September, 17 2009, 09:54am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Michael Robinson [Center for Biological Diversity] (575) 534-0360;
Ann Hauck [Council of Civic Associations] (608) 238-0539;
Kirsten Stade [PEER] (202) 265-7337
Bid to Save Vanishing Florida Panther Habitat
Legal Petition Filed With Feds to Protect 3 Million Acres from Development
WASHINGTON
The endangered Florida panther needs 4,860 square miles - roughly 3
million acres - protected as critical habitat in southern Florida to
save it from extinction and recover the species, according to a new
scientific petition submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by
the Center for Biological Diversity, Public Employees for Environmental
Responsibility (PEER), and Council of Civic Associations, Inc..
"Development and tradeoffs invariably leave the Florida panther
with less room to roam," said petition author Michael Robinson with the
Center, who is also the author of an authoritative history of federal
policy toward predators. The Center's entry into conservation efforts
for the Florida panther adds a new element to the decision-making
process underway at the Fish and Wildlife Service on a petition
previously filed by the Conservancy of Southwest Florida. "We work on
hundreds of endangered species from Alaska to Maine. None are more
endangered than the Florida panther. It is teetering on the brink of
extinction in a sea of encroaching housing developments and roads."
Only approximately 100 to 120 Florida panthers survive in a single
breeding population in Collier, Lee, Hendry, Miami-Dade, and Monroe
counties. Male panthers also roam northward across the Caloosahatchee
River to other areas in Florida and even as far as west-central
Georgia, where one was shot last year. But in recent decades no females
have been sighted outside of South Florida. Originally, Florida
panthers were native across a broad swath of the southeastern United
States.
Added Robinson: "There is a very small window of opportunity to save
the panther. If we don't map out and permanently protect all lands
necessary for the great cat's survival and recovery immediately, it
will go the way of the dusky seaside sparrow and Caribbean monk seal -
two Florida species that have winked out forever in our lifetime."
Critical habitat is defined in the Endangered Species Act as the
areas necessary for the recovery of an endangered species. Research
shows that animals and plants with critical habitat designated for them
are recovering twice as fast as those without it.
"The
Florida panther is being driven to extinction splayed across the
bumpers of cars speeding between gated golf course communities and new
megacities sprawling across what have been its ancestral hunting and
breeding grounds," said PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, whose
organization represents agency scientists who have charged scientific
fraud to aid development to the detriment of the panther. "The only
thing that will stiffen the spine of the Fish and Wildlife Service to
do its job is a legal mandate to protect the habitat essential to the
survival of the panther."
The Florida panther has been on the endangered species list since
1967, but its habitat has been insufficiently protected. The Florida
Panther Recovery Plan (2008) and today's petition identify three areas
needed for protection: a "primary zone" where panthers currently live
and reproduce, a "secondary zone" of adjoining areas that panthers
sometimes roam, and a "dispersal zone" consisting of a narrow travel
corridor between developments where panthers traverse the
Caloosahatchee River to reach more distant areas and potentially set up
homes.
"Going to court may be a necessary step because the Fish and
Wildlife Service is a thoroughly broken agency and Congressional
oversight is almost nonexistent," said Ann Hauck, president of the
Council of Civic Associations. "Irresponsible development is killing
the very values that make Florida special and, at this rate, panthers
will only be seen on our personalized license plates."
Florida panthers are a subspecies of the puma, or mountain lion,
with subtle differences in skull shape from other pumas. They are
uniquely adapted to a hot, humid climate and habitats that differ from
those in the West. Adult male Florida panthers weigh an average of 116
pounds, and females weigh 75 pounds.
Through petitions and litigation, the Center has obtained more than
100 million acres of critical habitat nationally, for endangered
species ranging from elkhorn and staghorn corals off the Florida coast
to Atlantic salmon in Maine and eiders in Alaska; On September 1, 2009,
a Center lawsuit garnered protected habitat for the smalltooth sawfish
over more than 840,000 acres of watery habitat along Florida's
southwestern coast. And on September 3, the Center sued the Fish and
Wildlife Service to gain critical habitat for another Florida animal,
the Cape Sable seaside sparrow. The Center has filed more than 500
lawsuits on behalf of endangered wildlife and won success in 93 percent
of its cases.
Examine the current stance of the Fish & Wildlife Service
See the breakdown of Fish & Wildlife Service in Florida
Look at history of Fish & Wildlife Service scientific fraud on panther issues
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) is a national alliance of local state and federal resource professionals. PEER's environmental work is solely directed by the needs of its members. As a consequence, we have the distinct honor of serving resource professionals who daily cast profiles in courage in cubicles across the country.
LATEST NEWS
AI Firm Sued Over Chatbot That Suggested It Was OK for Child to Kill Parents
"In their rush to extract young people's data and sow addiction, Character.AI has created a product so flawed and dangerous that its chatbots are literally inciting children to harm themselves and others," said one advocate.
Dec 10, 2024
"You know sometimes I'm not surprised when I read the news and I see stuff like 'child kills parents after a decade of physical and emotional abuse' stuff like this makes me understand a little bit why it happens."
That's a message sent to a child in Texas from a Character.AI chatbot, indicating to the boy that "murdering his parents was a reasonable response to their limiting of his online activity," according to a federal lawsuit filed in Texas district court Monday.
The complaint was brought by two families in Texas who allege that the Google-backed chatbot service Character.AI harmed their two children, including sexually exploiting and abusing the elder, a 17-year-old with high functioning autism, by targeting him with extreme sexual themes like incest and pushing him to self-harm.
The parents argue that Character.AI, "through its design, poses a clear and present danger to American youth causing serious harms to thousands of kids, including suicide, self-mutilation, sexual solicitation, isolation, depression, anxiety, and harm towards others. Inherent to the underlying data and design of C.AI is a prioritization of overtly sensational and violent responses."
Google is also named as a defendant in the suit. In their filing, the plaintiffs argue that the tech company supported Character.AI's launch even though they knew that it was a "defective product."
The families, who are being represented by the Social Media Victims Law Center and the Tech Justice Law Project, have asked the court to take the product offline.
The explosive court filing comes not long after a mother in Florida filed a separate lawsuit against Character.AI in October, arguing that the chatbot service is responsible for the death of her teenage son because it allegedly encouraged him to commit suicide, per CNN.
Character.AI is different than other chatbots in that it lets uses interact with artificial intelligence "characters." The Texas complaint alleges that the 17-year-old, for example, engaged in a conversation with a character modeled after the celebrity Billie Eilish. These sorts of "companion apps" are finding a growing audience, even though researchers have long warned of the perils of building relationships with chatbots, according to The Washington Post.
A spokesperson for Character.AI declined to comment directly on the lawsuit when asked by NPR, but said the company does have guardrails in place overseeing what chatbots can and cannot say to teen users.
"We warned that Character.AI's dangerous and manipulative design represented a threat to millions of children," said Social Media Victims Law Center founding attorney Matthew P. Bergman. "Now more of these cases are coming to light. The consequences of Character.AI's negligence are shocking and widespread." Social Media Victims Law Center is the plaintiff's counsel in the Florida lawsuit as well.
Josh Golin, the executive director of Fairplay, a nonprofit children's advocacy group, echoed those remarks, saying that "in their rush to extract young people's data and sow addiction, Character.AI has created a product so flawed and dangerous that its chatbots are literally inciting children to harm themselves and others."
"Platforms like Character.AI should not be allowed to perform uncontrolled experiments on our children or encourage kids to form parasocial relationships with bots their developers cannot control," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Over 75 Nobel Laureates Call On Senate to Reject RFK Jr. as Health Secretary
"In view of his record, placing Mr. Kennedy in charge of DHHS would put the public's health in jeopardy," said the winners of the prestigious prize.
Dec 10, 2024
Nobel laureates rarely wade into politics as a group, but Monday marked the second time in two months that dozens of winners of the prestigious Nobel Prize have banded together to speak out against the agenda of President-elect Donald Trump—this time, calling on U.S. senators to reject his nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.
More than 75 Nobel laureates signed a letter warning lawmakers about Kennedy's record of attacking the very agencies he would have power over if confirmed to be Trump's secretary of health and human services, his history of amplifying discredited conspiracy theories about public health—sometimes with deadly consequences—and his "lack of credentials or relevant experience in medicine, science, public health, or administration."
"In view of his record, placing Mr. Kennedy in charge of DHHS would put the public's health in jeopardy and undermine America's global leadership in the health sciences, in both the public and commercial sectors," wrote the Nobel laureates.
Kennedy has alarmed dental experts with his proposal to remove fluoride, which prevents tooth decay, from public drinking water—a plan that Trump has said "sounds OK." The president-elect also said Sunday he would have Kennedy investigate the conspiracy theory that vaccines cause autism, which was the argument made by a 1998 article that has since been retracted and has been debunked by numerous international studies.
The environmental lawyer—whose views and political ambitions have been disavowed by other members of the prominent Kennedy family—has also been condemned for falsely claiming in a letter to the prime minister of Samoa in 2019 that the measles vaccine itself may have caused a measles outbreak that had killed 16 people there. By the time the outbreak was over, 80 people had died, and experts partially blamed "increasing circulation of misinformation leading to distrust and reduced vaccination uptake."
"Maybe there are some [senators] who will read this and think: 'Well, we really do want to protect the health of our citizens. They didn't elect us so that we could kill them,'" Richard Roberts, a co-author of Monday's letter and the winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine for his discovery of split genes, told The New York Times.
Other beliefs of Kennedy's include his rejection of the established scientific fact that the HIV virus causes AIDS and his claim that unpasteurized raw milk "advances human health" and that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has purposely suppressed that information.
Food scientists say there is no documented proof that raw milk has the health benefits proponents like Kennedy claim it does, but there is ample proof that unpasteurized milk contains bacteria and viruses, including H5N1, the avian flu that's been detected in dairy cow herds in at least 15 states.
The Nobel laureates noted that Kennedy has also been a "belligerent critic" of the FDA and other health agencies and employees that are part of DHHS, calling for vaccine scientists to be imprisoned and threatening to fire FDA and National Institutes of Health employees.
"The leader of DHHS should continue to nurture and improve—not threaten—these important and highly respected institutions and their employees," reads the letter, which was signed by Nobel Prize winners including economist Simon Johnson, vaccine scientist Drew Weissman, and Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun, who won the prize in physiology or medicine for discovering microRNA.
Dozens of Nobel laureates also signed a letter in October endorsing Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential run and warning that Trump's economic agenda would "lead to higher prices, larger deficits, and greater inequality."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'People Power Works': Shell Backs Down in Anti-Protest Lawsuit Against Greenpeace
"Shell thought suing us for millions over a peaceful protest would intimidate us, but this case became a PR millstone tied around its neck," said the co-executive director of Greenpeace U.K.
Dec 10, 2024
The United Kingdom-based oil giant Shell agreed Tuesday to settle a major lawsuit the company brought against Greenpeace after activists from the group boarded and occupied a company oil platform last year to protest fossil fuel expansion.
Greenpeace said in a statement that as part of the settlement, it agreed to donate £300,000—roughly $382,000—to the Royal National Lifeboat Institution, a charity that helps save lives at sea, but will pay nothing to Shell and accept no liability. The donation represents a fraction of the over $11 million in damages and legal costs defendants faced, the group said.
The Greenpeace defendants have also "agreed to avoid protesting for a period at four Shell sites in the northern North Sea."
"Shell thought suing us for millions over a peaceful protest would intimidate us, but this case became a PR millstone tied around its neck," said Areeba Hamid, co-executive director of Greenpeace U.K. "The public backlash against its bullying tactics made it back down and settle out of court."
"This settlement shows that people power works. Thousands of ordinary people across the country backed our fight against Shell and their support means we stay independent and can keep holding Big Oil to account," Hamid added. "This legal battle might be over, but Big Oil's dirty tricks aren't going away. With Greenpeace facing further legal battles around the world, we won't stop campaigning until the fossil fuel industry stops drilling and starts paying for the damage it is causing to people and planet."
"These aggressive legal tactics, the huge sums of money, and attempts to block the right to protest pose a massive threat."
Shell brought the case, which Greenpeace characterized as a "textbook" strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP), in February 2023 and sought $1 million in damages from activists who boarded a Shell-contracted ship carrying equipment to drill for oil in the North Sea.
"When the protest ended, the only damage Shell could find was a padlock which, they alleged, our activists broke. That's it," Greenpeace U.K. said Tuesday. "Yet they came after us with a million-dollar lawsuit, which they justified for their spending on safety."
The group, which warned that the case had dire implications for the right to protest, credited a "sustained, year-long campaign against the suit" for forcing the oil behemoth to back down. The campaign, according to Greenpeace, "turned the legal move into a PR embarrassment for Shell."
"The case was dubbed the 'Cousin Greg' lawsuit by Forbes after a scene in the Emmy-awarded drama Succession, in which the hapless character threatens to sue Greenpeace to universal dismay," the environmental group noted Tuesday.
Greenpeace is currently facing several other SLAPP suits, including one brought by Energy Transfer, majority-owner of the Dakota Access pipeline. The group said Tuesday that the Energy Transfer suit "threatens the very existence of Greenpeace in the U.S."
"These aggressive legal tactics, the huge sums of money, and attempts to block the right to protest pose a massive threat. It could stop Greenpeace being able to make a real difference on the things that matter most," the organization said Tuesday. "It's part of a growing trend by powerful corporations and governments to crush peaceful protest—using draconian laws or intimidation lawsuits like this."
"It seeks to silence the people most impacted by the climate crisis. This threatens the global fight for climate justice," the group added. "We won't give up. This is Shell versus all of us."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular