September, 16 2009, 11:04am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Natalie Curtis (In the UK until 18th September and then in New York until September 24th):
Phone: +44 (0) 18 65 472498 or + 44 (0) 7824 503108
ncurtis@oxfam.org.uk
Rich Countries Must Not Raid Aid to Pay Climate Debt
LONDON
A new Oxfam report has
today warned that at least 4.5 million children could die unless world
leaders deliver additional funds to help poor countries fight the
growing impact of climate change, rather than diverting it from
existing aid promises.
The warning comes as world leaders prepare to join President Obama
at his first United Nations address on climate change, at next week's
Climate Summit in New York on 22nd September. The meeting will be
followed by the G20 Summit on the 24th September, where climate finance
will be high on the agenda. With only Denmark, the Netherlands and the
UK in support of additional funds, Oxfam is concerned that December's
climate negotiations in Copenhagen could fail, unless action is taken
now by Heads of State.
The report, 'Beyond Aid,'
also warns that at least 75 million fewer children are likely to attend
school and 8.6 million fewer people could have access to HIV/AIDS
treatment if aid is diverted to help poor countries tackle climate
change. Without at least $50 billion a year in addition to the 0.7 per
cent of national income rich countries have already pledged as aid,
recent progress toward the Millennium Development Goals could stall and
then go into reverse.
There have been great strides toward the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) since their inception in 2000. In just seven years,
- 90 per cent of children in poor countries have been enrolled in school.
- Between 1999 and 2005 there was a 24 per cent drop in the number of people living in extreme poverty,
- and between 1990 and 2007 the number of deaths in children under five plummeted by 3.6 million, despite population growth.
But despite these gains, poor countries are struggling to meet the
MDGs and many goals still fall short of the mark. Diverting aid for
climate adaptation would strain an already overstretched system. For
example, whilst Zambia now has free healthcare for all people living in
rural areas and around 149,000 people are receiving lifesaving
treatment for HIV/AIDS, one in six children still die before they reach
the age of five and the number of mothers losing their life in
pregnancy and childbirth is increasing. Ghana has abolished all primary
school fees, resulting in 1.2 million more children being able to
attend school. Yet almost half of Ghana's population lives on less than
US$1 a day and four out of ten men and women in Ghana cannot read or
write.
"Funds must be increased - not diverted - to help poor countries
adapt to climate change and this cannot be seen as a two for one deal
by politicians. Rich countries must not steal money from poor
hospitals and schools in order to pay their climate debt to the
developing world," said Jeremy Hobbs, Executive Director of Oxfam
International.
"World leaders must show they are not content to stand by and watch
recent successes in combating poverty, such as children attending
school, mothers surviving child birth and the sick receiving life
saving drugs, reversed," he added.
Oxfam points to the Global Fund, set up in 2002 to fight AIDS,
tuberculosis and malaria, as an example of how political will on a
global scale can mobilize money quickly and effectively. To date, the
Global Fund has approved funding for $15.6 billion in more than 140
countries.
Like the Global Fund, a fund for climate adaptation
must be made available quickly, equitably governed, managed under
streamlined arrangements and transparent. Currently there is no single
route for delivering money for adaptation. A 'spaghetti bowl' of aid
channels means it is impossible to determine which governments have and
have not delivered their promises. To date, less that half the money
pledged for adaptation funding has been delivered.
Climate shocks and the short-term measures that poor people take in
order to cope can have long-term impacts, potentially spanning
generations. Without adequate support to adapt to the changing climate,
the effect is a downward spiral into deeper poverty and increased
vulnerability. In the absence of additional adaptation funding, Oxfam
is seeing people in poor countries going without food, pulling their
children out of school or selling off cattle and other assets critical
to their livelihoods, so that they can pay for debt caused by
continuing failed crops and other climate shocks.
Efforts to help communities adapt to climate change have proved
successful in Oxfam projects around the world. In Char Atra in
Bangladesh, where increased flooding has caused people to lose both
homes and lives, 70 per cent of people now have access to clean water
during flooding, death due to diarrhea has been virtually abolished and
over 100 homes have been raised above flood level. Likewise investment
in small-scale farmers, such as training in new cropping techniques,
the introduction of drought-resistant seeds and effective irrigation
systems has helped ensure that food is available even in times of
drought and failing rains. With 20 million people under threat of
rising sea levels, 26 million people displaced as a direct result of
climate change and many facing hunger and loss of life due to climate
shocks, the twin challenge of addressing poverty and alleviating
climate change has never been more pressing for aid agencies.
Download the report: Beyond Aid: Ensuring adaptation to climate change works for the poor
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
LATEST NEWS
Why Can't We Fund Universal Public Goods? Blame the Tax-Dodging Billionaire Nepo Babies
"In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta," reads a new report.
Dec 13, 2024
The children of the richest families in the U.S. are well-known for spending their vast wealth on frivolous luxuries—constructing a replica of a medieval church on their acres of property, in the case of banking heir Timothy Mellon, or starting a brand of T-shirts described by one critic as "terrible beyond your wildest imagination," as Wyatt Koch, nephew of Republican megadonors Charles and David, did.
But a report released by Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) on Thursday shows how "billionaire nepo babies" don't just waste their families' fortunes. They also benefit from "a rigged system" that allows them to "pass that wealth down over generations without being properly taxed–often without being taxed at all."
In addition, the heirs of the country's biggest fortunes spend vast sums "to elect politicians who protect their unearned wealth and manipulate the country's economy in their favor," said ATF.
Along with Mellon and Koch, the report profiles Samuel Logan of the Scripps media dynasty; Nicola Peltz-Beckham, daughter of billionaire investor Nelson Peltz; Gabrielle Rubenstein, whose family has made its fortune in private equity; and President-elect Donald Trump's son, Eric Trump.
The nepo babies are part of a small group of billionaire families in the U.S. who benefit from tax loopholes that ensure little of their immense wealth ever goes to benefit the public good.
At least 90 billionaires have passed away over the last decade, leaving their beneficiaries $455 billion in collective wealth.
But according to ATF, "$255 billion (56%) of that amount was likely entirely exempt from the capital gains tax because of a special break called 'stepped up basis.'"
"Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations."
Without loopholes included the stepped up basis tax cut, the current estate tax on billionaires and centimillionaires would yield enough revenue to fund universal childcare, preschool, and paid family leave for U.S. workers, with hundreds of billions of dollars left over, according to ATF's report.
The wealthy heirs profiled in the report and their families are some of the Republican Party's top donors—contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to candidates including Trump in the hopes of securing even more tax cuts.
Mellon, for example, is Trump's "biggest supporter, giving $140 million to a pro-Trump PAC in 2024 alone," reads the report.
A previous analysis by ATF found that as of late October, just 150 billionaire families had spent $1.9 billion on the 2024 elections.
As the Center for American Progress found earlier this year, Trump's plan to extend the tax cuts that he pushed through in 2017 would cost $4 trillion over the next decade.
"The vast wealth inherited by centuries-old billionaire families is staggering. While these heirs and their billions go undertaxed, enormous sums are squandered on lavish mansions, private jets, and vanity projects instead of funding crucial public investments," said ATF executive director David Kass. "In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta. Now, Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations—all while advocating for cuts to vital programs that working and middle-class Americans depend on."
The report calls for Congress to pass "proven, pragmatic proposals to unrig the tax system that enjoy high levels of popular support," such as the Ultra Millionaire Tax Act that was proposed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) this year. The bill would tax fortunes between $50 million and $1 billion at 2% and wealth above $1 billion at $1 billion.
The small tax on enormous wealth would generate "a whopping $3 trillion over 10 years," said ATF.
The estate tax could also be "restored so that it can play a meaningful role in promoting fairness and equal opportunities" through the passage of the For the 99.5% Act, which was introduced in 2023 by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.).
Under the bill, the estate tax exemption would be lowered to $7 million per couple and the current 40% flat rate would be replaced with a sliding scale that would charge higher rates as a family's wealth grows.
"None of these tax reforms would impoverish the ultra wealthy, nor even inconvenience them in any meaningful way–but they would reduce the concentration of wealth that is so corrosive to society," reads the report. "At the same time, they would raise trillions of dollars that could be used to reduce inequality and improve the lives of families that can only dream of the kind of security and opportunity enjoyed by the nation’s richest clans."
"And if rich families ever did need to tighten their belts a bit to pay their taxes," the report continues, "the economizing might begin by reducing the flow of money funding the extravagant lifestyles of America's Billionaire Nepo Babies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Next Recession Starts Here': Trump Team Weighs Abolishing Bank Regulators
The president-elect's advisers are reportedly discussing plans to shrink or eliminate key bank watchdogs, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dec 13, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump and his advisers are reportedly considering plans to weaken—or abolish altogether—top bank regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The Wall Street Journalreported Thursday that members of Trump's transition team and the new Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency have asked nominees under consideration to head the FDIC and OCC if the bank watchdogs could be eliminated and have their functions absorbed by the Treasury Department, which is set to be run by a billionaire hedge fund manager and crypto enthusiast.
"Bank executives are optimistic President-elect Donald Trump will ease a host of regulations on capital cushions and consumer protections, as well as scrutiny of consolidation in the industry," the Journal reported. "But FDIC deposit insurance is considered near sacred. Any move that threatened to undermine even the perception of deposit insurance could quickly ripple through banks and in a crisis might compound customer fears."
The Trump team's internal and fluid discussions about the fate of the key bank regulators broadly aligns with Project 2025's proposal to "merge the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve's non-monetary supervisory and regulatory functions."
The FDIC, which is primarily funded by bank insurance premiums, was established during the Great Depression to restore public trust in the nation's banking system, and the agency played a central role in navigating the 2023 bank failures that threatened a systemic crisis.
Observers warned that gutting the FDIC and OCC could catalyze another economic meltdown.
"The next recession starts here," tech journalist Jacob Silverman warned in response to the Journal's reporting.
Eric Rauchway, a historian of the New Deal, wrote that "even Milton Friedman appreciated the FDIC," underscoring the extreme nature of the incoming Trump administration's deregulatory ambitions.
Musk, the world's wealthiest man, is also pushing for the elimination of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The Journal noted Thursday that "Rep. Andy Barr, a Republican from Kentucky and Trump ally on the House Financial Services Committee, has backed the plan to eliminate or drastically alter the CFPB and said he wants to get rid of what he calls 'one-size-fits-all' regulation for banks."
Barr has received millions of dollars in campaign donations from the financial sector and "introduced many pieces of pro-industry legislation, including significant rollbacks of protections stemming from the 2008 financial crisis," according to the watchdog group Accountable.US.
Keep ReadingShow Less
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular