December, 02 2009, 01:27pm EDT
US: Remote Detainee Lockups Hinder Justice
Transfers of Detained Immigrants Interfere with Lawyer Access and Right to Challenge Deportation
WASHINGTON
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency's increasing practice
of transferring immigrants facing deportation to detention centers far
away from their homes severely curtails their ability to challenge
their deportation, Human Rights Watch says in a report released today.
The agency made 1.4 million detainee transfers in the decade from 1999
through 2008, the report says.
The 88-page report, "Locked Up Far Away: The Transfer of Immigrants to Remote Detention Centers in the United States,"
presents new data analyzed for Human Rights Watch by the Transactional
Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) of Syracuse University. The data
show that 53 percent of the 1.4 million transfers have taken place
since 2006, and most occur between state and local jails that contract
with the agency, known as ICE, to provide detention bed space. The
report's findings are based on the new data and interviews with
officials, immigration lawyers, detainees, and their family members.
"ICE is increasingly subjecting detainees to a chaotic game of
musical chairs," said Alison Parker, deputy US director for Human
Rights Watch and author of the report. "And it's a game with dire
consequences since it may keep them from finding an attorney or
presenting evidence in their defense."
Many immigrants are first arrested and detained in major cities like
Los Angeles or Philadelphia, places where immigrants have lived for
decades and where their family members, employers, and attorneys also
live. Days or months later, with no notice, many of these immigrants
are loaded onto planes for transport to detention centers in remote
corners of states such as Texas, California, and Louisiana (the three
states most likely to receive transfers), the report found.
The detained immigrants have the right, under both US and
international human rights law, to be represented in deportation
hearings by an attorney of their choice and to present evidence in
their defense. But once they are transferred, immigrants are often so
far away from their lawyers, evidence, and witnesses that their ability
to defend themselves in deportation proceedings is severely curtailed,
the report found.
"Immigrant detainees should not be treated like so many boxes of
goods - shipped to the most convenient place for ICE to store them,"
Parker said. "We are especially concerned that the transferred
detainees may find that their chances of successfully fighting
deportation or gaining asylum from persecution have just evaporated."
The federal Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (which covers
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas) has jurisdiction over the largest
number of the transferred detainees. Those transfers are of particular
concern, Human Rights Watch said, because that court is widely known
for decisions that are hostile to non-citizens and because the states
within its jurisdiction collectively have the lowest ratio of
immigration attorneys to immigration detainees in the country.
Human Rights Watch acknowledged that some detainee transfers are
inevitable, but said that ICE and Congress should use reasonable and
rights-protective checks on detainee transfers as the best state
criminal justice systems do. The report recommends concrete steps to
help create such a system.
Although ICE has recently announced plans to revamp its detention
system, which may provide an opening for reforms, the agency previously
has rejected recommendations to place enforceable constraints on its
transfer power.
Human Rights Watch's report is being released on the same day (December 2) as the Constitution Project's
"Recommendations for Reforming our Immigration Detention System and
Promoting Access to Counsel in Immigration Proceedings," finding that
immigration detention is overused and immigrant detainees experience
problems in accessing counsel and providing recommendations for reform.
Also on December 2, the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse will
release detailed facility level data on detainee transfers.
***
Testimony from detainees, family members, and attorneys about transfers:
"The transfers are devastating, absolutely devastating. [Detainees]
are loaded onto a plane in the middle of the night. They have no idea
where they are, no idea what [US] state they are in. I cannot
overemphasize the psychological trauma to these people. What it does to
their family members cannot be fully captured either. I have taken
calls from seriously hysterical family members - incredibly traumatized
people - sobbing on the phone, crying out, 'I don't know where my son
or husband is!'" - Rebecca Schreve, immigration attorney, El Paso, Texas, January 29, 2009.
"In New York when I was detained, I was about to get an attorney
through one of the churches, but that went away once they sent me here
to New Mexico.... All my evidence and stuff that I need is right there
in New York. I've been trying to get all my case information from New
York ... writing to ICE to get my records. But they won't give me my
records; they haven't given me nothing. I'm just representing myself
with no evidence to present." - Kevin H. (pseudonym), Otero County Processing Center, Chaparral, New Mexico, February 11, 2009.
"I have never represented someone who has not been in more than
three detention facilities. Could be El Paso, Texas, a facility in
Arizona, or they send people to Hawaii .... I have been practicing
immigration law for more than a decade. Never once have I been notified
of [my client's] transfer. Never." - Holly Cooper, immigration
attorney and clinical professor of law, University of California Davis
School of Law, Davis, California, January 27, 2009.
"Ever since they sent him there [to New Mexico], it's been a
nightmare. My mother has blood pressure problems, and her pressure goes
up and down like crazy now because of worrying about him and stuff.
[His wife] has been terrified. She cries every night. And his baby asks
for him, asks for "Papa." He kisses his photo. He starts crying as soon
as he hears his father's voice on the phone even though he is only
one.... Last week [my brother] called to say he can't do it anymore.
He's going to sign the paper agreeing to his deportation." - Georgina V. (pseudonym), sister of detainee, Brooklyn, New York, January 23, 2008.
A detainee who was transferred 1,400 miles away to a detention
facility in Texas after a few weeks in a detention center in southern
California said that the difference for him was "like the difference
between heaven and earth. At least in California I had a better chance.
I could hire a[n] attorney to represent me. Now, here, I have no chance
other than what the grace of God gives me." - Michael M. (pseudonym), Pearsall Detention Center, Pearsall, Texas, April 25, 2008.
A legal permanent resident originally from the Dominican Republic,
who had been living in Philadelphia but was transferred to Texas said,
"I had to call to try to get the police records myself. It took a lot
of time. The judge got mad that I kept asking for more time. But
eventually they arrived. I tried to put on the case myself. I lost." - Miguel A. (pseudonym), Port Isabel Service Processing Center, Los Fresnos, Texas, April 23, 2008.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Why Can't We Fund Universal Public Goods? Blame the Tax-Dodging Billionaire Nepo Babies
"In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta," reads a new report.
Dec 13, 2024
The children of the richest families in the U.S. are well-known for spending their vast wealth on frivolous luxuries—constructing a replica of a medieval church on their acres of property, in the case of banking heir Timothy Mellon, or starting a brand of T-shirts described by one critic as "terrible beyond your wildest imagination," as Wyatt Koch, nephew of Republican megadonors Charles and David, did.
But a report released by Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) on Thursday shows how "billionaire nepo babies" don't just waste their families' fortunes. They also benefit from "a rigged system" that allows them to "pass that wealth down over generations without being properly taxed–often without being taxed at all."
In addition, the heirs of the country's biggest fortunes spend vast sums "to elect politicians who protect their unearned wealth and manipulate the country's economy in their favor," said ATF.
Along with Mellon and Koch, the report profiles Samuel Logan of the Scripps media dynasty; Nicola Peltz-Beckham, daughter of billionaire investor Nelson Peltz; Gabrielle Rubenstein, whose family has made its fortune in private equity; and President-elect Donald Trump's son, Eric Trump.
The nepo babies are part of a small group of billionaire families in the U.S. who benefit from tax loopholes that ensure little of their immense wealth ever goes to benefit the public good.
At least 90 billionaires have passed away over the last decade, leaving their beneficiaries $455 billion in collective wealth.
But according to ATF, "$255 billion (56%) of that amount was likely entirely exempt from the capital gains tax because of a special break called 'stepped up basis.'"
"Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations."
Without loopholes included the stepped up basis tax cut, the current estate tax on billionaires and centimillionaires would yield enough revenue to fund universal childcare, preschool, and paid family leave for U.S. workers, with hundreds of billions of dollars left over, according to ATF's report.
The wealthy heirs profiled in the report and their families are some of the Republican Party's top donors—contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to candidates including Trump in the hopes of securing even more tax cuts.
Mellon, for example, is Trump's "biggest supporter, giving $140 million to a pro-Trump PAC in 2024 alone," reads the report.
A previous analysis by ATF found that as of late October, just 150 billionaire families had spent $1.9 billion on the 2024 elections.
As the Center for American Progress found earlier this year, Trump's plan to extend the tax cuts that he pushed through in 2017 would cost $4 trillion over the next decade.
"The vast wealth inherited by centuries-old billionaire families is staggering. While these heirs and their billions go undertaxed, enormous sums are squandered on lavish mansions, private jets, and vanity projects instead of funding crucial public investments," said ATF executive director David Kass. "In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta. Now, Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations—all while advocating for cuts to vital programs that working and middle-class Americans depend on."
The report calls for Congress to pass "proven, pragmatic proposals to unrig the tax system that enjoy high levels of popular support," such as the Ultra Millionaire Tax Act that was proposed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) this year. The bill would tax fortunes between $50 million and $1 billion at 2% and wealth above $1 billion at $1 billion.
The small tax on enormous wealth would generate "a whopping $3 trillion over 10 years," said ATF.
The estate tax could also be "restored so that it can play a meaningful role in promoting fairness and equal opportunities" through the passage of the For the 99.5% Act, which was introduced in 2023 by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.).
Under the bill, the estate tax exemption would be lowered to $7 million per couple and the current 40% flat rate would be replaced with a sliding scale that would charge higher rates as a family's wealth grows.
"None of these tax reforms would impoverish the ultra wealthy, nor even inconvenience them in any meaningful way–but they would reduce the concentration of wealth that is so corrosive to society," reads the report. "At the same time, they would raise trillions of dollars that could be used to reduce inequality and improve the lives of families that can only dream of the kind of security and opportunity enjoyed by the nation’s richest clans."
"And if rich families ever did need to tighten their belts a bit to pay their taxes," the report continues, "the economizing might begin by reducing the flow of money funding the extravagant lifestyles of America's Billionaire Nepo Babies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Next Recession Starts Here': Trump Team Weighs Abolishing Bank Regulators
The president-elect's advisers are reportedly discussing plans to shrink or eliminate key bank watchdogs, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dec 13, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump and his advisers are reportedly considering plans to weaken—or abolish altogether—top bank regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The Wall Street Journalreported Thursday that members of Trump's transition team and the new Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency have asked nominees under consideration to head the FDIC and OCC if the bank watchdogs could be eliminated and have their functions absorbed by the Treasury Department, which is set to be run by a billionaire hedge fund manager and crypto enthusiast.
"Bank executives are optimistic President-elect Donald Trump will ease a host of regulations on capital cushions and consumer protections, as well as scrutiny of consolidation in the industry," the Journal reported. "But FDIC deposit insurance is considered near sacred. Any move that threatened to undermine even the perception of deposit insurance could quickly ripple through banks and in a crisis might compound customer fears."
The Trump team's internal and fluid discussions about the fate of the key bank regulators broadly aligns with Project 2025's proposal to "merge the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve's non-monetary supervisory and regulatory functions."
The FDIC, which is primarily funded by bank insurance premiums, was established during the Great Depression to restore public trust in the nation's banking system, and the agency played a central role in navigating the 2023 bank failures that threatened a systemic crisis.
Observers warned that gutting the FDIC and OCC could catalyze another economic meltdown.
"The next recession starts here," tech journalist Jacob Silverman warned in response to the Journal's reporting.
Eric Rauchway, a historian of the New Deal, wrote that "even Milton Friedman appreciated the FDIC," underscoring the extreme nature of the incoming Trump administration's deregulatory ambitions.
Musk, the world's wealthiest man, is also pushing for the elimination of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The Journal noted Thursday that "Rep. Andy Barr, a Republican from Kentucky and Trump ally on the House Financial Services Committee, has backed the plan to eliminate or drastically alter the CFPB and said he wants to get rid of what he calls 'one-size-fits-all' regulation for banks."
Barr has received millions of dollars in campaign donations from the financial sector and "introduced many pieces of pro-industry legislation, including significant rollbacks of protections stemming from the 2008 financial crisis," according to the watchdog group Accountable.US.
Keep ReadingShow Less
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular