September, 12 2008, 02:07pm EDT

Uzbekistan: Release Independent Journalist
Trial of Government Critic Begins
MOSCOW
Uzbek authorities should drop all charges against an independent
journalist facing politically motivated prosecution and release him,
Human Rights Watch said today. Salijon Abdurakhmanov, a journalist
known for his critical reporting of the authorities, goes on trial on
September 12, 2008, in Nukus, the capital city of Karakalpakstan, an
autonomous republic in Uzbekistan, 1,100 kilometers west of Tashkent.
Traffic police arrested Abdurakhmanov, 58, on June 7 when they stopped
his car, allegedly to check his identity, and found 114.18 g of
marijuana and 5.89 g of opium on the underside of his car.
Abdurakhmanov denies knowing about or having anything to do with the
drugs and his brother, Bakhrom, a lawyer who is representing him at
this trial, believes that the police planted the drugs. A few days
before his arrest Abdurakhmanov left his car in a local repair shop. He
told his brother that the police monitored him closely after he picked
his car up until his arrest. The investigators failed to carry out
basic investigative steps such as checking the drugs for fingerprints
despite repeated requests by Abdurakhmanov and his lawyer.
"Abdurakhmanov often criticized local authorities,
including law enforcement," said Igor Vorontsov, Uzbekistan researcher
for Human Rights Watch. "His arrest is yet another example of the Uzbek
government's policy of silencing critics."
Shortly before the arrest, Abdurakhmanov wrote a very
critical article about traffic police in Karakalpakstan, his brother,
Bakhrom, said.
Abdurakhmanov is an outspoken journalist who has written
on sensitive issues such as social and economic justice, human rights,
corruption, and the legal status of Karakalpakstan in Uzbekistan. He
worked closely with UzNews, an independent online news agency, and also
freelanced for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Voice of America and
the Institute for War and Peace Reporting.
Authorities initially charged Abdurakhmanov with drug
possession, but after the investigators determined that Abdurakhmanov
does not use drugs, they charged him with selling drugs instead, a more
serious charge punishable by up to 20 years of imprisonment.
Abdurakhmanov's case is the latest in a long line of
politically motivated prosecutions waged by the Uzbek authorities
against independent journalists and human rights activists. At least 18
human rights defenders, dissidents and journalists remain in prison.
Numerous others, fearing for their safety, have fled Uzbekistan to seek
asylum abroad. One independent journalist, Jamshid Karimov, has been in
held in closed psychiatric detention since mid-September 2006 and has
been subjected to forcible psychiatric treatment. In response to
international criticism, the government has released several imprisoned
human rights defenders, but harassment and arrests of others continue.
"Make no mistake - the release of human rights defenders,
while welcome, does not represent fundamental reform," said Vorontsov.
"As Abdurakhmanov's case shows, anyone who dares to speak out remains
vulnerable to be locked up at any time."
Abdurakhmanov's trial comes just one month before the
European Union is slated to review Uzbekistan's human rights record to
determine whether to continue the sanctions regime adopted in the
aftermath of the 2005 Andijan massacre, when government forces shot
hundreds of unarmed protesters
(https://hrw.org/reports/2008/uzbekistan0508/). Among the assessment
criteria established by the European Union for reviewing the sanctions
are for the Uzbek government to stop the harassment of civil society
and to release imprisoned rights defenders and dissidents.
"The Uzbek government is eager to talk about its
commitment to human rights and that's welcome, but it continues
business as usual - throwing journalists and dissidents behind bars,"
Vorontsov said. "Abdurakhmanov's prosecution flies in the face of the
EU sanctions criteria and the EU must not let this pass without
consequences."
Human Rights Watch urged the United States and EU
governments to closely monitor Abdurakhmanov's trial in Nukus, and to
call for Abdurakhmanov's immediate release.
In July, the Uzbek government banned Human Rights Watch's researcher from entering Uzbekistan.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
30th Strike in Trump's High-Seas Kill Spree Claims 2 More Lives
At least 107 people have been killed in US bombings of boats that the Trump administration claims—without evidence—were involved in narco-trafficking in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean.
Dec 29, 2025
The US military said Monday that two alleged drug smugglers were killed in the bombing of another boat in the eastern Pacific Ocean, but—as has been the case throughout 30 such strikes—offered no verifiable evidence to support its claim.
US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) said on X that, on orders from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, "Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations in international waters."
"Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the eastern Pacific and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations," SOUTHCOM added. "Two male narco-terrorists were killed. No US military forces were harmed."
According to the Trump administration's figures, at least 107 people have been killed in 30 boat strikes since early September. The administration has tried to justify the strikes to Congress by claiming that the US is in an “armed conflict” with drug cartels, while legal scholars and Democratic US lawmakers counter that the bombings are likely war crimes.
War powers resolutions aimed at reining in President Donald Trump’s ability to extrajudicially execute alleged drug traffickers in or near Venezuela failed to pass the Senate in October and the House earlier this month.
Monday's strike came amid Trump's escalating aggression against Venezuela, including the deployment of warships and thousands of US troops to the region, authorization of covert CIA operations targeting the country's socialist government, and threats to launch ground attacks.
Trump claimed Monday without providing evidence that US forces destroyed a "big facility" in an unspecified country where narco-traffickers' "ships come from."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Bemoans Not Winning Nobel Peace Prize During Netanyahu Hot Mic
The self-described "most anti-war president in history" has ordered the bombing of at least nine nations—more than any US leader in history—and has been indispensable to Israel's genocide in Gaza.
Dec 29, 2025
President Donald Trump—who has bombed more countries than any US leader in history—once again lamented what he considers his snub for the Nobel Peace Prize during a Monday meeting with fugitive Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
In an apparent hot mic moment, Trump, seemingly unaware that there were reporters in the room, speaks to Netanyahu and other Israeli and US officials gathered at the president's Mar-a-Lago club in Florida about the "35 years of fighting" between two unspecified countries that he "stopped."
"Do I get credit for it? No," Trump says, adding before being interrupted by Netanyahu, "They gave the Nob..."
As something of a consolation prize, Netanyahu said Monday that he's awarding Trump with the Israel Prize, that nation's highest cultural honor. Trump will be the first foreign leader to receive the award.
Football's global governing body also gave Trump its inaugural—and widely derided—FIFA Peace Prize earlier this month in recognition of the administration's role in brokering an end to international conflicts.
"I did eight of them," Trump said during the hot mic—likely referring to the number of wars he falsely claims to have ended—before seeming to notice the journalists and changing the subject.
Trump ranting to Netanyahu on a hot mic: "Do I get credit for it? No. They gave the Nob-- I did 8 of them. How about India and Pakistan? So I did 8 of them. And then I'll tell you the rest of it."
[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) December 29, 2025 at 10:57 AM
Trump did nine of them—as in the number of countries he's bombed, breaking former President Barack Obama's record of seven. Over the course of his two terms, Trump has ordered the bombing of Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen, as well as boats allegedly transporting drugs in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean.
Thousands of civilians have been killed or wounded during these campaigns, according to experts.
Trump has recently deployed warships and thousands of US troops near Venezuela, which could become the next country attacked by a the self-described "the most anti-war president in history."
The US president has also backed Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, which has left more than 250,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million others forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened. Israel's conduct in the war is the subject of an ongoing International Court of Justice genocide case filed by South Africa.
Meanwhile, Netanyahu and his former defense minister Yoav Gallant are wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, including murder and forced starvation.
“He is a wartime prime minister. He’s done a phenomenal job," Trump said while standing with Netanyahu later on Monday. "He’s taken Israel through a very dangerous period of trauma."
He is also accused of prolonging the Gaza war to forestall a reckoning in his domestic corruption trial, in which Trump has intervened by requesting a pardon.
“Israel, with other people, might not exist right now," Trump added. "If you had the wrong prime minister, Israel right now would not exist.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
New State Laws Aim to Protect Environment, Consumers as Trump Wages All-Out War on Climate
"The gridlock and partisanship we see in Washington, DC can be dispiriting. But history shows that states can build momentum that eventually leads to change at the federal level."
Dec 29, 2025
Even as President Donald Trump and his administration have been ripping up environmental and consumer protection regulations, a number of state laws are set to take effect next year that could at least mitigate some of the damage.
A Monday statement from Environment America and the Public Interest Network highlighted a number of new laws aimed at curbing corporate polluters and enhancing consumer welfare.
First, the groups highlighted "Right to Repair" laws set to take effect in Washington, Nevada, Oregon, and Colorado, which give people the right to repair their own appliances and electronics without burdensome costs or barriers.
The groups lavished particular praise on Colorado's "Right to Repair" laws that they said provide "the broadest repair protections in the country," with new regulations that will give businesses in the state "access to what they and independent repair providers need to fix their electronics themselves."
Illinois, meanwhile, will fully phase out the sale of fluorescent lightbulbs, which will be replaced by energy-efficient LED bulbs. The groups estimate that eliminating the fluorescent bulbs will collectively save Illinois households more than $1.5 billion on their utility bills by 2050, while also reducing energy waste and mercury pollution.
Illinois also drew praise for enacting a ban on polystyrene foam foodware that will take effect on January 1.
The groups also highlighted the work being done in Oregon to protect consumers with legislation mandating price transparency to eliminate surprise junk fees on purchases; prohibiting ambulance companies from socking out-of-network patients with massive fees for rides to nearby hospitals; and placing new restrictions on the ability of medical debt to negatively impact a person's credit score.
California also got a mention in the groups' release for closing a loophole that allowed supermarkets to continue using plastic bags and for creating a new privacy tool for consumers allowing them to request that online data brokers delete all of the personal information they have gathered on them over the years.
Emily Rusch, vice president and senior director of state offices for the Public Interest Network, contrasted the action being taken in the states to protect consumers and the environment with a lack of action being done at the federal level.
"The gridlock and partisanship we see in Washington, DC can be dispiriting," said Rusch. "But history shows that states can build momentum that eventually leads to change at the federal level. As we build on this progress in 2026, we look forward to working with anyone—Republican, Democrat, or independent—with whom we can find common ground."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


