February, 25 2009, 11:39am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
AIUSA media office,Email:,media@aiusa.org,Phone: 202-544-0200 x302
Pakistan Government Must Resolve Hundreds of Baluch "Disappearances," Says Amnesty International
The Pakistani government
must immediately act on its commitment to trace hundreds of Baluch victims
of enforced disappearances, Amnesty International said today.
The human rights organization also calls
on the United Nations to raise the issue of enforced disappearances in
Pakistan at the 10th session of the Human Rights Council (Geneva, March
2-27, 2009) to follow up on Pakistan's previous pledges to begin to resolve
the issue.
WASHINGTON
The Pakistani government
must immediately act on its commitment to trace hundreds of Baluch victims
of enforced disappearances, Amnesty International said today.
The human rights organization also calls
on the United Nations to raise the issue of enforced disappearances in
Pakistan at the 10th session of the Human Rights Council (Geneva, March
2-27, 2009) to follow up on Pakistan's previous pledges to begin to resolve
the issue.
Despite several pledges to resolve the country's
crisis of "disappearances," Pakistan's new civilian government
has not yet provided information about hundreds of cases of people believed
to be held secretly by the government as part of the so-called war on terror,
or in response to internal opposition, for instance in Baluchistan.
The Chief Minister of Baluchistan pledged
in April 2008 that resolving the cases of Baluch disappearances would be
a priority. In May 2008, Senator Babar Awan, the Secretary of the
ruling Pakistan People's Party Reconciliatory Committee on Baluchistan,
announced the creation of a committee headed by Nawabzada Haji Lashkri
to trace "disappeared" persons of Baluchistan as part of its
efforts to address Baluch grievances.
To date the government has not revealed the
findings of its investigations or any actions it has taken to resolve the
Baluch enforced disappearance cases.
According to press reports, on February 14,
Interior Ministry Adviser Rehman Malik stated that the Baluchistan Chief
Minister had given the government an "incomplete list of 800 'missing'
people," of which 200 names on the list had been verified.
A hitherto unknown separatist group, the
Baluchistan Liberation United Front (BLUF), on February 2, kidnapped John
Solecki, head of the office of the U.N. High Commissioner of Refugees in
Quetta.
The BLUF (not to be confused with the long
established Baluchistan Liberation Front) claims that 6,000 Baluch activists
have gone "missing." The BLUF also claims that 141 Baluch women
are among the "disappeared." The group demanded their release
in exchange for Solecki's return. The Pakistani government has denied the
allegations.
Amnesty International condemns the kidnapping
of John Solecki and calls for his immediate and unconditional release and
points out that hostage-taking is a crime under international law.
Acts of enforced disappearance violate several
provisions of Pakistan's Constitution, including freedom from arbitrary
detention, the right to judicial overview of detentions and to human dignity
and the prohibition of torture, as well as constituting criminal offences.
Pakistan has still not acted on its promise
made in May 2008 that it would accede to International Convention for the
Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.
At the meeting of the Working Group on the
Universal Periodic Review of the U.N. Human Rights Council (UPR), on May
8, 2008, Pakistan's representatives declared that its security forces
trained in international humanitarian law and were fully accountable. In
a written statement in response to the UPR, the permanent representative
"vowed to investigate" disappearances.
On several occasions, Amnesty International
has called the government to account on this issue. In 2008, the
organization used official court records and affidavits of victims and
witnesses of enforced disappearances to show how government officials,
especially from the country's security and intelligences agencies, were
resorting to a variety of tactics to conceal enforced disappearance. These
include: denying detention takes place and denying all knowledge of the
fate and whereabouts of "disappeared" persons; refusing to obey
judicial orders; concealing the identity of the detaining authorities,
for example by transferring the "disappeared" to other secret
locations, threatening harm or re-disappearance and leveling spurious criminal
charges to conceal enforced disappearances
Amnesty International urges the Pakistani
government to immediately resolve all acts of enforced disappearance; to
ensure the immediate release of all persons held in secret detention unless
they are transferred to official places of detention, charged with a recognizably
criminal offence and remanded by an independent court; and to bring to
justice officials found responsible. Victims, including families of those
"disappeared," should be granted reparations in accordance with
international standards.
Background
Baluchistan has a history of insurgency with
local groups advocating greater autonomy. Four waves of violent unrest
took place in 1948, 1958-59, 1962-63 and 1973-77. In early 2005,
tensions in Baluchistan again increased, with numerous clashes reported
between security forces and Baluch tribesman. Local people in Baluchistan
are demanding a bigger share of the revenue generated by the province's
natural resources, principally natural gas, which they believe now benefit
other provinces. A number of Baluchi groups are seeking more rights for
the province. Some of these groups have resorted to violence, while others
are campaigning peacefully. The Pakistani national government has attempted
to suppress this opposition by increasing the military presence in the
region. Many people have died at the hands of the security forces in extrajudicial
executions and deaths in custody, and thousands of people are reported
to have "disappeared." The confrontation between Baluch nationalists
and the state is characterized by human rights abuses committed by all
sides.
Amnesty International is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning
grassroots activist organization with more than 2.2 million supporters,
activists and volunteers in more than 150 countries campaigning for human
rights worldwide. The organization investigates and exposes abuses, educates
and mobilizes the public, and works to protect people wherever justice,
freedom, truth and dignity are denied.
# # #
For more information, please see Amnesty's
report, Denying the Undeniable: Enforced Disappearances in Pakistan
at https://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA33/018/2008/en.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
Mike Johnson Touts $901 Billion Military Budget Plan After Gutting Medicaid, SNAP
"At such a time, bipartisan agreement to provide additional funds to the Pentagon would deliver a cruel message to the American public," advocacy groups warned.
Dec 08, 2025
Republican congressional leaders unveiled a sprawling military policy bill late Sunday that would authorize $901 billion in US military spending for the coming fiscal year, just months after GOP lawmakers and President Donald Trump pushed through the largest-ever cuts to Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who aggressively pushed cuts to Medicaid by peddling false claims of large-scale fraud, touted the 3,086-page National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) as legislation that would "ensure our military forces remain the most lethal in the world."
The bill, a compromise between House and Senate versions of the annual legislation, would authorize $8 billion more in US military spending than Trump asked for in his 2026 budget request.
If passed, the 2026 NDAA would pump billions of dollars more into the Pentagon, a cesspool of the kinds of waste, fraud, and abuse that Johnson and other Republicans claim to be targeting when they cut safety net programs, stripping health insurance and food aid from millions. The Pentagon has never passed an independent audit and continues to have "significant fraud exposure," the Government Accountability Office said earlier this year.
"The surge in Pentagon spending stands in sharp contrast to the drastic cuts in healthcare and food assistance programs imposed by the reconciliation package."
Final passage of the NDAA would push total military spending authorized by Congress this year above $1 trillion, including the $150 billion in Pentagon funds included in the Trump-GOP budget law enacted over the summer.
Last month, as Common Dreams reported, a coalition of watchdog and anti-war groups implored Congress not to approve any funding above the originally requested $892.6 billion, warning that additional money for the Pentagon would enable the Trump administration's lawless use of the military in US streets and overseas.
The groups also noted that "the surge in Pentagon spending stands in sharp contrast to the drastic cuts in healthcare and food assistance programs imposed by the reconciliation package."
"At such a time," they wrote in a letter to lawmakers, "bipartisan agreement to provide additional funds to the Pentagon would deliver a cruel message to the American public, one out of step with Democratic messaging over healthcare, reconciliation, and the shutdown."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


