February, 05 2009, 10:40am EDT

Biggest Need for Reform Since Watergate
Eight Action Items in New Report Would Permanently Change the Washington Game
WASHINGTON
Common Cause, one of the nation's largest citizen action organizations, is calling on Congress and the Obama Administration to join in making eight changes that will "utterly change the pay-to-play nature of how business gets done in Washington," said Arn Pearson, vice president for programs at Common Cause. "The country needs to have its faith restored in our campaigns and elected officials as we rely on them for big decisions that will affect our lives for years."
Common Cause released its agenda for change in a new document, "Campaign Finance Reform: A New Era," [PDF] and laid out eight specific action steps that would eliminate the dominant role of large contributors in campaigns, increase transparency in the way campaigns are funded, and "at long last, give the us the teeth to enforce the rules, which today does not happen at all," Pearson said.
The reform package urges adoption of these measures:
1. Creation of a Congressional campaign financing system that allows qualified candidates to blend unlimited small donations with substantial public funding, cutting out the role of large donors who today dominate fundraising. This would take advantage of the increased potential of candidates to raise small donations from many individuals, mostly online, Pearson noted, and through public grants allow serious candidates to wage effective campaigns and get their message out to constituents at election time.
2. An overhaul of the three-decade old public financing system for Presidential candidates, which is now so outdated that last year's leading candidate, Barack Obama, opted out of the system entirely. 'Everyone acknowledges that the presidential system is out of date," Pearson said, "and the only action that makes any sense is to update it by empowering small donors to play a bigger role and increase the public funding to qualified candidates. Otherwise, we face a grim future where every major candidate - even those with a wide base of supporters - will continue to rely heavily on a handful of wealthy interests for campaign funds. By using public financing to amplify the voice of small donors, we can reduce the power of special interests and put campaigns back in the hands of the average citizen."
3. Congressional leaders of both parties must bring an end to their internal system of party fundraising quotas for sitting members of Congress. "An insidious system of fundraising quotas has grown over the past several years, requiring members of Congress who want good committee assignments, for example, to 'pony up' by getting lobbyists and other well-connected individuals and PACs to contribute heavily. Many members now tell us they spend upwards of a third of their time just raising money for campaigns - and not only for their own," Pearson said.
4. Federal candidates should be prohibited from forming so-called joint fundraising committees with party organizations. Campaign contributions to candidates are capped at a lower level than contributions to political parties, but presidential candidates and the parties have found a loophole through joint committees where even a candidate who accepts public financing can still solicit and benefit from large contributions to the party organization, which then uses the money to help the candidate's campaign.
5. Congress should ban unlimited contributions from corporations and unions to each party's nominating convention. Under the McCain-Feingold bill of 2002, unlimited "soft money" donations to national parties were banned, but the Federal Election Commission created a loophole for the party conventions. "This is another backdoor method of finding special favor with candidates and the political establishment," Pearson said.
6. Congress must increase transparency in their reporting of bundling of contributions. Often, lobbyists and other political activists will gather as many individual contributions as they can and present them as a "bundle" to a campaign, ingratiating themselves to the candidates and assuring special access in the future. Common Cause urged Congress to enact tighter disclosure requirements on bundling.
7. The Senate must at long last join the 21st century and file its campaign finance reports electronically. "This may seem like a small step, which is all the more reason it should have happened long ago. The current filing system means that the public often cannot find out who funded a Senatorial campaign until weeks after the election is over," Pearson said. Common Cause points out that there is no reason the data cannot be processed electronically and made available quickly, since campaigns track donations electronically in the first place and House and Presidential campaigns have filed electronically for years.
8. Congress must get rid of the Federal Election Commission, "which has done almost nothing good in recent years," in Pearson's words, "and establish a new independent agency that is not subject to partisan gridlock." Under the current system, the FEC has three Republican and three Democratic appointments, almost assuring deadlock on many cases - and thus little enforcement of the law. The agency is further hamstrung by a lengthy enforcement process. The new agency would have single commissioner directing a professional staff, with a specific term of office to help assure independence and the ability to act quickly if a campaign or organization violates the law.
"Some people may see these eight recommendations as 'process' issues only, but they would be missing the big picture - when government fails to address the issues that people worry about every day, you can often trace it directly back to how we elect our leaders and how our system forces many of them to act," Pearson said.
"Only when Congress and the Administration really get down to business - and that means taking apart the money trail and letting the sunlight in on the ways decisions get made - can the nation move forward. With our country beset by a huge economic crisis and ongoing wars, we must take bold steps to renew the average citizen's belief that yes, in the end, the government is here for them and that their voices will be heard - and gone are the days of catering to Wall Street, oil companies, and other wealthy interests with plenty of money to spend in Washington."
Click here to read and download the report. [PDF]
Common Cause is a nonpartisan, grassroots organization dedicated to upholding the core values of American democracy. We work to create open, honest, and accountable government that serves the public interest; promote equal rights, opportunity, and representation for all; and empower all people to make their voices heard in the political process.
(202) 833-1200LATEST NEWS
Million-Dollar Ad Blitz Targets Senate Dems Who Voted for 'Trump Loyalist Judges'
"This isn’t normal," said the president of the group behind the ad campaign. "If Senate Democrats don’t take a stand and strongly oppose these judicial nominees who have disqualified themselves—we will."
Dec 03, 2025
The progressive advocacy group Demand Justice on Wednesday launched a seven-figure advertising campaign targeting three members of the Senate Democratic caucus who have voted to confirm President Donald Trump's lifetime judicial nominees, enabling the ongoing right-wing takeover of the nation's courts.
The first series of ads will target Sens. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), and Angus King (D-Maine), three of the 16 members of the Senate Democratic caucus who have voted to confirm at least one Trump judge this year. Other Senate Democrats who have voted with Republicans in support of at least one Trump judicial pick include Sens. Dick Durbin of Illinois, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Adam Schiff of California, and Chris Coons of Delaware.
"It is outrageous that Senate Democrats are voting to confirm Trump’s judicial nominees who refuse to tell the truth about January 6th and the 2020 election,” Josh Orton, the president of Demand Justice, said in a statement. “This isn’t normal. If Senate Democrats don’t take a stand and strongly oppose these judicial nominees who have disqualified themselves—we will. And we won’t let up.”
The group's campaign will also include a national cable TV ad buy and "coordinated digital rollout across key battleground states" naming and shaming Democrats who support "Trump loyalist judges" even as the lawmakers condemn the president's authoritarian assault on democracy.
Watch the Demand Justice ad targeting Maggie Hassan, who on Tuesday voted to confirm Lindsey Ann Freeman, Trump's nominee to the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina:
Freeman, like other Trump judicial picks, refused during her confirmation process to say directly that the president lost the 2020 election.
"President Biden was certified as the winner of the 2020 presidential election and served as the 46th President of the United States," Freeman wrote in response to questions from Durbin, who ultimately voted in favor of her confirmation.
In a report released last month, Demand Justice analyzed Trump judicial picks' written responses to senators' questions. The analysis shows that "nominees' responses appear nearly identical, with many nominees using verbatim phrasing, repeating key words, and, overall, using unusual and evasive language that’s almost entirely outside the normal, historical, and common lexicon used to describe such events."
"Every nominee provided near-identical phrasing to avoid a direct answer about the 2020 election, instead referencing the results of the congressional 'certification' process, or answering by noting that President Biden 'served' as president," the report notes. "And 21 of 27 nominees provided extremely similar responses in regard to January 6, often describing what transpired as a 'political issue' and refusing to comment further."
Orton of Demand Justice said that "it is unprecedented for lifetime nominees to the federal bench to provide dishonest and misleading answers about historical facts—and it is deeply concerning that Trump’s nominees are parroting such strikingly similar language, the president’s own language, to avoid telling the truth."
That more than a dozen Senate Democrats still voted to confirm at least one of those nominees is "simply unacceptable," said Orton.
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘Yikes’: New Jobs Data Further Undermines Trump Fiction of Thriving Economy
"The booming job market exists only in Donald Trump's demented head," said economist Dean Baker.
Dec 03, 2025
Economists on Wednesday expressed significant concerns after new data from global payroll processing firm ADP estimated that the US economy lost 32,000 jobs last month.
As reported by CNBC, small businesses bore the brunt of the job losses, as firms with fewer than 50 employees shed a total of 120,000 jobs, more than offsetting the 90,000 in job gains reported by firms with 50 or more employees.
The loss of 32,000 jobs in November marked a major miss for economists' consensus estimate of 40,000 jobs added on the month, and CNBC noted that the total number of jobs lost according to ADP data "was the biggest drop since March 2023."
Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted in a post on X that the job losses recorded by ADP were widespread across the US economy.
"Yikes," she wrote in reaction to the report. "Most industries were doing layoffs. The only ones still are hiring are hospitality and healthcare."
Long also said the disparity between small and large businesses in terms of job growth was more evidence that the US is experiencing a "K-shaped" economy in which those at the top of the economic ladder thrive, even as everyone else struggles.
"Larger companies are still hiring," she explained. "Smaller firms (under 50 workers) are doing the layoffs. It's been a very tough year for small biz due to tariffs and more selective spending from lower and middle-class consumers."
Kevin Gordon, head of macro research and strategy at the Schwab Center for Financial Research, observed that ADP hasn't reported such a big drop in small-business employment since October 2020, when the US economy was suffering through the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, cautioned against reading too much into ADP data, although he added that "in the absence of up to date government payrolls, all other signs point to a further deteriorating labor market."
Charlie Bilello, chief market strategist at financial planner Creative Planning, argued that the ADP jobs numbers were part of a negative three-month trend in which the US economy lost an estimated 4,000 jobs per month, which he said was "the first three-month decline since the 2020 recession."
Bilello added that "a year ago, we were adding over 200,000 jobs per month."
Diane Swonk, chief economist at accounting firm KPMG, argued that the ADP report showed job losses in the US economy were "broad based" and "were accompanied by a cooling of wage gains" for workers who still have jobs or are switching from one job to another.
"Those with a job are clinging on, while those without are left wanting," she explained.
Dean Baker, senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, argued that the ADP report blows up President Donald Trump's spin about the health of the US economy.
"The booming job market exists only in Donald Trump's demented head," he wrote.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Pope Leo Presses Trump to End Military Escalation Against Venezuela
"So often, who suffers in these situations is the people, not the authorities," the first American pope said as another regime change war looms.
Dec 03, 2025
Amid escalating threats from the White House in recent days, Pope Leo XIV pleaded for President Donald Trump to pursue diplomacy with Venezuela rather than another regime change war.
"It is better to search for ways of dialogue, or perhaps pressure, including economic pressure," said the first American pope as he returned to Rome from Lebanon.
Since September, the Trump administration has launched airstrikes against at least 22 boats mostly in the Southern Caribbean that have extrajudicially killed at least 83 people. While the administration has claimed these people are "narcoterrorists" from Venezuela, it has provided no evidence to support this.
Trump said he had ordered the closing of Venezuela’s airspace on Saturday, which has left many observers holding their breath in expectation of military action against the South American nation.
As Reuters reported Monday, Trump also offered safe passage to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro last month if he left the country, suggesting that regime change is the administration’s ultimate goal.
"On one hand, it seems there was a call between the two presidents," said the pope, referring to that ultimatum from Trump last month. "On the other hand, there is the danger, there is the possibility there will be some activity, some [military] operation."
"The voices that come from the United States, they change with a certain frequency," Leo added.
The pope has been a frequent critic of the Trump administration’s policies since he was elected earlier this year, with harsh rebukes issued towards the White House's attacks on immigrants.
While the pope did not denounce the idea of US-imposed regime change in Venezuela entirely, he said it should search for other means "if that is what they want to do in the United States.”
The US has notably already applied a great deal of "economic pressure" to Venezuela, via a regime of crippling sanctions that are considered one of the major causes of the nation's economic instability in recent years.
On Tuesday, Abigail Hall, a senior fellow at the Independent Institute, warned that "a US invasion, however framed, would impose steep costs on both nations."
"For the United States, an attempt at regime change in Venezuela would likely be another foray into failed foreign policy, with all the costs that go with it," she said. "A destabilized Venezuela could also trigger another wave of migration across the region, straining neighboring countries and potentially reaching US shores."
"For Venezuelans, the costs would be even greater," she added. "Beyond the immediate human toll of conflict, the long-term costs are incalculable. Even if Maduro were removed, a chaotic transition could destroy prospects for rebuilding Venezuela’s institutions, economy, and civil society."
Amid Trump's latest series of threats, Pope Leo echoed this warning aboard the papal plane. He said Venezuela's bishops are "looking for ways to calm the situation" and pursue "the good of the people, because so often who suffers in these situations is the people, not the authorities."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


