For Immediate Release
Kirsten Stade (202) 265-7337
Obama Goes to UN With Empty Climate Bag
New Video Frames Fundamental Weaknesses of Cap & Trade Approach
WASHINGTON - On the eve of President Obama's address to the United Nations
climate summit, a new video by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
experts challenges the efficacy of the President's plan for controlling
greenhouse gas emissions. The video adds to growing scientific and
economic skepticism about relying upon cap & trade schemes for
addressing climate change, according to Public Employees for
Environmental Responsibility (PEER).
The video, entitled "The Huge Mistake," by Laurie Williams and
Allan Zabel, two EPA enforcement attorneys (speaking as private
citizens), explains why the cap & trade plan endorsed by President
Obama will not accomplish its goals, let alone effectively curb climate
change, for reasons that include -
- Cap & trade for climate change in Europe produced few
greenhouse gas reductions. Instead it raised energy prices for
consumers and made billions in windfall profits for utilities;
keep cap & trade cheap, Congress's climate plan would allow the
first approximately 17 years of proposed greenhouse gas reductions (2
billion tons per year) to be satisfied with a combination of domestic
and international carbon offsets. This offset program will create
perverse economic incentives that make it even harder to control
greenhouse gas emissions. Significantly, the Acid Rain Program, the
model on which this plan is supposed to be based, allowed no offsets;
- It is virtually impossible to certify or verify that
the offsets will result in real additional reductions. The video notes,
among other problems, that "since the most flawed offsets are generally
cheapest, they will be most in demand."
"Carbon offsets may make sub-prime mortgages look like prudent
investments," stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, noting that
previous EPA attempts at open-ended emission trading collapsed due to
the inability to verify the validity of credits given out under the
programs. "It is like trading an apple for the unenforceable promise of
a planting an apple tree someday."
Williams and Zabel argue that the "biggest obstacle to successfully
addressing climate change is that uncontrolled fossil-fuel energy is a
lot cheaper than clean energy." They urge steps to ensure "that clean
energy becomes cost-competitive with uncontrolled fossil fuels within a
known time-frame" while making sure that "the energy people need
remains affordable." The two urge a system of carbon fees that has also
been endorsed by the eminent NASA climate scientist James Hansen.
"As worldwide political pressure mounts on the U.S., which emits
one-quarter of the planet's greenhouses gases, to act, the danger is
that the politically palatable displaces what is environmentally
effective," Ruch added. "Hopefully, this video will be widely seen and
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) is a national alliance of local state and federal resource professionals. PEER's environmental work is solely directed by the needs of its members. As a consequence, we have the distinct honor of serving resource professionals who daily cast profiles in courage in cubicles across the country.