March, 30 2009, 11:40am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
AIUSA media office,Email:,media@aiusa.org,Phone: 202-544-0200 x302
Three Concrete Steps to Improve Conditions for Afghans
WASHINGTON
As representatives of the international
community gather in The Hague to discuss the deteriorating situation in
Afghanistan, Amnesty International outlined three concrete steps that can
be taken immediately to improve the human rights of the Afghan people.
The organization said that while Washington's
new rhetoric and strategy offer new potential for progress on human rights,
the Afghan people deserve and demand performance, not promises, from their
government and its international supporters--chief among them the United
States.
Amnesty International has long pushed the
international community to adopt benchmarks that focus on the well-being
of the Afghan people, not just short-term military or political goals.
In that light, Amnesty International recommends the following three steps,
all of which can be implemented quickly.
1) Improve the accountability of international
and Afghan military forces
In view of the U.S. government's announcement
of the deployment of up to 30,000 extra troops in Afghanistan, Amnesty
International urges the international military forces to do more to provide
accountability for violations of international humanitarian law and remedy
for civilian casualties of military action, in order to ensure that the
presence of more international troops does not lead to more harm to Afghan
civilians.
There are currently military personnel from
more than 40 countries operating in Afghanistan, most of them under the
mandate of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), provided
by NATO, and a smaller number as part of the counter-terrorism mandate
of the U.S.-led Operation Enduring Freedom. In addition to regular military
forces in Afghanistan, there are numerous members of civilian intelligence
agencies as well as private contractors and local militias conducting military
operations.
A concerted effort is needed to clarify and
harmonize mandates, rules of engagement and the chains of command of these
forces. All international forces must immediately adopt common rules of
engagement that ensure full compliance with international humanitarian
law, and improve coordination with Afghan national forces to ensure compliance
with these rules.
Amnesty International welcomes the recent
announcement that the ISAF will create a mechanism for investigating civilian
casualties. But it is unclear whether this long-overdue mechanism will
investigate the conduct of forces operating under the U.S.-led Operation
Enduring Freedom. All international and Afghan security forces should develop
and implement a consistent, clear and credible mechanism for receiving
complaints and investigating claims of civilian casualties or injuries
resulting from its military operations. A coherent and systematic program
of assisting those injured by Afghan and NATO/U.S. forces and bringing
to justice those suspected of violations of international humanitarian
law should be developed and communicated to the Afghan people.
2) Improve respect for the rule of law
by international and Afghan authorities
Ordinary Afghans have almost no recourse
to the protection of the law from their own government's abuses, or those
committed by international forces. The international effort to build Afghanistan's
judiciary has been a notable failure of the past seven years. Making up
for this failure will take time. A clear political commitment to judicial
reform and the injection of the necessary resources must be a key priority
for action by the Afghan government and the international community. In
the meantime, several measures can be adopted now to improve respect for
the rule of law. They include:
*The Afghan government should bolster accountability
for its security forces--including misdeeds by the police and persecution
of journalists and human rights defenders--and focus on protecting Afghans,
especially women, who bear the brunt of insecurity throughout the country.
*The U.S. government should immediately grant
all detainees held at the U.S. base in Bagram access to legal counsel,
relatives, doctors, and to consular representatives, without delay and
regularly thereafter, and grant all Bagram detainees access to U.S. courts
to be able to challenge the lawfulness of their detention. Currently, U.S.
forces continue to detain hundreds of Afghans without clear legal authority
and without adequate legal process.
*International forces should retain responsibility
for the custody of the people they capture, and not hand them over to the
sole control of the Afghan authorities, until they no longer face the current
risks of torture or other ill-treatment, particularly at the hands of the
National Directorate of Security (NDS).
*The Afghan government should prohibit the
NDS from detaining prisoners and allow independent human rights monitoring
of all detainees, including by the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission,
with access to all places of detention and all detainees.
*The Afghan government and the international
community should seek mechanisms to ensure fair trials for those in detention,
including the option of mixed tribunals to try those apprehended in counter-insurgency
operations by either Afghan or international forces.
*The Afghan government should immediately
seek international assistance to help implement the 2005 Action Plan for
Peace, Justice and Reconciliation, which foresees the establishment of
"effective and reasonable accountability mechanisms in order to end impunity
in Afghanistan and ensure that there will no amnesty for war crimes, crimes
against humanity and other gross human rights violations".
3) Vet candidates in upcoming elections
to improve the government's legitimacy
With Presidential, parliamentary, and
regional elections scheduled for the next year, it is essential that a
proper vetting process be in place to keep out those who may have been
involved in human rights abuses, especially leaders of armed groups and
militias whose usurpation of the role of elected officials has done much
to erode the Afghan people's trust in their government and its international
supporters.
Since the inauguration of the Afghan National
Assembly in 2004, thousands of complaints about these abuses have been
received by the Complaint's Commission of the Afghan parliament.
However only one member of Parliament has
been suspended - in May 2007, Malalai Joya, an outspoken parliamentarian,
was suspended for raising concerns about the presence in parliament of
figures widely accused of being war criminals and human rights violators.
The Afghan government and its international
supporters should immediately institute a fair and transparent process
to vet candidates who are linked to armed groups and militias and against
whom there have been credible allegations of involvement in human rights
abuses.
Even as the Afghan government and international
forces increasingly discuss the possibility of seeking political compromise
with some members of the Taliban and other insurgent groups notorious for
a long record of human rights abuses, the Afghan people demand to be protected
from a return to the abusive policies of the Taliban and other armed groups.
Each such step would improve the dire human
rights situation in Afghanistan and signal that the interests of the Afghan
people are the focus of their government and the international community.
These steps are not the full answer to the political and economic problems
besetting the Afghan people. But if these steps are taken immediately,
they will give the Afghan people something that is essential and in increasingly
short supply: hope for the future.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular