July, 13 2009, 10:51am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Wende Gozan at 212-633-4247,
wgozan@aiusa.org,
or Betsy Hawkings at 202-544-0200 x347, bhawkings@aiusa.org.
Native Advocates Come to DC to Change Policies, Obtain Funds to Combat Sexual Violence
On Monday, July 13, a group of noted Native American and Alaska Native
women advocates will meet with federal lawmakers in Washington, DC, to
advocate for stronger policies and increased funding to combat sexual violence
against Native women and ensure victims' access to care and justice.
WASHINGTON
On Monday, July 13, a group of noted Native American and Alaska Native
women advocates will meet with federal lawmakers in Washington, DC, to
advocate for stronger policies and increased funding to combat sexual violence
against Native women and ensure victims' access to care and justice.
The meetings come as President Obama announced
a series of initiatives, designed in consultation with tribal leaders,
to address the underlying causes of rising crime and a breakdown of justice
in Indian Country - particularly rape, child sexual assault, domestic
assault and beatings - that in part stem from neglect by federal prosecutors
and investigators.
The advocates are all members of Amnesty
International USA's (AIUSA's) Native American and Alaska Native Advisory
Council, many of whom were consultants or contributors to the organization's
groundbreaking report, Maze of Injustice: the Failure to Protect
Indigenous Women from Sexual Assault in the U.S.A. They include
Charon Asetoyer, chair of the Advisory Council and executive director of
the Native American Women's Health Education Resource Center; Sarah Deer,
William Mitchell College of Law and the eighth American Indian woman law
professor in the United States; Juskwa Burnett, an advocate currently working
in Oklahoma; Denise Morris, president and CEO of the Alaska Native Justice
Center; and Victoria Ybanez, executive director for Red Wind Consulting,
Inc.
"Native women will continue to walk the
halls of Congress and meet with high-ranking government officials as long
as our human rights are being violated," said Asetoyer. "When rape
is allowed to occur within our communities with the knowledge of public
officials who are not doing everything in their power to stop this atrocity,
it is time to take action."
While in Washington, the Advisory Council
members will meet with members of Congress and administration officials
to advocate for measures that would help protect Native American and Alaska
Native women from sexual violence, remove obstacles to justice in these
cases, and seek needed funding to help implement such measures. The
meetings are one in a series of initiatives following the launch of Maze
of Injustice, which described how Native women suffer alarmingly high
levels of rape, often at the hands of non-Native perpetrators.
One focus of the trip will be strengthening
an FY '10 Senate appropriations bill that earmarks funds to combat sexual
violence. The House version of the bill, which was recently passed
out of subcommittee, called for an unprecedented$64.4 billion
to bolster law enforcement and combat violence against women in Indian
Country. The group will also advocate passage of The Tribal Law and
Order Act, which clarifies jurisdiction between federal, state, tribal
and local governments, increases coordination between their law enforcement
agencies for responding to violent crime against Native Americans, requires
U.S.
Attorneys to collect criminal data, documents the reasons for declining
to prosecute, and shares criminal history information with state and tribal
officials.
"Native women are still suffering sexual
assault at rates far disproportionate to women in the United States generally,"
said Larry Cox, executive director of AIUSA, who is joining Council members
to meet lawmakers. "Until Native women receive equal justice under
the law, the U.S. government must show its will to effect real change,
not just by appropriating funds but by changing policies and laws. The
crimes perpetrated against Native women are more than statistical horrors;
they are historical horrors that have been allowed to occur because of
years of our country's subjugation of Native peoples. Congress has
made great strides in the last two years, but significantly more work is
needed until Native women truly have the law on their side."
In the two years since the report's launch,
Congress has made some significant strides toward improving infrastructure
in Indian Country and helping combat sexual violence against Native women,
including holding a number of hearings in Washington and in the field that
have involved input from Native women advocates. The FY 2009 Omnibus
Appropriations Act included an increase of $235 million for the Indian
Health Service (IHS) and $85 million for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA),
with $25 million for tribal law enforcement in Indian country to be targeted
to addressing violence against women. The Tribal Law and Order
Act was reintroduced this year. And President Obama's stimulus package
allocated $990 million to improve infrastructure and healthcare in Indian
Country. Still, these improvements, while unprecedented, have not
yet led to actual change for Native women on the ground.
Amnesty International is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning
grassroots activist organization with more than 2.2 million supporters,
activists and volunteers in more than 150 countries campaigning for human
rights worldwide. The organization investigates and exposes abuses, educates
and mobilizes the public, and works to protect people wherever justice,
freedom, truth and dignity are denied.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
Russia's Putin Secures Another Term
The controversial leader won a record number of votes for a post-Soviet candidate even as opponents organized a protest at noon on the election's third and last day.
Mar 17, 2024
Despite protests on Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin won reelection with more votes than any candidate since the fall of the Soviet Union.
Exit poll the Public Opinion Foundation (POF) put the final tally after three days of voting at 87.8%, the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) at 87%, and Russia's Central Election Commission (CEC) at 87.3%. Putin will now serve another six-year term, meaning he will have been at the helm of the Russian state for longer than any leader since Catherine the Great, surpassing Josef Stalin.
The election comes less than a month after the second anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and is likely to lead to more tensions between the Russian and U.S. governments.
"It gives me some hope to see how many people are not happy with the dictatorship, the war, with what's happening in Russia."
"For a U.S. administration that hoped Putin's Ukraine adventure would be wrapped up by now with a decisive setback to Moscow's interests, the election is a reminder that Putin expects that there will be many more rounds in the geopolitical boxing ring," Nikolas Gvosdev, director of the National Security Program at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, told the Russia Matters project.
With most of Putin's prominent opponents either dead, imprisoned, or in exile, the elections results were considered a foregone conclusion by both friends and foes of his administration.
A Putin spokesperson said in 2023 that the election was "not really democracy" but instead "costly bureaucracy," according to CNN. Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the White House National Security Council said the election was "obviously not free nor fair."
However, Russian opponents of Putin did find a way to demonstrate their position with a protest called "Noon Against Putin." The protest was called for by St. Petersburg politician Maxim Reznik, according to The Guardian. Participants were instructed to head to a polling place at noon and cast a paper ballot for one of the candidates running against Putin, or to write-in another candidate or spoil their ballot.
Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny had endorsed the protest before his death last month in a Russian prison, leading the Independent Novaya Gazeta newspaper to dub it "Navalny's political testament."
The action drew crowds to polling places both in Russian cities like Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Yekaterinburg and at Russian embassies around the world.
"This is the first time in my life I have ever seen a queue for elections," one woman waiting in line in Moscow told
CNN. Russian journalists reported that the lines at some stations within the country reached the thousands, according to Reuters.
Navalny's widow, Yulia Navalnaya, who had also endorsed the protest, voted at the embassy in Berlin, while several protesters gathered outside the embassy in London.
"I expected there to be a lot of people, but not this many," London-based participant Maria Dorofeyeva told The Guardian, adding, "It gives me some hope to see how many people are not happy with the dictatorship, the war, with what's happening in Russia. And we want to stop it."
Ruslan Shaveddinov of Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation told Reuters:
"We showed ourselves, all of Russia and the whole world that Putin is not Russia (and) that Putin has seized power in Russia."
"Our victory is that we, the people, defeated fear, we defeated solitude—many people saw they were not alone," Shaveddinov said
Keep ReadingShow Less
Van Hollen Says Netanyahu Spreading 'Flat Out Lies' About UNRWA
The Maryland senator defended the organization on CBS and said there was no evidence that it was a "proxy for Hamas."
Mar 17, 2024
U.S. Senator for Maryland Chris Van Hollen continued his defense of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and its work in Gaza in an appearance on CBS News' "Face the Nation" on Sunday.
"The claim that Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu and others are making that somehow UNRWA is a proxy for Hamas are just flat out lies, that's a flat out lie," he told journalist Margaret Brennan.
The U.S. was one of many Western countries that paused funding for UNRWA after the agency announced in January that it had fired 12 staffers over Israeli allegations that they had been involved in Hamas' October 7 attack on Israel. However, some countries including Canada, Sweden, the European Union, and Australia have since restored funding. A report has also emerged that Israel tortured UNRWA staffers into falsely confessing to involvement in the Hamas attack.
"Netanyahu has wanted to get rid of UNRWA because he had seen them as a means to continue the hopes of the Palestinian people for a homeland of their own."
Van Hollen's remarks on Sunday come days after he argued for the restoration of UNRWA funds on the floor of the U.S. Senate and criticized Republican legislators who wanted to permanently end funds for the organization that supports some 6 million Palestinian refugees in countries across the Middle East, including around 2 million in Gaza.
During his speech, he pointed out that the Netanyahu government had not shared the underlying evidence that UNRWA staffers participated in October 7 with either UNRWA itself or the U.S. government. He also urged his colleagues to read a classified Director of National Intelligence report on Netanyahu's claims of UNRWA complicity with Hamas.
On "Face the Nation," Van Hollen said that the person in charge of operations on the ground in UNRWA was a 20-year U.S. Army veteran.
"You can be sure he is not in cahoots with Hamas," the senator told Brennan.
He also repeated claims that Netanyahu has wanted to eliminate UNRWA entirely since at least 2017.
"Netanyahu has wanted to get rid of UNRWA because he had seen them as a means to continue the hopes of the Palestinian people for a homeland of their own," Van Hollen said, adding that the right-wing Israeli leader's "primary objective" was preventing the formation of a Palestinian state.
However, the dismantling of UNRWA would be especially catastrophic amid Israel's ongoing bombardment and invasion of Gaza, which has killed more than 31,000 people and put the survivors at risk of famine. No other organization has the infrastructure in place to distribute the necessary aid.
"If you cut off funding for UNRWA in Gaza entirely, it means more people will starve, more people won't get the medial assistance they need, and so it would be a huge mistake," Van Hollen said.
He also said that only 14 of the agency's 13,000-strong staff in Gaza had been accused of participating in the October 7 attack.
"We should investigate it, we should hold all those people accountable, but for goodness' sake, let's not hold 2 million innocent Palestinian civilians who are dying of starvation... accountable for the bad acts of 14 people."
Van Hollen also repeated his call for President Joe Biden to condition the sale of offensive military weapons to Israel on the country obeying international law and allowing aid into Gaza. While Israel sent the U.S. a letter saying it was in compliance with the law, "the day it was signed, clearly the Netanyahu government is not in compliance, because we see that they're continuing to restrict humanitarian assistance," he told Brennan.
Also on "Face the Nation" Sunday, United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) Chief Executive Catherine Russell described the impact that a lack of aid was having on the children of Gaza.
"We know now that children are dying of malnutrition in Gaza," she told Brennan.
Russell said that not enough aid was reaching those who needed it, calling both air drops and sea deliveries "a drop in the bucket."
She also called for greater transparency into what was actually happening in Gaza and the difficulties of delivering aid.
"The world should be able to see what's happening and make their own judgments about what's going on," Russell said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Gore Calls Out Fossil Fuel Industry 'Shamelessness' in Lying to Public
"They are continuing to do similar things today to try to fool people and pull the wool over people's eyes just in the name of greed," the former vice president said.
Mar 17, 2024
In reflecting on nearly 50 years of climate advocacy, former Vice President Al Gore said that he had "underestimated" the greed of the fossil fuel industry.
The remarks came in an interview published in USA Today on Sunday. When asked if he had any regrets, Gore responded that he had "put every ounce of energy" he had into climate advocacy, but added:
"I was pretty slow to recognize how important the massive funding of anti-climate messaging was going on. I underestimated the power of greed in the fossil fuel industry, the shamelessness in putting out the lies."
"They are continuing to do similar things today to try to fool people and pull the wool over people's eyes just in the name of greed," Gore continued.
"What's at stake is so incredible."
Gore, who tried to raise awareness about the climate crisis in the U.S. House of Representatives as early as 1981 and brought the issue to national attention in 2006's documentary An Inconvenient Truth, has taken a harsher tone against oil, gas, and coal companies in recent months. In August 2023, he said that the "climate crisis is a fossil fuel crisis," and in September, he implored the industry to "get out of the way." In December, he lamented that the industry had "captured the COP process," referring to the appointment of the United Arab Emirates national oil company CEO Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber to preside over the United Nations' COP28 climate conference in that country.
In the USA Today interview, Gore also named the fossil fuel industry when asked about his greatest frustration.
"Well, that we haven't made more progress," Gore answered, "and that some of the fossil fuel companies have been shameless in providing, continuing to provide lavish funding for disinformation and misinformation."
"What's at stake is so incredible," he added.
However, Gore told USA Today that he tried not to focus on his anger, but instead on continuing to raise awareness about the crisis and what can be done about it. And he remained hopeful that his grandchildren would live in a world in which people had come together and acted in time.
"We've got all the solutions we need right now to cut emissions in half before the end of this decade," he said. "We've got a clear line of sight to how we can cut the other 50% of emissions by mid century."
He also encouraged more people to get involved with the climate movement.
"I would say the greatest need is for more grassroots advocates because the most persuasive advocates are those in your own community," he said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular