SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A photo illustration shows the Twitter logo on a smartphone with Elon Musk's official profile. (Photo Illustration: Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
'Not Good for Democracy,' Critics Warn as Mega-Billionaire Elon Musk Moves to Buy Twitter
"Musk making a play for Twitter out of his petty cash drawer is one more example of why the pooling of so much wealth in the hands of a few is a societal disease."
Apr 14, 2022
News Thursday that Tesla CEO Elon Musk has offered to buy Twitter outright for around $43 billion--a fraction of his skyrocketing net worth--fueled growing concerns about the anti-democratic implications of allowing the ultra-wealthy to exert control over communication platforms used by hundreds of millions of people worldwide.
Robert Weissman, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, tweeted that a "gazillionaire treating a vital (if flawed) global communications platform as his plaything" is "not good for democracy."
"Users of social media platforms shouldn't have to be subject to the whims of bombastic billionaires who are detached from reality."
"Isn't Mark Zuckerberg all the proof we need that it's a terrible idea to have one out-of-touch billionaire controlling critical communications platforms?" Weissman asked.
Walter Shaub, a senior ethics fellow at the Project On Government Oversight, added that "Elon Musk making a play for Twitter out of his petty cash drawer is one more example of why the pooling of so much wealth in the hands of a few is a societal disease."
Musk's offer, which he announced via Twitter Thursday morning, came just days after federal filings revealed that he purchased a $2.9 billion stake in the social media company, becoming its largest shareholder. Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal then announced that Musk would be appointed to the company's board, a decision that was reversed soon thereafter.
Twitter said in a statement Thursday that its board "will carefully review the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the company and all Twitter stockholders." The company's stock surged following news of Musk's buyout offer.
In a letter to the chair of Twitter's board, Musk--who is currently the wealthiest man in the world, his net worth having soared 1,080% during the pandemic--wrote that his offer to buy the company for $54.20 a share in cash is his "best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder."
"Twitter has extraordinary potential," Musk continued. "I will unlock it."
It's not entirely clear what Musk--a self-proclaimed "free speech absolutist" who has blocked people for criticizing his business practices--has in mind for the company, should the board accept his offer. On the day that his stake in Twitter was made public last week, Musk tweeted out a poll asking his tens of millions of followers whether the platform should have an "edit" button.
"If Elon Musk takes over Twitter, I assume he'll reinstate Trump, who'll use the platform to spark deadly violence again."
Some right-wing lawmakers, including Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), reacted with enthusiasm to news of Musk's Twitter stake, voicing hope that Musk would use his influence to push for the reinstatement of former President Donald Trump.
"Now that Elon Musk is Twitter's largest shareholder, it's time to lift the political censorship," Boebert tweeted last week. "Oh... and BRING BACK TRUMP!"
Twitter permanently banned Trump's personal account in early 2021 following the January 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
"If Elon Musk takes over Twitter, I assume he'll reinstate Trump, who'll use the platform to spark deadly violence again," Shaub warned Thursday. "Musk may also delete accounts of people who think he's a blight on the world--as I do."
Jessica Gonzalez, co-CEO of the advocacy group Free Press, said in a statement Thursday that "what the richest man in the world wants, the richest man in the world might get."
"Unfortunately for the rest of us, Musk doesn't want to buy another expensive bauble but a global online community that includes more than 330 million people," said Gonzalez. "Musk himself has used Twitter and other platforms to attack and effectively silence other speakers. He's turned to social media to spread disinformation about Covid-19 and vaccines. He's used Twitter to manipulate markets and increase his already-considerable wealth."
"Users of social media platforms," she added, "shouldn't have to be subject to the whims of bombastic billionaires who are detached from reality and lack any true commitment to free expression, racial justice, and democracy."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
News Thursday that Tesla CEO Elon Musk has offered to buy Twitter outright for around $43 billion--a fraction of his skyrocketing net worth--fueled growing concerns about the anti-democratic implications of allowing the ultra-wealthy to exert control over communication platforms used by hundreds of millions of people worldwide.
Robert Weissman, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, tweeted that a "gazillionaire treating a vital (if flawed) global communications platform as his plaything" is "not good for democracy."
"Users of social media platforms shouldn't have to be subject to the whims of bombastic billionaires who are detached from reality."
"Isn't Mark Zuckerberg all the proof we need that it's a terrible idea to have one out-of-touch billionaire controlling critical communications platforms?" Weissman asked.
Walter Shaub, a senior ethics fellow at the Project On Government Oversight, added that "Elon Musk making a play for Twitter out of his petty cash drawer is one more example of why the pooling of so much wealth in the hands of a few is a societal disease."
Musk's offer, which he announced via Twitter Thursday morning, came just days after federal filings revealed that he purchased a $2.9 billion stake in the social media company, becoming its largest shareholder. Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal then announced that Musk would be appointed to the company's board, a decision that was reversed soon thereafter.
Twitter said in a statement Thursday that its board "will carefully review the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the company and all Twitter stockholders." The company's stock surged following news of Musk's buyout offer.
In a letter to the chair of Twitter's board, Musk--who is currently the wealthiest man in the world, his net worth having soared 1,080% during the pandemic--wrote that his offer to buy the company for $54.20 a share in cash is his "best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder."
"Twitter has extraordinary potential," Musk continued. "I will unlock it."
It's not entirely clear what Musk--a self-proclaimed "free speech absolutist" who has blocked people for criticizing his business practices--has in mind for the company, should the board accept his offer. On the day that his stake in Twitter was made public last week, Musk tweeted out a poll asking his tens of millions of followers whether the platform should have an "edit" button.
"If Elon Musk takes over Twitter, I assume he'll reinstate Trump, who'll use the platform to spark deadly violence again."
Some right-wing lawmakers, including Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), reacted with enthusiasm to news of Musk's Twitter stake, voicing hope that Musk would use his influence to push for the reinstatement of former President Donald Trump.
"Now that Elon Musk is Twitter's largest shareholder, it's time to lift the political censorship," Boebert tweeted last week. "Oh... and BRING BACK TRUMP!"
Twitter permanently banned Trump's personal account in early 2021 following the January 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
"If Elon Musk takes over Twitter, I assume he'll reinstate Trump, who'll use the platform to spark deadly violence again," Shaub warned Thursday. "Musk may also delete accounts of people who think he's a blight on the world--as I do."
Jessica Gonzalez, co-CEO of the advocacy group Free Press, said in a statement Thursday that "what the richest man in the world wants, the richest man in the world might get."
"Unfortunately for the rest of us, Musk doesn't want to buy another expensive bauble but a global online community that includes more than 330 million people," said Gonzalez. "Musk himself has used Twitter and other platforms to attack and effectively silence other speakers. He's turned to social media to spread disinformation about Covid-19 and vaccines. He's used Twitter to manipulate markets and increase his already-considerable wealth."
"Users of social media platforms," she added, "shouldn't have to be subject to the whims of bombastic billionaires who are detached from reality and lack any true commitment to free expression, racial justice, and democracy."
News Thursday that Tesla CEO Elon Musk has offered to buy Twitter outright for around $43 billion--a fraction of his skyrocketing net worth--fueled growing concerns about the anti-democratic implications of allowing the ultra-wealthy to exert control over communication platforms used by hundreds of millions of people worldwide.
Robert Weissman, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, tweeted that a "gazillionaire treating a vital (if flawed) global communications platform as his plaything" is "not good for democracy."
"Users of social media platforms shouldn't have to be subject to the whims of bombastic billionaires who are detached from reality."
"Isn't Mark Zuckerberg all the proof we need that it's a terrible idea to have one out-of-touch billionaire controlling critical communications platforms?" Weissman asked.
Walter Shaub, a senior ethics fellow at the Project On Government Oversight, added that "Elon Musk making a play for Twitter out of his petty cash drawer is one more example of why the pooling of so much wealth in the hands of a few is a societal disease."
Musk's offer, which he announced via Twitter Thursday morning, came just days after federal filings revealed that he purchased a $2.9 billion stake in the social media company, becoming its largest shareholder. Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal then announced that Musk would be appointed to the company's board, a decision that was reversed soon thereafter.
Twitter said in a statement Thursday that its board "will carefully review the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the company and all Twitter stockholders." The company's stock surged following news of Musk's buyout offer.
In a letter to the chair of Twitter's board, Musk--who is currently the wealthiest man in the world, his net worth having soared 1,080% during the pandemic--wrote that his offer to buy the company for $54.20 a share in cash is his "best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder."
"Twitter has extraordinary potential," Musk continued. "I will unlock it."
It's not entirely clear what Musk--a self-proclaimed "free speech absolutist" who has blocked people for criticizing his business practices--has in mind for the company, should the board accept his offer. On the day that his stake in Twitter was made public last week, Musk tweeted out a poll asking his tens of millions of followers whether the platform should have an "edit" button.
"If Elon Musk takes over Twitter, I assume he'll reinstate Trump, who'll use the platform to spark deadly violence again."
Some right-wing lawmakers, including Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), reacted with enthusiasm to news of Musk's Twitter stake, voicing hope that Musk would use his influence to push for the reinstatement of former President Donald Trump.
"Now that Elon Musk is Twitter's largest shareholder, it's time to lift the political censorship," Boebert tweeted last week. "Oh... and BRING BACK TRUMP!"
Twitter permanently banned Trump's personal account in early 2021 following the January 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
"If Elon Musk takes over Twitter, I assume he'll reinstate Trump, who'll use the platform to spark deadly violence again," Shaub warned Thursday. "Musk may also delete accounts of people who think he's a blight on the world--as I do."
Jessica Gonzalez, co-CEO of the advocacy group Free Press, said in a statement Thursday that "what the richest man in the world wants, the richest man in the world might get."
"Unfortunately for the rest of us, Musk doesn't want to buy another expensive bauble but a global online community that includes more than 330 million people," said Gonzalez. "Musk himself has used Twitter and other platforms to attack and effectively silence other speakers. He's turned to social media to spread disinformation about Covid-19 and vaccines. He's used Twitter to manipulate markets and increase his already-considerable wealth."
"Users of social media platforms," she added, "shouldn't have to be subject to the whims of bombastic billionaires who are detached from reality and lack any true commitment to free expression, racial justice, and democracy."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy