March, 12 2010, 10:15am EDT

Amnesty International Calls on President Obama to Establish Office of Maternal Health to Lead Government Effort to Reduce Appalling U.S. Death Rate for Women Having Babies
ew, National Amnesty International Report Finds Systemic Failures and Shocking Disparities in Maternal Health Care, Contributing to High Rates of Deaths and Rising Incidences of "Near Misses"
NEW YORK
Amnesty International called
on President Obama today to quickly establish an Office of Maternal Health
to lead government action to reduce soaring pregnancy-related complications
and maternal deaths nationwide. The human rights organization said
the government must take immediate steps to stop the loss of two to three
women every day and reduce the risk of complications that now affect one-third
of all pregnant women - 1.7 million women a year.
With a lifetime risk of maternal deaths that
is greater than in 40 other countries, including virtually all of the industrialized
countries, the United States has failed to reverse the two-decade upward
trend in preventable maternal deaths, despite pledges to do so. Most
recently, the government has failed to meet the goals set forth in the
2010 Healthy People initiative, which called for reducing the number of
maternal deaths to one- third of current rates.
"This country's extraordinary record
of medical advancement makes its haphazard approach to maternal care all
the more scandalous and disgraceful," said Larry Cox, executive director
of Amnesty International USA. "Good maternal care should not be
considered a luxury available only to those who can access the best hospitals
and the best doctors. Women should not die in the richest
country on earth from preventable complications and emergencies."
Cox said: "Mothers die not because
the United States can't provide good care, but because it lacks the political
will to make sure good care is available to all women."
Amnesty International's new 101-page, national
report, Deadly Delivery: The Maternal Health Care Crisis in the USA,
reveals the following disturbing findings:
+ severe pregnancy-related complications
that nearly cause death -- known as "near misses" -- are rising
at an alarming rate, increasing by 25 percent since 1998; currently nearly
34,000 women annually experience a "near miss" during delivery;
+ discrimination is costing lives.
Opportunities to save women's lives and reduce complications are being
missed, in large part because women face barriers to care, especially women
of color, those living in poverty, Native American and immigrant women
and those who speak little or no English.
Maternal health is a human right for every
woman in the United States, regardless of race or income. Yet, the
United States lacks a systematic, robust government response to this critical
problem. Amnesty International is urging President Obama to work with Health
and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to establish, and seek Congressional
funding, for a single office responsible for ensuring that all women receive
quality maternal health care. (Please visit: www.amnestyusa.org\deadlydelivery)
.
Additionally, Amnesty International calls
for vigorous enforcement of federal non-discrimination laws and an increase
in support for Federally Qualified Health Centers by 2011 to expand the
number of women who can access affordable maternal health care.
Amnesty International's analysis shows that
health care reform before Congress does not address the crisis of maternal
health care.
"Reform is primarily focused on health
care coverage and reducing health care costs, and even optimistic estimates
predict that any proposal on the table will still leave millions without
access to affordable care," said Rachel Ward, one of the authors of
the Deadly Delivery report. "Furthermore, it does not
address discrimination, systemic failures and the lack of government accountability
documented in Amnesty International's report."
Ward said: "The barriers preventing
women from getting the care that they need go far beyond simply lacking
health insurance. Health care reform does not address obstacles to
maternal care, recommend nationally standardized protocols for preventing
and treating the most common causes of death, eliminate health disparities
or ensure that the government takes responsibility for reducing levels
of maternal mortality."
Rapid and comprehensive federal leadership
is required, as the report found numerous systemic failures, including
the following:
- Obstacles
to care are widespread, even though the United States spends more on health
care than any other country and more on pregnancy and childbirth-related
hospital costs, $86 billion, than any other type of hospital care. - Nearly
13 million women of reproductive age (15 to 44), or one in five, have no
health insurance. Women of color account for just under one-third
of all women in the United States (32 percent) but over half (51 percent)
of uninsured women. - One
in four women do not receive adequate prenatal care, starting in the first
trimester. The number rises to about one in three for African American
and Native American women. - Burdensome
bureaucratic procedures in Medicaid enrollment substantially delay access
to vital prenatal care for pregnant women seeking government-funded care.
Twenty-one states do not offer "presumptive eligibility" which
allows pregnant women to temporarily access medical care while their permanent
application for Medicaid is pending. Women who do not receive any prenatal
care are three to four times more likely to die than women who do. - A
shortage of health care professionals is a serious obstacle to timely and
adequate care, especially in rural areas and inner cities. In 2008, 64
million people were living in "shortage areas" for primary care
(which includes maternal care), but federally-supported community health
centers -- a critical safety net -- are available in only 20 percent of
these areas. - The
lack of nationally standardized protocols addressing the leading causes
of death -- or the inconsistent use of them -- may lead to preventable
deaths or injuries. Measures used widely in the United Kingdom to prevent
blood clots after caesarian sections are not consistently taken in the
United States, for example. - Many
women are not given a say in decisions about their care and do not get
enough information about the signs of complications and the risks of interventions
such as inducing labor or cesarean sections. Cesarean sections make
up nearly one-third of all deliveries in the United States - twice as
high as recommended by the World Health Organization. The risk of
death following c-sections is more than three times higher than for vaginal
births. - The
number of deaths is significantly understated because there are no federal
requirements to report maternal deaths or complications and data collection
at the state level is insufficient. - Oversight
and accountability is lacking. 29 states and the District of Columbia
have no maternal death review process at all.
As a result, women are more likely to enter
into pregnancy in ill health, receive late or inadequate prenatal care,
are given inadequate or inappropriate care during childbirth and receive
insufficient post-natal care.
Amnesty International is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning
grassroots activist organization with more than 2.2 million supporters,
activists and volunteers in more than 150 countries campaigning for human
rights worldwide. The organization investigates and exposes abuses, educates
and mobilizes the public, and works to protect people wherever justice,
freedom, truth and dignity are denied.
####
For more information or to take action, please
visit: www.amnestyusa.org\deadlydelivery
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
In Blow to 'Fetal Personhood' Push, Alabamian Serving 18 Years After Stillbirth Gets New Trial
"I'm hopeful that my new trial will end with me being freed, because I simply lost my pregnancy at home because of an infection," said Brooke Shoemaker, who has already spent five years in prison.
Dec 30, 2025
While Brooke Shoemaker and a rights group representing her in court are celebrating this week after an Alabama judge threw out her conviction and ordered a new trial, her case is also drawing attention to the dangers of "fetal personhood" policies.
"Laws and judicial decisions that grant fetuses—and in some cases embryos and fertilized eggs—the same legal rights and status given to born people, such as the right to life, is 'fetal personhood,'" explains the website of the group, Pregnancy Justice. "When fetuses have rights, this fundamentally changes the legal rights and status of all pregnant people, opening the door to criminalization, surveillance, and obstetric violence."
Since the US Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling ended the federal right to abortion in 2022, far-right activists and politicians have ramped up their fight for fetal personhood policies. Pregnancy Justice found that in the two years after the decision, the number of people who faced criminal charges related to their pregnancies hit its highest level in US history.
Shoemaker's case began even earlier, in 2017, when she experienced a stillbirth at home about 24-26 weeks into her pregnancy. Paramedics brought her to a hospital, where she disclosed using methamphetamine while pregnant. Although a medical examiner could not determine whether the drug use caused the stillbirth—and, according to Pregnancy Justice, "her placenta showed clear signs of infection"—a jury found her guilty of chemical endangerment of a minor. She's served five years of her 18-year sentence.
"After becoming Ms. Shoemaker's counsel in 2024, Pregnancy Justice filed a petition alongside Andrew Stanley of the Samford Law Office requesting a hearing based on new evidence about the infection that led to the demise of Ms. Shoemaker's pregnancy, leading the judge to agree with Pregnancy Justice's medical witness and to vacate the conviction," the rights group said in a Monday statement.
Lee County Circuit Judge Jeffrey Tickal wrote in his December 22 order that "should the facts had been known, and brought before the jury, the results probably would have been different."
Shoemaker said Monday that "after years of fighting, I'm thankful that I'm finally being heard, and I pray that my next Christmas will be spent at home with my children and parents... I'm hopeful that my new trial will end with me being freed, because I simply lost my pregnancy at home because of an infection. I loved and wanted my baby, and I never deserved this."
Although Tickal's decision came three days before Christmas, the 45-year-old mother of four remained behind bars for the holiday last week, as the state appeals.
"While we are thrilled with the judge's decision, we are outraged that Ms. Shoemaker is still behind bars when she should have been home for Christmas," said former Pregnancy Justice senior staff attorney Emma Roth. "She was convicted based on feelings, not facts. Pregnancy Justice will continue to fight on appeal and prove that pregnancies end tragically for reasons far beyond a mother's control. Women like Ms. Shoemaker should be allowed to grieve their loss without fearing arrest."
AL.com reported Tuesday that "Alabama is unique in that it is one of only three states, along with Oklahoma and South Carolina, where the state Supreme Court allows the application of criminal laws meant to punish child abuse or child endangerment to be applied in the context of pregnancy."
However, similar cases aren't restricted to those states. Pregnancy Justice found that in the two years following Dobbs, "prosecutors initiated cases in 16 states: Alabama, California, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. While prosecutions were brought in all of these states, to date, the majority of the reported cases occurred in Alabama (192) and Oklahoma (112)."
This is fantastic news!!I wrote in my book how the medical examiner ruled the cause of the stillbirth "undetermined," but the coroner (who lacks medical training) instead listed cause of stillbirth as mom's meth usage on the fetal death certificate.
[image or embed]
— Jill Wieber Lens (@jillwieberlens.bsky.social) December 30, 2025 at 12:25 PM
"Prosecutors used a variety of criminal statutes to charge the defendants in these cases, often bringing more than one charge against an individual defendant," the group's report continues. "In total, the 412 defendants faced 441 charges for conduct related to pregnancy, pregnancy loss, or birth. The majority of charges (398/441) asserted some form of child abuse, neglect, or endangerment."
"As has been the case for decades, nearly all the cases alleged that the pregnant person used a substance during pregnancy," the report adds. "In 268 cases, substance use was the only allegation made against the pregnant person. In the midst of a wide-ranging crisis in maternal healthcare and despite maternal healthcare deserts across the country, prosecutors or police argued that pregnant people's failure to obtain prenatal care was evidence of a crime. This was the case in 29 of 412 cases."
When the publication was released last year, Pregnancy Justice president Lourdes A. Rivera said in a statement that "the Dobbs decision emboldened prosecutors to develop ever more aggressive strategies to prosecute pregnancy, leading to the most pregnancy-related criminal cases on record."
"This is directly tied to the radical legal doctrine of 'fetal personhood,' which grants full legal rights to an embryo or fetus, turning them into victims of crimes perpetrated by pregnant women," Rivera argued. "To turn the tide on criminalization, we need to separate healthcare from the criminal legal system and to change policy and practices to ensure that pregnant people can safely access the healthcare they need, without fear of criminalization. This report demonstrates that, in post-Dobbs America, being pregnant places people at increased risk, not only of dire health outcomes, but of arrest."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'A Wake-Up Call': Scientists Find 2025 Among Hottest Years on Record
"2025 was full of stark reminders of the urgent need to cut climate pollution, invest in clean energy, and tackle the climate crisis now."
Dec 30, 2025
Climate change driven by human burning of fossil fuels helped make 2025 one of the hottest years ever recorded, a scientific report published Monday affirmed, prompting renewed calls for urgent action to combat the worsening planetary emergency.
Researchers at World Weather Attribution (WWA) found that "although 2025 was slightly cooler than 2024 globally, it was still far hotter than almost any other year on record," with only two other recent years recording a higher average worldwide temperature.
For the first time, the three-year running average will end the year above the 1.5°C warming goal, relative to preindustrial levels, established a decade ago under the landmark Paris climate agreement.
"Global temperatures remained very high and significant harm from human-induced climate change is very real," the report continues. "It is not a future threat, but a present-day reality."
"Across the 22 extreme events we analyzed in depth, heatwaves, floods, storms, droughts, and wildfires claimed lives, destroyed communities, and wiped out crops," the researchers wrote. "Together, these events paint a stark picture of the escalating risks we face in a warming world."
The WWA researchers' findings tracked with the findings of United Nations experts and others that 2025 would be the third-hottest year on record.
According to the WWA study:
This year highlighted again, in stark terms, how unfairly the consequences of human-induced climate change are distributed, consistently hitting those who are already marginalized within their societies the hardest. But the inequity goes deeper: The scientific evidence base itself is uneven. Many of our studies in 2025 focused on heavy rainfall events in the Global South, and time and again we found that gaps in observational data and the reliance on climate models developed primarily for the Global North prevented us from drawing confident conclusions. This unequal foundation in climate science mirrors the broader injustices of the climate crisis.
The events of 2025 make it clear that while we urgently need to transition away from fossil fuels, we also must invest in adaptation measures. Many deaths and other impacts could be prevented with timely action. But events like Hurricane Melissa highlight the limits of preparedness and adaptation: When an intense storm strikes small islands such as Jamaica and other Caribbean nations, even relatively high levels of preparedness cannot prevent extreme losses and damage. This underscores that adaptation alone is not enough; rapid emission reductions remain essential to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.
“If we don’t stop burning fossil fuels very, very, quickly, very soon, it will be very hard to keep that goal” of 1.5°C, WWA co-founder Friederike Otto—who is also an Imperial College London climate scientist—told the Associated Press. “The science is increasingly clear.”
The WWA study's publication comes a month after this year's United Nations Climate Change Conference—or COP30—ended in Brazil with little meaningful progress toward a transition from fossil fuels.
Responding to the new study, Climate Action Campaign director Margie Alt said in a statement that "2025 was full of stark reminders of the urgent need to cut climate pollution, invest in clean energy, and tackle the climate crisis now."
"Today’s report is a wake-up call," Alt continued. "Unfortunately, [US President Donald] Trump and Republicans controlling Congress spent the past year making climate denial official US policy and undermining progress to stave off the worst of the climate crisis. Their reckless polluters-first agenda rolled back critical climate protections and attacked and undermined the very agencies responsible for helping Americans prepare for and recover from increasingly dangerous disasters."
"Across the country, people are standing up and demanding their leaders do better to protect our families from climate change and extreme weather," Alt added. "It's time those in power started listening.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Judge Slaps Down Trump Administration Scheme to 'Starve' Nation's Top Consumer Protection Watchdog
"If the CFPB is not there, people have nowhere to turn when they get cheated," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
Dec 30, 2025
President Donald Trump and his administration have been openly plotting to scrap the nation's top consumer protection watchdog, but a federal judge has at least temporarily put those plans on hold.
US District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled on Tuesday that the US Federal Reserve must continue providing funds to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), rejecting the Trump administration's claims that the nation's central bank that the nation's central bank currently lacks to "combined earnings" to fund the bureau's operations.
The administration had argued that the Federal Reserve should not be making payments to the CFPB because it has been operating at a loss since 2022, when it began a series of aggressive interest rate hikes aimed at taming inflation.
However, Jackson rejected this reasoning and accused the administration of using it as a cover to defund an agency that the president and top officials such as Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, had long expressed a desire to abolish.
"It appears that defendants’ new understanding of 'combined earnings' is an unsupported and transparent attempt to starve the CPFB of funding," the judge wrote.
The CFPB must now be funded at least until the DC Circuit of Appeals weighs in on an ongoing lawsuit brought by the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) against Vought over layoffs at the agency that is scheduled for hearings in February.
The NTEU took a victory lap in the wake of the ruling and taunted Vought for his defeat.
"Yet another loss for Rusty Vought," the union posted on Bluesky. "Wonder how much longer Donald is going to put up with this?"
While it will continue to receive funding for the time being, the CFPB has still seen its ability to fulfill its mission severely diminished during Trump's second term.
A Tuesday report from Reuters claimed that the CFPB is "on the brink of collapse" given that the Trump administration, congressional Republicans, and industry lawsuits have "undone a decade's worth of CFPB rules on matters ranging from medical debt and student loans to credit card late fees, overdraft charges and mortgage lending."
The report also noted that, during Trump's second term, the CFPB has "dropped or paused its probes and enforcement actions, and stopped supervising the consumer finance industries, leading to a string of resignations" at the agency.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who first drew up plans to create the CFPB in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis, explained the agency's importance in an interview with Reuters.
"I was stunned by the number of people in financial trouble who had lost a job or got sick but who had also been cheated by one or more of their creditors," she said. "For no agency was consumer protection a first priority, it was somewhere between fifth and 10th, which meant there was just no cop on the beat. If the CFPB is not there, people have nowhere to turn when they get cheated."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


