For Immediate Release
Pundits Should Listen to Voters on Immigration
Fallout Over Arizona’s Anti-Immigration Law More Likely to Help Democrats, Hurt GOP
WASHINGTON - News
coverage of this week's ruling on the Arizona anti-immigrant law is
re-igniting the debate over comprehensive immigration reform and the
need for a federal solution. But as Washington pundits analyze the
political implications of the judge's decision, they are turning to
outdated thinking instead of real facts from real elections.
Conventional wisdom in Washington has it that the Obama Administration's
lawsuit, and success this week in court, will hurt congressional
Democrats in swing districts and help Republicans mobilize their base.
Once again, these experts prove that they have a superficial
understanding of the politics of immigration.
to Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America's Voice, "The Arizona
law and Wednesday's ruling only heightens the public's desire for a
federal immigration solution. While polls show the Arizona law is
popular with voters, these same surveys show comprehensive immigration
reform is even more popular. The public is hungry for leaders in
Washington to solve this problem, and they will reward politicians who
cut through the rhetoric to offer real solutions."
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Get our best delivered to your inbox.
Some points to consider about the politics of immigration:
- Conventional wisdom has consistently been wrong:
While running on a hard-line immigration stance may work in some
Republican primaries, it has not proven to be successful in the vast
majority of general election campaigns. Polling in swing districts and states
consistently shows that comprehensive immigration reform is supported
by a majority of voters because it is a practical solution that
increases the tax base and restores order to the system. In 2006 and 2008, comprehensive reform candidates consistently trounced hard-line candidates in close races. An America's Voice report
found that in twenty of twenty-two contested congressional races in
2008, the losers advocated a deportation-only agenda and the winners
supported more comprehensive policies. According to the late Richard
Nadler, a GOP activist who studied
the role of immigration in 2008 House races: "Immigration was a wedge
issue benefiting the Democratic Party, but not the GOP."
- The American people have complex views on immigration, and support pragmatic approaches to fixing the problem:
Voters want the problem of illegal immigration solved and want a
national solution instead of a state-by state approach. A number of
recent surveys have shown that while the Arizona immigration law is
popular, comprehensive immigration reform enjoys even wider support. Bi-partisan nationwide polling
conducted by Lake Research Partners and Public Opinion Strategies found
that 60% of voters support the Arizona law with 23% opposed. This
support for Arizona's SB1070 reflects people's frustration over
Washington's failure to act on immigration reform. Even more
voters--78%--support federal, comprehensive immigration reform.
Notably, 84% of those who support the Arizona law also support
comprehensive immigration reform, and by a margin of 60% to 18%, voters
want the federal government to act instead of letting the states
- Republicans in Washington have formed a wall of resistance to working on immigration reform, leaving states like Arizona floundering under the weight of a problem that must be solved at the national level. While some Republicans
are calling on the Obama Administration to "make immigration reform a
priority" following the judge's decision, the fact is these same
politicians have done nothing to advance the issue this year, and even refused to work with Democrats
on a reform proposal this spring. By insisting on "border first"
proposals as a precondition for engaging on broader reforms, Arizona's
own Senators Jon Kyl and John McCain are also blocking the only approach
that they know will work at a time when Arizona and the rest of the
country desperately needs a solution.
- Latino voters are re-engaged and energized by immigration:
While conventional wisdom has it that western Democrats in close races
have the most to "lose" from the court's ruling, the exact opposite is
true. Conservative voters were already motivated to turn out and vote
against Democrats this cycle; it is the Democratic base, including the crucial Latino voter group,
that needed a reason to show up. In Nevada, Florida, Colorado,
Arizona, and elsewhere, new polling shows that the fallout over
Arizona's anti-immigration law is having a mobilizing effect on Latinos,
and defining the good guys and bad guys in a way that will hurt
Republicans and help Democrats if sustained through the fall. For
example, a recent poll
from LatinoMetrics, co-sponsored by the Hispanic Federation and the
League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), found that "since the
end of 2009, immigration has catapulted to the top issue of personal
concern among 1 in 4 Latinos -tied with jobs & the economy." A poll
of Latino voters in CA, CO, FL, and TX from Dr. Ricardo Ramirez of the
University of Southern California, for the National Association of
Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Education Fund (NALEO), similarly
found that 70% of Latino voters are likely to vote this year and an
additional 8% said it was possible; over half of them (57%) cited the
current immigration debate as the reason they are more likely to vote.
Notably, 54% of the NALEO poll respondents said a candidate or party
espousing an immigration position they disagreed with would be less
likely to vote for that candidate, even if they agreed with most of that
candidate or party's positions on other issues. According to Arturo Vargas, NALEO's Executive Director, "Latinos are feeling less optimistic and more under siege."
the Republican Party's continued embrace of its restrictionist wing-the
most visible example being the debate over the Arizona anti-immigration
law-could do very little to win new voters to the GOP, and a lot to
further motivate and alienate the fastest-growing group of new voters in
the nation. Now that's a true read on the politics of immigration in 2010.
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Won't Exist.
Please select a donation method:
America's Voice -- Harnessing the power of American voices and American values to win common sense immigration reform. The mission of America’s Voice is to realize the promise of workable and humane comprehensive immigration reform. Our goal is to build the public support and create the political momentum for reforms that will transform a dysfunctional immigration system that does not work into a regulatory system that does.