January, 28 2010, 03:47pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brenda Bowser Soder,bowsersoderb@humanrightsfirst.org,O -202/370-3323, C - 301/906-4460
US Must Refocus on Safety of Displaced Iraqis
Iraqi Refugee Act Anniversary Provides Opportunity to Reaffirm U.S. Commitment to Protecting Iraqi Refugees
WASHINGTON
Today, two years after the bipartisan Refugee Crisis in
Iraq Act became law, Human Rights First is calling for a renewed focus
on the safety and security of Iraq's refugees, including those who have
been targeted because of their work with the U.S. government, military,
non-governmental organizations and journalists.
"The United States has improved its resettlement
efforts over the last two years, but several serious unaddressed
problems continue to delay some Iraqi refugees and their families
stranded abroad in difficult and sometimes dangerous circumstances,'
said Human Rights First's Eleanor Acer. 'Just as troubling is the
reality that most of Iraq's refugees will not be resettled and cannot
return home given their very real security and protection concerns. The
administration must ensure that protecting the rights of Iraq's
refugees and displaced people is at the top of the U.S. foreign policy
agenda in its discussions with Iraq, Syria, Jordan and other states."
In April 2009, Human Rights First issued a report, Promises to the Persecuted: The Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2008,
which recommended specific reforms to ensure that Iraqi refugees -
including those who have worked with the United States or U.S. groups -
are brought to safety in a timely manner. Today, the organization
reiterated its call for the United States to implement these and other
key reforms to help ensure the protection of Iraqi refugees and
displaced people.
Specifically, Human Rights First urges the U.S. government to:
- Reduce processing times for Iraqi refugees who access the U.S. refugee program directly.
The State Department should increase staffing at the Embassy in Baghdad
and the International Organization of Migration, and the Department of
Homeland Security should increase the frequency and staffing of its
"circuit ride" visits to the region, so that the refugee applications
of thousands of U.S.-affiliated Iraqis and their families facing danger
can be processed expeditiously.
- Improve the multi-agency security clearance process. Many
Iraqi refugees and other Iraqis who have worked for the United States
have had their applications delayed for months or longer due to delays
in the multi-agency security clearance process. The administration
should implement improvements to this process promptly, including
better coordination and additional resources to all agencies involved,
so that refugees and others who meet all of the requirements for
admission to the United Sates do not wait indefinitely - many while
facing on-going dangers in their countries of first asylum - for final
answers on their applications.
- Develop a formal system to fast-track refugee status
determinations and resettlement processing for refugees who face
imminent danger in their countries of first asylum. The
priority access afforded under the Act is available only in specific
locations and to specific populations. The United States should develop
an effective process for fast-tracking cases involving urgent
protection concerns. A wide range of individuals have been reported to
face serious threats or harm, including U.S.-affiliated Iraqis, victims
of sexual and gender-based violence, and LGBT refugees.
- Ensure that the U.S. devotes sufficient attention and priority to addressing the protection needs of Iraq's displaced people.
Human Rights First welcomed President Obama's August 2009 appointment
of Samantha Power, Senior Director for Multilateral Affairs and Human
Rights at the National Security Council, to coordinate the work of the
many U.S. agencies engaged on issues that affect Iraqi refugees and
internally displaced persons. The office of Multilateral Affairs and
Human Rights should be provided with adequate resources, including
additional staff, to facilitate effective leadership, coordination, and
consistent engagement with the Government of Iraq and the international
community on the needs of displaced Iraqis.
The Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act was first proposed in
June 2007 by the late Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and former Senator
Gordon Smith (R-OR). It mandated Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs) for
Iraqis who worked with the U.S. government, military, or contractors
for at least a year; direct access to the U.S. refugee resettlement
program for Iraqis who worked with the U.S. government, military,
contractors, or U.S.-based media or NGOs, and certain minority groups;
and refugee processing inside Iraq.
In Promises to the Persecuted,
Human Rights First found that, despite a Congressional mandate intended
to expedite Iraqi refugee processing times, only a small portion of
eligible Iraqis had been granted safe haven in the United States. Since
the Act became law, the United States has issued 3,064 SIVs to
U.S.-affiliated Iraqis under the Act's terms. It has issued an
additional 1,552 SIVs under a previous law, for a total of 4,616 SIVs
issued to Iraqis who worked for the U.S. government, military, or
contractors, and their families (as of September 30, 2009, the most
recent data available from the State Department).
Human Rights First has estimated that there are
approximately 146,000 U.S.-affiliated Iraqis, including Embassy direct
hires, contractors, and employees of U.S.-based media and NGOs. This
figure does not include spouses and children. The United States has
promised to resettle 17,000 Iraqi refugees this fiscal year, and since
the war began almost seven years ago, the State Department has brought
approximately 38,000 Iraqis to safety in the United States through the
refugee resettlement program. These refugees include religious
minorities, persecuted women with children, and those who were targeted
because of their work with the U.S. government. The United Nations
refugee agency has stated that more than 53,000 vulnerable Iraqis
remain in need of resettlement.
Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. Human Rights First believes that building respect for human rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, intolerance, and violence.
LATEST NEWS
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Memo Shows Pam Bondi Wants List of 'Domestic Terrorism' Groups Who Express 'Anti-American Sentiment'
"Millions of Americans like you and I could be the target," warned journalist Ken Klippenstein of the new memo.
Dec 07, 2025
A leaked memo written by US Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Department of Justice to compile a list of potential "domestic terrorism" organizations that espouse "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment."
The memo, which was obtained by journalist Ken Klippenstein, expands upon National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), a directive signed by President Donald Trump in late September that demanded a "national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts."
The new Bondi memo instructs law enforcement agencies to refer "suspected" domestic terrorism cases to the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which will then undertake an "exhaustive investigation contemplated by NSPM-7" that will incorporate "a focused strategy to root out all culpable participants—including organizers and funders—in all domestic terrorism activities."
The memo identifies the "domestic terrorism threat" as organizations that use "violence or the threat of violence" to advance political goals such as "opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality."
Commenting on the significance of the memo, Klippenstein criticized mainstream media organizations for largely ignoring the implications of NSPM-7, which was drafted and signed in the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"For months, major media outlets have largely blown off the story of NSPM-7, thinking it was all just Trump bluster and too crazy to be serious," he wrote. "But a memo like this one shows you that the administration is absolutely taking this seriously—even if the media are not—and is actively working to operationalize NSPM-7."
Klippenstein also warned that NSPM-7 appeared to be the start of a new "war on terrorism," but "only this time, millions of Americans like you and I could be the target."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


