April, 14 2009, 03:13pm EDT
Sri Lanka: Commonwealth Should Act on Crisis
Use International Clout to Press Both Sides to End Humanitarian Disaster
LONDON
The Commonwealth and its members should use their combined
diplomatic influence to press the Sri Lankan government and the
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to cease attacks that violate
the laws of war and end the humanitarian crisis in Sri Lanka's northern
Vanni region, the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) and Human
Rights Watch said today in a letter
to the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG). A two-day holiday
pause in military operations was not long enough to address the
desperate situation of trapped civilians.
Fighting reportedly has resumed in the tiny government-declared
"no-fire zone" still in the control of LTTE forces, where the
approximately 100,000 civilians remaining are at grave risk. LTTE
forces have prevented civilians from leaving the area, while government
forces have repeatedly and indiscriminately shelled the no-fire zone.
More than 3,000 civilians have reportedly been killed and many more
wounded during the fighting since January.
"With the United Nations warning that there could be a potential
'bloodbath,' the CMAG needs to assert itself to protect the civilians
trapped in the fighting in a member country," said Maja Daruwalla,
executive director of CHRI. "It should not stay silent during this
mounting tragedy."
Both the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE deny they are violating
the laws of war. However, there is credible information that the LTTE
is preventing civilians from leaving the conflict area and shooting at
those that try to escape. Displaced persons who have managed to flee
the fighting have been placed in detention camps by the Sri Lankan
government, where they are denied freedom of movement. The government
has said that it will improve access to the camps by relatives and
allow some to leave after screening for LTTE combatants, but to date
only a few hundred elderly have been allowed to leave. There are
allegations that an unknown number of people with alleged LTTE ties
have been taken into government custody, leading to fears of enforced
disappearances.
The Sri Lankan government has refused to allow independent observers
and journalists into conflict zones so that there is a lack of accurate
and timely information about the situation of the trapped civilians. It
has also barred most humanitarian agencies from the conflict area in
northern Sri Lanka, citing security concerns, leading to severe
shortfalls in humanitarian assistance. There have been repeated
allegations of threats and intimidation against Sri Lankan journalists
and human rights workers.
"The Commonwealth harms itself when it stays silent during a crisis
in a member state," said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights
Watch. "Abuses by the Tamil Tigers should not deter it from pressing
the Sri Lankan government to uphold the Commonwealth's fundamental
principles."
In the Harare Commonwealth Declaration, 1991, Commonwealth Heads of
Government pledged to protect and promote fundamental human rights and
to support "the United Nations and other international institutions in
the world's search for peace."
Calling upon CMAG to protect the fundamental principles of the Commonwealth, CHRI and Human Rights Watch urged it to:
- Seek assurances that civilians are given the highest protections,
and that international humanitarian law is being complied with in full. - Call upon the Sri Lankan government to cease attacks that violate
the laws of war, including artillery bombardment and aerial bombing
that does not discriminate between military targets and civilians, or
that causes expected harm to civilians and civilian objects
disproportionate to the anticipated military gain. Violations of the
laws of war by the LTTE do not justify attacks by government security
forces in violation of the law. - Call upon the LTTE to stop using civilians as "human shields," take
all feasible steps to avoid placing military targets near civilians,
stop preventing civilians from leaving areas under its control, respect
and facilitate the right to freedom of movement of civilians, including
their right to move to government-controlled territory for safety, and
end all deliberate attacks on civilians, such as those seeking to flee
LTTE-controlled areas. - State its concern for the trapped civilians, call upon both parties
to facilitate the immediate creation of humanitarian corridors to allow
trapped civilians to escape and offer neutral assistance to ensure safe
evacuation of civilians, as well as to provide aid for humanitarian
camps for relocated civilians. - Consistent with the UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement,
ensure that camps for displaced personsrespect the basic rights of
residents.The camps should be under civilian authority, residents
shouldhave thefreedom of movement due all Sri Lankan citizens, and
impartial humanitarian agencies should have access to the centers
without unnecessary restrictions. - Call upon the Sri Lankan government to allow independent observers,
including journalists, access to conflict zones so that accurate and
timely information about the situation of civilians in such areas is
publicly available. - Call upon the government to lift immediately the September 2008
order barring humanitarian agencies from the conflict area in northern
Sri Lanka and allow humanitarian agencies to return to assist at-risk
individuals and reach all civilians in need. Restrictions on relief
should be made on a case-by-case basis and only when there is a
specific and justifiable security reason for the restriction. Refusals
for valid security reasons should only be for as long as necessary and
should not block legitimate humanitarian assistance. - Call upon the government to ensure that nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs) are able to perform their work without arbitrary
government interference. Regulation of NGO activities should comply
with international standards, be transparent, and follow clearly
defined procedures. Registration should ultimately facilitate the work
of NGOs and should neither disrupt legitimate NGO activities nor put
NGO workers at risk. - Strongly urge all CMAG members to act on the crisis in Sri Lanka
collectively as a positive way to engage the crisis and such situations
in the future, while also giving full adherence to the Harare
Declaration among the Commonwealth's membership.
To read the letter from Human Rights Watch and the
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative to the Commonwealth Ministerial
Action Group, please visit:
https://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/04/14/joint-letter-cmag-follow-action-deepening-crisis-sri-lanka
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Israeli Anti-Government Protests Hit New Heights as 200,000 March in Tel Aviv
"There's a great danger that Israel will turn into a dictatorship," warned one protester.
Mar 05, 2023
Ongoing protests against the far-right Israeli government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyhu were larger than ever on Saturday night as an estimated 200,000 people or more took to the streets in Tel Aviv and other cities to denounce judicial reforms they warn put the nation on a path towards dictatorship.
For over two months, weekly protests—mostly on the weekends but increasingly during the workweek as well—large demonstrations have taken place in response to Netanyahu and his coalition government pushing a judicial takeover that critics say would curtail democracy.
Haaretzreported Saturday's turnout as a record since the movement started in early January.
"There's a great danger that Israel will turn into a dictatorship," Ophir Kubitsky, a 68-year-old high school teacher at the demonstration, toldReuters. "We came here to demonstrate over and over again until we win."
\u201cAn incredible photo. \n\nDowntown Tel Aviv is flooded with Israelis protesting the government\u2019s judicial reform package.\u201d— Aviva Klompas (@Aviva Klompas) 1677972433
The demonstrations in Tel Aviv and other locations "began peacefully," reports Reuters. "However, footage released by police later showed protesters breaking down barriers in Tel Aviv and igniting fires as they blocked roads. Police sprayed water cannons at the protesters."
While Israeli liberals increasingly register fear and discomfort over the direction of its government's growing autocratic tendencies, Palestinian rights advocates have noted that the right-wing slide is a direct and predictable continuation of a system that denies its Palestinian citizens full rights under the law while overseeing a brutal and repressive apartheid regime.
As American-Palestinian scholar Yousef Munayyer recently wrote in a column about the protest movement for +972 Magazine:
As tens of thousands of Israelis protest the reforms that Netanyahu’s government seeks to ram through in hopes of “saving the essence” of Israeli democracy, they are largely avoiding a confrontation with the foundational problem, namely that the essence of the Israeli system is to put settler colonialism ahead of any liberal principles around democracy, equality, or human rights.
A key question for many concerned not only about Israel's increasingly autocratic and right-wing lurch, but its ever-worsening treatment of the Palestinians living under hostile military occupation is this: "Does this loose group oppose the settler-colonial system that these legal reforms would further enable, or does it simply seek a return to the settler-colonial system, but without Netanyahu at its head?"
Munayyer believes all evidence thus far indicates the latter is the unfortunate answer, which is why Palestinians are noticeably absent from celebrating the display of dissent and opposition in Tel Aviv and elsewhere.
"For all Palestinians, including those with Israeli citizenship, there is little urgency to try to 'save' Israeli democracy, primarily because for them it has never existed," Munayyer concluded. "Not only is a political system that is constructed to be democratic toward some, but not all, not a democracy, it is also not going to seem worth saving to those it disadvantages."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Biggest Conservation Victory Ever!' Global Treaty to Protect Oceans Reached
"This is a historic day for conservation and a sign that in a divided world, protecting nature and people can triumph over geopolitics," said Greenpeace in response to an agreement to protect world's marine biodiversity.
Mar 05, 2023
Ocean conservationists expressed elation late Saturday after it was announced—following nearly two decades of consideration and effort—that delegates from around the world had agreed to language for a far-reaching global treaty aimed at protecting the biodiversity on the high seas and in the deep oceans of the world.
"This is a historic day for conservation and a sign that in a divided world, protecting nature and people can triumph over geopolitics," declared Dr. Laura Meller, the oceans campaigner for Greenpeace Nordic.
"We praise countries for seeking compromises, putting aside differences, and delivering a Treaty that will let us protect the oceans, build our resilience to climate change and safeguard the lives and livelihoods of billions of people," Meller added.
The final text of the Global Ocean Treaty, formally referred to as the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction treaty (BBNJ), was reached after a two-week round of talks that concluded with a 48-hour marathon push between delegations at the United Nations headquarters in New York.
"The High Seas Treaty opens the path for humankind to finally provide protection to marine life across our one ocean."
"This is huge," said Greenpeace in a social media post, calling the agreement "the biggest conservation victory ever!"
Rena Lee of Singapore, the U.N Ambassador for Oceans and president of the conference hosting the talks, received a standing ovation after announcing a final deal had been reached. "The shipped has reached the shore," Lee told the conference.
\u201cBBNJ President Rena Lee: "The ship has reached the shore."\n\nThe BBNJ Agreement is agreed.\u201d— Duncan Currie (@Duncan Currie) 1677984046
"Following a two-week-long rollercoaster ride of negotiations and super-hero efforts in the last 48 hours, governments reached agreement on key issues that will advance protection and better management of marine biodiversity in the High Seas," said Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance, a coalition of over 40 ocean-focused NGOs that also includes the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Minna Epps, director of the Global Marine and Polar Programme at the IUCN, said the agreement represents a new opportunity.
"The High Seas Treaty opens the path for humankind to finally provide protection to marine life across our one ocean," Epps said in a statement. "Its adoption closes essential gaps in international law and offers a framework for governments to work together to protect global ocean health, climate resilience, and the socioeconomic wellbeing and food security of billions of people."
Protecting the world's high seas, which refers to areas of the oceans outside the jurisdiction of any country, is part of the larger push to protect planetary biodiversity and seen as key if nations want to keep their commitment to the UN-brokered Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework—also known as the known as the 30x30 pledge—that aims protect 30 percent of the world's natural habitat by 2030.
"With currently just over 1% of the High Seas protected," said the High Seas Alliance in a statement, "the new Treaty will provide a pathway to establish marine protected areas in these waters." The group said the treaty will make acheiving the goals of the Kunming-Montreal agreement possible, but that "time is of the essence" for the world's biodiversity.
"The new Treaty will bring ocean governance into the 21st century," said the group, "including establishing modern requirements to assess and manage planned human activities that would affect marine life in the High Seas as well as ensuring greater transparency. This will greatly strengthen the effective area-based management of fishing, shipping, and other activities that have contributed to the overall decline in ocean health."
According to Greenpeace's assessment of the talks:
The High Ambition Coalition, which includes the EU, US and UK, and China were key players in brokering the deal. Both showed willingness to compromise in the final days of talks, and built coalitions instead of sowing division. Small Island States have shown leadership throughout the process, and the G77 group led the way in ensuring the Treaty can be put into practice in a fair and equitable way.
The fair sharing of monetary benefits from Marine Genetic Resources was a key sticking point. This was only resolved on the final day of talks. The section of the Treaty on Marine Protected Areas does away with broken consensus-based decision making which has failed to protect the oceans through existing regional bodies like the Antarctic Ocean Commission. While there are still major issues in the text, it is a workable Treaty that is a starting point for protecting 30% of the world’s oceans.
The group said it is now urgent for governments around the world to take the final step of ratifying the treaty.
"We can now finally move from talk to real change at sea. Countries must formally adopt the Treaty and ratify it as quickly as possible to bring it into force, and then deliver the fully protected ocean sanctuaries our planet needs," Meller said. "The clock is still ticking to deliver 30×30. We have half a decade left, and we can't be complacent."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Calls US Democracy a 'Very Dangerous System' at CPAC
Former U.S. president headlines ousted autocrat double-header by following Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro at annual far-right convention.
Mar 04, 2023
The former presidents of Brazil and the United States took the stage CPAC on Saturday where both fascist politicians continued to sow doubt about their respective electoral defeats as they received standing ovations from the annual convention's far-right attendees.
Brazil's disgraced former leader Jair Bolsonaro—whose supporters stormed government offices in January after his successor, leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, was sworn into office—was brought onto the stage this year's "diminished" CPAC gathering to blaring rock music and loud cheers from the crowd.
Addressing the American audience, Bolsonaro indicated once more his doubts that he lost the Brazilian election fairly, saying, "I had way more support in 2022 than I had in 2018, and I don't understand why the numbers said the opposite."
"I thank God for the mission of being president of Brazil for one term," he said, but hinted at a possible third run for president by adding: "But I feel deep inside that this mission is still not over."
When Trump took the podium as the convention's keynote appearance, there again was raucous applause.
During his speech, he singled out Bolsonaro in the audience and said it was a "great honor" to be appearing with the "very popular" former president.
\u201cBolsonaro \ud83e\udd1d Trump\nCPAC Washington\u201d— Patriota (@Patriota) 1677972787
"Our getting back in the White House is their worst nightmare," Trump said of Democrats and his other political opponents. "But it is our country's only hope."
Trump went on to call the electoral process in the United States a "very bad" and a "very dangerous system" that only he and the far-right attendees at CPAC can overcome.
\u201cTrump claims the 2020 election was so bad, that instead of Biden serving four years, people he talked to in early 2021 were saying "you'll be back [in office] in six weeks, sir"\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1677970747
During the speech, Trump vowed to "finish what we started" as the enthusiastic crowd chanted "Four more years! Four more years!"
In the traditional straw poll taken each year by CPAC attendees, Trump won in a landslide, the convention's organizers announced on Saturday, with the former president taking 65 percent of the vote.
The second-place finisher was Florida's far-right Gov. Ron DeSantis, who did not attend the gathering this year despite many viewing him as the strongest GOP challenger to Trump in a possible 2024 primary matchup.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular
SUPPORT OUR WORK.
We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100%
reader supported.
reader supported.