July, 05 2013, 08:19am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Reprieve's London office can be contacted on: communications [at] reprieve.org.uk / +44 (0) 207 553 8140.,Reprieve US,, based in New York City, can be contacted on Katherine [dot] oshea [at] reprieve.org
Guantanamo Lawyers Warn of "Force-Feeding Factory" in Ramadan
Lawyers for four Guantanamo detainees have criticised the Obama administration's "equivocal" response over whether daytime force-feeding will take place during Ramadan, and warned that the prison may become "a veritable force-feeding factory" during the religious period.
WASHINGTON
Lawyers for four Guantanamo detainees have criticised the Obama administration's "equivocal" response over whether daytime force-feeding will take place during Ramadan, and warned that the prison may become "a veritable force-feeding factory" during the religious period.
In a reply filed today to the Government's response to court proceedings brought by the four men, Guantanamo counsel Cori Crider, of human rights charity Reprieve, and Jon B Eisenberg propose that the US Government should consent to a court-enforceable decree to ensure that detainees' religious rights are not violated.
They argue that this is necessary as Government lawyers have remained "silent...as to how they might implement nighttime-only force-feeding," and as, given the high number currently being force-fed, "nighttime-only force-feeding seems problematic at best and possibly even dangerous to petitioners' health."
US authorities have claimed that they intend to only force-feed during the night, in order to avoid breaking the daytime fast which is the central feature of Ramadan. However, Lt. Col Todd Breasseale, a Pentagon spokesman, told CNN this week that doing so "is an accommodation, not a right."
Crider and Eisenberg add that, based on Guantanamo authorities' own numbers, there will be "just 10 hours and 44 minutes [between sunset and sunrise] for respondents to implement two force-feedings of 45 detainees for up to an hour of feeding time and four hours of total observation time per detainee" which "could require dozens of restraint chairs and hundreds of staff."
They warn that "if this can even be achieved, Guantanamo Bay will become a veritable force-feeding factory" and therefore propose "that respondents agree to a consent decree, enforceable by this Court, which will have the legal effect of securing the detainees' rights to observe the Ramadan fast and to refuse the administration of [anti-nausea drug] Reglan."
The attorneys for the four detainees - Shaker Aamer, Nabil Hadjarab, Ahmed Belbacha and Abu Wa'el Dhiab - also take issue with the Government lawyers' claim that "the public interest lies with maintaining the status quo," pointing to President Obama's recent description of Guantanamo as "a symbol around the world for an America that flouts the rule of law."
"We submit," say Crider and Eisenberg, "that America's public interest lies not in force-feeding the petitioners to prolong their indefinite detention, but in either trial or release as 'ready alternatives' to force-feeding." They note that the US Government "insist[s] that petitioners' force-feeding is necessary to prevent them from 'lay[ing] waste to their bodies,'" and in response state that "Petitioners' indefinite detention, however, is laying waste to their souls."
ENDS
1. For further information, please contact Donald Campbell in Reprieve's press office: +44 (0) 207 553 8166 / 7791 755 415 / donald.campbell@reprieve.org.uk
2. The full document is available on request. The argument on overnight feeding during Ramadan is as follows:
Perhaps tellingly, respondents do not disclaim any prolonged administration of Reglan to other detainees, saying only vaguely that Reglan is "very rarely used."
With regard to force-feeding during Ramadan, respondents offer an equivocal assurance that, "absent any unforeseen emergency or operational issues, Joint Task Force-Guantanamo ('JTF-GTMO') plans" to force-feed detainees only before dawn and after sunset. Resp.'s Opp. at 1-2 (emphasis added). Respondents are silent, however, as to how they might implement nighttime-only force-feeding. See id. at 17-18. Given the number currently being force-fed, which respondents now say is 45 detainees, see id. at 2, nighttime-only force-feeding seems problematic at best and possibly even dangerous to the detainees' health.
According to respondents' regulations, the force-feedings "are usually done two times a day" and are "[t]ypically" completed "over 20 to 30 minutes," and the detainee is then placed in a " 'dry cell' " without access to water "for 45-60 minutes"--unless he vomits or attempts to vomit, in which case he can remain in the restraint chair for up to two hours. Joint Task Force Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Joint Medical Group, Medical Management of Detainees on Hunger Strike at 18 (March 5, 2013.) On July 9, 2013-- the first full day of Ramadan this year--sunrise at Guantanamo Bay is at 6:28 a.m. and sunset is at 7:44 p.m. See Climatology: Sunrise/Sunset for Guantanamo Bay NAS, Cuba, https://in.weather.com/climate/sunRiseSunSet-Guantanamo-Bay-NASCUXX0016. That leaves just 10 hours and 44 minutes for respondents to implement two force-feedings of 45 detainees for up to an hour of feeding time and four hours of total observation time per detainee, which could require dozens of restraint chairs and hundreds of staff.
If this can even be achieved, Guantanamo Bay will become a veritable force-feeding factory. And the fasting detainees, who may not take water during the daylight hours of Ramadan, will be spending up to four more nighttime hours without access to water as well as being under physical restraint, putting them at substantial risk of dehydration and sleep deprivation.
...
We therefore propose that respondents agree to a consent decree, enforceable by this Court, which will have the legal effect of securing the detainees' rights to observe the Ramadan fast and to refuse the administration of Reglan. Absent a consent decree, petitioners' observation of the Ramadan fast will depend on the government's largess and its ability to overcome numerous and repeatedly-acknowledged "operational issues." Resp.'s Opp. at 2, 5, 17, exh. 1 at 6.
We also note that respondents have rebuffed petitioners' assertion of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), see Appl. for Prelim. Inj. at 19-20, merely by citing Rasul v. Myers, 563 F.3d 527, 532 (D.C. Cir. 2009) for the proposition that "non-resident aliens are not protected 'persons' within the meaning of RFRA." Resp.'s Opp. at 18. Respondents do not address petitioners' point that this issue has been revived by Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010). See Appl. for Prelim. Inj. at 19-20.) And it hardly advances international respect for American democracy when the Supreme Court treats corporations as "persons" but the President insists that the Guantanamo Bay detainees are not.
Reprieve is a UK-based human rights organization that uses the law to enforce the human rights of prisoners, from death row to Guantanamo Bay.
LATEST NEWS
Russia Says 40 Killed in Fiery Attack on Concert Hall Near Moscow
While the attack comes over two years into Russia's war on Ukraine, an adviser for the Ukrainian president said the neighboring nation "certainly has nothing to do with the shooting/explosions in the Crocus City Hall."
Mar 22, 2024
This is a developing story… Please check back for possible updates...
At least dozens of people were killed and wounded when individuals reportedly armed with automatic weapons opened fire at Crocus City Hall, a concert venue in suburban Moscow, Russia.
"According to preliminary data, as a result of the terrorist attack at the Crocus City Hall building 40 people were killed and over 100 were injured," Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) said in a statement reported by TASS.
Citing eyewitnesses, the Russian news agency reported that the group of unidentified men "armed with assault rifles went on a shooting spree in the lobby and then inside the concert hall just before a concert by the rock band Picnic."
As The Moscow Timesdetailed:
According to a journalist who was at Crocus City Hall during the attack, a grenade or an incendiary bomb was thrown after the shooting broke out and caused a fire.
"People in the hall were lying down on the floor to escape from the shooting, lying between 15 and 20 minutes, after which they began to crawl out. Many managed to get out," the unnamed journalist was quoted as saying by RIA Novosti.
The attack comes on the heels of Russian President Vladimir Putin's contested reelection and over two years into Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which has received weapons support from around the world, including the United States.
In a lengthy social media post, Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said that "Ukraine certainly has nothing to do with the shooting/explosions in the Crocus City Hall."
"There is not the slightest doubt that the events in the Moscow suburbs will contribute to a sharp increase in military propaganda, accelerated militarization, expanded mobilization, and, ultimately, the scaling up of the war," Podolyak added. "And also to justify manifest genocidal strikes against the civilian population of Ukraine."
According toThe Guardian, John Kirby, the White House national security spokesperson, told reporters that "there's no indication at this time that Ukraine, or Ukrainians were involved in the shooting... We're taking a look at it, but I would disabuse you at this early hour of any connection to Ukraine."
Asked whether the attack signals cracks in Putin's regime, Kirby said that "there are people in Moscow and in Russia that object to the way Mr. Putin is governing the country, but I don't think we, at this early hour, can make a link between the shopping mall attack and political motivations. I think... we just need more time and we need to learn more information."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Just 22 House Dems Oppose Bill That Bars UNRWA Funding While Giving Billions to Israel
"Our elected leaders are funding Palestinian death," said one advocacy group.
Mar 22, 2024
The House of Representatives on Friday approved a sprawling government spending package that prohibits U.S. funding for the United Nations' Palestinian refugee agency for at least a year and hands Israel billions of dollars in unconditional military assistance, even as the country massacres and starves Gaza civilians.
The 1,012-page legislation passed in a 286-134 vote, with 112 Republicans and just 22 Democrats opposing the bill. All but one of the bill's Democratic opponents are members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC).
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the chair of the CPC, said in a statement after voting against the measure that she is "very concerned that this package continues funding for the Netanyahu government with no conditions, while at the same time prohibiting funding" for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA)
"For decades, UNRWA has played a unique and integral role in supporting the welfare and survival of Palestinians in several countries," said Jayapal. "Humanitarian aid in the region is already severely restricted. Implementing a prohibition on UNRWA funding is irresponsible and unacceptable. As the largest contributor of funding to Israel, we should use our funding leverage to demand that humanitarian aid enter Gaza and that we have a lasting cease-fire and a return of all hostages."
In a
social media post ahead of Friday's vote, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) announced his intention to "vote no on this bill that bans aid to children in Gaza who are dying of hunger."
"Forget the politics and procedural jargon," Khanna wrote. "This is a test of first principles. The America I believe in must never be indifferent to the man-made starvation of children."
The legislation now heads to the Senate, which must pass the bill by Friday night to avert a partial government shutdown.
"Instead of banning funding for UNRWA, the U.S. should restore its aid to Gaza and halt weapons transfers to the Israeli military. No more money for massacre."
If passed and signed into law by President Joe Biden, the measure would bar the U.S. from resuming funding for UNRWA until at least March 25, 2025. The Biden administration and other Western governments suspended donations to UNRWA in January after Israel accused a dozen of the agency's 13,000 Gaza employees of taking part in the October 7 Hamas-led attack—allegations it has not substantiated.
While Canada, Finland, and other countries have since resumed funding for UNRWA, the U.S. has kept its contributions frozen as famine spreads rapidly in Gaza. The territory's entire population is facing "high levels of acute food insecurity," according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification.
By including such a provision in must-pass government funding legislation, Congress is "further deepening U.S. complicity in Israel's starvation of Palestinian children," said Josh Ruebner, an adjunct lecturer at Georgetown University and the former policy director of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights.
While barring U.S. funding for the primary humanitarian relief agency in Gaza, the measure includes $3.8 billion in military support for Israel, whose forces have used
U.S.-made weaponry to commit atrocities against civilians in the Palestinian enclave.
As Security Policy Reform Institute co-founder Stephen Semler pointed out, the bill also prohibits U.S. funding for the United Nations commission that is investigating potential war crimes committed in the occupied Palestinian territories and Israel.
The House just passed a bill that cements genocide as official US policy. The legislation gives Israel $3.8 billion in weapons, sanctions UNRWA as Palestinians starve, and defunds a UN investigation into Israel's violations of international law.
All but 22 Democrats voted for it pic.twitter.com/8q9xaMVeJI
— Stephen Semler (@stephensemler) March 22, 2024
IfNotNow, an American Jewish group that campaigns for Palestinian rights, said in response to Friday's vote that "our elected leaders are funding Palestinian death."
"It's unsurprising that the GOP is working to ban funding for UNRWA while the Israeli military massacres and starves Palestinians in Gaza with U.S. financial and diplomatic backing," the group said. "It's unconscionable that so many Democrats are joining them."
"Instead of banning funding for UNRWA, the U.S. should restore its aid to Gaza and halt weapons transfers to the Israeli military," IfNotNow added. "No more money for massacre."
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Pariah Status Grows as Finland Resumes UNRWA Funding
"Collectively punishing millions of Palestinians over allegations concerning a few individuals is never acceptable," said one campaigner. "Other E.U. member states must follow."
Mar 22, 2024
As the United States doubled down on banning funds for the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees, Finland said Friday that it would resume contributions to the lifesaving organization in an implicit rebuke of unsubstantiated Israeli claims—reportedly extracted via torture—that staff members were involved in the October 7 attacks.
Finnish Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Ville Tavio announced during a press conference that the country's €5 million ($5.4 million) annual contribution to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) would be reinstated, with 10% of the funding reserved for "risk management."
"Improving UNRWA's risk management, i.e. starting to prevent abuses and close supervision, gives us sufficient guarantees at this stage from the perspective of risk management that support can continue," said Tavio. "As a result, UNRWA's support for this year will proceed."
"In the future, UNRWA will also require annual bilateral discussions with Finland on how to improve the efficiency of risk management," the minister added. "It is of paramount importance to ensure that our money does not end up benefiting terrorism."
Led by the United States, more than a dozen nations including Finland suspended UNRWA funding after Israeli officials accused 12 of the agency's 13,000 employees in Gaza of participating in the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel.
UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini terminated nine of the 12 employees accused by Israel. However, Lazzarini later admitted to having no evidence to support their firing, calling the terminations an act of "reverse due process." An Israeli dossier cited by countries suspending UNRWA funding also contained no concrete evidence of staff involvement in the October 7 attacks.
U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) earlier this week called Israeli claims that UNRWA is a Hamas proxy "flat-out lies."
UNRWA employees say they were tortured into making false confessions about involvement in Hamas and October 7. The staffers accuse Israeli interrogators of severely beating and waterboarding them, as well as threatening to harm their relatives.
The European Union and nations including Canada, Sweden, Denmark, and Australia subsequently resumed funding for UNRWA, while other contributors including Saudi Arabia increased their donations.
"For the time being there is no alternative to UNRWA," Danish Minister for Development Cooperation Dan Jørgensen said earlier this week.
The United States, however, continues to withhold UNRWA contributions, as do other nations including Japan, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. An agreement reached earlier this week between Congress and the White House as part of a $1.1 trillion militarized spending package extends the ban on UNRWA funding until next March.
On Friday, the House of Representatives voted 286-134 on a bill sanctioning UNRWA while giving Israel $3.8 billion in armed aid. The Biden administration is also seeking an additional $14.3 billion in armed assistance for Israel while repeatedly sidestepping Congress to expedite emergency weapons shipments.
UNRWA supports Palestinian refugees not only in Gaza and the illegally occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, but also in Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. In Gaza, agency staff provide shelter, food, water, clothing, blankets, and other essential humanitarian assistance amid Israel's genocidal war and siege, which have killed and maimed more than 113,000 Palestinians while displacing around 90% of the embattled strip's 2.3 million people. With deadly starvation spreading rapidly in Gaza, the agency's work is more needed than ever.
It's perilous work. According to figures from the Aid Worker Security Database, at least 196 humanitarian workers—most of them UNRWA staffers in Gaza—have been killed in Palestine since last October. One in every 100 UNRWA workers in Gaza has been killed by Israeli bombs and bullets, the highest toll in United Nations history.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular