

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) waves to demonstrators outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. on August 1, 2022. (Photo: Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)
Sen. Bernie Sanders announced Wednesday that he will be filing amendments to remove fossil fuel industry giveaways from Democrats' new reconciliation bill and strengthen the legislation's drug price provisions, which the Vermont senator has characterized as unacceptably weak.
In a speech on the Senate floor, Sanders reiterated the message he delivered in Tuesday remarks outlining what he sees as the deep flaws of the reconciliation package, the product of months of negotiations primarily between fossil fuel industry ally Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
"We have got to do everything possible to take on the greed of the fossil fuel industry, not give billions of dollars in corporate welfare to an industry that has been actively destroying our planet," Sanders said in his Wednesday speech. "I will be introducing an amendment to do just that."
According to Warren Gunnels, Sanders' staff director, the amendment would "eliminate all of the fossil fuel giveaways in the so-called 'Inflation Reduction Act,'" a proposed change that's sure to draw opposition from Manchin.
One section Sanders is targeting is the requirement that millions of acres of public lands be offered for oil drilling as a condition for new solar and wind development. He also warned that the measure in its current form would give the oil and gas industry "billions of dollars in new tax breaks and subsidies over the next 10 years."
"It might seem a bit incongruous to people why we are rewarding the people whose emissions are driving the temperature of the Earth up and causing massive destruction," the senator said, "but that is in fact what this bill does."
Sanders also said he intends to introduce an amendment that would ensure Medicare "pays no more for prescription drugs" than the Department of Veterans Affairs. At present, the reconciliation bill includes limited provisions that would require Medicare to negotiate the prices of a small number of drugs directly with pharmaceutical companies, which are lobbying aggressively against the proposal.
A recent study by the Government Accountability Office found that in 2017, Medicare Part D--the prescription drug benefit provided through government-approved private plans--paid twice as much as the Department of Veterans Affairs on average for the same medicines.
"How insane is it that you have one federal agency called the VA that pays 50% of what Medicare pays," Sanders said Wednesday. "I mean, how crazy is that?"
"When it comes to reducing the price of prescription drugs under Medicare, we don't have to reinvent the wheel," he continued. "We could simply require Medicare to pay no more for prescription drugs than the VA pays, end of discussion... And if we did that, we could save Medicare some $900 billion over the next decade. That is nine times more savings than the rather weak negotiation provision in this bill."
Related Content

The Vermont senator's criticism of the reconciliation bill and his proposed fixes come as Democrats are racing to complete work on the package by the end of this week and pass it before recess is scheduled to start on August 8.
The Senate parliamentarian is currently examining provisions of the legislation and preparing to advise lawmakers on whether each section complies with the arcane rules of budget reconciliation, raising the possibility of last-minute changes to the bill.
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), meanwhile, is reportedly pushing for the removal of carried interest provisions aimed at limiting the ability of private equity moguls and hedge fund managers to dodge taxes. Sinema, whose vote is necessary for final passage, has yet to publicly express support for the bill.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Sen. Bernie Sanders announced Wednesday that he will be filing amendments to remove fossil fuel industry giveaways from Democrats' new reconciliation bill and strengthen the legislation's drug price provisions, which the Vermont senator has characterized as unacceptably weak.
In a speech on the Senate floor, Sanders reiterated the message he delivered in Tuesday remarks outlining what he sees as the deep flaws of the reconciliation package, the product of months of negotiations primarily between fossil fuel industry ally Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
"We have got to do everything possible to take on the greed of the fossil fuel industry, not give billions of dollars in corporate welfare to an industry that has been actively destroying our planet," Sanders said in his Wednesday speech. "I will be introducing an amendment to do just that."
According to Warren Gunnels, Sanders' staff director, the amendment would "eliminate all of the fossil fuel giveaways in the so-called 'Inflation Reduction Act,'" a proposed change that's sure to draw opposition from Manchin.
One section Sanders is targeting is the requirement that millions of acres of public lands be offered for oil drilling as a condition for new solar and wind development. He also warned that the measure in its current form would give the oil and gas industry "billions of dollars in new tax breaks and subsidies over the next 10 years."
"It might seem a bit incongruous to people why we are rewarding the people whose emissions are driving the temperature of the Earth up and causing massive destruction," the senator said, "but that is in fact what this bill does."
Sanders also said he intends to introduce an amendment that would ensure Medicare "pays no more for prescription drugs" than the Department of Veterans Affairs. At present, the reconciliation bill includes limited provisions that would require Medicare to negotiate the prices of a small number of drugs directly with pharmaceutical companies, which are lobbying aggressively against the proposal.
A recent study by the Government Accountability Office found that in 2017, Medicare Part D--the prescription drug benefit provided through government-approved private plans--paid twice as much as the Department of Veterans Affairs on average for the same medicines.
"How insane is it that you have one federal agency called the VA that pays 50% of what Medicare pays," Sanders said Wednesday. "I mean, how crazy is that?"
"When it comes to reducing the price of prescription drugs under Medicare, we don't have to reinvent the wheel," he continued. "We could simply require Medicare to pay no more for prescription drugs than the VA pays, end of discussion... And if we did that, we could save Medicare some $900 billion over the next decade. That is nine times more savings than the rather weak negotiation provision in this bill."
Related Content

The Vermont senator's criticism of the reconciliation bill and his proposed fixes come as Democrats are racing to complete work on the package by the end of this week and pass it before recess is scheduled to start on August 8.
The Senate parliamentarian is currently examining provisions of the legislation and preparing to advise lawmakers on whether each section complies with the arcane rules of budget reconciliation, raising the possibility of last-minute changes to the bill.
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), meanwhile, is reportedly pushing for the removal of carried interest provisions aimed at limiting the ability of private equity moguls and hedge fund managers to dodge taxes. Sinema, whose vote is necessary for final passage, has yet to publicly express support for the bill.
Sen. Bernie Sanders announced Wednesday that he will be filing amendments to remove fossil fuel industry giveaways from Democrats' new reconciliation bill and strengthen the legislation's drug price provisions, which the Vermont senator has characterized as unacceptably weak.
In a speech on the Senate floor, Sanders reiterated the message he delivered in Tuesday remarks outlining what he sees as the deep flaws of the reconciliation package, the product of months of negotiations primarily between fossil fuel industry ally Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
"We have got to do everything possible to take on the greed of the fossil fuel industry, not give billions of dollars in corporate welfare to an industry that has been actively destroying our planet," Sanders said in his Wednesday speech. "I will be introducing an amendment to do just that."
According to Warren Gunnels, Sanders' staff director, the amendment would "eliminate all of the fossil fuel giveaways in the so-called 'Inflation Reduction Act,'" a proposed change that's sure to draw opposition from Manchin.
One section Sanders is targeting is the requirement that millions of acres of public lands be offered for oil drilling as a condition for new solar and wind development. He also warned that the measure in its current form would give the oil and gas industry "billions of dollars in new tax breaks and subsidies over the next 10 years."
"It might seem a bit incongruous to people why we are rewarding the people whose emissions are driving the temperature of the Earth up and causing massive destruction," the senator said, "but that is in fact what this bill does."
Sanders also said he intends to introduce an amendment that would ensure Medicare "pays no more for prescription drugs" than the Department of Veterans Affairs. At present, the reconciliation bill includes limited provisions that would require Medicare to negotiate the prices of a small number of drugs directly with pharmaceutical companies, which are lobbying aggressively against the proposal.
A recent study by the Government Accountability Office found that in 2017, Medicare Part D--the prescription drug benefit provided through government-approved private plans--paid twice as much as the Department of Veterans Affairs on average for the same medicines.
"How insane is it that you have one federal agency called the VA that pays 50% of what Medicare pays," Sanders said Wednesday. "I mean, how crazy is that?"
"When it comes to reducing the price of prescription drugs under Medicare, we don't have to reinvent the wheel," he continued. "We could simply require Medicare to pay no more for prescription drugs than the VA pays, end of discussion... And if we did that, we could save Medicare some $900 billion over the next decade. That is nine times more savings than the rather weak negotiation provision in this bill."
Related Content

The Vermont senator's criticism of the reconciliation bill and his proposed fixes come as Democrats are racing to complete work on the package by the end of this week and pass it before recess is scheduled to start on August 8.
The Senate parliamentarian is currently examining provisions of the legislation and preparing to advise lawmakers on whether each section complies with the arcane rules of budget reconciliation, raising the possibility of last-minute changes to the bill.
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), meanwhile, is reportedly pushing for the removal of carried interest provisions aimed at limiting the ability of private equity moguls and hedge fund managers to dodge taxes. Sinema, whose vote is necessary for final passage, has yet to publicly express support for the bill.