SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Wende Gozan at 212-633-4247,
wgozan@aiusa.org,
or Betsy Hawkings at 202-544-0200 x347, bhawkings@aiusa.org.
On Monday, July 13, a group of noted Native American and Alaska Native
women advocates will meet with federal lawmakers in Washington, DC, to
advocate for stronger policies and increased funding to combat sexual violence
against Native women and ensure victims' access to care and justice.
On Monday, July 13, a group of noted Native American and Alaska Native
women advocates will meet with federal lawmakers in Washington, DC, to
advocate for stronger policies and increased funding to combat sexual violence
against Native women and ensure victims' access to care and justice.
The meetings come as President Obama announced
a series of initiatives, designed in consultation with tribal leaders,
to address the underlying causes of rising crime and a breakdown of justice
in Indian Country - particularly rape, child sexual assault, domestic
assault and beatings - that in part stem from neglect by federal prosecutors
and investigators.
The advocates are all members of Amnesty
International USA's (AIUSA's) Native American and Alaska Native Advisory
Council, many of whom were consultants or contributors to the organization's
groundbreaking report, Maze of Injustice: the Failure to Protect
Indigenous Women from Sexual Assault in the U.S.A. They include
Charon Asetoyer, chair of the Advisory Council and executive director of
the Native American Women's Health Education Resource Center; Sarah Deer,
William Mitchell College of Law and the eighth American Indian woman law
professor in the United States; Juskwa Burnett, an advocate currently working
in Oklahoma; Denise Morris, president and CEO of the Alaska Native Justice
Center; and Victoria Ybanez, executive director for Red Wind Consulting,
Inc.
"Native women will continue to walk the
halls of Congress and meet with high-ranking government officials as long
as our human rights are being violated," said Asetoyer. "When rape
is allowed to occur within our communities with the knowledge of public
officials who are not doing everything in their power to stop this atrocity,
it is time to take action."
While in Washington, the Advisory Council
members will meet with members of Congress and administration officials
to advocate for measures that would help protect Native American and Alaska
Native women from sexual violence, remove obstacles to justice in these
cases, and seek needed funding to help implement such measures. The
meetings are one in a series of initiatives following the launch of Maze
of Injustice, which described how Native women suffer alarmingly high
levels of rape, often at the hands of non-Native perpetrators.
One focus of the trip will be strengthening
an FY '10 Senate appropriations bill that earmarks funds to combat sexual
violence. The House version of the bill, which was recently passed
out of subcommittee, called for an unprecedented $64.4 billion
to bolster law enforcement and combat violence against women in Indian
Country. The group will also advocate passage of The Tribal Law and
Order Act, which clarifies jurisdiction between federal, state, tribal
and local governments, increases coordination between their law enforcement
agencies for responding to violent crime against Native Americans, requires
U.S.
Attorneys to collect criminal data, documents the reasons for declining
to prosecute, and shares criminal history information with state and tribal
officials.
"Native women are still suffering sexual
assault at rates far disproportionate to women in the United States generally,"
said Larry Cox, executive director of AIUSA, who is joining Council members
to meet lawmakers. "Until Native women receive equal justice under
the law, the U.S. government must show its will to effect real change,
not just by appropriating funds but by changing policies and laws. The
crimes perpetrated against Native women are more than statistical horrors;
they are historical horrors that have been allowed to occur because of
years of our country's subjugation of Native peoples. Congress has
made great strides in the last two years, but significantly more work is
needed until Native women truly have the law on their side."
In the two years since the report's launch,
Congress has made some significant strides toward improving infrastructure
in Indian Country and helping combat sexual violence against Native women,
including holding a number of hearings in Washington and in the field that
have involved input from Native women advocates. The FY 2009 Omnibus
Appropriations Act included an increase of $235 million for the Indian
Health Service (IHS) and $85 million for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA),
with $25 million for tribal law enforcement in Indian country to be targeted
to addressing violence against women. The Tribal Law and Order
Act was reintroduced this year. And President Obama's stimulus package
allocated $990 million to improve infrastructure and healthcare in Indian
Country. Still, these improvements, while unprecedented, have not
yet led to actual change for Native women on the ground.
Amnesty International is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning
grassroots activist organization with more than 2.2 million supporters,
activists and volunteers in more than 150 countries campaigning for human
rights worldwide. The organization investigates and exposes abuses, educates
and mobilizes the public, and works to protect people wherever justice,
freedom, truth and dignity are denied.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400The State Department said the women were related to the assassinated Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani, but Iranian media said they had no connection to him.
With a majority of Americans including President Donald Trump's own base demanding a swift end to the war in Iran—and Iran's military capabilities proving difficult to overpower—observers suggested on Saturday that the White House was looking elsewhere to score "victories," as Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that federal agents had arrested relatives of the late Major General Qasem Soleimani, the Iranian military commander who the US assassinated in 2020 during President Donald Trump's first term.
Rubio accused Soleimani's niece, Hamideh Soleimani Afshar, of promoting "regime propaganda" and voicing support for the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and said she had been living a "lavish lifestyle" in the US. Afshar's husband has been barred from entering the US and the lawful permanent resident status she and her daughter had has been terminated, said the State Department.
"Are we losing so badly we need to arrest the distant relatives of long-since-dead Iranian commanders?" asked Ryan Grim of Drop Site News.
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council noted that the administration had used the same legal authority to arrest Soleimani's reported family members as it did to detain former Columbia University student organizer Mahmoud Khalil and Tufts University scholar Rümeysa Öztürk for speaking out against US support for Israel—a tactic which is being challenged in court as unconstitutional.
Far-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer, who has wielded influence in the White House during the second Trump administration, claimed credit for the arrest of the two women, saying that in communications with the State Department, she had "exposed the fact that Qasem Soleimani’s Niece Hamideh Soleimani Afshar has been living in the United States (Los Angeles, California) where she posts pro-Iranian regime and pro-IRGC content on her social media while she lives a life of luxury."
"She has been arrested and will be deported back to Iran!" she added. "Over the last few months, I have quietly been documenting all of Hamideh Soleimani Afshar’s social media activity. I uploaded it all to a secure file and shared it with [the Department of Homeland Security] and Department of State, and now she has been arrested and she will be deported from our country."
In Iran on Saturday, media outlets were reporting that the two women arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement were not related to Soleimani—who had no nieces, according to journalist Kourosh Ziabari.
Soleimani's daughter told the news outlet Jamaran that "none" of her extended family has ever lived in the US.
Regardless of the women's relation to Soleimani or lack thereof, journalist Ryan Grim said the arbitrary arrest "actively puts innocent Americans around the world at risk."
Rubio's explanation for the detention and his move to revoke the women's green cards is the latest evidence that "the US is now deporting people for thought crimes," said historian Zachary Foster.
Journalist Sana Saeed said the case shows that constitutional protections for due process and free speech, which are supposed to apply to green card holders, "no longer mean anything."
"People cannot lose their green card status simply because of familial relationships, so the justification shifts here to their alleged support for the Iranian government," said Saeed. "But supporting a foreign government is not a criminal offense. And if you begin to treat it as one—as the US government effectively is in this case—then expect a lot more of this."
"It will not stop here, and it will not remain limited to Iranians," she said. "The logic does not contain itself, it expands."
The president demanded once again that Iran open the Strait of Hormuz and said that "all Hell will reign down" on the country if officials don't "make a deal."
As the US military's frantic search continued Saturday for an airman who was aboard an F-15E fighter jet when it was downed by Iranian forces a day earlier, and analysts and Iranian media alike suggested the Trump administration has lost control of its war against Iran, President Donald Trump issued his latest threat against the country—once again appearing to threaten tens of millions of Iranians with war crimes.
Renewing his demand that Iran "MAKE A DEAL or OPEN UP THE HORMUZ STRAIT," the president said he was giving the Iranian government "48 hours before all Hell will reign down on them," appearing to confuse the word "reign" with "rain."
"Time is running out," said Trump in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social.
In his post, Trump did not directly address the ongoing search for the airman, who was one of two who ejected from the fighter jet when Iran reportedly used new air defense systems to shoot down the plane. One crew member was found and rescued on Friday.
Iranian officials were also looking for the missing airman on Saturday, raising concerns that the service member could be taken as a hostage and used as leverage.
The president has said little about the ongoing search, but spoke briefly to The Independent in a phone call Saturday about the possibility that Iran could find the service member first.
"We hope that’s not going to happen,” he said.
Trump's comments on social media, meanwhile, appeared to signal "a countdown to massive war crimes," said New York University law professor Ryan Goodman.
The president has also previously warned Iran with an ultimatum, only to delay the threatened action. He said on March 22 that the US would "hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!" if officials did not reopen the strait—prompting critics to condemn him as a "maniacal tyrant."
The March 22 threat was likely a reference to Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, the vicinity of which was struck by a projectile on Saturday, prompting condemnation from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Human rights experts have repeated warnings in recent weeks that striking power plants would constitute war crimes.
At least five people were killed and 170 were injured in airstrikes on a petrochemical hub in Iran's Khuzestan province on Saturday morning, in addition to the Bushehr attack.
After his initial threat, Trump later said direct strikes on energy infrastructure would not be launched until April 6, and demanded that Iran open the key waterway before then.
Despite Trump's increasingly belligerent threats of "hell" and destruction of civilian infrastructure, a number of media critics noted on Saturday that mainstream Western news outlets including The New York Times, The Economist, and Bloomberg described Iran's use of air defense systems to shoot down US war planes involved in the invasion as an "escalation from Iran's leadership."
"Does Iran have a right to defend itself? Does Palestine? Does Lebanon?" asked commentator Hasan Piker, noting that the US and Israel have claimed they launched the invasion of Iran to "defend" themselves against an imminent attack, contrary to US intelligence analysis. "Or is it just Israel and America who get to claim self-defense as they engage in wars of conquest?"
The International Atomic Energy Agency warned of "the paramount importance of adhering to the seven pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during a conflict."
The director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency on Saturday demanded "maximum military restraint" from the US and Israel as it confirmed reports that strikes had targeted a location close to Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, killing at least one person.
In a statement released via social media, the IAEA relayed a message from Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi, who expressed "deep concern about the reported incident."
Grossi warned that nuclear power plants or nearby areas "must never be attacked, noting that auxiliary site buildings may contain vital safety equipment" and stressed "the paramount importance of adhering to the seven pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during a conflict."
The IAEA said the attack near the Bushehr plant, Iran's only operational nuclear power facility, was the fourth such attack since Israel and the US began its invasion of Iran on February 28. The plant lies in a city inhabited by about 250,000 people.
A security staff member was killed by a projectile fragment and a building on the Bushehr site was impacted by shockwaves and fragments. Grossi said that no increase in radiation levels was reported.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also condemned the Bushehr strike and issued a reminder of the "Western outrage about hostilities near Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine" when Russia attacked the site.
"Israel-US have bombed our Bushehr plant four times now. Radioactive fallout will end life in [Gulf Cooperation Council] capitals, not Tehran. Attacks on our petrochemicals also convey real objectives," said Araghchi.
Al Jazeera reported that at least two petrochemical facilities had been hit by the US and Israel in southern Iran’s Khuzestan province, an energy hub in the country. At least five people were injured in those attacks,
Iranian news agency Mehr reported that the state-run Bandar Imam petrochemical complex, which produces liquefied petroleum gas and chemicals as well as other products, sustained damage.
President Donald Trump said late last month that he would delay any attacks on Iran's energy infrastructure until April 6 and said the delay was "subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions.”
He has threatened to destroy Iran's power plants and other civilian infrastructure if Iranian leaders don't end the blockade on the oil export waterway the Strait of Hormuz, which they began in retaliation for the US-Israeli strikes that started more than a month ago and which has fueled skyrocketing global energy prices.
The threat amounted to Trump warning that he could soon commit a war crime, said international law experts.