SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
July, 10 2012, 03:42pm EDT
Contact:
Email:,info@peer.org
Romney Loathed Non-Partisan Civil Service
Corporate Style Clashed with Anti-Spoils System Safeguards in Massachusetts
BOSTON
As Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney bridled at independent review of his decisions by the Commonwealth's civil service. In reaction, Romney repeatedly politicized previously non-partisan state operations, imposed gag orders and pushed out dissenters, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), presaging a possibly similar take-no-prisoners management style should he be elected this November.
Favoring a top-down, no-questions-asked, corporate style of governance, Romney had little patience with any resistance from state specialists. He frequently used his reorganization powers to snuff out pockets of independence within agencies, especially on environmental matters. Thus, for example, Gov. Romney--
- In one of his very first acts, issued a gag order forbidding employees to "have contact with a member of the State Legislature" or "speak with" any member of the media. Violations were subject to "disciplinary action";
- Eliminated the ability of citizens and businesses, as well as environmental organizations, to obtain independent review of the legality of Department of Environmental Protection decisions. In January 2004, he abolished the cadre of administrative law judges tasked with hearing citizen appeals. Instead, all such appeals were reviewed by his political appointees; and
- Unsuccessfully tried to strip 800 attorneys of civil service status, so that they could be fired without cause. In so doing, he would have terminated all attorney slots for environmental enforcement. All remaining lawyers were to be moved inside the Governor's office
"As Governor, the Romney management style was paranoid, preclusive and hyper-political," stated New England PEER Director Kyla Bennett, a former enforcement attorney with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "His governance approach more closely resembled a bunker than a boardroom."
Perhaps a prime example of the Romney record was his treatment of Katherine Abbott, head of the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). First, Romney raided the DCR budget to pay for a pre-Super Bowl rally for the New England Patriots football team. The short-changed account was for maintenance of parkways. When a truck hit four teen-agers walking along the side of a parkway where the sidewalks had not been cleared of snow, Romney blamed Abbott for "poor shoveling" and fired her. It was later revealed that Abbott and her top deputy (who was also fired) were resisting pressure on DCR to hire a Republican politician his office was pushing.
"Inside the Romney administration, people constantly told me that it was hard to remain inspired by the calling of public service and were relieved when he decided to forego a second term," Bennett added. "None of the challenges facing the federal government today can be solved by mass-firings, intimidation tactics or outsourcing work abroad."
PEER protects public employees who protect our environment. We are a service organization for environmental and public health professionals, land managers, scientists, enforcement officers, and other civil servants dedicated to upholding environmental laws and values. We work with current and former federal, state, local, and tribal employees.
LATEST NEWS
United Nations Experts Condemn Trump Assault on Venezuela as ‘Flagrant Violation of the UN Charter’
"Latin America is a zone of peace. The obligation to resolve conflicts peacefully and in accordance with international law must be respected."
Jan 16, 2026
A group of United Nations experts on Thursday condemned the Trump administration's deadly assault on Venezuela, abduction of its president, and efforts to control its government and natural resources as profound violations of international law that cannot be allowed to stand without accountability.
"It is gravely concerning that, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, this marks the second time in four years that a permanent member of the Security Council has carried out an armed attack in flagrant violation of the UN Charter," the experts, including around two dozen UN special rapporteurs, said in a joint statement.
The UN Charter prohibits "the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state."
“The prohibition against violating national sovereignty through unprovoked armed attacks applies even in the context of serious human rights violations and restrictions on freedoms such as those documented in Venezuela,” the experts added. "Latin America is a zone of peace. The obligation to resolve conflicts peacefully and in accordance with international law must be respected."
Their statement came days after US President Donald Trump expressed contempt for international law in an interview with the New York Times, saying, "I don’t need international law."
Trump added that his "own morality" is "the only thing that can stop" him.
Top administration officials have been similarly dismissive of any legal restraints on the ability of the US to invade nations and seize their resources whenever it pleases.
“We’re a superpower, and under President Trump we are going to conduct ourselves as a superpower," top White House adviser Stephen Miller said in a CNN appearance last week. "It is absurd that we would allow a nation in our backyard to become the supplier of resources to our adversaries but not to us.”
Morris Tidball-Binz, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions, said in a separate statement on Thursday that the Trump administration has engaged in "excessive and unlawful use of lethal force" at home and abroad, including in Venezuela and on the high seas.
“International law does not allow States to kill on the basis of labels, perceptions of how someone appears, or allegations of wrongdoing,” Tidball-Binz said. “Whether at sea, abroad, or at home, the use of lethal force must be strictly limited by the principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, and precaution, and may be used only as a last resort to protect life.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
58% of Americans—Across Political Spectrum—Say 2025 Was a 'Failure' Under Trump
Americans also said he's "gone too far" on using presidential powers and the US military, cutting government programs, and deporting immigrants, and not done enough to cut costs.
Jan 16, 2026
Polling released Friday by CNN shows a majority of Americans see President Donald Trump's first year back in the White House as a "failure" and are dissatisfied with his focus on deportations, warmaking, and gutting the government rather than cutting costs.
SSRS surveyed over 1,000 Americans from last Friday through Monday and found that 58% consider the first year of Trump's second term as president to be a failure, compared with just 42% who said it was a "success."
An even higher majority, 64%, said that the Republican "hasn't paid enough attention to the country's most important problems," a figure that rises to 71% for respondents under age 45.
Additionally, majorities said he has "gone too far" with:
- changes to cultural institutions such as the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts and the Smithsonian (62%);
- trying to expand America's power over other countries (59%);
- use of the power of the presidency and executive branch (58%);
- cuts to federal government programs (57%); use of the US military to achieve his goals (55%);
- deporting immigrants living in the United States illegally (52%); and
- changing the way the United States government works (51%).
Trump last month slapped his name on the Kennedy Center, provoking allegations of "narcissism" and newly introduced legislation that would ban the naming or renaming of federal buildings, land, and other assets after sitting presidents.
Over the past year, he's also been called out for moving the country "toward oligarchy, authoritarianism, and kleptocracy," including by serving the interests of the fossil fuel executives and Big Tech billionaires who worked to get him elected. Among them is Elon Musk, the richest man on Earth and former de facto leader of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, which led Trump's evisceration of the federal workforce.
Trump has also bullied journalists and news agencies across the United States and abroad, unleashed thousands of federal immigration agents for violent enforcement operations in various US cities, and cracked down on protesters, including those opposing his attacks on immigrants.
The administration has also illegally killed over 100 people in a boat-bombing spree allegedly targeting drug traffickers in international waters, abducted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, and recently threatened to bomb Iran and take over Greenland, a Danish territory.
Meanwhile, "when it comes to trying to reduce the price of everyday goods," 64% of those polled for CNN said Trump has "not gone far enough."
Research released Thursday by the congressional Joint Economic Committee's Democratic staff shows that a typical US family paid $310 more for groceries during the first year of Trump's second term compared to 2024. Millions of Americans are also struggling to get health insurance coverage due to Republicans' refusal to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits.
New from us: Public opinion on nearly every aspect of President Donald Trump’s first year back in the White House is negative, a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS finds.www.cnn.com/2026/01/16/p...
[image or embed]
— Ariel Edwards-Levy (@aedwardslevy.bsky.social) January 16, 2026 at 10:09 AM
"Asked to choose the country's top issue, Americans pick the economy by a nearly two-to-one margin over any other topic," CNN reported. "The poll suggests Trump is struggling to prove that he's addressing it."
"Views of economic conditions have remained stable—and largely negative—for the past two years, with about 3 in 10 rating the economy positively," the network detailed. "What’s changed in the latest poll is the increased pessimism about the future: Just over 4 in 10 expect the economy to be good a year from now, down from 56% just before Trump was sworn in last January."
Overall, 61% of respondents said they disapprove of the job Trump is doing as president. Democratic strategists called the results "brutal" and "devastating." As New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie put it, "A year in and Trump is in free fall with the public across every conceivable issue."
Faced with widespread disapproval from voters, Trump is doing whatever he can to keep his party in power—including pressuring GOP state legislators to rig their congressional maps before November, trying to seize sensitive voter data, and even suggesting that this year's elections should be canceled.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Donations to Auto Worker Suspended for Heckling Trump Soar Past $800,000
"We greatly appreciate the outpouring of support!" autoworker TJ Sabula said to donors.
Jan 16, 2026
Fundraisers for TJ Sabula, the auto worker who called President Donald Trump a “pedophile protector,” are being flooded with cash from supporters following news that he was suspended from his job at a Ford truck plant in Dearborn, Michigan.
Two separate GoFundMe campaigns aimed at raising money for Sabula have raked in a total of over $800,000 just three days after the auto worker heckled Trump for his attempts to block the release of files related to late billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Trump responded to Sabula's taunts by giving him the middle finger, while appearing to mouth or yell “fuck you” back at the auto worker.
Sabula on Wednesday expressed gratitude to all the people who had chipped in for the crowdfunding campaign so far.
"We greatly appreciate the outpouring of support!" he wrote at the "TJ Sabula is a Patriot" GoFundMe page. "At this time we are closing donations to this campaign and encourage you to look for other causes and organizations to support. We appreciate every single donation, comment, share, and sign of support!"
In addition to the outpouring of support from strangers, Sabula got the backing of the United Auto Workers (UAW), which described the suspended worker as "a proud member of a strong and fighting union,” further noting that “he believes in freedom of speech, a principle we wholeheartedly embrace, and we stand with our membership in protecting their voice on the job."
UAW vowed that Sabula will receive “the full protection of all negotiated contract language safeguarding his job and his rights as a union member.”
In a Tuesday interview published by the Washington Post, Sabula said he had “no regrets whatsoever” about yelling at the president, despite the uncertain future he now faces at his job.
“I don’t feel as though fate looks upon you often, and when it does, you better be ready to seize the opportunity,” Sabula told the Post. “And today I think I did that.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular