcome Pope Francis to the United States on September 23. Adriana Alvarez, a 22-year-old McDonald's worker from Chicago who is part of the delegation attending the welcoming ceremony said, "It's a great privilege and a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to be able to welcome the Pope and represent fast-food and low-wage workers everywhere."
From working at KFC to standing with the VP Workers in New York and all over the country continued to celebrate Governor Cuomo's decision to adopt a $15 minimum wage for the state's 200,000 fast-food workers. Alvin Major, a Brooklyn KFC worker who has been involved in the movement since the very first strike in 2012, told his story in the Huffington Post: "Because of our movement, cities and states have stopped waiting for Congress and have started raising the minimum wage themselves. And many elected officials and candidates for high office are lining up to support our Fight for $15. Who would have thought three years ago that a KFC cook from Brooklyn would stand with the Vice President of the United States?"
In an Atlanta Journal Constitution op-ed, home care worker Latonya Allen explained why she joined the Fight for $15: "Home care workers know that $15 an hour and a union would change our lives. It would put our nation's home care system back on the right path and help us care for our clients without living in poverty."
"How this single mom survives on $7.50 an hour"
In an in-depth video segment, CNNMoney looks at the life of McDonald's worker and Fight for 15 Philly member Safiyyah Cotton and her struggle to support herself and her child on $7.50 an hour. Safiyyah works 20 hours a week and brings home about $240 every two weeks. She is forced to penny-pinch on every expense, from shelter to food to health care. CNNMoney writes, "Prioritizing her rent bill means wiping out most of her first paycheck of the month. During her pregnancy, she ended up in a shelter. She is desperate to keep that from happening again."
Demands for $15/hour - and higher - sharpen nationwide:
Declaring that it's time to join "the big boys" like New York, Florida State Senator Dwight Bullard and State Representative Victor Torres called on their colleagues in the State House to sign on to their respective bills to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour.
Bleu Rainer, a fast-food worker from Tampa, told the Tallahassee Democrat, "We can't even afford to get a bus ticket to and from work. So we ask elected officials to stand with the workers and against the CEOs who make millions and treat us like trash and don't want to pay a livable wage."
Meanwhile, in Berkeley the Labor Commission is proposing a $19 minimum by 2020, which the Berkeley City Council will vote on in November.
Target workers in Brooklyn form "microunion"
This week a group of pharmacists at a Target store in Brooklyn successfully won a "microunion," allowing them to bargain for higher pay and have a voice on the job. Fusion explains, "Workers affiliated with unions earn, on average, 27% more than non-union members. As wages have stagnated, the urgency of finding ways to boost them has become more pronounced." Lately, unions are seeing renewed support, with leading economists such as Larry Summers championing unions' roles in tackling inequality and an August Gallup poll showing Americans' are increasingly viewing unions favorably.
Senate and House Dems Intro New Bill to Strengthen Union Rights:
Sen. Patty Murray and Rep. Bobby Scott introduced the WAGE Act this week, which would strengthen protections for workers seeking to exercise their collective voice at work. As AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka explained in an op-ed to The Hill, "The very best way to raise wages and turn the tide back in favor of working people is to protect and strengthen their right to speak out together, whether they are seeking to form a union or not. The WAGE Act would do exactly that."
"That burger flipper's job matters as much as yours"
In a St. Louis Post-Dispatch op-ed, Lara Granich, director of Missouri Jobs with Justice, responds to elected officials who dismiss the value and importance of service and food sector jobs. She writes, "Our economy runs on every kind of work -- from cleaning bathrooms to writing computer code. Those who do the work that keeps our region thriving also need to be able to take care of their loved ones and lead a decent life. So let's recognize and value the dignity of all work and make sure it sustains our families."
Fast food workers are coming together all over the country to fight for $15 an hour and the right to form a union without retaliation. We work for corporations that are making tremendous profits, but do not pay employees enough to support our families and to cover basic needs like food, health care, rent and transportation.
LATEST NEWS
‘A Mistake of Radioactive Proportions’: Markey Pushes Bill to Block Trump From Testing Nuclear Bombs
"This is a reckless directive from Trump that will only make the country and the world less safe and lead to a terrible new nuclear arms race," Markey said.
Oct 30, 2025
President Donald Trump's surprise order to resume nuclear weapons testing has set off concerns about a potential global arms race, but one Democratic senator is working to stop it from happening.
Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) on Thursday introduced emergency legislation to prevent the president from resuming nuclear weapons tests, which experts have warned could undermine global geopolitical stability as more nations could respond by ramping up weapons tests of their own.
The text of Markey's bill is just two pages and it states that "none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2026, or authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year before fiscal year 2026, and available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this act, may be obligated or expended to conduct or make preparations for any explosive nuclear weapons test that produces any yield."
In a statement promoting the bill, Markey warned that restarting nuclear weapons tests would be "a mistake of radioactive proportions," which Congress should intervene to block.
"The United States has not conducted a nuclear test since 1992, and there is absolutely no need to resume," Markey said. "A Trumpatomics plan would provoke Russia and China to resume nuclear testing, and China in particular has much more to gain from this than does the United States. This is a reckless directive from Trump that will only make the country and the world less safe and lead to a terrible new nuclear arms race."
Markey, who co-chairs the Nuclear Weapons and Arms Control Working Group, also urged the US Senate to finally ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, which was first adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1996 and which has been ratified by 178 other nations.
The UK-based Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) on Thursday put out a statement condemning Trump's weapons testing announcement, which it described as "a wake-up call that the threat of nuclear war is real and accelerating."
The organization also pointed out that resuming nuclear tests was not the only way that the US under the leadership of both Trump and former President Joe Biden is increasing the risks of nuclear war. Among other things, CND pointed to risks posed by the "Golden Dome" missile shield being pushed by Trump, as well as the AUKUS Agreement signed during Biden's tenure that gives Australia access to nuclear-powered submarines.
CND general secretary Sophie Bol warned of the dire consequences of a global nuclear arms race and said "it is absolutely critical that we rachet up the political pressure to make these world leaders—including the British government—step back from this nuclear escalation."
In an editorial published by Common Dreams on Thursday, Pavel Devyatkin, nonresident fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, argued that the resumption of nuclear weapons tests "marks a dangerous turning point in international security."
In particular, Devyatkin argued that resuming such tests would imperil chances of extending the nuclear arms treaty between the US and Russia that has been in effect since 2011.
"The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), the last agreement limiting US and Russian nuclear weapons, expires in February 2026," he explained. "For over a decade, New START has kept a cap on deployed warheads and compelled both sides to transparency through data exchanges and inspections. If this agreement expires, there would be no binding limits on the two countries’ nuclear arsenals."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'It Will Kill People': HHS Proposal Targeting Transgender Healthcare Could Cause Even More Hospitals to Close
One advocate said the proposed rule would force hospitals "to choose between providing lifesaving care for trans people or maintaining the ability to serve patients through Medicare and Medicaid."
Oct 30, 2025
A pair of extreme new Trump administration rules aimed at functionally banning gender-affirming healthcare for transgender youth could force even more hospitals to close down.
NPR reported Thursday that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) drafted a proposed rule that would prohibit federal Medicaid reimbursement for medical care provided to transgender patients younger than 18 and prohibit the same from the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for patients under 19.
Another proposed rule goes even further, blocking all Medicaid and Medicare funding to hospitals that provide gender-affirming care to youth.
As Erin Reed, an independent journalist who reports on LGBTQ+ rights, explained, this "would effectively eliminate access to such care nationwide, except at the few private clinics able to forgo Medicaid entirely, a rarity in transgender youth medicine."
The policies are of a piece with the Trump administration and the broader Republican Party's efforts to eliminate transgender healthcare for youth across the country.
Bans on gender-affirming care for those under 18 have already been passed in 27 states, despite evidence that early access to treatments like puberty blockers and hormones can save lives.
As Reed pointed out, a Cornell University review of more than 51 studies shows that access to such care dramatically reduces the risk of suicide and the rates of anxiety and depression among transgender adolescents.
The new HHS rules are being prepared for public release in November and would not be finalized for several more months.
But if passed, the ramifications could extend far beyond transgender people, impacting the entire healthcare system, for which federal funding from Medicare and Medicaid is a load-bearing piece. According to a report last year from the American Hospital Association, 96% of hospitals in the US have more than half their inpatient days paid for by Medicare and Medicaid.
It is already becoming apparent what happens when even some of that funding is taken away. As a result of the massive GOP budget law passed in July, an estimated $1 trillion is expected to be cut from Medicaid over the next decade. According to an analysis released Thursday by Protect Our Care, which maintains a Hospital Crisis Watch database, more than 500 healthcare providers across the country are already at risk of shutting down due to the budget cuts.
Tyler Hack, the executive director of the Christopher Street Project, a transgender rights organization, said that the newly proposed HHS rule would be "forcing hospitals to choose between providing lifesaving care for trans people or maintaining the ability to serve patients through Medicare and Medicaid."
"Today’s news marks a dangerous overreach by the executive branch, pitting trans people, low-income families, disabled people, and seniors against each other and making hospitals choose which vulnerable populations to serve," Hack said. "If these rules become law, it will kill people."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Demand for Trump's Social Security Chief Bisignano to Resign After $30 Billion Implosion of Former Company
"Bisignano is in charge of the American people’s hard-earned Social Security benefits, as well as the collection of our taxes," said one advocate. "If he engaged in wrongdoing, the people need to know."
Oct 30, 2025
The new CEO of the financial services technology company Fiserv said Wednesday that the firm's financial outlook was grim, sending its stock collapsing by more than 40% and erasing $30 billion in market value—and laid the blame squarely with a Trump administration appointee whom the president has praised as "amazing."
When nominating former Fiserv CEO Frank Bisignano as Social Security administrator earlier this year, President Donald Trump said the executive frequently "takes troubled entities and turns them around."
With current Fiserv chief Mike Lyons warning on Wednesday that Bisignano had made major missteps as CEO, overinflating its sales projections and relying on short-term cost-cutting before selling his stock for $500 million, the advocacy group Social Security Works said beneficiaries of the government's anti-poverty program for senior citizens should be alarmed that the former executive is now in charge of their crucial benefits.
"Fiserv lost 40% of its value because the former CEO, Frank Bisignano, is a liar," said SSW. "But Bisignano is Trump's buddy, so he can only fail up. He's now in charge of your Social Security."
Lyons told analysts and investors that when Bisignano was leading Fiserv from 2020 until earlier this year, the company made sales projections that "would have been objectively difficult to achieve even with the right investment and strong execution."
He added that Bisignano made "decisions to defer certain investments and cut certain costs [which] improved margins in the short term but are now limiting our ability to serve clients in a world-class way, execute product launches to our standards and grow revenue to our full potential.”
Translating Lyons' comment, Brett Arends wrote at MarketWatch that "under Bisignano, the company made forecasts it could not plausibly have achieved" and that the former CEO "was chasing short-term quarterly results, not building the business."
"Did Bisignano know that Fiserv’s stock was about to tank, and ask his friend Donald Trump for a life raft?"
Lyons broke the news to investors weeks after a police pension fund sued Fiserv and Bisignano, as well as the new CEO, for "artificially inflating [Fiserv’s] growth numbers."
But along with causing his former company's value to plummet, emphasized SSW president Nancy Altman on Thursday, Bisignano personally benefited from overestimating his firm's performance—selling more than three million shares after he was appointed Social Security administrator for at least $500 million.
"That sale saved him $300 million (and counting) in stock value," said Altman. "Did Bisignano know that Fiserv’s stock was about to tank, and ask his friend Donald Trump for a life raft?"
Altman demanded that Bisignano "resign immediately" from his roles at the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service, where he was also named the first-ever CEO earlier this month.
"Bisignano is in charge of the American people’s hard-earned Social Security benefits, as well as the collection of our taxes—despite his total lack of expertise, or even basic knowledge, of either," said Altman. "He infamously admitted that he had to Google ‘Social Security’ when Trump offered him the job. If he engaged in wrongdoing, the people need to know."
Altman called on the US Department of Justice and Congress to launch "immediate" investigations into Bisignano's conduct as CEO of Fiserv, but noted that with Republican allies of Trump running the government, the former executive is unlikely to be held accountable."
"The only recourse," said Altman, "is for Democrats to win control of Congress and make investigating Bisignano a top priority.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


