September, 22 2009, 02:28pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brad Luna | Phone: 202/216.1514,Trevor Thomas | Phone: 202/216.1547
Majority of Workers Still Hide Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity at Work
New “Degrees of Equality” report finds persistent negative climate for LGBT workers
WASHINGTON
A
majority - 51 percent - of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
workers continue to hide their identity from most or all co-workers,
according to a new report released today from the Human Rights Campaign
Foundation that examines the real-life experiences of LGBT workers.
The report, "Degrees of Equality: A National Study Examining Workplace
Climate for LGBT Employees," found that, despite significant advances
in employment policies at major U.S. corporations, a majority of LGBT
workers continue to experience a range of negative consequences because
of their sexual orientation and gender identity. Younger workers are
even more likely to hide their LGBT identity - only 5 percent of LGBT
employees ages 18 to 24 say they are totally open at work, compared to
more than 20 percent in older age cohorts. The report is available for
download at www.DegreesOfEquality.org.
majority - 51 percent - of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
workers continue to hide their identity from most or all co-workers,
according to a new report released today from the Human Rights Campaign
Foundation that examines the real-life experiences of LGBT workers.
The report, "Degrees of Equality: A National Study Examining Workplace
Climate for LGBT Employees," found that, despite significant advances
in employment policies at major U.S. corporations, a majority of LGBT
workers continue to experience a range of negative consequences because
of their sexual orientation and gender identity. Younger workers are
even more likely to hide their LGBT identity - only 5 percent of LGBT
employees ages 18 to 24 say they are totally open at work, compared to
more than 20 percent in older age cohorts. The report is available for
download at www.DegreesOfEquality.org.
"Overall
attitudes towards LGBT people have come a long way, but we can't forget
that people still struggle at work and that this has a profound impact
on LGBT workers' careers," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human
Rights Campaign Foundation. "Degrees of Equality helps us bridge the
gap between policy and practice to fully understand LGBT workers'
experiences. The more we understand the workplace, the more we can
help usher it to a place where all employees can thrive."
attitudes towards LGBT people have come a long way, but we can't forget
that people still struggle at work and that this has a profound impact
on LGBT workers' careers," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human
Rights Campaign Foundation. "Degrees of Equality helps us bridge the
gap between policy and practice to fully understand LGBT workers'
experiences. The more we understand the workplace, the more we can
help usher it to a place where all employees can thrive."
The
study examined why workers chose to disclose their LGBT identity or
not, how these issues arise in the workplace, the impact they have for
businesses and what can be done to improve productivity and retention.
In recent years, businesses have engaged in sustained efforts to
implement policies aimed at creating safe and productive workplaces for
talented LGBT employees. The number of companies that receive top
ratings on the Human Rights Campaign Foundation Corporate Equality
Index, for example, rose from just 13 in 2002 to 305 in the 2010 report
released last week.
study examined why workers chose to disclose their LGBT identity or
not, how these issues arise in the workplace, the impact they have for
businesses and what can be done to improve productivity and retention.
In recent years, businesses have engaged in sustained efforts to
implement policies aimed at creating safe and productive workplaces for
talented LGBT employees. The number of companies that receive top
ratings on the Human Rights Campaign Foundation Corporate Equality
Index, for example, rose from just 13 in 2002 to 305 in the 2010 report
released last week.
Nevertheless,
significant numbers of LGBT employees continue to experience a negative
workplace climate that affects productivity, retention and professional
relationships. At least once in the past year, 42 percent of LGBT
employees report lying about their personal lives, 27 percent have felt
distracted, 21 percent have job searched and 13 percent have stayed
home from work as a result of working in an environment that is not
always accepting of LGBT people.
significant numbers of LGBT employees continue to experience a negative
workplace climate that affects productivity, retention and professional
relationships. At least once in the past year, 42 percent of LGBT
employees report lying about their personal lives, 27 percent have felt
distracted, 21 percent have job searched and 13 percent have stayed
home from work as a result of working in an environment that is not
always accepting of LGBT people.
As
reasons for hiding their identities, 39 percent fear losing
connections, 28 percent fear not being considered for advancement, 17
percent fear getting fired and more than one in ten (13 percent) fear
for their personal safety. Transgender workers are much more likely
than other groups to report fearing for their personal safety - 40
percent compared to 20 percent of gay men. And 42 percent of
transgender workers feared getting fired if they revealed their LGBT
identity, compare to 22 percent of gay men.
reasons for hiding their identities, 39 percent fear losing
connections, 28 percent fear not being considered for advancement, 17
percent fear getting fired and more than one in ten (13 percent) fear
for their personal safety. Transgender workers are much more likely
than other groups to report fearing for their personal safety - 40
percent compared to 20 percent of gay men. And 42 percent of
transgender workers feared getting fired if they revealed their LGBT
identity, compare to 22 percent of gay men.
An
employee's sexual orientation or gender identity are often unavoidable
in casual, non-work related conversations. These conversations occur
frequently and are an essential component to building productive work
relationships. At least once per week, 89 percent of LGBT employees
say conversations about social lives, 80 percent confront conversations
involving spouses, relationships and dating at least once per week and
50 percent say the topic of sex arises at least once a week. These
conversations are the most likely to make LGBT employees feel
uncomfortable: fewer than half feel very comfortable talking about any
of these topics.
employee's sexual orientation or gender identity are often unavoidable
in casual, non-work related conversations. These conversations occur
frequently and are an essential component to building productive work
relationships. At least once per week, 89 percent of LGBT employees
say conversations about social lives, 80 percent confront conversations
involving spouses, relationships and dating at least once per week and
50 percent say the topic of sex arises at least once a week. These
conversations are the most likely to make LGBT employees feel
uncomfortable: fewer than half feel very comfortable talking about any
of these topics.
Derogatory
comments and jokes still happen at work and are a major indicator that
it is unsafe to be open about their sexual orientation and/or gender
identity at work. A total of 58 percent of LGBT workers say someone at
work makes a joke or derogatory comment about LGBT people at least once
in a while. Similarly, jokes and derogatory comments about other
minority groups are equally indicative of a negative climate. About
two-thirds (62 percent) of LGBT employees say negative comments about
minority groups are made at least once in a while at work.
comments and jokes still happen at work and are a major indicator that
it is unsafe to be open about their sexual orientation and/or gender
identity at work. A total of 58 percent of LGBT workers say someone at
work makes a joke or derogatory comment about LGBT people at least once
in a while. Similarly, jokes and derogatory comments about other
minority groups are equally indicative of a negative climate. About
two-thirds (62 percent) of LGBT employees say negative comments about
minority groups are made at least once in a while at work.
Even
with inclusive employment policies, significant numbers of employees
report negative consequences of an unwelcoming environment for LGBT
employees. Moreover, the vast majority of LGBT workers do not report
instances when they hear an anti-LGBT remark to HR or management. On
average, 67 percent ignore it or let it go, 9 percent raise the issue
with a supervisor and only 5 percent go to HR.
with inclusive employment policies, significant numbers of employees
report negative consequences of an unwelcoming environment for LGBT
employees. Moreover, the vast majority of LGBT workers do not report
instances when they hear an anti-LGBT remark to HR or management. On
average, 67 percent ignore it or let it go, 9 percent raise the issue
with a supervisor and only 5 percent go to HR.
"We've
found that inclusive non-discrimination policies and equal benefits are
the essential first step toward cultivating a productive and engaged
LGBT employee, but they are not the last step," said Daryl Herrschaft,
director of the Workplace Project. "By understanding how LGBT identity
surfaces and unfolds in the workplace, we will be better able to turn
policy into practice and address opportunities to improve productivity
and retention of LGBT employees."
found that inclusive non-discrimination policies and equal benefits are
the essential first step toward cultivating a productive and engaged
LGBT employee, but they are not the last step," said Daryl Herrschaft,
director of the Workplace Project. "By understanding how LGBT identity
surfaces and unfolds in the workplace, we will be better able to turn
policy into practice and address opportunities to improve productivity
and retention of LGBT employees."
