

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Kathy
Westra, The Wilderness Society, (202) 429-2642 or Kathy_Westra@tws.org
Jessica
Brand, Defenders of Wildlife, (202) 772-0239 or JBRAND@defenders.org
Amy
Kober, American Rivers, (206) 213-0330, ext. 23 or akober@americanrivers.org
Erin
Allweiss, NRDC, (202) 513-6254 or eallweiss@nrdc.org
Representatives of national conservation
organizations today released the annual "Green Budget" for FY 2010,
a document that details the federal agency funding the groups say is needed to
sustain clean air and water, lands, oceans and wildlife over the long term-an
increasingly urgent priority in an era of global warming. "Many of these
programs have been systematically marginalized and ignored over the past eight
years, and we must begin to restore adequate funding to them through the
regular appropriations process," said Bill Meadows, President of The Wilderness
Society, who hosted a news conference to unveil the Green Budget. The full
document, which was produced with input from more than 25 national conservation
groups, is available at www.wilderness.org
or www.saveourenvironment.org.
(Find an MP3 of today's teleconference at https://wilderness.org/content/green-budget-2010-teleconference)
Meadows noted that "funding
for individual land-management programs is low, and staff cuts have made it
increasingly difficult for the agencies to achieve their mission on the
ground. The new administration has a unique opportunity in the FY 2010
budget to provide jobs and restore economic vitality to many areas in need,
while also beginning to address the impacts of global warming. Our natural
resources provide economic growth in perpetuity, and investing in them provides
our country with long-term, lasting benefits."
That sentiment was echoed by
Mary Beth Beetham, Director of Legislative Affairs for Defenders of Wildlife. "America's
public lands and wildlife are not only anchors for healthy natural systems,
they are also important to our economy, helping to support at least 6.5 million
jobs across the nation," she noted. "The programs that support
these vital resources are chronically under-funded, but smart investments will
pay returns many times over the years to come. And the value of preserving our
natural heritage is immeasurable."
Appropriating adequate funds
for agency programs to thrive in the long-term is critical, even with the
recent passage of an economic recovery package that includes significant
funding for environmental programs, stressed Heather Taylor-Miesle, energy
consultant to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). "The economic recovery package made smart investments
that will repower America with
clean energy and create new jobs quickly. Congress can make good on this
down payment with a budget that keeps us on a path to a clean energy economy.
By providing the necessary funding for renewable energy and energy efficiency,
we can help end our dependence on oil and ensure that America has
the tools to meet the challenges of the 21st century."
Building
on that theme, Colin Peppard, Federal Transportation Program Manager for
Friends of the Earth, noted the importance of restoring funding for critical federal
transportation programs that help, rather than harm, the environment. "Over
the past several years, many innovative transportation programs that protect
our environment and reduce pollution have been underfunded, reducing their
effectiveness, and increasing the environmental impacts of
transportation," Peppard said. "Our transportation budget
recommendations ensure we are once again promoting clean air and water,
reducing oil use and global warming, and protecting wildlife and open
space."
One
of the agencies that has suffered severe funding cuts over the past eight years
is the Environmental Protection Agency, which saw a $1.8 billion decrease in inflation-adjusted funding
during the Bush Administration. The Green Budget makes a forceful case for
reversing this trend. "Nothing is more vital to the health and well-being
of our communities than clean water and clean air, said Peter Raabe, Policy
Director for Budget and Appropriations at American Rivers. "With global
warming presenting new challenges to our water, air and public health, we must
increase our investments to protect communities from pollution, boost quality
of life, and chart a new path to a green economy."
Long-term funding also is
critically important to the health of America's oceans and coasts,
said Roberta Elias, Senior Program Officer for Marine and Fisheries Policy at
the World
Wildlife Fund. "Our oceans and coasts are more
than a place where people visit. They generate a $117 billion in economic
revenues each year, provide us with food and recreation, and are home to fish
and marine wildlife. On top of that, oceans play a critical role in
regulating our climate. Unfortunately, ocean health, fisheries
sustainability, and marine biodiversity face a growing list of pressures
including poorly planned development, damaging fishing levels and practices, pollution
of all kinds, as well as global warming and ocean acidification. Putting
ocean conservation and management on hold is no longer an option.
It is time that we properly invest in the very marine ecosystems and
resources - at home and around the world - that we depend on to
provide basic ecological functions, to support economies and coastal
communities, and to feed a hungry planet."
#
# #
Find an MP3 of today's
teleconference at https://wilderness.org/content/green-budget-2010-teleconference
"It's gutter racism with real consequences," one critic said of Trump's rhetoric.
President Donald Trump went on a racist tirade on Thursday where he targeted both the Somali-American community and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.
During a Cabinet meeting, the president once against lashed out at Minnesota residents of Somali descent, whom he said "come from a crooked country, disgusting country, one of the worst countries in the world."
"They come to our country, low IQs, and they rob us blind," Trump said of the Somali-American community. "They rob us blind because we have crooked politicians and dirty cops."
The president then turned his attention specifically to Ellison, the Minnesota attorney general who in 2006 became the first Muslim elected to a statewide office in the US when he won the race to represent Minnesota's 5th District in the US House of Representatives.
Trump: "In Minnesota, it's very Somalia-oriented. These people come from a crooked country, disgusting country, one of the worst countries in the world. They come to our country -- low IQs -- and they rob us blind. Stupid people, and they rob us blind." pic.twitter.com/2TRhf2gAMn
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) March 26, 2026
"The attorney general's a dirty cop, that's my opinion," said Trump, who in 2024 was convicted on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. "And something should be done about him."
Ellison hit back at Trump in a social media post.
"If Donald Trump thinks Minnesotans will turn on our neighbors, he doesn’t understand this state," wrote Ellison. "When he surged ICE here and killed two Minnesotans, we stood up for each other, not against each other. Trump’s racist tirades can’t distract from the fact that his reckless and deeply unpopular war is driving up inflation, raising gas prices, and making life unaffordable for Minnesotans."
The Minnesota attorney general added that "while Trump desperately protects the Epstein class and pardons outrageous fraudsters, I’ve been prosecuting and convicting them."
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, slammed Trump for his "outright bigotry against an entire ethnic minority," which he said "continues to stain this country."
Reichlin-Melnick also referenced a recent New York Times report about a lawsuit alleging that the US Department of Justice has been expediting Somalis' immigration cases and denying them fair hearings.
"It’s gutter racism with real consequences," said Reichlin-Melnick of Trump's rhetoric. "The government itself has been ordered to target this minority group for special disfavor."
Trump drew criticism in December when he described Somali immigrants as "garbage."
“I don’t want them in our country, I’ll be honest with you,” Trump said. “Their country’s no good for a reason. Their country stinks, and we don’t want them in our country. I can say that about other countries too... We’re going to go the wrong way if we keep taking in garbage into our country."
“Donald Trump poses a direct threat to our Constitution and to the rule of law," said one of the impeachment campaign's leaders.
The legal advocacy organization Free Speech for People on Thursday published a full-page advertisement in The New York Times highlighting the more than 1 million people who have endorsed the group's petition to impeach and remove President Donald Trump from office.
Free Speech for People's (FSFP) campaign—which also includes billboard trucks and projections in Washington, DC—comes ahead of the third wave of "No Kings" demonstrations, which are set to take place Saturday in thousands of locations across the United States.
“On March 28, 2026, the people will rise up," said FSFP digital organizing strategist Jax Foley. "The No Kings 3 protest is projected to be the largest mass comobilization in US history, with over 3,000 actions planned worldwide. People across this country are organizing, mobilizing, defending their communities, and demanding accountability.”
➡️ Over 1 million signatures.➡️ 27 current grounds.➡️ 1 lawless administration.Join our nationwide movement calling on Members of Congress to honor their oaths of office by impeaching and removing Donald Trump now. #ImpeachTrump
[image or embed]
— Free Speech For People (@fsfp.bsky.social) March 26, 2026 at 6:24 AM
No Kings 3 comes amid Trump's attacks on the rule of law and constitutional rights at home and escalating militarism abroad as the president has bombed seven countries since returning to office—and 10 or possibly even 11 over the course of his two terms—while backing Israel's genocidal war on Gaza.
“Donald Trump poses a direct threat to our Constitution and to the rule of law,” FSFP president and co-founder John Bonifaz said in a statement. “The constitutional remedy of impeachment exists precisely for moments like this when a president abuses power, defies the law, and attacks democracy itself. Congress must act.”
FSFP's petition, which was launched on the day of Trump's second inauguration, urges Congress to "take action to defend our republic and Constitution" by impeaching the president again. As of Thursday afternoon, the petition had over 1,070,000 signatures and is more than halfway to its goal of 2 million signers.
“For more than a year, FSFP’s team of lawyers, election security experts, and grassroots organizers have been tirelessly and fiercely leading the campaign to impeach and remove Trump and key administration officials,” Foley said. “We have heard from people across the United States who are with us in the call for no kings, no tyrants, and the immediate impeachment and removal of Trump and his coconspirators. Put the power back in the hands of We The People."
Trump is the only US president to be impeached twice—once in 2019 for abuse of power and obstruction of justice and again in 2021 for incitement of insurrection. A majority of senators voted to acquit Trump in 2019; a majority—but not the requisite two-thirds—voted to convict in 2021. Both chambers of Congress are now narrowly controlled by Trump's GOP.
"The congressional power of impeachment is designed to address this tyrannical threat to our democracy," FSFP said in the New York Times ad. "Members of Congress must abide by their oath to protect and defend the Constitution and impeach and remove Trump from office."
"Trump has started illegal regime change conflicts in Venezuela and Iran and is now threatening Cuba," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal. "We must pass this legislation to block him from acting on a whim."
Amid calls for Congress to "do something—before it is too late," a pair of US House Democrats on Thursday introduced the Prevent an Unconstitutional War in Cuba Act to block President Donald Trump from using any federal funds to take military action against the island nation without congressional authorization.
The proposal from Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Gregory Meeks (D-NY), ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, comes after Trump ramped up the United States' decades-long economic blockade, cutting off Cuba from Venezuelan oil. The fuel shortage has led to island-wide blackouts, and disrupted everything from healthcare to transportation. As Jayapal put it earlier this month, the "cruel and failing policy... has caused incredible harm to the Cuban people."
Trump has also repeatedly threatened a US takeover of Cuba. His other misadventures abroad—such as joining Israel in waging war on Iran without authorization from Congress, bombing boats allegedly being used to smuggle drugs in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, and abducting President Nicolás Maduro from Venezuela in an operation that killed dozens of Venezuelans and Cubans—have fueled fears that he may act on those threats, as Jayapal signaled in a Thursday statement.
“Trump has started illegal regime change conflicts in Venezuela and Iran and is now threatening Cuba. These military attacks put our troops in danger, endanger innocent civilians, waste billions of taxpayer dollars, and are not what the American people want," she said. "Trump promised to end forever wars—he lied. Congress alone has the power to declare war, something Trump clearly does not respect. He has no plan to improve conditions for the Cuban people or promote democracy, and we must pass this legislation to block him from acting on a whim."
The bill's prohibition on funding military action against Cuba does not apply to any use of force that is consistent with the section of the War Powers Act that empowers the president to respond to a "national emergency" created by an attack on the United States or its armed forces. In January, Trump notably signed an executive order declaring a national emergency with respect to Cuba and authorized new tariffs on imports from countries that supply oil to the island.
As with Iran pre-war, the Trump administration is currently engaged in negotiations with the Cuban government. Those talks are being led by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a son of Cuban immigrants and longtime supporter of regime change in the country, who said earlier this month that "the embargo is tied to political change on the island... They're in a lot of trouble, and the people in charge, they don't know how to fix it, so they have to get new people in charge."
Predictions over whether Trump will actually bomb or invade Cuba, which is located just 90 miles south of Florida, remain mixed.
"I think once Donald Trump gets an economic agreement that opens the island to US business, he will have fulfilled his transactional aims in Cuba. I don't think he cares about political transition. He doesn't seem to care about it in Venezuela," American University professor and Back Channel to Cuba coauthor William LeoGrande told USA Today this week. "And so, I think once there's an economic agreement that's to the advantage of the United States and US businesses, the president will move on to the next thing."
Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan Robinson, who's reported on the Nuestra América Convoy from Havana this week, declared on Wednesday that "they WILL run the Venezuela playbook on Cuba."
"They want a Republican donor imperial viceroy who will privatize the Cuban healthcare and school systems, and hand all the waterfront property to developers, with the Cuban people serving as cheap labor building a playground for Miami's rich," said Robinson.
Meeks—who is facing pressure to force a vote on his Iran war powers resolution—said Thursday that "Cuba is not for Donald Trump to take, and today we stand firm against the illegal use of the US military to pursue turning Cuba into another playground for Trump's chaotic adventurism."
"Such a reckless course would risk American lives, cost taxpayers billions, and, in all likelihood, leave the underlying political and economic conditions unchanged," he said. "The United States cannot bomb Cuba out of economic collapse or political repression—lasting change must come through empowering the Cuban people, not doubling down on a failed approach that disproportionately harms them."
The new bill is backed by Democratic Reps. Gabe Amo (RI), Joaquin Castro (Texas), Sara Jacobs (Calif.), Jesús "Chuy" García (Ill.), Hank Johnson (Ga.), Sydney Kamlager-Dove (Calif.), Jim McGovern (Mass.), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC), Mark Pocan (Wis.), Jan Schakowsky (Ill.), Melanie Stansbury (NM), Dina Titus (Nev.), Rashida Tlaib (Mich.), and Nydia Velázquez (NY). However, like legislation aimed at stopping Trump's boat strikes, aggression toward Venezuela, and war on Iran, it is unlikely to be passed by the GOP-controlled Congress.
Still, earlier this week, Velázquez also introduced a war powers resolution to prevent US involvement in military hostilities against the island. She said in a statement that "Donald Trump's belligerent foreign policy is creating new wars and conflicts across the world."
"This administration's foreign policy is totally out of control and is putting countless American and foreign lives at risk," Velázquez warned. "Trump's military blockade, his threats, and his track record this term show that Congress must reassert its constitutional authority and stop another disastrous war before it's too late."