The
study is the cornerstone of a new project that will provide employers
with a climate assessment tool and toolkits for improving their
workplaces. The HRC Foundation conducted 14 focus groups to examine
current LGBT workplace experiences and identify key elements of
workplace climate. Since there is no uniform LGBT experience, the
diversity of the working LGBT community was accounted for by conducting
focus groups around race, ethnicity and gender, among other
sub-groupings. In addition, the HRC Foundation commissioned the
largest national survey of LGBT workplace experiences to date,
administered to 761 LGBT workers from across the country. Finally,
in-depth interviews supplemented the research.
study is the cornerstone of a new project that will provide employers
with a climate assessment tool and toolkits for improving their
workplaces. The HRC Foundation conducted 14 focus groups to examine
current LGBT workplace experiences and identify key elements of
workplace climate. Since there is no uniform LGBT experience, the
diversity of the working LGBT community was accounted for by conducting
focus groups around race, ethnicity and gender, among other
sub-groupings. In addition, the HRC Foundation commissioned the
largest national survey of LGBT workplace experiences to date,
administered to 761 LGBT workers from across the country. Finally,
in-depth interviews supplemented the research.
The Human Rights Campaign represents a grassroots force of over 750,000 members and supporters nationwide. As the largest national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, HRC envisions an America where LGBT people are ensured of their basic equal rights, and can be open, honest and safe at home, at work and in the community.
LATEST NEWS
'Yes, You Are,' Tlaib Tells Lawmaker Who Said Republicans Aren't 'Little Bitches' Doing Trump's Bidding
"This budget betrayal is the largest cut to Medicaid and food assistance in history to give billionaires a tax break," said the Michigan Democrat.
Jul 02, 2025
Progressive Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib on Wednesday clapped back at one of her Republican colleagues who suggested that the GOP effort to pass the so-called Big Beautiful Bill this week isn't in response to a directive from U.S. President Donald Trump, who has set a July 4 deadline.
“The president of the United States didn't give us an assignment. We're not a bunch of little bitches around here, OK? I'm a member of Congress. I represent almost 800,000 Wisconsinites," Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) told journalists near the back entrance to the House of Representatives chamber, according toPunchbowl News' Kenzie Nguyen.
Responding to Van Orden's claims on the social media platform X, Tlaib (D-Mich.) simply said, "Yes, he did, and yes, you are."
The Michigan Democrat also released a video explaining to constituents why she is voting "hell no" on the package, which would cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and strip an estimated 17 million Americans of their health insurance over the next decade while giving trillions of dollars in tax breaks to the ultrarich and corporations.
Tlaib wasn't the only House Democrat to notice the Republican's remarks. A fellow Wisconsinite, Congressman Mark Pocan, asked his followers on X, "Do you think Derrick Van Orden is right... that Congress is not a bunch of 'little bitches'?"
According toPolitico's Samuel Benson and Mike DeBonis, Van Orden's comment came in the context of confirming he would vote for the budget reconciliation package, despite some critiques. The congressman reportedly said: "So this bill will pass. Am I happy about everything? No, but there's a difference between compromise and capitulation. We're not capitulating. We're compromising."
His remarks to reporters, and the backlash, came as the House considered a version of the megabill passed by the Senate on Tuesday, with help from Vice President JD Vance. GOP leaders in the lower chamber are struggling to get it past a procedural hurdle due to opposition from Republican fiscal hawks—plus all Democrats, who oppose steep cuts to the social safety net.
To protest the Republican effort to send the bill to Trump's desk by Independence Day, House Democrats on Wednesday formed a procedural conga line offering an amendment that would block cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.
Multiple Democrats also took to the House floor to rail against the package, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, who declared that "this bill is a deal with the devil. It explodes our national debt, it militarizes our entire economy, and it strips away healthcare and basic dignity of the American people. For what? To give Elon Musk a tax break and billionaires the greedy taking of our nation. We cannot stand for it, and we will not support it."
"You should be ashamed," Ocasio-Cortez told the chamber's Republicans.
As Common Dreamsreported earlier Wednesday, progressives outside of Congress are also working to block the bill. Advocacy organizations, including Indivisible, are urging Americans to call and email House Republicans and pressure them to oppose the package. The phone number for the House switchboard is 202-224-3121.
Keep ReadingShow Less
All Likud Ministers Urge Netanyahu to Annex Entire West Bank This Month
The 15 ministers said that Israel's "strategic partnership, backing, and support of the U.S. and President Donald Trump" make this a "propitious time" to formally steal most of Palestine.
Jul 02, 2025
All 15 Israeli government members representing Likud on Wednesday urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who leads the right-wing party—to annex the entire West Bank of Palestine before the end of the Knesset's summer session on July 27, citing support from U.S. President Donald Trump.
The ministers, along with Likud Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana, sent a letter to Netanyahu asserting that "this is the time to approve in government a decision to apply sovereignty" over Judea and Samaria, the biblical name for the West Bank, which includes East Jerusalem.
"Following the state of Israel's historic achievements in the face of Iran's Axis of Evil and its sympathizers, the task must be completed and the existential threat from within must be eliminated, to prevent another massacre in the heart of the country," the letter argues, referring to the recent 12-day war between Israel and Iran, in which the United States intervened by bombing Iranian nuclear sites.
"The strategic partnership, backing, and support of the U.S. and President Donald Trump have made it a propitious time to move forward with it now, and ensure Israel's security for generations," the ministers said. "The October 7 massacre proved that the doctrine of settlement blocs and the establishment of a Palestinian state in the remaining territory is an existential danger to Israel. It's time for sovereignty."
Asked during a Wednesday press briefing for reaction on the ministers' call to annex the West Bank, U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce replied, "I think that is specifically something that the White House would be able to answer for you, but I also know that our position regarding Israel... is that we stand with Israel and its decisions and how it views its own internal security."
Netanyahu is set to travel to Washington, D.C. next week to meet with Trump, despite an International Criminal Court warrant for the Israeli leader's arrest for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza including murder and forced starvation.
I asked State Dept spox Bruce about Israeli minister’s call to annex the occupied West Bank — she referred me to the WH, saying the US "stand with Israel and its decisions.”
I followed up asking if the two-state solution remains US policy, she said Trump is “realistic… Gaza is… pic.twitter.com/GdtN0tTDdy
— Rabia İclal Turan (@iclalturan) July 2, 2025
Palestinians and their defenders warned during the 2024 U.S. presidential election cycle that a victoriousTrump might lift the few guardrails the Biden administration had placed on Israel and unleash Netanyahu to seize all of Palestine. The goal of Israel's far right is expansion of Israeli territory to include what proponents call "Greater Israel," which is based on biblical boundaries that stretched from Africa to Turkey to Mesopotamia.
Netanyahu has repeatedly displayed maps showing the Middle East without Palestine, all of whose territory is shown as part of Israel. However, annexation had previously been most closely associated with far-right figures outside Likud like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich of the Religious Zionist Party and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir of Jewish Power.
Following Trump's reelection last November, Smotrich said that "the year 2025 will be, with God's help, the year of sovereignty in Judea and Samaria."
"The only way to remove the threat of a Palestinian state from the agenda is to apply Israeli sovereignty over the settlements in Judea and Samaria," he continued. "I have no doubt that President Trump, who showed courage and determination in his decisions during his first term, will support the state of Israel in this move."
Smotrich praised Wednesday's letter, declaring he'll be ready to impose Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank as soon as Netanyahu "gives the order," according toThe Times of Israel.
Israeli Justice Minister Yariv Levin, one of the Likud members who signed the letter, said Wednesday: "I think that this period, beyond the current issues, is a time of historic opportunity that we must not miss. The time for sovereignty has come, the time to apply sovereignty. My position on this matter is firm, it is clear."
Israel occupied the West Bank, along with the Gaza Strip, Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, and the Golan Heights in Syria during the Six-Day War in 1967. Israel eventually withdrew from the Sinai but unilaterally annexed East Jerusalem in 1980 while keeping control of the rest of the West Bank and Golan Heights. Although Israel dismantled settlements and withdrew troops from Gaza in 2005, it is still considered an occupier under international law and its conduct during the current invasion, bombardment, and siege of the coastal enclave is the subject of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case.
Since 1967, Israel has steadily seized more and more Palestinian land in the West Bank while building and expanding Jewish-only settlements there. Settlement population has increased exponentially from around 1,500 colonists in 1970 to roughly 140,000 at the time of the Oslo Accords in 1993—under which Israel agreed to halt new settlement activity—to around 770,000 today. Settlers often attack Palestinians and their property, including in deadly pogroms, in order to terrorize them into leaving so their land can be stolen. In recent weeks, Israeli settlers have attacked Israel Defense Forces soldiers they view as standing in their way and Palestinians alike in the West Bank.
From 1978 until new guidelines were announced by then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during the first Trump administration, the U.S. State Department also considered Israel's settlements to be "inconsistent with international law."
In July 2024, the ICJ found Israel's occupation of Palestine to be an illegal form of apartheid that must be ended as soon as possible. The tribunal also said that Israeli settler colonization of the West Bank amounts to annexation, also a crime under international law. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that an "occupying power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies."
As the world's attention is focused on Gaza, Israeli soldiers and settlers have killed upward of 950 Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem since October 2023, including at least 200 children, while wounding thousands more, according to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'We Will Organize Those People,' Anti-Poverty Crusader William Barber Says of Millions Set to Lose Medicaid
"They will not kill us and our communities without a fight."
Jul 02, 2025
Armed with 51 caskets and a new federal analysis, faith leaders and people who would be directly impacted by U.S. President Donald Trump's so-called Big Beautiful Bill got arrested protesting in Washington, D.C. this week and pledged to organize the millions of Americans set to lose their health insurance under the package.
Citing Capitol Police, The Hill reported Monday that "a total of 38 protestors were arrested, including 24 detained at the intersection of First and East Capitol streets northeast and another 14 arrested in the Capitol Rotunda. Those taken into custody were charged with crowding, obstructing, and incommoding."
The "Moral Monday" action was organized because of the "dangerous and deadly cuts" in the budget reconciliation package, which U.S. Senate Republicans—with help from Vice President JD Vance—sent to the House of Representatives Tuesday and which the lower chamber took up for consideration Wednesday.
According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the megabill would result in an estimated 17 million Americans becoming uninsured over the next decade: 11.8 million due to the Medicaid cuts, 4.2 million people due to expiring Affordable Care Act tax credits, and another 1 million due to other policies.
"This is policy violence. This is policy murder," Bishop William Barber said at Monday's action, which began outside the U.S. Supreme Court followed by a march to the Capitol. "That's why we brought these caskets today—because in the first year of this bill, as it is, the estimates are that 51,000 people will die."
"If you know that, and still pass it, that's not a mistake," added Barber, noting that Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.)—one of three Republican senators who ultimately opposed the bill—had said before the vote that his party was making a mistake on healthcare.
Moral Mondays originated in Tillis' state a dozen years ago, to protest North Carolina Republicans' state-level policymaking, led by Barber, who is not only a bishop but also president of the organization Repairers of the Breach and co-chair of the Poor People's Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival.
This past Monday, Barber vowed that if federal lawmakers kick millions of Americans off their healthcare with this megabill, "we will organize those people," according to Sarah Anderson of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS).
In partnership with IPS and the Economic Policy Institute, Repairers of the Breach on Monday published The High Moral Stakes of Budget Reconciliation fact sheet, which examines the version of the budget bill previously passed by the House. The document highlights cuts to health coverage, funding for rural hospitals, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
The fact sheet also points out that while slashing programs for the poor, the bill would give tax breaks to wealthy individuals and corporations, plus billions of dollars to the Pentagon and Trump's mass deportation effort.
"Instead of inflicting policy violence on the most vulnerable, Congress should harness America's abundant wealth to create a moral economy that works for all of us," the publication asserts. "By fairly taxing the wealthy and big corporations, reducing our bloated military budget, and demilitarizing immigration policy, we could free up more than enough public funds to ensure we can all survive and thrive."
"As our country approaches its 250th anniversary," it concludes, "we have no excuse for not investing our national resources in ways that reflect our Constitutional values: to establish justice, domestic tranquility, real security, and the general welfare for all."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular